Reações alérgicas a medicamentos Allergic drug reactions

OBJETIVO: Rever as publicações recentes mais relevantes sobre alergia medicamentosa e oferecer ao clínico subsídios para uma maior compreensão dessa problemática de grande relevância para a saúde pública. FONTES DOS DADOS: Busca de artigos originais e revisões indexados nas bases MEDLINE, Pubmed e Lilacs, publicados na última década, relacionando o tema de alergia a medicamentos com mecanismos imunológicos, epidemiologia, diagnóstico laboratorial, lesões cutâneas, manejo clínico e reexposição ao fármaco. SÍNTESE DOS DADOS: As reações alérgicas representam um terço das reações adversas a medicamentos. São consideradas eventos raros, mas com elevada morbimortalidade. Apesar da descrição de Gell & Coombs, útil para classificar reações alérgicas a fármacos, algumas permanecem sem classificação devido ao desconhecimento dos mecanismos imunológicos envolvidos. A existência de subpopulações de células T com características diversas daquelas comumente descritas revela a complexidade do tema e, ao mesmo tempo, elucida inúmeras questões inerentes ao mesmo. Recentemente, um novo conceito de apresentação de fármaco a linfócitos T surgiu, diante de evidências crescentes do seu envolvimento nas lesões cutâneas decorrentes de reações alérgicas a medicamentos. Na prática clínica, é muito difícil a correlação de sinais e sintomas das reações alérgicas a medicamentos com o mecanismo imunológico envolvido sem o auxílio de testes laboratoriais. Testes cutâneos in vivo e testes in vitro têm sido empregados nas suspeitas de reações alérgicas a medicamentos. No entanto, há poucos produtos comerciais adequados para sua execução. CONCLUSÕES: As reações alérgicas a fármacos constituem uma fração importante dos eventos adversos a medicamentos. É importante enfatizar a necessidade de notificação dessas reações pelos profissionais envolvidos no tratamento do paciente de forma sistematizada, por meio de ações de farmacovigilância, bem como a identificação dos possíveis mecanismos imunológicos envolvidos através de testes laboratoriais, história e avaliação clínica detalhadas.<br>OBJECTIVE: This review addresses the most recent published literature regarding drug allergy, in order to provide physicians with a background for a better understanding of this problem of great relevance for public health. SOURCES OF DATA: The sources of data for obtaining the original and review articles published in the last 10 years were MEDLINE, Pubmed and Lilacs. The articles chosen for this review relate drug allergy to immunological mechanisms, epidemiology, clinical and laboratory evaluation, skin lesions, clinical management, and re-exposure to the drug. SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS: Allergic reactions represent one third of adverse drug reactions. They are considered rare but with high morbimortality. Gell & Coombs' definition has been useful for classifying some types of drug allergic reactions; however, some still remain without classification because of poor knowledge of the mechanisms involved. The existence of T cell subpopulations with diverse characteristics reveals the complexity of the subject and, at the same time, elucidates several questions raised about it. It was recently postulated a new concept of chemically inert drug presentation to T cells, restricted to the major histocompatibility complex, but in a non-covalent and labile way. In clinical practice, without adequate laboratory tests, it is difficult to correlate clinical symptoms and immunological mechanisms. In vitro and in vivo skin tests have been employed in cases of suspected drug allergy reaction. However, there are very few commercially available reagents. CONCLUSIONS: Drug allergy constitutes an important problem in adverse drug reactions because of its potential of morbidity and mortality. It is necessary to emphasize the relevance of pharmacovigilance during treatment of patients, as well as the identification of possible immunological mechanisms involved in the events, through laboratory tests and detailed history and clinical evaluation

Salivary anti-PGL IgM and IgA titers and serum antibody IgG titers and avidities in leprosy patients and their correlation with time of infection and antigen exposure

The present work proposed to correlate serum antibody avidity and salivary antibody titers as parameters for time of infection and antigen exposure in a co-hort study evaluating leprosy patients in different periods of treatment. Colorimetric enzyme-immunoassays for salivary antibodies, serum antibody IgG titers and avidities were performed in the samples. Anti-PGL-1 IgA and IgM salivary antibodies were significantly higher in multibacillar (MB-L) patients compared to normal controls (p<0.05), but not when compared to borderline tuberculoid (BT) or to paucibacillar (PB-L) patients (p>0.05). A good correlation was found between salivary anti-PGL-1 IgA and IgM levels in MB-L patients (r=0.41, p<0.01). Two out of 33 tested saliva samples from patients who had completed the drug regimen treatment presented positive salivary antibodies. Among non-treated patients, samples with low, medium or high serum IgG antibody avidity were found in similar frequencies. In patients under treatment, most of the serum samples showed low or medium IgG antibody avidity. The treated MB-L patients showed medium or high antibody avidity, except for two, who showed very low antibody avidity results. We suggest that salivary anti-PGL antibodies and serum IgG avidity could be useful for the indication of recent exposure or re-exposure to bacteria after chemotherapy

Coccidioidal pericarditis: a rapid presumptive diagnosis by an in-house antigen confirmed by mycological and molecular methods

Coccidioidal pericarditis is a condition found in approximately 1-5% of patients infected by Coccidioides species. It is associated with widely diverse clinical symptoms. This paper reports a case of coccidioidal pericarditis diagnosed by an in-house Coccidioides posadasii antigen and confirmed with mycological and molecular methods. From February to September 2005, the patient suffered from fever, weight loss, a non-productive cough, thoracic pain and tachycardia. He received a positive diagnosis of coccidioidal pericarditis only in October 2005. the macromorphological examination of the culture showed a whitish felt-like colony, which became brownish with age. Preparations in lactophenol cotton blue stain showed hyaline septate hyphae with fragmentation and thin arthroconidia-like structures. Pericardial fluid and sera samples were positive for Coccidioides antibodies by immunodiffusion and ELISA with a C. posadasii in-house antigen preparation. the C. posadasii identification was confirmed by nested PCR of the antigen 2/proline-rich antigen (Ag2/PRA) encoding gene.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Univ Fed Ceara, Specialized Med Mycol Ctr, Fortaleza, Ceara, BrazilUniv Fed Ceara, Postgrad Program Med Sci, Fortaleza, Ceara, BrazilUniv Fed Ceara, Postgrad Program Med Microbiol, Fortaleza, Ceara, BrazilUniv Estadual Ceara, Dept Biol Sci, Fortaleza, Ceara, BrazilUniv Estadual Ceara, Postgrad Program Vet Sci, Fortaleza, Ceara, BrazilUniv Fed Ceara, Dept Clin & Toxicol Anal, Fortaleza, Ceara, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Microbiol Immunol & Parasitol, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Microbiol Immunol & Parasitol, São Paulo, BrazilCNPq: 150984/2005-7CNPq: 620161/2006-0FAPESP: 4/14270-0Web of Scienc