Sex- and age-related differences in the management and outcomes of chronic heart failure: an analysis of patients from the ESC HFA EORP Heart Failure Long-Term Registry

Aims: This study aimed to assess age- and sex-related differences in management and 1-year risk for all-cause mortality and hospitalization in chronic heart failure (HF) patients. Methods and results: Of 16 354 patients included in the European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Long-Term Registry, 9428 chronic HF patients were analysed [median age: 66 years; 28.5% women; mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 37%]. Rates of use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) were high (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: 85.7%, 88.7% and 58.8%, respectively). Crude GDMT utilization rates were lower in women than in men (all differences: P\ua0 64 0.001), and GDMT use became lower with ageing in both sexes, at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. Sex was not an independent predictor of GDMT prescription; however, age >75 years was a significant predictor of GDMT underutilization. Rates of all-cause mortality were lower in women than in men (7.1% vs. 8.7%; P\ua0=\ua00.015), as were rates of all-cause hospitalization (21.9% vs. 27.3%; P\ua075 years. Conclusions: There was a decline in GDMT use with advanced age in both sexes. Sex was not an independent predictor of GDMT or adverse outcomes. However, age >75 years independently predicted lower GDMT use and higher all-cause mortality in patients with LVEF 6445%

Catecholamines as outcome markers in isolated traumatic brain injury: the COMA-TBI study

Abstract Background Elevated catecholamine levels might be associated with unfavorable outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI). We investigated the association between catecholamine levels in the first 24 h post-trauma and functional outcome in patients with isolated moderate-to-severe TBI. Methods A cohort of 174 patients who sustained isolated blunt TBI was prospectively enrolled from three Level-1 Trauma Centers. Epinephrine (Epi) and norepinephrine (NE) concentrations were measured at admission (baseline), 6, 12 and 24 h post-injury. Outcome was assessed at 6 months by the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) score. Fractional polynomial plots and logistic regression models (fixed and random effects) were used to study the association between catecholamine levels and outcome. Effect size was reported as the odds ratio (OR) associated with one logarithmic change in catecholamine level. Results At 6 months, 109 patients (62.6%) had an unfavorable outcome (GOSE 5–8 vs. 1–4), including 51 deaths (29.3%). Higher admission levels of Epi were associated with a higher risk of unfavorable outcome (OR, 2.04, 95% CI: 1.31–3.18, p = 0.002) and mortality (OR, 2.86, 95% CI: 1.62–5.01, p = 0.001). Higher admission levels of NE were associated with higher risk of unfavorable outcome (OR, 1.59, 95% CI: 1.07–2.35, p = 0.022) but not mortality (OR, 1.45, 95% CI: 0.98–2.17, p = 0.07). There was no relationship between the changes in Epi levels over time and mortality or unfavorable outcome. Changes in NE levels with time were statistically associated with a higher risk of mortality, but the changes had no relation to unfavorable outcome. Conclusions Elevated circulating catecholamines, especially Epi levels on hospital admission, are independently associated with functional outcome and mortality after isolated moderate-to-severe TBI

Establishing Healthcare Worker Performance and Safety in Providing Critical Care for Patients in a Simulated Ebola Treatment Unit: Non-Randomized Pilot Study

Improving the provision of supportive care for patients with Ebola is an important quality improvement initiative. We designed a simulated Ebola Treatment Unit (ETU) to assess performance and safety of healthcare workers (HCWs) performing tasks wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) in hot (35 °C, 60% relative humidity) or thermo-neutral (20 °C, 20% relative humidity) conditions. In this pilot phase to determine the feasibility of study procedures, HCWs in PPE were non-randomly allocated to hot or thermo-neutral conditions to perform peripheral intravenous (PIV) and midline catheter (MLC) insertion and endotracheal intubation (ETI) on mannequins. Eighteen HCWs (13 physicians, 4 nurses, 1 nurse practitioner; 2 with prior ETU experience; 10 in hot conditions) spent 69 (10) (mean (SD)) minutes in the simulated ETU. Mean (SD) task completion times were 16 (6) min for PIV insertion; 33 (5) min for MLC insertion; and 16 (8) min for ETI. Satisfactory task completion was numerically higher for physicians vs. nurses. Participants’ blood pressure was similar, but heart rate was higher (p = 0.0005) post-simulation vs. baseline. Participants had a median (range) of 2.0 (0.0–10.0) minor PPE breaches, 2.0 (0.0–6.0) near-miss incidents, and 2.0 (0.0–6.0) health symptoms and concerns. There were eight health-assessment triggers in five participants, of whom four were in hot conditions. We terminated the simulation of two participants in hot conditions due to thermal discomfort. In summary, study tasks were suitable for physician participants, but they require redesign to match nurses’ expertise for the subsequent randomized phase of the study. One-quarter of participants had a health-assessment trigger. This research model may be useful in future training and research regarding clinical care for patients with highly infectious pathogens in austere settings.Medicine, Faculty ofNon UBCInfectious Diseases, Division ofMedicine, Department ofPediatrics, Department ofReviewedFacultyResearcherOthe

Global Survey of Outcomes of Neurocritical Care Patients: Analysis of the PRINCE Study Part 2

