5 research outputs found

    Maternal effects in a wild songbird are environmentally plastic but only marginally alter the rate of adaptation

    Get PDF
    Despite ample evidence for the presence of maternal effects (MEs) in a variety of traits and strong theoretical indications for their evolutionary consequences, empirical evidence to what extent MEs can influence evolutionary responses to selection remains ambiguous. We tested the degree to which MEs can alter the rate of adaptation of a key life-history trait, clutch size, using an individual-based model approach parameterized with experimental data from a long-term study of great tits (Parus major). We modeled two types of MEs: (i) an environmentally plastic ME, in which the relationship between maternal and offspring clutch size depended on the maternal environment via offspring condition, and (ii) a fixed ME, in which this relationship was constant. Although both types of ME affected the rate of adaptation following an abrupt environmental shift, the overall effects were small. We conclude that evolutionary consequences of MEs are modest at best in our study system, at least for the trait and the particular type of ME we considered here. A closer link between theoretical and empirical work on MEs would hence be useful to obtain accurate predictions about the evolutionary consequences of MEs more generally

    Data from: probing variation in reaction norms in wild populations: the importance of reliable environmental proxies

    No full text
    Many traits are phenotypically plastic, i.e., the same genotype expresses different phenotypes depending on the environment. Genotypes and individuals can vary in their response to the environment and this genetic (G×E) and individual (I×E) variation in reaction-norm slopes can have important ecological or evolutionary consequences. Studies on I×E/G×E often fail to show slope variation, potentially due to the choice of the environmental covariate. Identifying the genuine environmental driver of phenotypic plasticity (the cue) is practically impossible and hence only proxies can be used. If the proxy is too weakly correlated with the cue, this may lead researchers to conclude there is little or no (variation in) plasticity, and hence lead to downwardly biased estimates of the potential for plastic responses (or evolutionary change in the slope) in response to environmental change. Alternatively, the Environment-Specific Mean phenotype (ESM) across individuals—which captures all environmental effects on the phenotype—as covariate should be less prone to such bias. We showed by simulation—after verifying the concept analytically—that using weakly correlated proxies indeed biased estimates of slope variation vis-à-vis the true cue downward but that ESM as a covariate held up well, even when multiple sources of I×E or an interaction between environments (I×E×E) existed in the data. Analysis of two real datasets revealed that estimated I×E and G×E, respectively, were more sizeable and precise when using ESM as opposed to reasonably informative environmental proxies. We argue that the ESM approach should be adopted by biologists as a yardstick in the study of (variation in) plasticity in the wild and that it may serve as a useful starting point for the search of better environmental proxies and unravelling complex I×E or G×E patterns.Data contain phenotypic breeding data and NAO data for the Common guillemot as described in Reed et al. (2006). These data were used as one of the two practical examples in the paper. See the readme file for details. For questions regarding these data, please contact Michael P. Harris ([email protected]). For R scripts used to analyze the data, please see the supporting information to the main article associated with this dataset (Ramakers et al. 2023). Ramakers, J.J.C., Reed, T.E., Harris, M.P. & Gienapp, P. (2023). Probing variation in reaction norms in wild populations: the importance of reliable environmental proxies. Oikos. doi: 10.1111/oik.09592 Reed, T.E., Wanless, S., Harris, M.P., Frederiksen, M., Kruuk, L.E.B. & Cunningham, E.J.A. (2006) Responding to environmental change: plastic responses vary little in a synchronous breeder. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273, 2713-2719

    bat passes per transect per night

    No full text
    File contains (only valid nights included) number of bat passes per night per transect. For detailed information on the setup of the experiment, please see Spoelstra et al. 2015, Experimental illumination of natural habitat—an experimental set-up to assess the direct and indirect ecological consequences of artificial light of different spectral composition. nightNR=night number, with first night January 1, 2012; yearperiod=June/July(1), August/September(2); lightonoff=experimental light on (1) or off (0)
    corecore