Optimization of residual stresses in MMC's through the variation of interfacial layer architectures and processing parameters

The objective of this work was the development of efficient, user-friendly computer codes for optimizing fabrication-induced residual stresses in metal matrix composites through the use of homogeneous and heterogeneous interfacial layer architectures and processing parameter variation. To satisfy this objective, three major computer codes have been developed and delivered to the NASA-Lewis Research Center, namely MCCM, OPTCOMP, and OPTCOMP2. MCCM is a general research-oriented code for investigating the effects of microstructural details, such as layered morphology of SCS-6 SiC fibers and multiple homogeneous interfacial layers, on the inelastic response of unidirectional metal matrix composites under axisymmetric thermomechanical loading. OPTCOMP and OPTCOMP2 combine the major analysis module resident in MCCM with a commercially-available optimization algorithm and are driven by user-friendly interfaces which facilitate input data construction and program execution. OPTCOMP enables the user to identify those dimensions, geometric arrangements and thermoelastoplastic properties of homogeneous interfacial layers that minimize thermal residual stresses for the specified set of constraints. OPTCOMP2 provides additional flexibility in the residual stress optimization through variation of the processing parameters (time, temperature, external pressure and axial load) as well as the microstructure of the interfacial region which is treated as a heterogeneous two-phase composite. Overviews of the capabilities of these codes are provided together with a summary of results that addresses the effects of various microstructural details of the fiber, interfacial layers and matrix region on the optimization of fabrication-induced residual stresses in metal matrix composites

Pediatric, adult and elderly bone material properties

Age dependence; Bone; Coupon; Full field strain measurements; Quasi-static and dynamic tensile testsPostprint (published version

Optimization of Residual Stresses in MMC's Using Compensating/Compliant Interfacial Layers. Part 2: OPTCOMP User's Guide

A user's guide for the computer program OPTCOMP is presented in this report. This program provides a capability to optimize the fabrication or service-induced residual stresses in uni-directional metal matrix composites subjected to combined thermo-mechanical axisymmetric loading using compensating or compliant layers at the fiber/matrix interface. The user specifies the architecture and the initial material parameters of the interfacial region, which can be either elastic or elastoplastic, and defines the design variables, together with the objective function, the associated constraints and the loading history through a user-friendly data input interface. The optimization procedure is based on an efficient solution methodology for the elastoplastic response of an arbitrarily layered multiple concentric cylinder model that is coupled to the commercial optimization package DOT. The solution methodology for the arbitrarily layered cylinder is based on the local-global stiffness matrix formulation and Mendelson's iterative technique of successive elastic solutions developed for elastoplastic boundary-value problems. The optimization algorithm employed in DOT is based on the method of feasible directions

Pediatric, adult and elderly bone material properties

Age dependence; Bone; Coupon; Full field strain measurements; Quasi-static and dynamic tensile test

Response and injury of the human leg for axial impact durations applicable to automotive intrusion and underbody blast environments

<p>Similar lower extremity injuries occur in both military vehicle underbody blast and automotive intrusion events despite the drastic differences in acceleration, velocity, and load duration. Understanding human leg response to variations in load rate and boundary condition is imperative to assessment of injury using anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs). Two axial impact test series were performed using post-mortem human surrogate legs, varying load rates and using ‘fixed’ and translational proximal tibia boundaries. Corridors were developed for a 50th percentile male for five loading rates ranging from 0.3 to 12 kN/ms. Calculated leg stiffness ranged from 700 to 1600 N/mm, and foot and ankle compression at peak force accounted for greater than 75% of lower leg compression. Injuries included calcaneus, talus, pilon, and malleolar fractures. Results indicated a duration-dependence of fracture force, which has major implications for the validity of existing injury criteria and the future design of ATD legs.</p

Response and injury of the human leg for axial impact durations applicable to automotive intrusion and underbody blast environments

