[Intravenous thrombolysis with rt-PA in stroke: experience of the French military hospital of Toulon from September 2003 to June 2009].

International audienceINTRODUCTION: Since 2003, intravenous thrombolysis with rt-PA for stroke victims has been largely developed in the military hospital of Toulon. We report the results of our practice and compare them with the literature. We also sought to identify predictive factors of favorable outcome after thrombolysis. METHODS: All patients treated with rt-PA for a stroke in the carotid territory between September 2003 and June 2009 were prospectively included. Disability was assessed at 3 months with the modified Rankin Scale (m-RS); outcome was considered unfavorable if m-RS score was above 2. Multivariate analysis was then performed to identify parameters correlating with poor and favorable outcome at 3 months follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were included in this study (mean initial National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]: 15.2). 53.4% had a Rankin score higher than 2 at 3 months follow-up. The absence of diabetes mellitus, low NIHSS score on admission, short time from stroke onset to treatment, and prior statin use were identified as independent predictive factors of favorable functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: After 6 years of activity, our stroke unit has results that appear similar to those of the French and international trials in terms of safety and efficacy. Efficacy of rt-PA in our series is poor for strokes caused by large-vessel atherothrombotic changes and cervical artery dissection due to high incidence of internal carotid thrombosis in these cases. Our studies also suggest that prior statin use may be an independent predictive factor of favorable outcome after thrombolysis

Subacute nodopathy with conduction blocks and anti-neurofascin 140/186 antibodies: an ultrastructural study

International audienc

Effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke having endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

Background: General anaesthesia (GA) during endovascular thrombectomy has been associated with worse patient outcomes in observational studies compared with patients treated without GA. We assessed functional outcome in ischaemic stroke patients with large vessel anterior circulation occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy under GA, versus thrombectomy not under GA (with or without sedation) versus standard care (ie, no thrombectomy), stratified by the use of GA versus standard care. Methods: For this meta-analysis, patient-level data were pooled from all patients included in randomised trials in PuMed published between Jan 1, 2010, and May 31, 2017, that compared endovascular thrombectomy predominantly done with stent retrievers with standard care in anterior circulation ischaemic stroke patients (HERMES Collaboration). The primary outcome was functional outcome assessed by ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days in the GA and non-GA subgroups of patients treated with endovascular therapy versus those patients treated with standard care, adjusted for baseline prognostic variables. To account for between-trial variance we used mixed-effects modelling with a random effect for trials incorporated in all models. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane method. The meta-analysis was prospectively designed, but not registered. Findings: Seven trials were identified by our search; of 1764 patients included in these trials, 871 were allocated to endovascular thrombectomy and 893 were assigned standard care. After exclusion of 74 patients (72 did not undergo the procedure and two had missing data on anaesthetic strategy), 236 (30%) of 797 patients who had endovascular procedures were treated under GA. At baseline, patients receiving GA were younger and had a shorter delay between stroke onset and randomisation but they had similar pre-treatment clinical severity compared with patients who did not have GA. Endovascular thrombectomy improved functional outcome at 3 months both in patients who had GA (adjusted common odds ratio (cOR) 1·52, 95% CI 1·09–2·11, p=0·014) and in those who did not have GA (adjusted cOR 2·33, 95% CI 1·75–3·10, p<0·0001) versus standard care. However, outcomes were significantly better for patients who did not receive GA versus those who received GA (covariate-adjusted cOR 1·53, 95% CI 1·14–2·04, p=0·0044). The risk of bias and variability between studies was assessed to be low. Interpretation: Worse outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy were associated with GA, after adjustment for baseline prognostic variables. These data support avoidance of GA whenever possible. The procedure did, however, remain effective versus standard care in patients treated under GA, indicating that treatment should not be withheld in those who require anaesthesia for medical reasons