248 research outputs found

    Genetic relationships and evolution in Cucurbita pepo (pumpkin, squash, gourd) as revealed by simple sequence repeat polymorphisms

    Get PDF
    Genetic relationships among 104 accessions of Cucurbita pepo were assessed from polymorphisms in 134 SSR (microsatellite) and four SCAR loci, yielding a total of 418 alleles, distributed among all 20 linkage groups. Genetic distance values were calculated, a dendrogram constructed, and principal coordinate analyses conducted. The results showed 100 of the accessions as distributed among three clusters representing each of the recognized subspecies, pepo, texana, and fraterna. The remaining four accessions, all having very small, round, striped fruits, assumed central positions between the two cultivated subspecies, pepo and texana, suggesting that they are relicts of undescribed wild ancestors of the two domesticated subspecies. In both, subsp. texana and subsp. pepo, accessions belonging to the same cultivar-group (fruit shape) associated with one another. Within subsp. pepo, accessions grown for their seeds or that are generalists, used for both seed and fruit consumption, assumed central positions. Specialized accessions, grown exclusively for consumption of their young fruits, or their mature fruit flesh, or seed oil extraction, tended to assume outlying positions, and the different specializations radiated outward from the center in different directions. Accessions of the longest-fruited cultivar-group, Cocozelle, radiated bidirectionally, indicating independent selection events for long fruits in subsp. pepo probably driven by a common desire to consume the young fruits. Among the accessions tested, there was no evidence for crossing between subspecies after domestication

    Inheritance analysis and identification of SNP markers associated with ZYMV resistance in Cucurbita pepo

    Full text link
    [EN] Cucurbit crops are economically important worldwide. One of the most serious threats to cucurbit production is Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV). Several resistant accessions were identified in Cucurbita moschata and their resistance was introgressed into Cucurbita pepo. However, the mode of inheritance of ZYMV resistance in C. pepo presents a great challenge to attempts at introgressing resistance into elite germplasm. The main goal of this work was to analyze the inheritance of ZYMV resistance and to identify markers associated with genes conferring resistance. An Illumina GoldenGate assay allowed us to assess polymorphism among nine squash genotypes and to discover six polymorphic single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between two near-isogenic lines, "True French" (susceptible to ZYMV) and Accession 381e (resistant to ZYMV). Two F-2 and three BC1 populations obtained from crossing the ZYMV-resistant Accession 381e with two susceptible ones, the zucchini True French and the cocozelle "San Pasquale," were assayed for ZYMV resistance. Molecular analysis revealed an approximately 90% association between SNP1 and resistance, which was confirmed using High Resolution Melt (HRM) and a CAPS marker. Co-segregation up to 72% in populations segregating for resistance was observed for two other SNP markers that could be potentially linked to genes involved in resistance expression. A functional prediction of proteins involved in the resistance response was performed on genome scaffolds containing the three SNPs of interest. Indeed, 16 full-length pathogen recognition genes (PRGs) were identified around the three SNP markers. In particular, we discovered that two nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) protein-encoding genes were located near the SNP1 marker. The investigation of ZYMV resistance in squash populations and the genomic analysis performed in this work could be useful for better directing the introgression of disease resistance into elite C. pepo germplasm.This work was supported by the Ministry of University and Research (GenHORT project).Capuozzo, C.; Formisano, G.; Iovieno, P.; Andolfo, G.; Tomassoli, L.; Barbella, M.; Picó Sirvent, MB.... (2017). Inheritance analysis and identification of SNP markers associated with ZYMV resistance in Cucurbita pepo. Molecular Breeding. 