Wpływ ß-cyclodekstryny na kinetykę zmian konformacyjnych receptora GABAa w hodowanych neuronach hipokampalnych szczura

Cyklodekstryny (CD) są szeroko stosowanymi nanostrukturami, zawierającymi w swojej budowie elementy hydrofobowe i hydrofilowe, dzięki czemu m ogą silnie oddziaływać ze składnikami błon biologicznych. W prezentowanej pracy zbadany został wpływ ßCD na receptory GABAa w hodowanych neuronach hipokampalnych szczura. W tym celu zmierzono odpowiedzi prądowe na ultraszybkie aplikacje GABA. Analiza danych pomiarowych wykazała, że ßCD silnie wpływa na kinetykę zmian konformacyjnych receptora GABAa głównie poprzez modulację procesu desensytyzacji i wiązania agonisty. Niniejsze wyniki wskazują na to, że ßCD może silnie modulować białka błonowe, przez co nie powinna być uważana jako obojętny nośnik substancji hydrofobowych.Praca dofinansowana przez KBN grant nr PBZ-MIN-001/P05/28Zadanie pt. „Digitalizacja i udostępnienie w Cyfrowym Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego kolekcji czasopism naukowych wydawanych przez Uniwersytet Łódzki” nr 885/P-DUN/2014 dofinansowane zostało ze środków MNiSW w ramach działalności upowszechniającej naukę

Napięciowa zależność kinetyki prądów GABA ergicznych mierzonych przy różnych wartościach zewnątrzkomórkowego pH

Zmiany wartości napięcia błonowego i stężenia jonów wodorowych to jedne z najbardziej powszechnych czynników modulujących układy biologiczne, szczególnie komórki nerwowe. Wiele doniesień literaturowych wskazuje, że zarówno potencjał błonowy jak i zmiana stężenia jonów wodorowych wpływają na kinetykę prądów GABAergicznych, ale zagadnienie równoczesnej modulacji przez oba te czynniki nie zostało zbadane. W niniejszej pracy dokonaliśm y opisu wpływu napięcia błonowego i zewnątrzkomórkowego pH w zakresie od 6.0 do 8.0 na kinetykę receptora GABAa. Otrzymane wyniki wskazują na brak istotnego wpływu napięcia na kinetykę odpowiedzi prądowych mierzonych w kwaśnym pH, natom iast silna modulacja przez napięcie dotyczyła odpowiedzi prądowych rejestrowanych w pH=7.2 i 8.0.Praca dofinansowana przez Wellcome Trust International Senior Research Fellowship in Biomedical Science (Grant Nr 070231/Z/03/Z).Zadanie pt. „Digitalizacja i udostępnienie w Cyfrowym Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego kolekcji czasopism naukowych wydawanych przez Uniwersytet Łódzki” nr 885/P-DUN/2014 dofinansowane zostało ze środków MNiSW w ramach działalności upowszechniającej naukę

Comparison of 10-year overall survival between patients with G1 and G2 grade Ta bladder tumors

To compare long-term overall survival (OS) in patients with G1 and G2 grade Ta bladder cancer after transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBTs). Secondary aim was to investigate clinical and pathologic prognostic factors for OS of Ta patients, except G3/high grade (HG). A total of 243 patients, retrospectively selected, with Ta nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) underwent TURBT between January 2006 and December 2008 (median follow-up 109 months). Inclusion criteria were: Ta at first manifestation, G1 or G2 grade with no associated carcinoma in situ (CIS). Seventy-nine patients were excluded due to concomitant CIS (1), G3/HG tumors (47), and lost to follow-up (31). Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Committee of the Mures County Hospital. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 11.0. Following inclusion criteria, 164 patients with primary G1 or G2 Ta tumors, were enrolled. Recurrence was observed in 26 (15.8%) and progression in 5 (3%) patients. Ten-year survival in G1 patients was 67.8% (CI 54.3-78.1) and in G2 patients 59% (CI 49-67.3) (P=.31). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis underlined that advanced age at diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10) and no Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) treatment (HR 0.24 and 0.29) were independent predictors for death at 10 years after diagnosis. Long-term analysis confirms that patients with well differentiated (G1) and moderately well differentiated (G2) Ta tumors have similar OS. A longer OS was even reported in those who underwent BCG adjuvant therapy

Myopathy associated BAG3 mutations lead to protein aggregation by stalling Hsp70 networks

BAG3 is a multi-domain hub that connects two classes of chaperones, small heat shock proteins (sHSPs) via two isoleucine-proline-valine (IPV) motifs and Hsp70 via a BAG domain.\ua0Mutations in either the IPV or BAG domain of BAG3 cause a dominant form of myopathy, characterized by protein aggregation in both skeletal and cardiac muscle tissues. Surprisingly, for both disease mutants, impaired chaperone binding is not sufficient to explain disease phenotypes. Recombinant mutants are correctly folded, show unaffected Hsp70 binding but are impaired in stimulating Hsp70-dependent client processing. As a consequence, the mutant BAG3 proteins become the node for a dominant gain of function causing aggregation of itself, Hsp70, Hsp70 clients and tiered interactors within the BAG3 interactome. Importantly, genetic and pharmaceutical interference with Hsp70 binding completely reverses stress-induced protein aggregation for both BAG3 mutations. Thus, the gain of function effects of BAG3 mutants act as Achilles heel of the HSP70 machinery

