320 research outputs found
Cambiando las ideas sobre el cambio biológico
Results of a study on the learning of Natural Selection are presented, focusing on the lines for the design of an instructional sequence used with secondary school students, taking into account the alternative ideas they use to interpret biological change. Some aspects of the conceptual change model are discussed, as well as the convenience of working other curricular topics with a similar methodology, from a perspective viewing educational problems related to complex cause
Calidad en las justificaciones, uso de conceptos y consistencia entre datos e inferencias en la toma de decisiones
Mapping Children's Discussions of Evidence in Science to Assess Collaboration and Argumentation
The research reported in this paper concerns the development of children's skills of interpreting and evaluating evidence in science. Previous studies have shown that school teaching often places limited emphasis on the development of these skills, which are necessary for children to engage in scientific debate and decision-making. The research, undertaken in the UK, involved four collaborative decision-making activities to stimulate group discussion, each was carried out with five groups of four children (10-11 years old). The research shows how the children evaluated evidence for possible choices and judged whether their evidence was sufficient to support a particular conclusion or the rejection of alternative conclusions. A mapping technique was developed to analyse the discussions and identify different "levels" of argumentation. The authors conclude that suitable collaborative activities that focus on the discussion of evidence can be developed to exercise children's ability to argue effectively in making decisions
Argumentation in school science : Breaking the tradition of authoritative exposition through a pedagogy that promotes discussion and reasoning
The value of argumentation in science education has become internationally recognised and has been the subject of many research studies in recent years. Successful introduction of argumentation activities in learning contexts involves extending teaching goals beyond the understanding of facts and concepts, to include an emphasis on cognitive and metacognitive processes, epistemic criteria and reasoning. The authors focus on the difficulties inherent in shifting a tradition of teaching from one dominated by authoritative exposition to one that is more dialogic, involving small-group discussion based on tasks that stimulate argumentation. The paper builds on previous research on enhancing the quality of argument in school science, to focus on how argumentation activities have been designed, with appropriate strategies, resources and modelling, for pedagogical purposes. The paper analyses design frameworks, their contexts and lesson plans, to evaluate their potential for enhancing reasoning through foregrounding the processes of argumentation. Examples of classroom dialogue where teachers adopt the frameworks/plans are analysed to show how argumentation processes are scaffolded. The analysis shows that several layers of interpretation are needed and these layers need to be aligned for successful implementation. The analysis serves to highlight the potential and limitations of the design frameworks
Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments
Over the last decade, researchers have developed sophisticated online learning environments to support students engaging in argumentation. This review first considers the range of functionalities incorporated within these online environments. The review then presents five categories of analytic frameworks focusing on (1) formal argumentation structure, (2) normative quality, (3) nature and function of contributions within the dialog, (4) epistemic nature of reasoning, and (5) patterns and trajectories of participant interaction. Example analytic frameworks from each category are presented in detail rich enough to illustrate their nature and structure. This rich detail is intended to facilitate researchers’ identification of possible frameworks to draw upon in developing or adopting analytic methods for their own work. Each framework is applied to a shared segment of student dialog to facilitate this illustration and comparison process. Synthetic discussions of each category consider the frameworks in light of the underlying theoretical perspectives on argumentation, pedagogical goals, and online environmental structures. Ultimately the review underscores the diversity of perspectives represented in this research, the importance of clearly specifying theoretical and environmental commitments throughout the process of developing or adopting an analytic framework, and the role of analytic frameworks in the future development of online learning environments for argumentation
Feature selection for chemical sensor arrays using mutual information
We address the problem of feature selection for classifying a diverse set of chemicals using an array of metal oxide sensors. Our aim is to evaluate a filter approach to feature selection with reference to previous work, which used a wrapper approach on the same data set, and established best features and upper bounds on classification performance. We selected feature sets that exhibit the maximal mutual information with the identity of the chemicals. The selected features closely match those found to perform well in the previous study using a wrapper approach to conduct an exhaustive search of all permitted feature combinations. By comparing the classification performance of support vector machines (using features selected by mutual information) with the performance observed in the previous study, we found that while our approach does not always give the maximum possible classification performance, it always selects features that achieve classification performance approaching the optimum obtained by exhaustive search. We performed further classification using the selected feature set with some common classifiers and found that, for the selected features, Bayesian Networks gave the best performance. Finally, we compared the observed classification performances with the performance of classifiers using randomly selected features. We found that the selected features consistently outperformed randomly selected features for all tested classifiers. The mutual information filter approach is therefore a computationally efficient method for selecting near optimal features for chemical sensor arrays
Chinese journals: a guide for epidemiologists.