37(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-017-0698-5S378Addinsoft (2007) XLSTAT, Analyse de données et statistique avec MS Excel. Addinsoft, NYAndolfo G, Ercolano MR (2015) Plant innate immunity multicomponent model. Front Plant Sci 6:987Andolfo G, Sanseverino W, Rombauts S et al (2013) Overview of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) candidate pathogen recognition genes reveals important Solanum R locus dynamics. New Phytol 197:223–237Andolfo G, Ferriello F, Tardella L et al (2014) Tomato genome-wide transcriptional responses to fusarium wilt, and tomato mosaic virus. PLoS One 9:e94963Blanca J, Cañizares J, Roig C, Ziarsolo P, Nuez F, Picó B (2011) Transcriptome characterization and high throughput SSRs and SNPs discovery in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). BMC Genomics 12:104Brown RN, Bolanos-Herrera A, Myers JR, Jahn MM (2003) Inheritance of resistance to four cucurbit viruses in Cucurbita moschata. Euphytica 129:253–258Burge CB, Karlin S (1998) Finding the genes in genomic DNA. Curr Opin Struct Biol 8:346–354Cipollini D (2008) Constitutive expression of methyl jasmonate-inducible responses delays reproduction and constrains fitness responses to nutrients in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evol Ecol 24:59–68Cohen R, Hanan A, Paris HS (2003) Single-gene resistance to powdery mildew in zucchini squash (Cucurbita pepo). Euphytica 130:433–441Collum TD, Padmanabhan MS, Hsieh YC, Culver JN (2016) Tobacco mosaic virus-directed reprogramming of auxin/indole acetic acid protein transcriptional responses enhances virus phloem loading. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E2740–E2749Desbiez C, Lecoq H (1997) Zucchini yellow mosaic virus. Plant Pathol 46:809–829Ercolano MR, Sanseverino W, Carli P, Ferriello F, Frusciante L (2012) Genetic and genomic approaches for R-gene mediated disease resistance in tomato: retrospects and prospects. Plant Cell Rep 31:973–985Esteras C, Gómez P, Monforte AJ, Blanca J, Vicente-Dólera N, Roig C, Nuez F, Picó B (2012) High-throughput SNP genotyping in Cucurbita pepo for map construction and quantitative trait loci mapping. BMC Genomics 13:80Formisano G, Paris HS, Frusciante L, Ercolano MR (2010) Commercial Cucurbita pepo squash hybrids carrying disease resistance introgressed from Cucurbita moschata have high genetic similarity. Plant Genet Resour 8:198–203Fulton TM, Chunwongse J, Tanksley SD (1995) Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Mol Biol Report 13:207–209Gal-On A (2007) Zucchini yellow mosaic virus: insect transmission and pathogenicity—the tails of two proteins. Mol Plant Pathol 8:139–150Gilbert-Albertini F, Lecoq H, Pitrat M, Nicolet JL (1993) Resistance of Cucurbita moschata to watermelon mosaic virus type 2 and its genetic relation to resistance to zucchini yellow mosaic virus. Euphytica 69:231–237Gómez P, Rodríguez-Hernández AM, Moury B, Aranda MA (2009) Genetic resistance for the sustainable control of plant virus diseases: breeding, mechanisms and durability. Eur J Plant Pathol 125:1–22Gong L, Stift G, Kofler R, Pachner M, Lelley T (2008a) Microsatellites for the genus Cucurbita and an SSR-based genetic linkage map of Cucurbita pepo L. Theor Appl Genet 117:37–48Gong L, Pachner M, Kalai K, Lelley T (2008b) SSR-based genetic linkage map of Cucurbita moschata and its synteny with Cucurbita pepo. Genome 51:878–887Iovieno P, Andolfo G, Schiavulli A, Catalano D, Ricciardi L, Frusciante L et al. (2015) Structure, evolution and functional inference on the MildewLocusO (MLO) gene family in three cultivated Cucurbitaceae. BMC Genomics 16:1112. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2325-3Ishibashi K, Kezuka Y, Kobayashi C, Kato M, Inoue T, Nonaka T et al (2014) Structural basis for the recognition–evasion arms race between Tomato mosaic virus and the resistance gene Tm-1. PNAS 111:E3486–E3495Lecoq H, Pitrat M, Clément M (1981) Identification et caractérisation d’un potyvirus provoquant la maladie du rabougrissement jaune du melon. Agronomie 1:827–834Lefebvre V, Palloix A (1996) Both epistatic and additive effects of QTLs are involved in polygenic induced resistance to disease: a case study, the interaction pepper—Phytophthora capsici Leonian. Theor Appl Genet 93:503–511Levi A, Thomas CE, Newman M, Zhan X, Xu Y, Wehner TC (2003) Massive preferential segregation and nonrandom assortment of linkage-groups produce quasi-linkage in an F2 mapping population of watermelon. Hortscience 38:782Lisa V, Lecoq H (1984) Zucchini yellow mosaic virus. Descriptions of Plant Viruses, Commonwealth Mycological Institute and Association of Applied Biologists 282Lisa V, Boccardo G, D'Agostino G, Dellavalle G, d’Aquilio M (1981) Characterization of a potyvirus that causes zucchini yellow mosaic. Phytopathology 71:667–672MacQueen A, Bergelson J (2016) Modulation of R-gene expression across environments. J Exp Bot 67:2093–2105Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220Munger HM, Provvidenti R (1987) Inheritance of resistance to zucchini yellow mosaic virus in Cucurbita moschata. Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep 10:8–81Nameth ST, Dodds JA, Paulus AO, Laemmlen FF (1986) Cucurbit viruses of California: an ever-changing problem. Plant Dis 70:8–12Ott J, Wang J, Leal SM (2015) Genetic linkage analysis in the age of whole-genome sequencing. Nat Rev Genet 16(5):275–284Pachner M, Lelley T (2004) Different genes for resistance to zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) in Cucurbita moschata. In: Lebeda A, Paris HS (eds) Progress in cucurbit genetics and breeding research: Proceedings of Cucurbitaceae 2004. Palacky University, Olomouc (Czech Republic), pp 237–243Pachner M, Paris HS, Lelley T (2011) Genes for resistance to zucchini yellow mosaic in tropical pumpkin. J Hered 102:330–335Pachner M, Paris HS, Winkler J, Lelley T (2015) Phenotypic and marker-assisted pyramiding of genes for resistance to zucchini yellow mosaic virus in oilseed pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo). Plant Breed 134:121–128Paris HS (1986) A proposed subspecific classification for Cucurbita pepo. Phytologia 61:133–138Paris HS (2001) Characterization of the Cucurbita pepo collection at the Newe Ya‘ar Research Center, Israel. Plant Genet Resour Newsl 126:41–45Paris HS (2008) Summer squash. In: Prohens J, Nuez F (eds) Handbook of plant breeding, Vegetables I: 351–379Paris HS, Cohen S (2000) Oligogenic inheritance for resistance to zucchini yellow mosaic virus in Cucurbita pepo. Ann Appl Biol 136:209–214Paris HS, Cohen S, Burger Y, Joseph R (1988) Single-gene resistance to zucchini yellow mosaic virus in Cucurbita moschata. Euphytica 37:27–29Peakall PE, Smouse R (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539Sakamoto T, Deguchi M, Brustolini OJ, Santos AA, Silva FF, Fontes EP (2012) The tomato RLK superfamily: phylogeny and functional predictions about the role of the LRRII-RLK subfamily in antiviral defense. BMC Plant Biol 12:229Sanseverino W, Ercolano MR (2012) In silico approach to predict candidate R proteins and to define their domain architecture. BMC Res Notes 5:678Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739Teare MD, Santibanez Koref MF (2014) Linkage analysis and the study of Mendelian disease in the era of whole exome and genome sequencing. Brief Funct Genomics 13(5):378–383Valkonen JPT, Wiegmann K, Hämäläinen JH, Marczewski W, Watanabe KN (2008) Evidence for utility of the same PCR-based markers for selection of extreme resistance to Potato virus Y controlled by Rysto of Solanum stoloniferum derived from different sources. Ann Appl Biol 152:121–130Wessel-Beaver L (2005) Cultivar and germplasm release. Release of ‘Soler’ tropical pumpkin. J Agric Univ P R 89:263–266Whitaker TW, Davis GN (1962) Cucurbits: botany, cultivation and utilization. Interscience, New York, pp 105–116Whitaker TW, Robinson RW (1986) Squash breeding. In: Bassett MJ (ed) Breeding vegetable crops. Avi, Westport, pp 209–242Xu Y, Crouch JH (2008) Marker-assisted selection in plant breeding: from publications to practice. Crop Sci 48:391–407Xu R, Zhang S, Huang J, Zheng C (2013) Genome-wide comparative in silico analysis of the RNA helicase gene family in Zea mays and Glycine max: a comparison with Arabidopsis and Oryza sativa. PLoS One 8:e78982Ye G, Smith KF (2008) Marker-assisted gene pyramiding for inbred line development: basic principles and practical guidelines. Int J Plant Breed 2:1–10Zdobnov EM, Apweiler R (2001) InterProScan—an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics 17:847–848Zraidi A, Stift G, Pachner M, Shojaeiyan A, Gong L, Lelley T (2007) A consensus map for Cucurbita pepo. Mol Breed 20:375–38

    A comprehensive RNA-Seq-based gene expression atlas of the summer squash (Cucurbita pepo) provides insights into fruit morphology and ripening mechanisms

    Get PDF
    Background: Summer squash (Cucurbita pepo: Cucurbitaceae) are a popular horticultural crop for which there is insufficient genomic and transcriptomic information. Gene expression atlases are crucial for the identification of genes expressed in different tissues at various plant developmental stages. Here, we present the first comprehensive gene expression atlas for a summer squash cultivar, including transcripts obtained from seeds, shoots, leaf stem, young and developed leaves, male and female flowers, fruits of seven developmental stages, as well as primary and lateral roots. Results: In total, 27,868 genes and 2352 novel transcripts were annotated from these 16 tissues, with over 18,000 genes common to all tissue groups. Of these, 3812 were identified as housekeeping genes, half of which assigned to known gene ontologies. Flowers, seeds, and young fruits had the largest number of specific genes, whilst intermediate-age fruits the fewest. There also were genes that were differentially expressed in the various tissues, the male flower being the tissue with the most differentially expressed genes in pair-wise comparisons with the remaining tissues, and the leaf stem the least. The largest expression change during fruit development was early on, from female flower to fruit two days after pollination. A weighted correlation network analysis performed on the global gene expression dataset assigned 25,413 genes to 24 coexpression groups, and some of these groups exhibited strong tissue specificity. Conclusions: These findings enrich our understanding about the transcriptomic events associated with summer squash development and ripening. This comprehensive gene expression atlas is expected not only to provide a global view of gene expression patterns in all major tissues in C. pepo but to also serve as a valuable resource for functional genomics and gene discovery in Cucurbitaceae

    Transcriptome characterization and high throughput SSRs and SNPs discovery in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae)

    Get PDF
    Background: Cucurbita pepo belongs to the Cucurbitaceae family. The "Zucchini" types rank among the highest-valued vegetables worldwide, and other C. pepo and related Cucurbita spp., are food staples and rich sources of fat and vitamins. A broad range of genomic tools are today available for other cucurbits that have become models for the study of different metabolic processes. However, these tools are still lacking in the Cucurbita genus, thus limiting gene discovery and the process of breeding.Results: We report the generation of a total of 512,751 C. pepo EST sequences, using 454 GS FLX Titanium technology. ESTs were obtained from normalized cDNA libraries (root, leaves, and flower tissue) prepared using two varieties with contrasting phenotypes for plant, flowering and fruit traits, representing the two C. pepo subspecies: subsp. pepo cv. Zucchini and subsp. ovifera cv Scallop. De novo assembling was performed to generate a collection of 49,610 Cucurbita unigenes (average length of 626 bp) that represent the first transcriptome of the species. Over 60% of the unigenes were functionally annotated and assigned to one or more Gene Ontology terms. The distributions