BACKGROUND: Neurocritical care is devoted to the care of critically ill patients with acute neurological or neurosurgical emergencies. There is limited information regarding epidemiological data, disease characteristics, variability of clinical care, and in-hospital mortality of neurocritically ill patients worldwide. We addressed these issues in the Point PRevalence In Neurocritical CarE (PRINCE) study, a prospective, cross-sectional, observational study. METHODS: We recruited patients from various intensive care units (ICUs) admitted on a pre-specified date, and the investigators recorded specific clinical care activities they performed on the subjects during their first 7 days of admission or discharge (whichever came first) from their ICUs and at hospital discharge. In this manuscript, we analyzed the final data set of the study that included patient admission characteristics, disease type and severity, ICU resources, ICU and hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. We present descriptive statistics to summarize data from the case report form. We tested differences between geographically grouped data using parametric and nonparametric testing as appropriate. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to evaluate factors associated with in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 1545 patients admitted to 147 participating sites from 31 countries of which most were from North America (69%, N = 1063). Globally, there was variability in patient characteristics, admission diagnosis, ICU treatment team and resource allocation, and in-hospital mortality. Seventy-three percent of the participating centers were academic, and the most common admitting diagnosis was subarachnoid hemorrhage (13%). The majority of patients were male (59%), a half of whom had at least two comorbidities, and median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 13. Factors associated with in-hospital mortality included age (OR 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.04); lower GCS (OR 1.20; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.16 for every point reduction in GCS); pupillary reactivity (OR 1.8; 95% CI, 1.09 to 3.23 for bilateral unreactive pupils); admission source (emergency room versus direct admission [OR 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.75]; admission from a general ward versus direct admission [OR 5.85; 95% CI, 2.75 to 12.45; and admission from another ICU versus direct admission [OR 3.34; 95% CI, 1.27 to 8.8]); and the absence of a dedicated neurocritical care unit (NCCU) (OR 1.7; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.47). CONCLUSION: PRINCE is the first study to evaluate care patterns of neurocritical patients worldwide. The data suggest that there is a wide variability in clinical care resources and patient characteristics. Neurological severity of illness and the absence of a dedicated NCCU are independent predictors of in-patient mortality.status: publishe

Association between loop diuretic dose changes and outcomes in chronic heart failure: observations from the ESC-EORP Heart Failure Long-Term Registry

Aims: Guidelines recommend down-titration of loop diuretics (LD) once euvolaemia is achieved. In outpatients with heart failure (HF), we investigated LD dose changes in daily cardiology practice, agreement with guideline recommendations, predictors of successful LD down-titration and association between dose changes and outcomes. Methods and results: We included 8130 HF patients from the ESC-EORP Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. Among patients who had dose decreased, successful decrease was defined as the decrease not followed by death, HF hospitalization, New York Heart Association class deterioration, or subsequent increase in LD dose. Mean age was 66 ± 13 years, 71% men, 62% HF with reduced ejection fraction, 19% HF with mid-range ejection fraction, 19% HF with preserved ejection fraction. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] LD dose was 40 (25–80) mg. LD dose was increased in 16%, decreased in 8.3% and unchanged in 76%. Median (IQR) follow-up was 372 (363–419) days. Diuretic dose increase (vs. no change) was associated with HF death [hazard ratio (HR) 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12–2.08; P = 0.008] and nominally with cardiovascular death (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.96–1.63; P = 0.103). Decrease of diuretic dose (vs. no change) was associated with nominally lower HF (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.33–1.07; P = 0.083) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.62,. 95% CI 0.38–1.00; P = 0.052). Among patients who had LD dose decreased, systolic blood pressure [odds ratio (OR) 1.11 per 10 mmHg increase, 95% CI 1.01–1.22; P = 0.032], and absence of (i) sleep apnoea (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09–0.69; P = 0.008), (ii) peripheral congestion (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29–0.80; P = 0.005), and (iii) moderate/severe mitral regurgitation (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37–0.87; P = 0.008) were independently associated with successful decrease. Conclusion: Diuretic dose was unchanged in 76% and decreased in 8.3% of outpatients with chronic HF. LD dose increase was associated with worse outcomes, while the LD dose decrease group showed a trend for better outcomes compared with the no-change group. Higher systolic blood pressure, and absence of (i) sleep apnoea, (ii) peripheral congestion, and (iii) moderate/severe mitral regurgitation were independently associated with successful dose decrease. © 2020 European Society of Cardiolog

Are hospitalized or ambulatory patients with heart failure treated in accordance with European Society of Cardiology guidelines? Evidence from 12 440 patients of the ESC Heart Failure Long-Term Registry.

AIMS: To evaluate how recommendations of European guidelines regarding pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for heart failure (HF) are adopted in clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ESC-HF Long-Term Registry is a prospective, observational study conducted in 211 Cardiology Centres of 21 European and Mediterranean countries, members of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). From May 2011 to April 2013, a total of 12 440 patients were enrolled, 40.5% with acute HF and 59.5% with chronic HF. Intravenous treatments for acute HF were heterogeneously administered, irrespective of guideline recommendations. In chronic HF, with reduced EF, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid antagonists (MRAs) were used in 92.2, 92.7, and 67.0% of patients, respectively. When reasons for non-adherence were considered, the real rate of undertreatment accounted for 3.2, 2.3, and 5.4% of the cases, respectively. About 30% of patients received the target dosage of these drugs, but a documented reason for not achieving the target dosage was reported in almost two-thirds of them. The more relevant reasons for non-implantation of a device, when clinically indicated, were related to doctor uncertainties on the indication, patient refusal, or logistical/cost issues. CONCLUSION: This pan-European registry shows that, while in patients with acute HF, a large heterogeneity of treatments exists, drug treatment of chronic HF can be considered largely adherent to recommendations of current guidelines, when the reasons for non-adherence are taken into account. Observations regarding the real possibility to adhere fully to current guidelines in daily clinical practice should be seriously considered when clinical practice guidelines have to be written

Performance of Prognostic Risk Scores in Chronic Heart Failure Patients Enrolled in the European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Long-Term Registry

