Watershed Management on Range and Forest Lands Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop of the United States/Australia Rangelands Panel

Preface: The U.S.-Australia Cooperative Rangeland Science Program In October 1968 the governments of the United States and Australia entered into an agreement for the purpose of facilitating close cooperative activities between the scientific communities of the two countries. The joint communique issued at that time designated the U.S. National Science Foundation and the Australian Commonwealth Department of Education and Science as the coordinating agencies. Both countries were to encourage binational teamwork in research, interchanges of scientists, joint seminars, and exchanges of information. A United States-Australia Rangeland Panel was established in December 1969 to further cooperation between the two countries in the rangeland sciences. The present panel includes the following

Phonological naturalness and phonotactic learning *

We investigate whether the patterns of phonotactic well-formedness internalized by language learners are direct reflections of the phonological patterns they encounter, or reflect in addition principles of phonological naturalness. As a research tool we employ the phonotactic learning system of Hayes and Wilson (2008), which carries out an unbiased search of the lexicon for valid phonotactic generalizations. Applying this system to English data, we find that it learns many constraints that seem to be unnatural—they have no evident typological or phonetic basis, yet hold true of the English lexicon. We tested the status of ten of these constraints in a nonce-probe study, obtaining nativespeaker ratings of novel words that violated them. We used 40 such words: 10 violating our unnatural constraints, 10 violating natural constraints assigned comparable weights by the Hayes/Wilson learner, and 20 violation-free forms, each similar to a test form and employed as a control. In our experiment, we found that violations of the natural constraints had a powerful effect on native speaker judgment and violations of the unnatural constraints had at best a weak one. We conclude by assessing a variety of hypotheses intended to explain this disparity, opting ultimately for a learning bias account. Author emails