Cover crops grown in monoculture and mixed cropping affect soils differently

Cover crops provide various benefits to agricultural soils. The legumes among cover crops may provide fixed nitrogen as nutrient. Other species show high uptake and storage capacity for nitrogen, thus preventing losses as water polluting nitrate or greenhouse effective nitrous oxide. The input of carbon by shoot and root biomass, as well as rhizodeposition and root decay after harvest or mulching increases soil quality e.g. in form of nutrient supply and organic matter buildup. Brassicaceae lack mutualism with mycorrhizal fungi and some species can reduce the number of phytopathogenic nematodes, thus affecting food web structures. However, many benefits provided by single plant species may be affected when these species grow under mixed cropping. In a pot experiment ten typical cover crop species were grown in monoculture: Phacelia tanacetifolia, Brassica rapa var. rapa, Raphanus sativus var. oleiformis, Sinapis alba, Trifolium incarnatum, Vicia villosa, Avena strigosa, Lolium multiforum, Sorghum bicolor x S. sudanense, and Fagopyrum esculentum. These were compared to six mixtures ranging in complexity from two to six species including the classics R. sativus/S. alba, R. sativus/A. strigosa, and the “Landsberger Gemenge”. Six plants per pot grew in two differently textured soils (silty loam, loamy sand) in a greenhouse for 60 days. Plant parameters measured, included shoot and root dry matter, their C and N content, root morphology, plant height as well as chlorophyll content. In the soil, the pH, C-to-N-ratio, inorganic nitrogen, microbial biomass, and abundance of microbial domains were measured. Already plant parameters indicated effects caused by mixed cropping. Height and chlorophyll content of P. tanacetifolia, S. alba, and S. bicolor were higher in monocultures than in mixtures indicating interspecific competition. Furthermore, below-ground biomass of two-species-mixtures containing R. sativus appeared to be higher than those of the corresponding monocultures. While monocultures increased soil pH differently, mixtures showed no significant difference between each other. This study aims to show that the impact on soil by different cover crop species are not necessarily realised the same way under mixed cropping

Nitrogen fixation of selected forage legumes for smallholder farmers in Uganda

Poster for the 18th Nitrogen workshop held in Lisbon, June 30 - July 3, 201

Application methods of tracers for N₂O source determination lead to inhomogeneous distribution in field plots

Source determination of N₂O has often been performed using stable isotope incubation experiments. In situ experiments with isotopic tracers are an important next step. However, the challenge is to distribute the tracers in the field as homogeneously as possible. To examine this, a bromide solution was applied as a stand-in tracer using either a watering can, a sprayer, or syringes to a relatively dry (25% gravimetric moisture content) or wet (30%) silt loam. After 1 h, samples were taken from three soil depths (0-10 cm), and analyzed for their water content and bromide concentration. The application with syringes was unsuccessful due to blocked cannulas. Therefore, further laboratory experiments were conducted with side-port cannulas. Despite a larger calculated gravimetric soil moisture difference with watering can application, more Br- tracer was recovered in the sprayer treatment, probably due to faster transport of Br- through macropore flow in the wetter conditions caused by the watering can treatment. The losses of Br- (33% for the watering can, 28% for the sprayer treatment) are equivalent to potential losses of isotopic tracer solutions. For application of 60 at% ¹⁵NHΚ₄+, this resulted in theoretical enrichments of 44-53 at% in the upper 2.5 cm and 7-48 at% in 5-10 cm. As there was hardly any NO₃- in the soil, extrapolations for ¹⁵NO₃- calculated enrichments were 57-59 at% in the upper 2.5 cm and 26-57 at% in 5-10 cm. Overall, no method, including the side-port cannulas, was able to achieve a homogeneous distribution of the tracer. Future search for optimal tracer application should therefore investigate methods that utilize capillary forces and avoid overhead pressure. We recommend working on rather dry soil when applying tracers, as tracer recovery was larger here. Furthermore, larger amounts of tracer lead to more uniform distributions. Further studies should also investigate the importance of plant surfaces

Biochar as a tool to reduce the agricultural greenhouse-gas burden – knowns, unknowns and future research needs

Agriculture and land use change has significantly increased atmospheric emissions of the non-CO2 green-house gases (GHG) nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4). Since human nutritional and bioenergy needs continue to increase, at a shrinking global land area for production, novel land management strategies are required that reduce the GHG footprint per unit of yield. Here we review the potential of biochar to reduce N2O and CH4 emissions from agricultural practices including potential mechanisms behind observed effects. Furthermore, we investigate alternative uses of biochar in agricultural land management that may significantly reduce the GHG-emissions-per-unit-of-product footprint, such as (i) pyrolysis of manures as hygienic alternative to direct soil application, (ii) using biochar as fertilizer carrier matrix for underfoot fertilization, biochar use (iii) as composting additive or (iv) as feed additive in animal husbandry or for manure treatment. We conclude that the largest future research needs lay in conducting life-cycle GHG assessments when using biochar as an on-farm management tool for nutrient-rich biomass waste streams