Objectives: This study compared the performance of major heart failure (HF) risk models in predicting mortality and examined their utilization using data from a contemporary multinational registry. Background: Several prognostic risk scores have been developed for ambulatory HF patients, but their precision is still inadequate and their use limited. Methods: This registry enrolled patients with HF seen in participating European centers between May 2011 and April 2013. The following scores designed to estimate 1- to 2-year all-cause mortality were calculated in each participant: CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality), GISSI-HF (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico-Heart Failure), MAGGIC (Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure), and SHFM (Seattle Heart Failure Model). Patients with hospitalized HF (n = 6,920) and ambulatory HF patients missing any variable needed to estimate each score (n = 3,267) were excluded, leaving a final sample of 6,161 patients. Results: At 1-year follow-up, 5,653 of 6,161 patients (91.8%) were alive. The observed-to-predicted survival ratios (CHARM: 1.10, GISSI-HF: 1.08, MAGGIC: 1.03, and SHFM: 0.98) suggested some overestimation of mortality by all scores except the SHFM. Overprediction occurred steadily across levels of risk using both the CHARM and the GISSI-HF, whereas the SHFM underpredicted mortality in all risk groups except the highest. The MAGGIC showed the best overall accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.743), similar to the GISSI-HF (AUC = 0.739; p = 0.419) but better than the CHARM (AUC = 0.729; p = 0.068) and particularly better than the SHFM (AUC = 0.714; p = 0.018). Less than 1% of patients received a prognostic estimate from their enrolling physician. Conclusions: Performance of prognostic risk scores is still limited and physicians are reluctant to use them in daily practice. The need for contemporary, more precise prognostic tools should be considered

Acute heart failure congestion and perfusion status – impact of the clinical classification on in-hospital and long-term outcomes; insights from the ESC-EORP-HFA Heart Failure Long-Term Registry

