Design and Rationale of a Scandinavian Multicenter Randomized Study Evaluating if Once-Daily Tacrolimus Versus Twice-Daily Cyclosporine Reduces the 3-year Incidence of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation (ScanCLAD Study)

Background A low level of evidence exists regarding the choice of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) for immunosuppression after lung transplantation (LTx). Therefore, we designed a randomized clinical trial according to good clinical practice rules to compare tacrolimus with cyclosporine after LTx. Methods The ScanCLAD study is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, controlled, randomized, open-label, multicenter study evaluating if an immunosuppressive protocol based on anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction, once-daily tacrolimus dose, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroid reduces the incidence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) after LTx, compared to a cyclosporine-based protocol with all other immunosuppressive and prophylactic drugs being identical between groups. All patients will be followed for 3 years to determine the main endpoint of CLAD. The study is designed for superiority, and power calculations show that 242 patients are needed. Also, the study is designed with more than 10 substudies addressing other important and unresolved issues in LTx. In addition, the ScanCLAD study enabled the synchronization of the treatment and follow-up protocols of the lung transplantation programs of all five Scandinavian lung transplantation centers. Planned Outcomes Recruitment started in 2016. At the end of April 2019, 227 patients were randomized. We anticipate the last patient to be randomized in autumn 2019, and thus the last patient visits will be in 2022. The ScanCLAD study is enrolling and investigates which CNI is to be preferred from a CLAD perspective after LTx. Trial Registry Number ScanCLAD trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov before patient enrollment (NCT02936505). EUDRACT number 2015-004137-27.Peer reviewe

Urgent lung allocation system in the Scandiatransplant countries

BACKGROUND: Throughout the world, the scarcity of donor organs makes optimal allocation systems necessary. In the Scandiatransplant countries, organs for lung transplantation are allocated nationally. To ensure shorter wait time for critically ill patients, the Scandiatransplant urgent lung allocation system (ScULAS) was introduced in 2009, giving supranational priority to patients considered urgent. There were no pre-defined criteria for listing a patient as urgent, but each center was granted only 3 urgent calls per year. This study aims to explore the characteristics and outcome of patients listed as urgent, assess changes associated with the implementation of ScULAS, and describe how the system was utilized by the member centers. METHODS: All patients listed for lung transplantation at the 5 Scandiatransplant centers 5 years before and after implementation of ScULAS were included. RESULTS: After implementation, 8.3% of all listed patients received urgent status, of whom 81% were transplanted within 4 weeks. Patients listed as urgent were younger, more commonly had suppurative lung disease, and were more often on life support compared with patients without urgent status. For patients listed as urgent, post-transplant graft survival was inferior at 30 and 90 days. Although there were no pre-defined criteria for urgent listing, the system was not utilized at its maximum. CONCLUSIONS: ScULAS rapidly allocated organs to patients considered urgent. These patients were younger and more often had suppurative lung disease. Patients with urgent status had inferior short-term outcome, plausibly due to the higher proportion on life support before transplantation. (C) 2018 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.Peer reviewe

Lung transplantation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation : a pan-European experience

Late-onset noninfectious pulmonary complications (LONIPCs) affect 6% of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) recipients within 5 years, conferring subsequent 5-year survival of 50%. Lung transplantation is rarely performed in this setting due to concomitant extrapulmonary morbidity, excessive immunosuppression and concerns about recurring malignancy being considered contraindications. This study assesses survival in highly selected patients undergoing lung transplantation for LONIPCs after SCT. SCT patients undergoing lung transplantation at 20 European centres between 1996 and 2014 were included. Clinical data pre- and post-lung transplantation were reviewed. Propensity score-matched controls were generated from the Eurotransplant and Scandiatransplant registries. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression models evaluating predictors of graft loss were performed. Graft survival at 1, 3 and 5 years of 84%, 72% and 67%, respectively, among the 105 SCT patients proved comparable to controls (p=0.75). Sepsis accounted for 15 out of 37 deaths (41%), with prior mechanical ventilation (HR 6.9, 95% CI 1.0-46.7; p Lung transplantation outcomes following SCT were comparable to other end-stage diseases. Lung transplantation should be considered feasible in selected candidates. No SCT-specific factors influencing outcome were identified within this carefully selected patient cohort.Peer reviewe

BAL levels of interleukin-18 do not change before or during acute rejection in lungtransplant recipients

AbstractStudy objective: Acute rejection (AR) of the allograft is a major clinical problem after lungtransplantation. Repeated episodes of AR increase the risk of developing obliterative bronchiolitis, the main cause of mortality in this patient group. It is believed that AR is caused by T-lymphocytes reacting to donor antigens and in turn activating antigen presenting cells (APC) such as alveolar macrophages. Hypothetically, the interferon-γ inducing cytokine IL-18 released from activated macrophages can play a role in the development of AR by modulating cytotoxic T-lymphocytes.Design: To determine whether IL-18 may serve as a marker of AR, we retrospectively analysed the concentration of soluble IL-18 protein and inflammatory cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) from lungtransplant recipients.Patients: To minimize confounding factors, eight pairs of patients were matched for age, gender, pre-op diagnosis, type of operation, absence of infection and time post transplant.Methods: BAL levels of IL-18 (ELISA) and BAL cell differentials were analysed before, during and after an episode of AR and compared with the matched control group.Conclusion: We found no changes in IL-18 concentration in BAL associated with AR. IL-18 in BAL did not correlate with BAL lymphocyte percentage. We conclude that change in soluble IL-18 protein does not constitute a useful marker of acute rejection in lung allograft recipients