of Cucurbita unigenes followed similar tendencies than that reported for Arabidopsis or melon, suggesting that the dataset may represent the whole Cucurbita transcriptome. About 34% unigenes were detected to have known orthologs of Arabidopsis or melon, including genes potentially involved in disease resistance, flowering and fruit quality. Furthermore, a set of 1,882 unigenes with SSR motifs and 9,043 high confidence SNPs between Zucchini and Scallop were identified, of which 3,538 SNPs met criteria for use with high throughput genotyping platforms, and 144 could be detected as CAPS. A set of markers were validated, being 80% of them polymorphic in a set of variable C. pepo and C. moschata accessions.Conclusion: We present the first broad survey of gene sequences and allelic variation in C. pepo, where limited prior genomic information existed. The transcriptome provides an invaluable new tool for biological research. The developed molecular markers are the basis for future genetic linkage and quantitative trait loci analysis, and will be essential to speed up the process of breeding new and better adapted squash varieties. © 2011 Blanca et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.Blanca Postigo, JM.; Cañizares Sales, J.; Roig Montaner, MC.; Ziarsolo Areitioaurtena, P.; Nuez Viñals, F.; Picó Sirvent, MB. (2011). Transcriptome characterization and high throughput SSRs and SNPs discovery in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). BMC Genomics. 12:104-117. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-104S1041171

    Whole-genome resequencing of Cucurbita pepo morphotypes to discover genomic variants associated with morphology and horticulturally valuable traits

    Get PDF
    [EN] Cucurbita pepo contains two cultivated subspecies, each of which encompasses four fruit-shape morphotypes (cultivar groups). The Pumpkin, Vegetable Marrow, Cocozelle, and Zucchini Groups are of subsp. pepo and the Acorn, Crookneck, Scallop, and Straightneck Groups are of subsp. ovifera. Recently, a de novo assembly of the C. pepo subsp. pepo Zucchini genome was published, providing insights into its evolution. To expand our knowledge of evolutionary processes within C. pepo and to identify variants associated with particular morphotypes, we performed whole-genome resequencing of seven of these eight C. pepo morphotypes. We report for the first time whole-genome resequencing of the four subsp. pepo (Pumpkin, Vegetable Marrow, Cocozelle, green Zucchini, and yellow Zucchini) morphotypes and three of the subsp. ovifera (Acorn, Crookneck, and Scallop) morphotypes. A high-depth resequencing approach was followed, using the BGISEQ-500 platform that enables the identification of rare variants, with an average of 33.5X. Approximately 94.5% of the clean reads were mapped against the reference Zucchini genome. In total, 3,823,977 high confidence single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified. Within each accession, SNPs varied from 636,918 in green Zucchini to 2,656,513 in Crookneck, and were distributed homogeneously along the chromosomes. Clear differences between subspecies pepo and ovifera in genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium are highlighted. In fact, comparison between subspecies pepo and ovifera indicated 5710 genes (22.5%) with Fst > 0.80 and 1059 genes (4.1%) with Fst = 1.00 as potential candidate genes that were fixed during the independent evolution and domestication of the two subspecies. Linkage disequilibrium was greater in subsp. ovifera than in subsp. pepo, perhaps reflective of the earlier differentiation of morphotypes within subsp. ovifera. Some morphotype-specific genes have been localized. Our results offer new clues that may provide an improved understanding of the underlying genomic regions involved in the independent evolution and domestication of the two subspecies. Comparisons among SNPs unique to particular subspecies or morphotypes may provide candidate genes responsible for traits of high economic importance.This work has been supported by Hellenic Agricultural