none614siAims: Classification of acute heart failure (AHF) patients into four clinical profiles defined by evidence of congestion and perfusion is advocated by the 2016 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)guidelines. Based on the ESC-EORP-HFA Heart Failure Long-Term Registry, we compared differences in baseline characteristics, in-hospital management and outcomes among congestion/perfusion profiles using this classification. Methods and results: We included 7865 AHF patients classified at admission as: ‘dry-warm’ (9.9%), ‘wet-warm’ (69.9%), ‘wet-cold’ (19.8%) and ‘dry-cold’ (0.4%). These groups differed significantly in terms of baseline characteristics, in-hospital management and outcomes. In-hospital mortality was 2.0% in ‘dry-warm’, 3.8% in ‘wet-warm’, 9.1% in ‘dry-cold’ and 12.1% in ‘wet-cold’ patients. Based on clinical classification at admission, the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for 1-year mortality were: ‘wet-warm’ vs. ‘dry-warm’ 1.78 (1.43–2.21) and ‘wet-cold’ vs. ‘wet-warm’ 1.33 (1.19–1.48). For profiles resulting from discharge classification, the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for 1-year mortality were: ‘wet-warm’ vs. ‘dry-warm’ 1.46 (1.31–1.63) and ‘wet-cold’ vs. ‘wet-warm’ 2.20 (1.89–2.56). Among patients discharged alive, 30.9% had residual congestion, and these patients had higher 1-year mortality compared to patients discharged without congestion (28.0 vs. 18.5%). Tricuspid regurgitation, diabetes, anaemia and high New York Heart Association class were independently associated with higher risk of congestion at discharge, while beta-blockers at admission, de novo heart failure, or any cardiovascular procedure during hospitalization were associated with lower risk of residual congestion. Conclusion: Classification based on congestion/perfusion status provides clinically relevant information at hospital admission and discharge. A better understanding of the clinical course of the two entities could play an important role towards the implementation of targeted strategies that may improve outcomes.noneChioncel O.; Mebazaa A.; Maggioni A.P.; Harjola V.-P.; Rosano G.; Laroche C.; Piepoli M.F.; Crespo-Leiro M.G.; Lainscak M.; Ponikowski P.; Filippatos G.; Ruschitzka F.; Seferovic P.; Coats A.J.S.; Lund L.H.; Auer J.; Ablasser K.; Fruhwald F.; Dolze T.; Brandner K.; Gstrein S.; Poelzl G.; Moertl D.; Reiter S.; Podczeck-Schweighofer A.; Muslibegovic A.; Vasilj M.; Fazlibegovic E.; Cesko M.; Zelenika D.; Palic B.; Pravdic D.; Cuk D.; Vitlianova K.; Katova T.; Velikov T.; Kurteva T.; Gatzov P.; Kamenova D.; Antova M.; Sirakova V.; Krejci J.; Mikolaskova M.; Spinar J.; Krupicka J.; Malek F.; Hegarova M.; Lazarova M.; Monhart Z.; Hassanein M.; Sobhy M.; El Messiry F.; El Shazly A.H.; Elrakshy Y.; Youssef A.; Moneim A.A.; Noamany M.; Reda A.; Dayem T.K.A.; Farag N.; Halawa S.I.; Hamid M.A.; Said K.; Saleh A.; Ebeid H.; Hanna R.; Aziz R.; Louis O.; Enen M.A.; Ibrahim B.S.; Nasr G.; Elbahry A.; Sobhy H.; Ashmawy M.; Gouda M.; Aboleineen W.; Bernard Y.; Luporsi P.; Meneveau N.; Pillot M.; Morel M.; Seronde M.-F.; Schiele F.; Briand F.; Delahaye F.; Damy T.; Eicher J.-C.; de Groote P.; Fertin M.; Lamblin N.; Isnard R.; Lefol C.; Thevenin S.; Hagege A.; Jondeau G.; Logeart D.; Le Marcis V.; Ly J.-F.; Coisne D.; Lequeux B.; Le Moal V.; Mascle S.; Lotton P.; Behar N.; Donal E.; Thebault C.; Ridard C.; Reynaud A.; Basquin A.; Bauer F.; Codjia R.; Galinier M.; Tourikis P.; Stavroula M.; Tousoulis D.; Stefanadis C.; Chrysohoou C.; Kotrogiannis I.; Matzaraki V.; Dimitroula T.; Karavidas A.; Tsitsinakis G.; Kapelios C.; Nanas J.; Kampouri H.; Nana E.; Kaldara E.; Eugenidou A.; Vardas P.; Saloustros I.; Patrianakos A.; Tsaknakis T.; Evangelou S.; Nikoloulis N.; Tziourganou H.; Tsaroucha A.; Papadopoulou A.; Douras A.; Polgar L.; Merkely B.; Kosztin A.; Nyolczas N.; Nagy A.C.; Halmosi R.; Elber J.; Alony I.; Shotan A.; Fuhrmann A.V.; Amir O.; Romano S.; Marcon S.; Penco M.; Di Mauro M.; Lemme E.; Carubelli V.; Rovetta R.; Metra M.; Bulgari M.; Quinzani F.; Lombardi C.; Bosi S.; Schiavina G.; Squeri A.; Barbieri A.; Di Tano G.; Pirelli S.; Ferrari R.; Fucili A.; Passero T.; Musio S.; Di Biase M.; Correale M.; Salvemini G.; Brognoli S.; Zanelli E.; Giordano A.; Agostoni P.; Italiano G.; Salvioni E.; Copelli S.; Modena M.G.; Reggianini L.; Valenti C.; Olaru A.; Bandino S.; Deidda M.; Mercuro G.; Dessalvi C.C.; Marino P.N.; Di Ruocco M.V.; Sartori C.; Piccinino C.; Parrinello G.; Licata G.; Torres D.; Giambanco S.; Busalacchi S.; Arrotti S.; Novo S.; Inciardi R.M.; Pieri P.; Chirco P.R.; Galifi M.A.; Teresi G.; Buccheri D.; Minacapelli A.; Veniani M.; Frisinghelli A.; Priori S.G.; Cattaneo S.; Opasich C.; Gualco A.; Pagliaro M.; Mancone M.; Fedele F.; Cinque A.; Vellini M.; Scarfo I.; Romeo F.; Ferraiuolo F.; Sergi D.; Anselmi M.; Melandri F.; Leci E.; Iori E.; Bovolo V.; Pidello S.; Frea S.; Bergerone S.; Botta M.; Canavosio F.G.; Gaita F.; Merlo M.; Cinquetti M.; Sinagra G.; Ramani F.; Fabris E.; Stolfo D.; Artico J.; Miani D.; Fresco C.; Daneluzzi C.; Proclemer A.; Cicoira M.; Zanolla L.; Marchese G.; Torelli F.; Vassanelli C.; Voronina N.; Erglis A.; Tamakauskas V.; Smalinskas V.; Karaliute R.; Petraskiene I.; Kazakauskaite E.; Rumbinaite E.; Kavoliuniene A.; Vysniauskas V.; Brazyte-Ramanauskiene R.; Petraskiene D.; Stankala S.; Switala P.; Juszczyk Z.; Sinkiewicz W.; Gilewski W.; Pietrzak J.; Orzel T.; Kasztelowicz P.; Kardaszewicz P.; Lazorko-Piega M.; Gabryel J.; Mosakowska K.; Bellwon J.; Rynkiewicz A.; Raczak G.; Lewicka E.; Dabrowska-Kugacka A.; Bartkowiak R.; Sosnowska-Pasiarska B.; Wozakowska-Kaplon B.; Krzeminski A.; Zabojszcz M.; Mirek-Bryniarska E.; Grzegorzko A.; Bury K.; Nessler J.; Zalewski J.; Furman A.; Broncel M.; Poliwczak A.; Bala A.; Zycinski P.; Rudzinska M.; Jankowski L.; Kasprzak J.D.; Michalak L.; Soska K.W.; Drozdz J.; Huziuk I.; Retwinski A.; Flis P.; Weglarz J.; Bodys A.; Grajek S.; Kaluzna-Oleksy M.; Straburzynska-Migaj E.; Dankowski R.; Szymanowska K.; Grabia J.; Szyszka A.; Nowicka A.; Samcik M.; Wolniewicz L.; Baczynska K.; Komorowska K.; Poprawa I.; Komorowska E.; Sajnaga D.; Zolbach A.; Dudzik-Plocica A.; Abdulkarim A.