<p>Similar lower extremity injuries occur in both military vehicle underbody blast and automotive intrusion events despite the drastic differences in acceleration, velocity, and load duration. Understanding human leg response to variations in load rate and boundary condition is imperative to assessment of injury using anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs). Two axial impact test series were performed using post-mortem human surrogate legs, varying load rates and using ‘fixed’ and translational proximal tibia boundaries. Corridors were developed for a 50th percentile male for five loading rates ranging from 0.3 to 12 kN/ms. Calculated leg stiffness ranged from 700 to 1600 N/mm, and foot and ankle compression at peak force accounted for greater than 75% of lower leg compression. Injuries included calcaneus, talus, pilon, and malleolar fractures. Results indicated a duration-dependence of fracture force, which has major implications for the validity of existing injury criteria and the future design of ATD legs.</p

Survival Model for Foot and Leg High Rate Axial Impact Injury Data

<div><p><b>Objectives:</b> Understanding how lower extremity injuries from automotive intrusion and underbody blast (UBB) differ is of key importance when determining whether automotive injury criteria can be applied to blast rate scenarios. This article provides a review of existing injury risk analyses and outlines an approach to improve injury prediction for an expanded range of loading rates. This analysis will address issues with existing injury risk functions including inaccuracies due to inertial and potential viscous resistance at higher loading rates.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> This survival analysis attempts to minimize these errors by considering injury location statistics and a predictor variable selection process dependent upon failure mechanisms of bone. Distribution of foot/ankle/leg injuries induced by axial impact loading at rates characteristic of UBB as well as automotive intrusion was studied and calcaneus injuries were found to be the most common injury; thus, footplate force was chosen as the main predictor variable because of its proximity to injury location to prevent inaccuracies associated with inertial differences due to loading rate. A survival analysis was then performed with age, sex, dorsiflexion angle, and mass as covariates. This statistical analysis uses data from previous axial postmortem human surrogate (PMHS) component leg tests to provide perspectives on how proximal boundary conditions and loading rate affect injury probability in the foot/ankle/leg (<i>n</i> = 82).</p><p><b>Results:</b> Tibia force-at-fracture proved to be up to 20% inaccurate in previous analyses because of viscous resistance and inertial effects within the data set used, suggesting that previous injury criteria are accurate only for specific rates of loading and boundary conditions. The statistical model presented in this article predicts 50% probability of injury for a plantar force of 10.2 kN for a 50th percentile male with a neutral ankle position. Force rate was found to be an insignificant covariate because of the limited range of loading rate differences within the data set; however, compensation for inertial effects caused by measuring the force-at-fracture in a location closer to expected injury location improved the model's predictive capabilities for the entire data set.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> This study provides better injury prediction capabilities for both automotive and blast rates because of reduced sensitivity to inertial effects and tibia–fibula load sharing. Further, a framework is provided for future injury criteria generation for high rate loading scenarios. This analysis also suggests key improvements to be made to existing anthropomorphic test device (ATD) lower extremities to provide accurate injury prediction for high rate applications such as UBB.</p></div

Blunt impacts to the back: Biomechanical response for model development

The development of advanced injury prediction models requires biomechanical and injury tolerance information for all regions of the body. While numerous studies have investigated injury mechanics of the thorax under frontal impact, there remains a dearth of information on the injury mechanics of the torso under blunt impact to the back. A series of hub-impact tests were performed to the back surface of the mid-thorax of four mid-size male cadavers. Repeated tests were performed to characterize the biomechanical and injury response of the thorax under various impact speeds (1.5m/s, 3m/s and 5.5m/s). Deformation of the chest was recorded with a 59-gage chestband. Subject kinematics were also recorded with a high-speed optoelectronic 3D motion capture system. In the highest-severity tests, peak impact forces ranged from 6.9 to 10.5kN. The peak change in extension angle measured between the 1st thoracic vertebra and the lumbar spine ranged from 39 to 62°. The most commonly observed injuries were strains of the costovertebral/costotransverse joint complexes, rib fractures, and strains of the interspinous and supraspinous ligaments. The majority of the rib fractures occurred in the rib neck between the costovertebral and costotransverse joints. The prevalence of rib-neck fractures suggests a novel, indirect loading mechanism resulting from bending moments generated in the rib necks caused by motion of the spine. In addition to the injury information, the biomechanical responses quantified here will facilitate the future development and validation of human body models for predicting injury risk during impact to the back