Chromophore-bearing NH_2-terminal domains of phytochromes A and B determine their photosensory specificity and differential light lability

In early seedling development, far-red-light-induced deetiolation is mediated primarily by phytochrome A (phyA), whereas red-light-induced deetiolation is mediated primarily by phytochrome B (phyB). To map the molecular determinants responsible for this photosensory specificity, we tested the activities of two reciprocal phyA/phyB chimeras in diagnostic light regimes using overexpression in transgenic Arabidopsis. Although previous data have shown that the NH_2-terminal halves of phyA and phyB each separately lack normal activity, fusion of the NH_2-terminal half of phyA to the COOH-terminal half of phyB (phyAB) and the reciprocal fusion (phyBA) resulted in biologically active phytochromes. The behavior of these two chimeras in red and far-red light indicates: (i) that the NH2-terminal halves of phyA and phyB determine their respective photosensory specificities; (ii) that the COOH-terminal halves of the two photoreceptors are necessary for regulatory activity but are reciprocally inter-changeable and thus carry functionally equivalent determinants; and (iii) that the NH_2-terminal halves of phyA and phyB carry determinants that direct the differential light lability of the two molecules. The present findings suggest that the contrasting photosensory information gathered by phyA and phyB through their NH_2-terminal halves may be transduced to downstream signaling components through a common biochemical mechanism involving the regulatory activity of the COOH-terminal domains of the photoreceptors

Phytochrome-imposed inhibition of PIF7 activity shapes photoperiodic growth in Arabidopsis together with PIF1 , 3, 4 and 5

Under photoperiodic conditions, Arabidopsis thaliana seedling growth is inhibited in long days (LDs), but promoted under the extended nights of short days (SDs). This behavior is partly implemented by phytochrome (phy)-imposed oscillations in the abundance of the growth-promoting, phy-interacting bHLH transcription factors PHY-INTERACTING FACTOR 1 (PIF1), PIF3, PIF4 and PIF5 (PIF quartet or PIFq). However, the observation that a pifq mutant is still stimulated to elongate when given a phy-inactivating end-of-day far-red pulse (EODFR), suggests that additional factors are involved in the phy-mediated suppression of growth during the subsequent dark period. Here, by combining growth-analysis of pif7 single- and higher-order mutants with gene expression analysis under SD, LD, SD-EODFR, and LD-EODFR, we show that PIF7 promotes growth during the dark hours of SD, by regulating growth-related gene expression. Interestingly, the relative contribution of PIF7 in promoting growth is stronger under EODFR, whereas PIF3 role is more important under SD, suggesting that PIF7 is a prominent target of phy-suppression. Indeed, we show that phy imposes phosphorylation and inactivation of PIF7 during the light hours in SD, and prevents full dephosphorylation during the night. This repression can be lifted with an EODFR, which correlates with increased PIF7-mediated gene expression and elongation. In addition, our results suggest that PIF7 function might involve heterodimerization with PIF3. Furthermore, our data indicate that a pifqpif7 quintuple mutant is largely insensitive to photoperiod for hypocotyl elongation. Collectively, the data suggest that PIF7, together with the PIFq, is required for the photoperiodic regulation of seasonal growth

A novel high-throughput in vivo molecular screen for shade avoidance mutants identifies a novel phyA mutation

The shade avoidance syndrome (SAS) allows plants to anticipate and avoid shading by neighbouring plants by initiating an elongation growth response. The phytochrome photoreceptors are able to detect a reduction in the red:far red ratio in incident light, the result of selective absorption of red and blue wavelengths by proximal vegetation. A shade-responsive luciferase reporter line (PHYB::LUC) was used to carry out a high-throughput screen to identify novel SAS mutants. The dracula 1 (dra1) mutant, that showed no avoidance of shade for the PHYB::LUC response, was the result of a mutation in the PHYA gene. Like previously characterized phyA mutants, dra1 showed a long hypocotyl in far red light and an enhanced hypocotyl elongation response to shade. However, dra1 additionally showed a long hypocotyl in red light. Since phyB levels are relatively unaffected in dra1, this gain-of-function red light phenotype strongly suggests a disruption of phyB signalling. The dra1 mutation, G773E within the phyA PAS2 domain, occurs at a residue absolutely conserved among phyA sequences. The equivalent residue in phyB is absolutely conserved as a threonine. PAS domains are structurally conserved domains involved in molecular interaction. Structural modelling of the dra1 mutation within the phyA PAS2 domain shows some similarity with the structure of the phyB PAS2 domain, suggesting that the interference with phyB signalling may be the result of non-functional mimicry. Hence, it was hypothesized that this PAS2 residue forms a key distinction between the phyA and phyB phytochrome species

The shade avoidance syndrome in Arabidopsis : the antagonistic role of phytochrome A and B differentiates vegetation proximity and canopy shade

Light limitation caused by dense vegetation is one of the greatest threats to plant survival in natural environments. Plants detect such neighboring vegetation as a reduction in the red to far-red ratio (R:FR) of the incoming light. The low R:FR signal, perceived by phytochromes, initiates a set of responses collectively known as the shade avoidance syndrome, intended to reduce the degree of current or future shade from neighbors by overtopping such competitors or inducing flowering to ensure seed production. At the seedling stage these responses include increased hypocotyl elongation. We have systematically analyzed the Arabidopsis seedling response and the contribution of phyA and phyB to perception of decreased R:FR, at three different levels of photosynthetically active radiation. Our results show that the shade avoidance syndrome, induced by phyB deactivation, is gradually antagonized by phyA, operating through the so-called FR-High Irradiance Response, in response to high FR levels in a range that simulates plant canopy shade. The data indicate that the R:FR signal distinguishes between the presence of proximal, but non-shading, neighbors and direct foliar shade, via a intrafamily photosensory attenuation mechanism that acts to suppress excessive reversion toward skotomorphogenic development under prolonged direct vegetation shade

Molecular convergence of clock and photosensory pathways through PIF3–TOC1 interaction and co-occupancy of target promoters

This study defines a molecular mechanism for how clock- and light-signaling pathways converge in Arabidopsis. The data reveal that TOC1, an essential core component of the central oscillator, binds to and represses PIF transcriptional activators, which are also the direct molecular signaling partners of the phytochrome photosensory receptors. This finding shows that TOC1 functions as a clock output-transducer, directly linking the core oscillator to a pleiotopically-acting transcriptional network, through repression of target genes. Collectively, in the plant, these components comprise a transcriptionallycentered signaling hub that provides clock-imposed gating of PIF-mediated, photosensory-regulated diurnal growth patterns. These results provide a framework for future research aimed at understanding how circadian dynamics are integrated with other plant physiological processes important for optimal plant fitness.Fil: Soy, Judit. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; EspañaFil: Leivar, Pablo. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; EspañaFil: Gonzalez Schain, Nahuel Damian. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; España. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Rosario. Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas. Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario; ArgentinaFil: Martín, Guiomar. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; EspañaFil: Diaz, Céline. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; EspañaFil: Sentandreu, Maria. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; EspañaFil: Al-Sady, Bassem. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos. United States Department of Agriculture; Estados UnidosFil: Quail, Peter H.. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos. United States Department of Agriculture; Estados UnidosFil: Monte, Elena. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Españ