-F.; Lauko-Rachocka A.; Kaminski L.; Kostka A.; Cichy A.; Ruszkowski P.; Splawski M.; Fitas G.; Szymczyk A.; Serwicka A.; Fiega A.; Zysko D.; Krysiak W.; Szabowski S.; Skorek E.; Pruszczyk P.; Bienias P.; Ciurzynski M.; Welnicki M.; Mamcarz A.; Folga A.; Zielinski T.; Rywik T.; Leszek P.; Sobieszczanska-Malek M.; Piotrowska M.; Kozar-Kaminska K.; Komuda K.; Wisniewska J.; Tarnowska A.; Balsam P.; Marchel M.; Opolski G.; Kaplon-Cieslicka A.; Gil R.J.; Mozenska O.; Byczkowska K.; Gil K.; Pawlak A.; Michalek A.; Krzesinski P.; Piotrowicz K.; Uzieblo-Zyczkowska B.; Stanczyk A.; Skrobowski A.; Ponikowski P.; Jankowska E.; Rozentryt P.; Polonski L.; Gadula-Gacek E.; Nowalany-Kozielska E.; Kuczaj A.; Kalarus Z.; Szulik M.; Przybylska K.; Klys J.; Prokop-Lewicka G.; Kleinrok A.; Aguiar C.T.; Ventosa A.; Pereira S.; Faria R.; Chin J.; De Jesus I.; Santos R.; Silva P.; Moreno N.; Queiros C.; Lourenco C.; Pereira A.; Castro A.; Andrade A.; Guimaraes T.O.; Martins S.; Placido R.; Lima G.; Brito D.; Francisco A.R.; Cardiga R.; Proenca M.; Araujo I.; Marques F.; Fonseca C.; Moura B.; Leite S.; Campelo M.; Silva-Cardoso J.; Rodrigues J.; Rangel I.; Martins E.; Correia A.S.; Peres M.; Marta L.; da Silva G.F.; Severino D.; Durao D.; Leao S.; Magalhaes P.; Moreira I.; Cordeiro A.F.; Ferreira C.; Araujo C.; Ferreira A.; Baptista A.; Radoi M.; Bicescu G.; Vinereanu D.; Sinescu C.-J.; Macarie C.; Popescu R.; Daha I.; Dan G.-A.; Stanescu C.; Dan A.; Craiu E.; Nechita E.; Aursulesei V.; Christodorescu R.; Otasevic P.; Seferovic P.M.; Simeunovic D.; Ristic A.D.; Celic V.; Pavlovic-Kleut M.; Lazic J.S.; Stojcevski B.; Pencic B.; Stevanovic A.; Andric A.; Iric-Cupic V.; Jovic M.; Davidovic G.; Milanov S.; Mitic V.; Atanaskovic V.; Antic S.; Pavlovic M.; Stanojevic D.; Stoickov V.; Ilic S.; Ilic M.D.; Petrovic D.; Stojsic S.; Kecojevic S.; Dodic S.; Adic N.C.; Cankovic M.; Stojiljkovic J.; Mihajlovic B.; Radin A.; Radovanovic S.; Krotin M.; Klabnik A.; Goncalvesova E.; Pernicky M.; Murin J.; Kovar F.; Kmec J.; Semjanova H.; Strasek M.; Iskra M.S.; Ravnikar T.; Suligoj N.C.; Komel J.; Fras Z.; Jug B.; Glavic T.; Losic R.; Bombek M.; Krajnc I.; Krunic B.; Horvat S.; Kovac D.; Rajtman D.; Cencic V.; Letonja M.; Winkler R.; Valentincic M.; Melihen-Bartolic C.; Bartolic A.; Vrckovnik M.P.; Kladnik M.; Pusnik C.S.; Marolt A.; Klen J.; Drnovsek B.; Leskovar B.; Anguita M.J.F.; Page J.C.G.; Martinez F.M.S.; Andres J.; Bayes-Genis A.; Mirabet S.; Mendez A.; Garcia-Cosio L.; Roig E.; Leon V.; Gonzalez-Costello J.; Muntane G.; Garay A.; Alcade-Martinez V.; Fernandez S.L.; Rivera-Lopez R.; Puga-Martinez M.; Fernandez-Alvarez M.; Serrano-Martinez J.L.; Crespo-Leiro M.; Grille-Cancela Z.; Marzoa-Rivas R.; Blanco-Canosa P.; Paniagua-Martin M.J.; Barge-Caballero E.; Cerdena I.L.; Baldomero I.F.H.; Padron A.L.; Rosillo S.O.; Gonzalez-Gallarza R.D.; Montanes O.S.; Manjavacas A.M.I.; Conde A.C.; Araujo A.; Soria T.; Garcia-Pavia P.; Gomez-Bueno M.; Cobo-Marcos M.; Alonso-Pulpon L.; Cubero J.S.; Sayago I.; Gonzalez-Segovia A.; Briceno A.; Subias P.E.; Hernandez M.V.; Cano M.J.R.; Sanchez M.A.G.; Jimenez J.F.D.; Garrido-Lestache E.B.; Pinilla J.M.G.; de la Villa B.G.; Sahuquillo A.; Marques R.B.; Calvo F.T.; Perez-Martinez M.T.; Gracia-Rodenas M.R.; Garrido-Bravo I.P.; Pastor-Perez F.; Pascual-Figal D.A.; Molina B.D.; Orus J.; Gonzalo F.E.; Bertomeu V.; Valero R.; Martinez-Abellan R.; Quiles J.; Rodrigez-Ortega J.A.; Mateo I.; ElAmrani A.; Fernandez-Vivancos C.; Valero D.B.; Almenar-Bonet L.; Sanchez-Lazaro I.J.; Marques-Sule E.; Facila-Rubio L.; Perez-Silvestre J.; Garcia-Gonzalez P.; Ridocci-Soriano F.; Garcia-Escriva D.; Pellicer-Cabo A.; de la Fuente Galan L.; Diaz J.L.; Platero A.R.; Arias J.C.; Blasco-Peiro T.; Julve M.S.; Sanchez-Insa E.; Aured-Guallar C.; Portoles-Ocampo A.; Melin M.; Hagglund E.; Stenberg A.; Lindahl I.-M.; Asserlund B.; Olsson L.; Dahlstrom U.; Afzelius M.; Karlstrom P.; Tengvall L.; Wiklund P.-A.; Olsson B.; Kalayci S.; Temizhan A.; Cavusoglu Y.; Gencer E.; Yilmaz M.B.; Gunes H.Chioncel, O.; Mebazaa, A.; Maggioni, A. P.; Harjola, V. -P.; Rosano, G.; Laroche, C.; Piepoli, M. F.; Crespo-Leiro, M. G.; Lainscak, M.; Ponikowski, P.; Filippatos, G.; Ruschitzka, F.; Seferovic, P.; Coats, A. J. S.; Lund, L. H.; Auer, J.; Ablasser, K.; Fruhwald, F.; Dolze, T.; Brandner, K.; Gstrein, S.; Poelzl, G.; Moertl, D.; Reiter, S.; Podczeck-Schweighofer, A.; Muslibegovic, A.; Vasilj, M.; Fazlibegovic, E.; Cesko, M.; Zelenika, D.; Palic, B.; Pravdic, D.; Cuk, D.; Vitlianova, K.; Katova, T.; Velikov, T.; Kurteva, T.; Gatzov, P.; Kamenova, D.; Antova, M.; Sirakova, V.; Krejci, J.; Mikolaskova, M.; Spinar, J.; Krupicka, J.; Malek, F.; Hegarova, M.; Lazarova, M.; Monhart, Z.; Hassanein, M.; Sobhy, M.; El Messiry, F.; El Shazly, A. H.; Elrakshy, Y.; Youssef, A.; Moneim, A. A.; Noamany, M.; Reda, A.; Dayem, T. K. A.; Farag, N.; Halawa, S. I.; Hamid, M. A.; Said, K.; Saleh, A.; Ebeid, H.; Hanna, R.; Aziz, R.; Louis, O.; Enen, M. A.; Ibrahim, B. S.; Nasr, G.; Elbahry, A.; Sobhy, H.; Ashmawy, M.; Gouda, M.; Aboleineen, W.; Bernard, Y.; Luporsi, P.; Meneveau, N.; Pillot, M.; Morel, M.; Seronde, M. -F.; Schiele, F.; Briand, F.; Delahaye, F.; Damy, T.; Eicher, J. -C.; de Groote, P.; Fertin, M.; Lamblin, N.; Isnard, R.; Lefol, C.; Thevenin, S.; Hagege, A.; Jondeau, G.; Logeart, D.; Le Marcis, V.; Ly, J. -F.; Coisne, D.; Lequeux, B.; Le Moal, V.; Mascle, S.; Lotton, P.; Behar, N.; Donal, E.; Thebault, C.; Ridard, C.; Reynaud, A.; Basquin, A.; Bauer, F.; Codjia, R.; Galinier, M.; Tourikis, P.; Stavroula, M.; Tousoulis, D.; Stefanadis, C.; Chrysohoou, C.; Kotrogiannis, I.; Matzaraki, V.; Dimitroula, T.; Karavidas, A.; Tsitsinakis, G.; Kapelios, C.; Nanas, J.; Kampouri, H.; Nana, E.; Kaldara, E.; Eugenidou, A.; Vardas, P.; Saloustros, I.; Patrianakos, A.; Tsaknakis, T.; Evangelou, S.; Nikoloulis, N.; Tziourganou, H.; Tsaroucha, A.; Papadopoulou, A.; Douras, A.; Polgar, L.; Merkely, B.; Kosztin, A.; Nyolczas, N.; Nagy, A. C.; Halmosi, R.; Elber, J.; Alony, I.; Shotan, A.; Fuhrmann, A. V.; Amir, O.; Romano, S.; Marcon, S.; Penco, M.; Di Mauro, M.; Lemme, E.; Carubelli, V.; Rovetta, R.; Metra, M.; Bulgari, M.; Quinzani, F.; Lombardi, C.; Bosi, S.; Schiavina, G.; Squeri, A.; Barbieri, A.; Di Tano, G.; Pirelli, S.; Ferrari, R.; Fucili, A.; Passero, T.; Musio, S.; Di Biase, M.; Correale, M.; Salvemini, G.; Brognoli, S.; Zanelli, E.; Giordano, A.; Agostoni, P.; Italiano, G.; Salvioni, E.; Copelli, S.; Modena, M. G.; Reggianini, L.; Valenti, C.; Olaru, A.; Bandino, S.; Deidda, M.; Mercuro, G.; Dessalvi, C. C.; Marino, P. N.; Di