5 research outputs found

    Survival of children with rare structural congenital anomalies: a multi-registry cohort study

    Get PDF
    Background Congenital anomalies are the leading cause of perinatal, neonatal and infant mortality in developed countries. Large long-term follow-up studies investigating survival beyond the first year of life in children with rare congenital anomalies are costly and sufficiently large standardized cohorts are difficult to obtain due to the rarity of some anomalies. This study aimed to investigate the survival up to 10 years of age of children born with a rare structural congenital anomaly in the period 1995–2014 in Western Europe. Methods Live births from thirteen EUROCAT (European network for the epidemiological surveillance of congenital anomalies) population-based registries were linked to mortality records. Survival for 12,685 live births with one of the 31 investigated rare structural congenital anomalies (CAs) was estimated at 1 week, 4 weeks and 1, 5 and 10 years of age within each registry and combined across Europe using random effects meta-analyses. Differences between registries were evaluated for the eight rare CAs with at least 500 live births. Results Amongst the investigated CAs, arhinencephaly/holoprosencephaly had the lowest survival at all ages (58.1%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 44.3–76.2% at 1 week; 47.4%, CI: 36.4–61.6% at 1 year; 35.6%, CI: 22.2–56.9% at 10 years). Overall, children with rare CAs of the digestive system had the highest survival (> 95% at 1 week, > 84% at 10 years). Most deaths occurred within the first four weeks of life, resulting in a 10-year survival conditional on surviving 4 weeks of over 95% for 17 out of 31 rare CAs. A moderate variability in survival between participating registries was observed for the eight selected rare CAs. Conclusions Pooling standardised data across 13 European CA registries and the linkage to mortality data enabled reliable survival estimates to be obtained at five ages up to ten years. Such estimates are useful for clinical practice and parental counselling

    Combination of azelaic acid 5 and erythromycin 2 in the treatment of acne vulgaris

    No full text
    Introduction: Acne vulgaris is a common problem, particularly among adolescents, which is usually resistant to monotherapy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a combination of azelaic acid (AA) 5 and erythromycin 2 gel (AzE) compared with AA 20 or erythromycin 2 gels in facial acne vulgaris.Methods: We conducted a 12-week, multicenter, randomized double-blind study on 147 patients with mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris. Four treatment group were determined (placebo, erythromycin, AA and AzE) and followed in 4-week intervals for 12 weeks, except the placebo group which was changed to routine treatment after 4 weeks.Results: The combination of AA 5 and erythromycin 2 gel significantly reduced the number of papules, pustules and comedones compared with placebo (p <0.001), erythromycin 2 (p <0.01) or AA 20 (p <0.05). The incidence of adverse effects observed in patients treated with AzE (27) was less than that with erythromycin 2 (54) and AA 20 (45).Conclusions: The combination of AA 5 and erythromycin 2 produced more potent therapeutic effects in comparison with erythromycin 2 or AA 20 alone, and with fewer side effects. © 2010 Informa UK Ltd

    Dressings Combined with Injection of Meglumine Antimoniate in the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

    Get PDF
    Background:Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a neglected infectious disease and a major health problem in several developing countries. Despite some reasonable explanation for their potential benefits, there is only trace evidence regarding the role of dressings in the treatment of CL.Methods:This randomized, assessor-blind, controlled, clinical trial was conducted in an endemic area for CL caused by Leishmania major in Iran to assess the efficacy of administration of weekly intralesional meglumine antimoniate (i.l.MA) either alone or combined with application of a silver or a non-silver polyester dressing on their lesions for 6 weeks. After screening of 241 patients with CL lesions, 83 eligible patients with 158 lesions were randomly allocated in three arms of the study. Eligibility criteria included parasitologically confirmed CL, age of 12 to 60 years; willingness to participate, duration of lesion<3 months, number of lesions<5, largest ulcer diameter<5 cm. Pregnant or lactating women were excluded. The primary outcome was absolute risk reduction (ARR) based on the proportion of complete healing, which was defined as more than 75 reduction in the size of the lesion compared with baseline in each group at the termination of treatment and 1 month later.Findings:ARR (95 Confidence Interval CI) in i.l.MA versus i.l.MA+non-silver dressing groups was 5.98% (-7.07% to 20.25%), between i.l.MA versus i.l.MA+silver dressing groups was -0.23% (-13.53% to 14.82%), and between i.l.MA+non-silver dressing versus i.l.MA+silver dressing groups was -6.21%(-18.28% to 6.52%) after 6 weeks of treatment. ARR (95% CI) in i.l.MA versus i.l.MA+non-silver dressing groups was -2.22% (-22.12% to 18.10%), between i.l.MA versus i.l.MA+silver dressing groups was 3.64% (-15.36% to 22.82%), and between i.l.MA+non-silver dressing versus i.l.MA+silver dressing groups was 5.86% (-12.86% to 24.31%) 1 month later.Conclusion:It could not be demonstrated that the efficacy of i.l.MA was improved by either dressing. Trial Registration:Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT.ir) IRCT138707201166N2. © 2013 Khatami et al

