The cost of surgical training: analysis of operative time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Background: Duration of surgery is a main cost factor of surgical training. The purpose of this analysis of operative times for laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) was to quantify the extra time and related costs in regards to the surgeons' experience in the operating room (OR). Methods: All LC performed between January 01, 2005 and December 31, 2008 in 46 hospitals reporting to the database of the Swiss Association for Quality Management in Surgery (AQC) were analyzed (n=10,010). Four levels of seniority were specified: resident (R), junior consultant (JC), senior consultant (SC), and attending surgeon (AS). The differences in operative time according to seniority were investigated in a multivariable log-linear and median regression analysis controlling for possible confounders. The OR costs were calculated by using a full cost rate in a teaching hospital. Results: A total of 9,208 LC were available for analysis; 802 had to be excluded due to missing data (n=212) or secondary major operations (n=590). Twenty-eight percent of the LC were performed by R as teaching operations (n=2,591). Compared with R, the multivariable analysis of operative time showed a median difference of −2.5min (−9.0; 4.8) for JC and −18min (−25; −11) for SC and −28min (−35; −10) for AS, respectively. The OR minute costs were €17.57, resulting in incremental costs of €492 (159; 615) per operation in case of tutorial assistance. Conclusions: The proportion of LC performed as tutorial assistance for R remains low. Surgical training in the OR causes relevant case-related extra time and therefore cost

The single-cell pathology landscape of breast cancer.

Single-cell analyses have revealed extensive heterogeneity between and within human tumours1-4, but complex single-cell phenotypes and their spatial context are not at present reflected in the histological stratification that is the foundation of many clinical decisions. Here we use imaging mass cytometry5 to simultaneously quantify 35 biomarkers, resulting in 720 high-dimensional pathology images of tumour tissue from 352 patients with breast cancer, with long-term survival data available for 281 patients. Spatially resolved, single-cell analysis identified the phenotypes of tumour and stromal single cells, their organization and their heterogeneity, and enabled the cellular architecture of breast cancer tissue to be characterized on the basis of cellular composition and tissue organization. Our analysis reveals multicellular features of the tumour microenvironment and novel subgroups of breast cancer that are associated with distinct clinical outcomes. Thus, spatially resolved, single-cell analysis can characterize intratumour phenotypic heterogeneity in a disease-relevant manner, with the potential to inform patient-specific diagnosis

Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) provide prognostic value in invasive breast cancer and guidelines for their assessment have been published. This study aims to evaluate: (a) methods of TILs assessment, and (b) their prognostic significance in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Hematoxylin and eosin sections from two clinically annotated DCIS cohorts; a training set (n = 150 pure DCIS) and a validation set (n = 666 comprising 534 pure DCIS and 132 cases wherein DCIS and invasive breast carcinoma were co-existent) were assessed. Seven different scoring methods were applied to the training set to identify the most optimal reproducible method associated with strongest prognostic value. Among different methods, TILs touching ducts' basement membrane or away from it by one lymphocyte cell thickness provided the strongest significant association with outcome and highest concordance rate [inter-cluster correlation coefficient = 0.95]. Assessment of periductal TILs at increasing distances from DCIS (0.2 , 0.5 , and 1 mm) as well as percent of stromal TILs were practically challenging and showed lower concordance rates than touching TILs. TILs hotspots and lymphoid follicles did not show prognostic significance. Within the pure DCIS validation set, dense TILs were associated with younger age, symptomatic presentation, larger size, higher nuclear grade, comedo necrosis and estrogen receptor negativity as well as shorter recurrence-free interval (p = 0.002). In multivariate survival analysis, dense TILs were independent predictor of shorter recurrence-free interval (p = 0.002) in patients treated with breast conservation. DCIS associated with invasive carcinoma showed denser TILs than pure DCIS (p = 9.0 × 10-13). Dense TILs is an independent prognostic variable in DCIS. Touching TILs provides a reproducible method for their assessment that can potentially be used to guide management

Oncoplastic Breast Consortium consensus conference on nipple-sparing mastectomy

Purpose Indications for nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) have broadened to include the risk reducing setting and locally advanced tumors, which resulted in a dramatic increase in the use of NSM. The Oncoplastic Breast Consortium consensus conference on NSM and immediate reconstruction was held to address a variety of questions in clinical practice and research based on published evidence and expert panel opinion. Methods The panel consisted of 44 breast surgeons from 14 countries across four continents with a background in gynecology, general or reconstructive surgery and a practice dedicated to breast cancer, as well as a patient advocate. Panelists presented evidence summaries relating to each topic for debate during the in-person consensus conference. The iterative process in question development, voting, and wording of the recommendations followed the modified Delphi methodology. Results Consensus recommendations were reached in 35, majority recommendations in 24, and no recommendations in the remaining 12 questions. The panel acknowledged the need for standardization of various aspects of NSM and immediate reconstruction. It endorsed several oncological contraindications to the preservation of the skin and nipple. Furthermore, it recommended inclusion of patients in prospective registries and routine assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Considerable heterogeneity in breast reconstruction practice became obvious during the conference. Conclusions In case of conflicting or missing evidence to guide treatment, the consensus conference revealed substantial disagreement in expert panel opinion, which, among others, supports the need for a randomized trial to evaluate the safest and most efficacious reconstruction techniques