Ruocco, M. V.; Sartori, C.; Piccinino, C.; Parrinello, G.; Licata, G.; Torres, D.; Giambanco, S.; Busalacchi, S.; Arrotti, S.; Novo, S.; Inciardi, R. M.; Pieri, P.; Chirco, P. R.; Galifi, M. A.; Teresi, G.; Buccheri, D.; Minacapelli, A.; Veniani, M.; Frisinghelli, A.; Priori, S. G.; Cattaneo, S.; Opasich, C.; Gualco, A.; Pagliaro, M.; Mancone, M.; Fedele, F.; Cinque, A.; Vellini, M.; Scarfo, I.; Romeo, F.; Ferraiuolo, F.; Sergi, D.; Anselmi, M.; Melandri, F.; Leci, E.; Iori, E.; Bovolo, V.; Pidello, S.; Frea, S.; Bergerone, S.; Botta, M.; Canavosio, F. G.; Gaita, F.; Merlo, M.; Cinquetti, M.; Sinagra, G.; Ramani, F.; Fabris, E.; Stolfo, D.; Artico, J.; Miani, D.; Fresco, C.; Daneluzzi, C.; Proclemer, A.; Cicoira, M.; Zanolla, L.; Marchese, G.; Torelli, F.; Vassanelli, C.; Voronina, N.; Erglis, A.; Tamakauskas, V.; Smalinskas, V.; Karaliute, R.; Petraskiene, I.; Kazakauskaite, E.; Rumbinaite, E.; Kavoliuniene, A.; Vysniauskas, V.; Brazyte-Ramanauskiene, R.; Petraskiene, D.; Stankala, S.; Switala, P.; Juszczyk, Z.; Sinkiewicz, W.; Gilewski, W.; Pietrzak, J.; Orzel, T.; Kasztelowicz, P.; Kardaszewicz, P.; Lazorko-Piega, M.; Gabryel, J.; Mosakowska, K.; Bellwon, J.; Rynkiewicz, A.; Raczak, G.; Lewicka, E.; Dabrowska-Kugacka, A.; Bartkowiak, R.; Sosnowska-Pasiarska, B.; Wozakowska-Kaplon, B.; Krzeminski, A.; Zabojszcz, M.; Mirek-Bryniarska, E.; Grzegorzko, A.; Bury, K.; Nessler, J.; Zalewski, J.; Furman, A.; Broncel, M.; Poliwczak, A.; Bala, A.; Zycinski, P.; Rudzinska, M.; Jankowski, L.; Kasprzak, J. D.; Michalak, L.; Soska, K. W.; Drozdz, J.; Huziuk, I.; Retwinski, A.; Flis, P.; Weglarz, J.; Bodys, A.; Grajek, S.; Kaluzna-Oleksy, M.; Straburzynska-Migaj, E.; Dankowski, R.; Szymanowska, K.; Grabia, J.; Szyszka, A.; Nowicka, A.; Samcik, M.; Wolniewicz, L.; Baczynska, K.; Komorowska, K.; Poprawa, I.; Komorowska, E.; Sajnaga, D.; Zolbach, A.; Dudzik-Plocica, A.; Abdulkarim, A. -F.; Lauko-Rachocka, A.; Kaminski, L.; Kostka, A.; Cichy, A.; Ruszkowski, P.; Splawski, M.; Fitas, G.; Szymczyk, A.; Serwicka, A.; Fiega, A.; Zysko, D.; Krysiak, W.; Szabowski, S.; Skorek, E.; Pruszczyk, P.; Bienias, P.; Ciurzynski, M.; Welnicki, M.; Mamcarz, A.; Folga, A.; Zielinski, T.; Rywik, T.; Leszek, P.; Sobieszczanska-Malek, M.; Piotrowska, M.; Kozar-Kaminska, K.; Komuda, K.; Wisniewska, J.; Tarnowska, A.; Balsam, P.; Marchel, M.; Opolski, G.; Kaplon-Cieslicka, A.; Gil, R. J.; Mozenska, O.; Byczkowska, K.; Gil, K.; Pawlak, A.; Michalek, A.; Krzesinski, P.; Piotrowicz, K.; Uzieblo-Zyczkowska, B.; Stanczyk, A.; Skrobowski, A.; Ponikowski, P.; Jankowska, E.; Rozentryt, P.; Polonski, L.; Gadula-Gacek, E.; Nowalany-Kozielska, E.; Kuczaj, A.; Kalarus, Z.; Szulik, M.; Przybylska, K.; Klys, J.; Prokop-Lewicka, G.; Kleinrok, A.; Aguiar, C. T.; Ventosa, A.; Pereira, S.; Faria, R.; Chin, J.; De Jesus, I.; Santos, R.; Silva, P.; Moreno, N.; Queiros, C.; Lourenco, C.; Pereira, A.; Castro, A.; Andrade, A.; Guimaraes, T. O.; Martins, S.; Placido, R.; Lima, G.; Brito, D.; Francisco, A. R.; Cardiga, R.; Proenca, M.; Araujo, I.; Marques, F.; Fonseca, C.; Moura, B.; Leite, S.; Campelo, M.; Silva-Cardoso, J.; Rodrigues, J.; Rangel, I.; Martins, E.; Correia, A. S.; Peres, M.; Marta, L.; da Silva, G. F.; Severino, D.; Durao, D.; Leao, S.; Magalhaes, P.; Moreira, I.; Cordeiro, A. F.; Ferreira, C.; Araujo, C.; Ferreira, A.; Baptista, A.; Radoi, M.; Bicescu, G.; Vinereanu, D.; Sinescu, C. -J.; Macarie, C.; Popescu, R.; Daha, I.; Dan, G. -A.; Stanescu, C.; Dan, A.; Craiu, E.; Nechita, E.; Aursulesei, V.; Christodorescu, R.; Otasevic, P.; Seferovic, P. M.; Simeunovic, D.; Ristic, A. D.; Celic, V.; Pavlovic-Kleut, M.; Lazic, J. S.; Stojcevski, B.; Pencic, B.; Stevanovic, A.; Andric, A.; Iric-Cupic, V.; Jovic, M.; Davidovic, G.; Milanov, S.; Mitic, V.; Atanaskovic, V.; Antic, S.; Pavlovic, M.; Stanojevic, D.; Stoickov, V.; Ilic, S.; Ilic, M. D.; Petrovic, D.; Stojsic, S.; Kecojevic, S.; Dodic, S.; Adic, N. C.; Cankovic, M.; Stojiljkovic, J.; Mihajlovic, B.; Radin, A.; Radovanovic, S.; Krotin, M.; Klabnik, A.; Goncalvesova, E.; Pernicky, M.; Murin, J.; Kovar, F.; Kmec, J.; Semjanova, H.; Strasek, M.; Iskra, M. S.; Ravnikar, T.; Suligoj, N. C.; Komel, J.; Fras, Z.; Jug, B.; Glavic, T.; Losic, R.; Bombek, M.; Krajnc, I.; Krunic, B.; Horvat, S.; Kovac, D.; Rajtman, D.; Cencic, V.; Letonja, M.; Winkler, R.; Valentincic, M.; Melihen-Bartolic, C.; Bartolic, A.; Vrckovnik, M. P.; Kladnik, M.; Pusnik, C. S.; Marolt, A.; Klen, J.; Drnovsek, B.; Leskovar, B.; Anguita, M. J. F.; Page, J. C. G.; Martinez, F. M. S.; Andres, J.; Bayes-Genis, A.; Mirabet, S.; Mendez, A.; Garcia-Cosio, L.; Roig, E.; Leon, V.; Gonzalez-Costello, J.; Muntane, G.; Garay, A.; Alcade-Martinez, V.; Fernandez, S. L.; Rivera-Lopez, R.; Puga-Martinez, M.; Fernandez-Alvarez, M.; Serrano-Martinez, J. L.; Crespo-Leiro, M.; Grille-Cancela, Z.; Marzoa-Rivas, R.; Blanco-Canosa, P.; Paniagua-Martin, M. J.; Barge-Caballero, E.; Cerdena, I. L.; Baldomero, I. F. H.; Padron, A. L.; Rosillo, S. O.; Gonzalez-Gallarza, R. D.; Montanes, O. S.; Manjavacas, A. M. I.; Conde, A. C.; Araujo, A.; Soria, T.; Garcia-Pavia, P.; Gomez-Bueno, M.; Cobo-Marcos, M.; Alonso-Pulpon, L.; Cubero, J. S.; Sayago, I.; Gonzalez-Segovia, A.; Briceno, A.; Subias, P. E.; Hernandez, M. V.; Cano, M. J. R.; Sanchez, M. A. G.; Jimenez, J. F. D.; Garrido-Lestache, E. B.; Pinilla, J. M. G.; de la Villa, B. G.; Sahuquillo, A.; Marques, R. B.; Calvo, F. T.; Perez-Martinez, M. T.; Gracia-Rodenas, M. R.; Garrido-Bravo, I. P.; Pastor-Perez, F.; Pascual-Figal, D. A.; Molina, B. D.; Orus, J.; Gonzalo, F. E.; Bertomeu, V.; Valero, R.; Martinez-Abellan, R.; Quiles, J.; Rodrigez-Ortega, J. A.; Mateo, I.; Elamrani, A.; Fernandez-Vivancos, C.; Valero, D. B.; Almenar-Bonet, L.; Sanchez-Lazaro, I. J.; Marques-Sule, E.; Facila-Rubio, L.; Perez-Silvestre, J.; Garcia-Gonzalez, P.; Ridocci-Soriano, F.; Garcia-Escriva, D.; Pellicer-Cabo, A.; de la Fuente Galan, L.; Diaz, J. L.; Platero, A. R.; Arias, J. C.; Blasco-Peiro, T.; Julve, M. S.; Sanchez-Insa, E.; Aured-Guallar, C.; Portoles-Ocampo, A.; Melin, M.; Hagglund, E.; Stenberg, A.; Lindahl, I. -M.; Asserlund, B.; Olsson, L.; Dahlstrom, U.; Afzelius, M.; Karlstrom, P.; Tengvall, L.; Wiklund, P. -A.; Olsson, B.; Kalayci, S.; Temizhan, A.; Cavusoglu, Y.; Gencer, E.; Yilmaz, M. B.; Gunes, H