Cognitive and Motor Decline in Dementia with Lewy Bodies and Parkinson's Disease Dementia

Funding Information: The University of Stavanger supported M.C.G. The CamPaIGN study has received funding from the Wellcome Trust, the Medical Research Council, the Patrick Berthoud Trust, and the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC‐1215‐20014). The ICICLE‐PD study was funded by Parkinson's UK (J‐0802, G‐1301, G‐1507) and supported by the Lockhart Parkinson's Disease Research Fund, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Newcastle Biomedical Research Unit and Centre based at Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Newcastle University. The PICNICS study was funded by the Cure Parkinson's Trust, the Van Geest Foundation, the Medical Research Council, Parkinson's UK, and the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC‐1215‐20014). The NYPUM study was supported by grants from the Swedish Medical Research Council, Erling‐Persson Foundation, the Swedish Brain Foundation (Hjärnfonden), Umeå University, Västerbotten County Council, King Gustaf V and Queen Victoria Freemason Foundation, Swedish Parkinson Foundation, Swedish Parkinson Research Foundation, Kempe Foundation, Swedish PD Association, the European Research Council, and the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation. The PINE study was funded by Parkinson's UK (grant numbers G0502, G0914, and G1302), the Scottish Chief Scientist Office (CAF/12/05, PCL/17/10), Academy of Medical Sciences, NHS Grampian endowments, the BMA Doris Hillier award, RS Macdonald Trust, the BUPA Foundation, and SPRING. The PARKWEST study was supported by the Research Council of Norway (grant# 177966), the Western Norway Regional Health Authority (grant# 911218 and # 911949), Reberg legacy and the Norwegian Parkinson's Research Foundation. The PICC collaboration has been supported by The Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government (PCL/17/10), the Academy of Medical Sciences, Parkinson's UK (initial collaborator meeting) and the Norwegian Association for Public Health. The DEMVEST Study was supported by the regional health authorities of Western Norway, Helse‐Vest (grant# 911973). Motol University Hospital's Czech Brain Aging Study was supported by the National Institute for Neurological Research (Programme EXCELES, ID Project No. LX22NPO5107)—Funded by the European Union—Next Generation EU and by Charles University grant PRIMUS 22/MED/011. The Sant Pau Initiative on Neurodegeration (SPIN) cohort was supported by the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitario (FIS), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI14/01126, PI17/01019 and PI20/01473 to JF, PI13/01532 and PI16/01825 to RB, PI18/00335 to MCI, PI18/00435 and INT19/00016 to DA, PI17/01896 and AC19/00103to AL) and the CIBERNED program (Program 1, Alzheimer Disease to AL), jointly funded by Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, Unión Europea, “Una manera de hacer Europa”. It was also supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIA grants 1R01AG056850‐01A1; R21AG056974; and R01AG061566), by Generalitat de Catalunya (2017‐SGR‐547, SLT006/17/125, SLT006/17/119, SLT002/16/408) and “Marató TV3” foundation grants 20141210, 044412 and 20142610. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. The sponsors were not involved in the study design, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the article for publication. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest relevant to this work. Funding Sources and Conflicts of Interest:Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Repeated nebulisation of non-viral CFTR gene therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis:a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial

Background: Lung delivery of plasmid DNA encoding the CFTR gene complexed with a cationic liposome is a potential treatment option for patients with cystic fibrosis. We aimed to assess the efficacy of non-viral CFTR gene therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis. Methods: We did this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial in two cystic fibrosis centres with patients recruited from 18 sites in the UK. Patients (aged ≥12 years) with a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of 50–90% predicted and any combination of CFTR mutations, were randomly assigned, via a computer-based randomisation system, to receive 5 mL of either nebulised pGM169/GL67A gene–liposome complex or 0·9% saline (placebo) every 28 days (plus or minus 5 days) for 1 year. Randomisation was stratified by % predicted FEV1 (<70 vs ≥70%), age (<18 vs ≥18 years), inclusion in the mechanistic substudy, and dosing site (London or Edinburgh). Participants and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the relative change in % predicted FEV1. The primary analysis was per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01621867. Findings: Between June 12, 2012, and June 24, 2013, we randomly assigned 140 patients to receive placebo (n=62) or pGM169/GL67A (n=78), of whom 116 (83%) patients comprised the per-protocol population. We noted a significant, albeit modest, treatment effect in the pGM169/GL67A group versus placebo at 12 months' follow-up (3·7%, 95% CI 0·1–7·3; p=0·046). This outcome was associated with a stabilisation of lung function in the pGM169/GL67A group compared with a decline in the placebo group. We recorded no significant difference in treatment-attributable adverse events between groups. Interpretation: Monthly application of the pGM169/GL67A gene therapy formulation was associated with a significant, albeit modest, benefit in FEV1 compared with placebo at 1 year, indicating a stabilisation of lung function in the treatment group. Further improvements in efficacy and consistency of response to the current formulation are needed before gene therapy is suitable for clinical care; however, our findings should also encourage the rapid introduction of more potent gene transfer vectors into early phase trials