Chinese journals in epidemiology, preventive medicine and public health contain much that is of potential international interest. However, few non-Chinese speakers are acquainted with this literature. This article therefore provides an overview of the contemporary scene in Chinese biomedical journal publication, Chinese bibliographic databases and Chinese journals in epidemiology, preventive medicine and public health. The challenge of switching to English as the medium of publication, the development of publishing bibliometric data from Chinese databases, the prospect of an Open Access publication model in China, the issue of language bias in literature reviews and the quality of Chinese journals are discussed. Epidemiologists are encouraged to search the Chinese bibliographic databases for Chinese journal articles.Published versio
Effect of natural and forced charge air humidity on the performance and emissions of a compression-ignition engine operating at high warm altitude
[EN] The effect of ambient humidity on the performance and pollutant emissions of internal combustion engines is not considered in the literature despite type-approval criteria are moving closer to real driving conditions. This work analyses experimentally the effects of charge air humidity at high warm altitudes, where the use of exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) is typically lowered and even avoided to recover engine performance at the expense of NOx emissions increase, on the response of a compression-ignition engine under a wide range of steady-state con-ditions in terms of engine-out emissions and specific fuel consumption. The impact of specific humidity varia-tions within the atmospheric range was analysed by coupling the engine to an altitude simulator with pressure, temperature, and humidity control capabilities. High altitudes and warm & high ambient temperatures were explored (2000 m at 30 degrees C and 2500 m at 45 degrees C) to cover ambient specific humidity up to 30 gwater/kgdry_air. In addition, the effects of increasing the specific humidity above the atmospheric levels were considered at 2500 m and 45 degrees C to emulate forced injection of water in the engine intake line corresponding to 60 gwater/kgdry_air. With this approach, understanding of the role of humidity is provided to highlight its importance as additional ambient property in emission control. In parallel, the assessment of the forced water content increase to control NOx emissions when EGR must be lowered was performed due to the altitude impact on the engine performance and turbocharger limits. The results showed a consistent and significant reduction in engine-out NOx emissions as the ambient humidity increased, reaching up to 300% with respect to the dry case, caused by the decrease in O2 availability due to the water content increase. The benefits of high humidity in NOx emission control at high altitudes when EGR is not feasible were complemented by an improved trade-off with particulate matter emission compared to the standard from EGR use. The results evidenced a reduction in opacity close to 250% for a given engine-out NOx emission when EGR was replaced by water content. By contrast, the slowdown of the combustion process as the fresh air humidity increased deteriorated the specific fuel consumption significantly as the engine load and speed increased. Nevertheless, these penalties ranged from 2 to 2.7% in the worst conditions and showed the same sensitivity for EGR and humidity increases.This research has been supported by Grant PID2020-114289RB-I00 funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion - Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033). The PhD candidate Roberto Tabet has been funded by Universitat Politecnica de Valencia through grant PAID -01-18.Serrano, J.; Martín, J.; Piqueras, P.; Tabet-Aleixandre, R.; Gómez-Gil, J. (2023). Effect of natural and forced charge air humidity on the performance and emissions of a compression-ignition engine operating at high warm altitude. Energy. 266:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.12640911126
Developing argumentation skills in mathematics through computer-supported collaborative learning: the role of transactivity
Collaboration scripts and heuristic worked examples are effective means to scaffold university freshmen’s mathematical argumentation skills. Yet, which collaborative learning processes are responsible for these effects has remained unclear. Learners presumably will gain the most out of collaboration if the collaborators refer to each other’s contributions in a dialectic way (dialectic transactivity). Learners also may refer to each other’s contributions in a dialogic way (dialogic transactivity). Alternatively, learners may not refer to each other’s contributions at all, but still construct knowledge (constructive activities). This article investigates the extent to which constructive activities, dialogic transactivity, and dialectic transactivity generated by either the learner or the learning partner can explain the positive effects of collaboration scripts and heuristic worked examples on the learners’ disposition to use argumentation skills. We conducted a 2 × 2 experiment with the factors collaboration script and heuristic worked examples with N = 101 math teacher students. Results showed that the learners’ engagement in self-generated dialectic transactivity (i.e., responding to the learning partner’s contribution in an argumentative way by critiquing and/or integrating their learning partner’s contributions) mediated the effects of both scaffolds on their disposition to use argumentation skills, whereas partner-generated dialectic transactivity or any other measured collaborative learning activity did not. To support the disposition to use argumentation skills in mathematics, learning environments should thus be designed in a way to help learners display dialectic transactivity. Future research should investigate how learners might better benefit from the dialectic transactivity generated by their learning partners
- …