Acute heart failure congestion and perfusion status – impact of the clinical classification on in-hospital and long-term outcomes; insights from the ESC-EORP-HFA Heart Failure Long-Term Registry

Aims: Classification of acute heart failure (AHF) patients into four clinical profiles defined by evidence of congestion and perfusion is advocated by the 2016 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)guidelines. Based on the ESC-EORP-HFA Heart Failure Long-Term Registry, we compared differences in baseline characteristics, in-hospital management and outcomes among congestion/perfusion profiles using this classification. Methods and results: We included 7865 AHF patients classified at admission as: ‘dry-warm’ (9.9%), ‘wet-warm’ (69.9%), ‘wet-cold’ (19.8%) and ‘dry-cold’ (0.4%). These groups differed significantly in terms of baseline characteristics, in-hospital management and outcomes. In-hospital mortality was 2.0% in ‘dry-warm’, 3.8% in ‘wet-warm’, 9.1% in ‘dry-cold’ and 12.1% in ‘wet-cold’ patients. Based on clinical classification at admission, the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for 1-year mortality were: ‘wet-warm’ vs. ‘dry-warm’ 1.78 (1.43–2.21) and ‘wet-cold’ vs. ‘wet-warm’ 1.33 (1.19–1.48). For profiles resulting from discharge classification, the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for 1-year mortality were: ‘wet-warm’ vs. ‘dry-warm’ 1.46 (1.31–1.63) and ‘wet-cold’ vs. ‘wet-warm’ 2.20 (1.89–2.56). Among patients discharged alive, 30.9% had residual congestion, and these patients had higher 1-year mortality compared to patients discharged without congestion (28.0 vs. 18.5%). Tricuspid regurgitation, diabetes, anaemia and high New York Heart Association class were independently associated with higher risk of congestion at discharge, while beta-blockers at admission, de novo heart failure, or any cardiovascular procedure during hospitalization were associated with lower risk of residual congestion. Conclusion: Classification based on congestion/perfusion status provides clinically relevant information at hospital admission and discharge. A better understanding of the clinical course of the two entities could play an important role towards the implementation of targeted strategies that may improve outcomes. © 2019 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure © 2019 European Society of Cardiolog