    Survival of children with rare structural congenital anomalies: a multi-registry cohort study

    No full text
    Background: Congenital anomalies are the leading cause of perinatal, neonatal and infant mortality in developed countries. Large long-term follow-up studies investigating survival beyond the first year of life in children with rare congenital anomalies are costly and sufficiently large standardized cohorts are difficult to obtain due to the rarity of some anomalies. This study aimed to investigate the survival up to 10&nbsp;years of age of children born with a rare structural congenital anomaly in the period 1995–2014 in Western Europe. Methods: Live births from thirteen EUROCAT (European network for the epidemiological surveillance of congenital anomalies) population-based registries were linked to mortality records. Survival for 12,685 live births with one of the 31 investigated rare structural congenital anomalies (CAs) was estimated at 1&nbsp;week, 4&nbsp;weeks and 1, 5 and 10&nbsp;years of age within each registry and combined across Europe using random effects meta-analyses. Differences between registries were evaluated for the eight rare CAs with at least 500 live births. Results: Amongst the investigated CAs, arhinencephaly/holoprosencephaly had the lowest survival at all ages (58.1%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 44.3–76.2% at 1&nbsp;week; 47.4%, CI: 36.4–61.6% at 1&nbsp;year; 35.6%, CI: 22.2–56.9% at 10&nbsp;years). Overall, children with rare CAs of the digestive system had the highest survival (&gt; 95% at 1&nbsp;week, &gt; 84% at 10&nbsp;years). Most deaths occurred within the first four weeks of life, resulting in a 10-year survival conditional on surviving 4&nbsp;weeks of over 95% for 17 out of 31 rare CAs. A moderate variability in survival between participating registries was observed for the eight selected rare CAs. Conclusions: Pooling standardised data across 13 European CA registries and the linkage to mortality data enabled reliable survival estimates to be obtained at five ages up to ten years. Such estimates are useful for clinical practice and parental counselling

    Survival of children with rare structural congenital anomalies: a multi-registry cohort study

    No full text
    Background: Congenital anomalies are the leading cause of perinatal, neonatal and infant mortality in developed countries. Large long-term follow-up studies investigating survival beyond the first year of life in children with rare congenital anomalies are costly and sufficiently large standardized cohorts are difficult to obtain due to the rarity of some anomalies. This study aimed to investigate the survival up to 10&nbsp;years of age of children born with a rare structural congenital anomaly in the period 1995–2014 in Western Europe. Methods: Live births from thirteen EUROCAT (European network for the epidemiological surveillance of congenital anomalies) population-based registries were linked to mortality records. Survival for 12,685 live births with one of the 31 investigated rare structural congenital anomalies (CAs) was estimated at 1&nbsp;week, 4&nbsp;weeks and 1, 5 and 10&nbsp;years of age within each registry and combined across Europe using random effects meta-analyses. Differences between registries were evaluated for the eight rare CAs with at least 500 live births. Results: Amongst the investigated CAs, arhinencephaly/holoprosencephaly had the lowest survival at all ages (58.1%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 44.3–76.2% at 1&nbsp;week; 47.4%, CI: 36.4–61.6% at 1&nbsp;year; 35.6%, CI: 22.2–56.9% at 10&nbsp;years). Overall, children with rare CAs of the digestive system had the highest survival (&gt; 95% at 1&nbsp;week, &gt; 84% at 10&nbsp;years). Most deaths occurred within the first four weeks of life, resulting in a 10-year survival conditional on surviving 4&nbsp;weeks of over 95% for 17 out of 31 rare CAs. A moderate variability in survival between participating registries was observed for the eight selected rare CAs. Conclusions: Pooling standardised data across 13 European CA registries and the linkage to mortality data enabled reliable survival estimates to be obtained at five ages up to ten years. Such estimates are useful for clinical practice and parental counselling
    corecore