Oncoplastic Breast Consortium consensus conference on nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Purpose Indications for nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) have broadened to include the risk reducing setting and locally advanced tumors, which resulted in a dramatic increase in the use of NSM. The Oncoplastic Breast Consortium consensus conference on NSM and immediate reconstruction was held to address a variety of questions in clinical practice and research based on published evidence and expert panel opinion. Methods The panel consisted of 44 breast surgeons from 14 countries across four continents with a background in gynecology, general or reconstructive surgery and a practice dedicated to breast cancer, as well as a patient advocate. Panelists presented evidence summaries relating to each topic for debate during the in-person consensus conference. The iterative process in question development, voting, and wording of the recommendations followed the modified Delphi methodology. Results Consensus recommendations were reached in 35, majority recommendations in 24, and no recommendations in the remaining 12 questions. The panel acknowledged the need for standardization of various aspects of NSM and immediate reconstruction. It endorsed several oncological contraindications to the preservation of the skin and nipple. Furthermore, it recommended inclusion of patients in prospective registries and routine assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Considerable heterogeneity in breast reconstruction practice became obvious during the conference. Conclusions In case of conflicting or missing evidence to guide treatment, the consensus conference revealed substantial disagreement in expert panel opinion, which, among others, supports the need for a randomized trial to evaluate the safest and most efficacious reconstruction techniques

Lymph node yield after rectal resection in patients treated with neoadjuvant radiation for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background The lymph node status represents a major prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. However, it was demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) decreases the numbers of lymph nodes in the specimen. Several studies describe less than 12 lymph nodes in the resected specimen of rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant radiation. This meta-analysis quantifies the influence of neoadjuvant CRT or radiotherapy (RT) only on the lymph node yield in rectal cancer patients. Methods We performed a systematic review and searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library without any language restriction from 1st of January 1980 until 31st March 2015. Two reviewers examined all publications independently and extracted the relevant data if the study assessed lymph node counts or positive lymph node yields of patients who received neoadjuvant treatment compared with patients who did not receive neoadjuvant treatment. Meta-analyses were conducted to quantify the mean difference in lymph node yield. Results A total of 34 articles (including 37 datasets) were included in the meta-analyses. Neoadjuvant CRT resulted in a mean reduction of 3.9 lymph nodes (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7–4.1) and an average reduction in harvested positive lymph nodes of 0.7 (95% CI 0.2–1.2) compared with patients who received no neoadjuvant therapy. Individuals who received neoadjuvant RT had, in average, 2.1 lymph node less (95% CI 1.7–2.5) resected compared with their counterparts who received no neoadjuvant treatment. Conclusions Neoadjuvant CRT or RT only in rectal cancer patients leads to a decrease in lymph node harvest of approximately four and two lymph nodes, respectively. We therefore stress the importance of intensifying all efforts from involved subspecialities (i.e. surgeons and pathologists) to reach the benchmark harvest of 12 resected lymph nodes according to current guidelines

Lymph node yield after rectal resection in patients treated with neoadjuvant radiation for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background The lymph node status represents a major prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. However, it was demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) decreases the numbers of lymph nodes in the specimen. Several studies describe less than 12 lymph nodes in the resected specimen of rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant radiation. This meta-analysis quantifies the influence of neoadjuvant CRT or radiotherapy (RT) only on the lymph node yield in rectal cancer patients. Methods We performed a systematic review and searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library without any language restriction from 1st of January 1980 until 31st March 2015. Two reviewers examined all publications independently and extracted the relevant data if the study assessed lymph node counts or positive lymph node yields of patients who received neoadjuvant treatment compared with patients who did not receive neoadjuvant treatment. Meta-analyses were conducted to quantify the mean difference in lymph node yield. Results A total of 34 articles (including 37 datasets) were included in the meta-analyses. Neoadjuvant CRT resulted in a mean reduction of 3.9 lymph nodes (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7–4.1) and an average reduction in harvested positive lymph nodes of 0.7 (95% CI 0.2–1.2) compared with patients who received no neoadjuvant therapy. Individuals who received neoadjuvant RT had, in average, 2.1 lymph node less (95% CI 1.7–2.5) resected compared with their counterparts who received no neoadjuvant treatment. Conclusions Neoadjuvant CRT or RT only in rectal cancer patients leads to a decrease in lymph node harvest of approximately four and two lymph nodes, respectively. We therefore stress the importance of intensifying all efforts from involved subspecialities (i.e. surgeons and pathologists) to reach the benchmark harvest of 12 resected lymph nodes according to current guidelines

Lymph node yield after rectal resection in patients treated with neoadjuvant radiation for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background The lymph node status represents a major prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. However, it was demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) decreases the numbers of lymph nodes in the specimen. Several studies describe less than 12 lymph nodes in the resected specimen of rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant radiation. This meta-analysis quantifies the influence of neoadjuvant CRT or radiotherapy (RT) only on the lymph node yield in rectal cancer patients. Methods We performed a systematic review and searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library without any language restriction from 1st of January 1980 until 31st March 2015. Two reviewers examined all publications independently and extracted the relevant data if the study assessed lymph node counts or positive lymph node yields of patients who received neoadjuvant treatment compared with patients who did not receive neoadjuvant treatment. Meta-analyses were conducted to quantify the mean difference in lymph node yield. Results A total of 34 articles (including 37 datasets) were included in the meta-analyses. Neoadjuvant CRT resulted in a mean reduction of 3.9 lymph nodes (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7–4.1) and an average reduction in harvested positive lymph nodes of 0.7 (95% CI 0.2–1.2) compared with patients who received no neoadjuvant therapy. Individuals who received neoadjuvant RT had, in average, 2.1 lymph node less (95% CI 1.7–2.5) resected compared with their counterparts who received no neoadjuvant treatment. Conclusions Neoadjuvant CRT or RT only in rectal cancer patients leads to a decrease in lymph node harvest of approximately four and two lymph nodes, respectively. We therefore stress the importance of intensifying all efforts from involved subspecialities (i.e. surgeons and pathologists) to reach the benchmark harvest of 12 resected lymph nodes according to current guidelines