Biochar reduces the efficiency of nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) mitigating N2O emissions

Among strategies suggested to decrease agricultural soil N2O losses, the use of nitrification inhibitors such as DMPP (3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate) has been proposed. However, the efficiency of DMPP might be affected by soil amendments, such as biochar, which has been shown to reduce N2O emissions. This study evaluated the synergic effect of a woody biochar applied with DMPP on soil N2O emissions. A incubation study was conducted with a silt loam soil and a biochar obtained from Pinus taeda at 500 degrees C. Two biochar rates (0 and 2% (w/w)) and three different nitrogen treatments (unfertilized, fertilized and fertilized + DMPP) were assayed under two contrasting soil water content levels (40% and 80% of water filled pore space (WFPS)) over a 163 day incubation period. Results showed that DMPP reduced N2O emissions by reducing ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) populations and promoting the last step of denitrification (measured by the ratio nosZI + nosZII/nirS + nirK genes). Biochar mitigated N2O emissions only at 40% WFPS due to a reduction in AOB population. However, when DMPP was applied to the biochar amended soil, a counteracting effect was observed, since the N2O mitigation induced by DMPP was lower than in control soil, demonstrating that this biochar diminishes the efficiency of the DMPP both at low and high soil water contents.This work was funded by the Spanish Government (AGL2015-64582-C3-2-R MINECO/FEDER), by the Basque Government (IT-932-16) and by the European Union (FACCE-CSA no 276610/MIT04-DESIGN-UPVASC, FACCE-CSA no 2814ERA01A and 2814ERA02A). This work is also supported by the USDA/NIFA Interagency Climate Change Grant Proposal number 2014-02114 [Project number 6657-12130-002-08I, Accession number 1003011] under the Multi-Partner Call on Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research of the FACCE-Joint Program Initiative. Any opinions, findings, or recommendation expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the USDA. MLC was supported by a Ramon y Cajal contract from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and thanks Fundacion Seneca for financing the project 19281/PI/14

Potential short-term losses of N₂O and N₂ from high concentrations of biogas digestate in arable soils

Biogas digestate (BD) is increasingly used as organic fertilizer, but has a high potential for NH3 losses. Its proposed injection into soils as a countermeasure has been suggested to promote the generation of N2O, leading to a potential trade-off. Furthermore, the effect of high nutrient concentrations on N2 losses as they may appear after injection of BD into soil has not yet been evaluated. Hence, we performed an incubation experiment with soil cores in a helium–oxygen atmosphere to examine the influence of soil substrate (loamy sand, clayey silt), water-filled pore space (WFPS; 35, 55, 75 %) and application rate (0, 17.6 and 35.2 mL BD per soil core, 250 cm3) on the emission of N2O, N2 and CO2 after the usage of high loads of BD. To determine the potential capacity for gaseous losses, we applied anaerobic conditions by purging with helium for the last 24 h of incubation. Immediate N2O and N2 emissions as well as the N2 ∕ (N2O+N2) product ratio depended on soil type and increased with WFPS, indicating a crucial role of soil gas diffusivity for the formation and emission of nitrogenous gases in agricultural soils. However, emissions did not increase with the application rate of BD. This is probably due to an inhibitory effect of the high NH4+ content of BD on nitrification. Our results suggest a larger potential for N2O formation immediately following BD injection in the fine-textured clayey silt compared to the coarse loamy sand. By contrast, the loamy sand showed a higher potential for N2 production under anaerobic conditions. Our results suggest that short-term N losses of N2O and N2 after injection may be higher than probable losses of NH3 following surface application of BD

N₂ production via aerobic pathways may play a significant role in nitrogen cycling in upland soils

The importance of di-nitrogen (N₂) production via aerobic pathways has been verified in a significant number of pure microbial strains. However, to date there are no reports confirming this in situ. In this study, we extracted micro-biota from three typical upland soils with variable properties and incubated them under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, with nitrate, to investigate whether N₂ production occurred via aerobic pathways and the relative importance of it when compared with the N₂ production via anaerobic pathways. Our results showed that N₂ can be produced in soil extracts under aerobic conditions, and that the N₂ produced via aerobic pathways equated to 29–51% of that produced via anaerobic pathways. Thus N₂ production via aerobic pathways may play a significant role in soil nitrogen (N) cycling. Our results demonstrate that an O₂ deficit may not to be a requirement for converting reactive N back into inert N₂, and consequently this process may be more widespread in upland soils than currently thought