Sacubitril/valsartan eligibility and outcomes in the ESC-EORP-HFA Heart Failure Long-Term Registry: bridging between European Medicines Agency/Food and Drug Administration label, the PARADIGM-HF trial, ESC guidelines, and real world

Aims: To assess the proportion of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who are eligible for sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) based on the European Medicines Agency/Food and Drug Administration (EMA/FDA) label, the PARADIGM-HF trial and the 2016 ESC guidelines, and the association between eligibility and outcomes. Methods and results: Outpatients with HFrEF in the ESC-EORP-HFA Long-Term Heart Failure (HF-LT) Registry between March 2011 and November 2013 were considered. Criteria for LCZ696 based on EMA/FDA label, PARADIGM-HF and ESC guidelines were applied. Of 5443 patients, 2197 and 2373 had complete information for trial and guideline eligibility assessment, and 84%, 12% and 12% met EMA/FDA label, PARADIGM-HF and guideline criteria, respectively. Absent PARADIGM-HF criteria were low natriuretic peptides (21%), hyperkalemia (4%), hypotension (7%) and sub-optimal pharmacotherapy (74%); absent Guidelines criteria were LVEF>35% (23%), insufficient NP levels (30%). and sub-optimal pharmacotherapy (82%); absent label criteria were absence of symptoms (New York Heart Association class I). When a daily requirement of ACEi/ARB ≥ 10 mg enalapril (instead of ≥ 20 mg) was used, eligibility rose from 12% to 28% based on both PARADIGM-HF and guidelines. One-year heart failure hospitalization was higher (12% and 17% vs. 12%) and all-cause mortality lower (5.3% and 6.5% vs. 7.7%) in registry eligible patients compared to the enalapril arm of PARADIGM-HF. Conclusions: Among outpatients with HFrEF in the ESC-EORP-HFA HF-LT Registry, 84% met label criteria, while only 12% and 28% met PARADIGM-HF and guideline criteria for LCZ696 if requiring ≥ 20 mg and ≥ 10 mg enalapril, respectively. Registry patients eligible for LCZ696 had greater heart failure hospitalization but lower mortality rates than the PARADIGM-HF enalapril group