12 research outputs found
Female Obesity and Assisted Reproductive Technologies
Obesity has grown to epidemic proportions, and currently nearly half of the reproductive-age women are overweight or obese. Risks, success rates, and economic aspects of infertility treatments in obese women have been extensively investigated. Unfavorable ovarian stimulation characteristics like increased gonadotropin consumption, fewer selected follicles, and lower number of retrieved oocytes have been observed in obese women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (ART). There seems to be a strong association between increased body mass index and lower pregnancy and live-birth rates and increased miscarriage rate. Coexisting factors like age and polycystic ovary syndrome status have also been blamed for these adverse effects. The mechanisms underlying those adverse outcomes, whether ovarian or endometrial, still remain to be fully elucidated. Moreover, maternal, perinatal, and neonatal complications have also been reported to be higher in obese pregnant women. Hence in some countries strict restrictions exist for access to elective fertility treatment in obese women. However, it is controversial if these policies are socially and ethically acceptable. Furthermore, because weight reduction is not an easy task, it may lead to the decreased probability of conception due to the advancing reproductive age for many obese women. Thus weight reduction should be encouraged and patients counseled accordingly, but whether restriction for fertility treatment is implemented in obese women remains a matter of debate. There remains much to be known regarding the association between obesity and ART
Endometrial miR-200c is Altered During Transformation into Cancerous States and Targets the Expression of ZEBs
Specialist physicians’ referral behavior regarding preimplantation genetic testing for single-gene disorders: Is there room to grow?
Objective: To assess whether primary care specialists’ demographics, specialty, and knowledge of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) influence their practice patterns. Design: Cross-sectional survey study. Setting: Academic medical center. Patient(s): Not applicable. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Objective PGT-M knowledge, subjective comfort with PGT-related topics, PGT care practices (discussions/referrals), and PGT-M implementation barriers. Result(s): Our survey had 145 respondents: 65 obstetrician/gynecologists, 36 internists, and 44 pediatricians. Overall, 88% believed that patients at a risk of passing on genetic disorders should be provided PGT-M information. However, few discussed PGT-M with their patients (24%) or referred them for testing (23%). Over half (63%) believed that the lack of physician knowledge was a barrier to PGT use. In terms of subjective comfort with PGT, only 1 in 5 physicians felt familiar enough with the topic to answer patient questions. There were higher odds of discussing (odds ratio, 3.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.75–5.87) or referring for PGT (odds ratio, 2.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.41–4.51) for each additional 0.5 correct answers to PGT knowledge-related questions. The odds of referring patients for PGT-M were the highest among obstetrician/gynecologists compared with those among the internists and pediatricians. Conclusion(s): Physician specialty and PGT knowledge were associated with PGT-M care delivery practices. Although most specialists believed in equipping at-risk patients with PGT-M information, <1 in 4 discussed or referred patients for PGT. The low levels of PGT-related care among providers may be owed to inadequate knowledge of and comfort with the topic. An opportunity to promote greater understanding of PGT-M among primary care specialists exists and can in turn improve the use of referrals to PGT-M services
Androstenedione Up-Regulation of Endometrial Aromatase Expression via Local Conversion to Estrogen: Potential Relevance to the Pathogenesis of Endometriosis
Context: Up-regulation of aromatase expression in endometrial cells disseminated into the peritoneal cavity may enhance their survival via local estrogen synthesis, which may lead to endometriosis. The factors that mediate induction of aromatase in the endometrium are not well defined, but increased expression of steroidogenic factor (SF)-1 may play a role