Organization (ELGO) Demeter. Furthermore, we thank the Conselleria de Educacio, Investigacio, Cultura i Esport (Generalitat Valenciana) for funding Project Prometeo 2017/078 "Seleccion de Variedades Tradicionales y Desarrollo de Nuevas Variedades de Cucurbitaceas Adaptadas a la Produccion Ecologica". Also, this work was supported by Chiang Mai University.Xanthopoulou, A.; Montero-Pau, J.; Mellidou, I.; Kissoudis, C.; Blanca Postigo, JM.; Picó Sirvent, MB.; Tsaballa, A.... (2019). Whole-genome resequencing of Cucurbita pepo morphotypes to discover genomic variants associated with morphology and horticulturally valuable traits. Horticulture Research. 6:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-019-0176-9S1176Maynard, D. & Paris, H. in The Encyclopedia of Fruits & Nuts (eds Paull, R. E. & Janick, J.) 276–313 (CABI, New Jersey, U.S.A., 2018).Paris, H. S. in Genetics and Genomics of Cucurbitaceae, Grumet, Rebecca, Katzir, Nurit, Garcia-Mas, Jordi (Eds.) 111–154 (Springer, New York, U.S.A., 2016).Whitaker, T. W. & Davis, G. N. Cucurbits (Leonard Hill (Books) Ltd., London, and Interscience Publishers Inc., New York, 1962).Paris, H. S. History of the cultivar-groups of Cucurbita pepo. Hortic. Rev. 25, 71–170 (2001).Paris, H. S. A proposed subspecific classifiaction for Cucurbita pepo. Phytologia (USA) 61, 133–138 (1986).Lira, R., Andres, T. C. & Nee, M. in Systematic and Ecogeographic Studies on Crop Genepools, Vol. 9, 1–115 (International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Roma, Italia, 1995).Castellanos-Morales, G. Historical biogeography and phylogeny of Cucurbita: insights from ancestral area reconstruction and niche evolution. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 128, 38–54 (2018).Paris, H. S., Lebeda, A., Křistkova, E., Andres, T. C. & Nee, M. H. Parallel evolution under domestication and phenotypic differentiation of the cultivated subspecies of Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). Econ. Bot. 66, 71–90 (2012).Dong, W., Wu, D., Li, G., Wu, D. & Wang, Z. Next-generation sequencing from bulked segregant analysis identifies a dwarfism gene in watermelon. Sci. Rep. 8, 2908 (2018).Galpaz, N. et al. Deciphering genetic factors that determine melon fruit‐quality traits using RNA‐Seq‐based high‐resolution QTL and eQTL mapping. Plant J. 94, 169–191 (2018).Gur, A. et al. Genome-wide linkage-disequilibrium mapping to the candidate gene level in melon (Cucumis melo). Sci. Rep. 7, 9770 (2017).Blanca, J. et al. Transcriptome characterization and high throughput SSRs and SNPs discovery in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). BMC Genom. 12, 104 (2011).Esteras, C. et al. High-throughput SNP genotyping in Cucurbita pepo for map construction and quantitative trait loci mapping. BMC Genom. 13, 80 (2012).Montero-Pau, J. et al. An SNP-based saturated genetic map and QTL analysis of fruit-related traits in Zucchini using genotyping-by-sequencing. BMC Genom. 18, 94 (2017).Vicente-Dólera, N. et al. First TILLING platform in Cucurbita pepo: a new mutant resource for gene function and crop improvement. PLoS ONE 9, e112743 (2014).Wyatt, L. E., Strickler, S. R., Mueller, L. A. & Mazourek, M. An acorn squash (Cucurbita pepo ssp. ovifera) fruit and seed transcriptome as a resource for the study of fruit traits in Cucurbita. Hortic. Res. 2, 14070 (2015).Xanthopoulou, A. et al. De novo comparative transcriptome analysis of genes involved in fruit morphology of pumpkin cultivars with extreme size difference and development of EST-SSR markers. Gene 622, 50–66 (2017).Montero‐Pau, J. et al. De novo assembly of the zucchini genome reveals a whole‐genome duplication associated with the origin of the Cucurbita genus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 1161–1171 (2018).Garcia-Mas, J. et al. Cloning and mapping of resistance gene homologues in melon. Plant Sci. 161, 165–172 (2001).Xanthopoulou, A. et al. Comparative analysis of genetic diversity in Greek Genebank collection of summer squash (‘Cucurbita pepo’) landraces using start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism and ISSR markers. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 9, 14 (2015).Huang, J. et al. A reference human genome dataset of the BGISEQ-500 sequencer. Gigascience 6, gix024 (2017).Natarajan, K. N. et al. Comparative analysis of sequencing technologies for single-cell transcriptomics. Genome Biol. 20, 70 (2019).Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).Tian, L. et al. Transcript and proteomic analysis of developing white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) roots. BMC Plant Biol. 9, 1 (2009).Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).Bradbury, P. J. et al. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23, 2633–2635 (2007).Chang, C. C. et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 4, 7 (2015).Team, R. C. (2015). http://www.r-project.org/ .Krzywinski, M. I. et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 19, 1639–1645 (2009).Kosman, E. & Leonard, K. J. Similarity coefficients for molecular markers in studies of genetic relationships between individuals for haploid, diploid, and polyploid species. Mol. Ecol. 14, 415–424 (2005).Huson, D. H. & Bryant, D. Estimating Phylogenetic Trees and Networks Using SplitsTree 4. www.splitstree.org (2005).Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strainw1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 6, 80–92 (2012).Wu, S. et al. A common genetic mechanism underlies morphological diversity in fruits and other plant organs. Nat. Commun. 9, 4734 (2018).Drevensek, S. et al. The Arabidopsis TRM1–TON1 interaction reveals a recruitment network common to plant cortical microtubule arrays and eukaryotic centrosomes. Plant Cell 24, 178–191 (2012).Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high‐quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).Nguyen, L.-T., Schmidt, H. A., von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B. Q. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268–274 (2014).Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K. F., von Haeseler, A. & Jermiin, L. S. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 14, 587 (2017).Hoang, D. T., Chernomor, O., von Haeseler, A., Minh, B. Q. & Vinh, L. S. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 518–522 (2017).Bailey, T. L. et al. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, W202–W208 (2009).Leida, C. et al. Variability of candidate genes, genetic structure and association with sugar accumulation and climacteric behavior in a broad germplasm collection of melon (Cucumis melo L.). BMC Genet. 16, 28 (2015).Esteras, C. et al. SNP genotyping in melons: genetic variation, population structure, and linkage disequilibrium. Theor. Appl. Genet. 126, 1285–1303 (2013).Maria José Gonzalo et al. Re-evaluation of the role of Indian germplasm as center of melon diversification based on genotyping-by-sequencing analysis. BMC Genom. 20, p. 448 (2019).Nimmakayala, P. et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms generated by genotyping by sequencing to characterize genome-wide diversity, linkage disequilibrium, and selective sweeps in cultivated watermelon. BMC Genom. 15, 767 (2014).Gonzalo, M. J. & Monforte, A. J. in Genetics and Genomics of Cucurbitaceae, Grumet, Rebecca, Katzir, Nurit, Garcia-Mas, Jordi (Eds.) 269–290 (Springer, New York, U.S.A., 2016).Pomares-Viciana, T. et al. First RNA-seq approach to study fruit set and parthenocarpy in zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L.). BMC Plant Biol. 19, 61 (2019).Lu, S. et al. The cauliflower Or gene encodes a DnaJ cysteine-rich domain-containing protein that mediates high levels of β-carotene accumulation. Plant Cell 18, 3594–3605 (2006).Jin, B., Kim, J., Jung, J., Kim, D. & Park, Y. Characterization of IQ domain gene homologs as common candidate genes for elongated fruit shape in cucurbits. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 36, 85–97 (2018).van der Knaap, E. et al. What lies beyond the eye: the molecular mechanisms regulating tomato fruit weight and shape. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 227 (2014).Xiao, H., Jiang, N., Schaffner, E., Stockinger, E. J. & Van Der Knaap, E. A retrotransposon-mediated gene duplication underlies morphological variation of tomato fruit. Science 319, 1527–1530 (2008).Dou, J. et al. Genetic mapping reveals a candidate gene (ClFS1) for fruit shape in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 131, 947–958 (2018).Pan, Y. et al. Round fruit shape in WI7239 cucumber is controlled by two interacting quantitative trait loci with one putatively encoding a tomato SUN homolog. Theor. Appl. Genet. 130, 573–586 (2017).Liu, J. et al. Banana Ovate family protein MaOFP1 and MADS-box protein MuMADS1 antagonistically regulated banana fruit ripening. PLoS ONE 10, e0123870 (2015).Liu, J. et al. Mu MADS 1 and Ma OFP 1 regulate fruit quality in a tomato ovate mutant. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 989–1001 (2018).Cong, B., Barrero, L. S. & Tanksley, S. D. Regulatory change in YABBY-like transcription factor led to evolution of extreme fruit size during tomato domestication. Nat. Genet. 40, 800 (2008).Huang, Z., Van Houten, J., Gonzalez, G., Xiao, H. & van der Knaap, E. Genome-wide identification, phylogeny and expression analysis of SUN, OFP and YABBY gene family in tomato. Mol. Genet. Genom. 288, 111–129 (2013).Bowman, J. L. The YABBY gene family and abaxial cell fate. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3, 17–22 (2000).Liu, J., Van Eck, J., Cong, B. & Tanksley, S. D. A new class of regulatory genes underlying the cause of pear-shaped tomato fruit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 13302–13306 (2002).Tsaballa, A., Pasentsis, K., Darzentas, N. & Tsaftaris, A. S. Multiple evidence for the role of an Ovate-like gene in determining fruit shape in pepper. BMC Plant Biol. 11, 46 (2011).Wang, S., Chang, Y., Guo, J. & Chen, J. G. Arabidopsis Ovate family protein 1 is a transcriptional repressor that suppresses cell elongation. Plant J. 50, 858–872 (2007).Lazzaro, M. D., Wu, S., Snouffer, A., Wang, Y. & Van Der Knaap, E. Plant organ shapes are regulated by protein interactions and associations with microtubules. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1766 (2018)

    Differential cross sections and spin density matrix elements for the reaction gamma p -> p omega

    Full text link
    High-statistics differential cross sections and spin density matrix elements for the reaction gamma p -> p omega have been measured using the CLAS at Jefferson Lab for center-of-mass (CM) energies from threshold up to 2.84 GeV. Results are reported in 112 10-MeV wide CM energy bins, each subdivided into cos(theta_CM) bins of width 0.1. These are the most precise and extensive omega photoproduction measurements to date. A number of prominent structures are clearly present in the data. Many of these have not previously been observed due to limited statistics in earlier measurements

    Quality assurance in pathology in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis—European recommendations

    Get PDF
    In Europe, colorectal cancer is the most common newly diagnosed cancer and the second most common cause of cancer deaths, accounting for approximately 436,000 incident cases and 212,000 deaths in 2008. The potential of high-quality screening to improve control of the disease has been recognized by the Council of the European Union who issued a recommendation on cancer screening in 2003. Multidisciplinary, evidence-based European Guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis have recently been developed by experts in a pan-European project coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The full guideline document consists of ten chapters and an extensive evidence base. The content of the chapter dealing with pathology in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis is presented here in order to promote international discussion and collaboration leading to improvements in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis by making the principles and standards recommended in the new EU Guidelines known to a wider scientific community
    corecore