34 research outputs found

    Astımlı hastalarda depo akarı duyarlılığı ve ilişkili faktörler

    Get PDF
    Introduction: The aim of the study was to investigate the storage mite sensitivity and related factors in patients with asthma or asthma and rhinitis. Patients and Methods: 149 patients with asthma or asthma and rhinitis were included to the study. Prick test was performed after addition of Acarus siro (A. siro), Lepidoglyphus destructor (L. destructor), Glycophagus domesticus (G. domesticus) and Tyrophagus putrescentiae (T. putrescentiae) to the standart prick test. Living conditions, smoking history, allergic diseases status, seasonal variations in symptoms were evaluated by a questionnaire. Besides, respiratory screening spesific IgE, L. destructor spesific IgE was examined in a group of patients who were allergic to storage mites according to prick tests. Results: Prick test results showed that; 115 of the patients were sensitized while 34 of them were not. House dust mite sensitivity was detected as mite 58.3%.The storage mite sensitivity for at least one of the studied species was detected in 61.7% of patients. The sensitivity rates were 50.4%, 48.7%, 47%, %40 for A. siro, L. destructor, G. domesticus and T. putrescentiae, respectively. The storage mite sensivity was found higher in the patients from the rural areas (p< 0.05). L. destructor IgE positiveness was detected in 9.1% of the group that antibody levels were examined. Positive reaction was detected for at least one of the storage mite species in %22.7 of the patients who were considered as not sensitized according to the results of the standart prick tests. Conclusion: As a result, storage mites are important allergens in subjects who live in rural areas and close contact with barn, haymow, bin and pantry. Addition of storage mite allergens to the standart prick test panel of patients living in rural area is suitable

    Validity and reliability of the assessment tool for Asthma (ATA) questionnaire: the ATA study

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVES: A multicenter trial was designed to validate the “Assessment Tools for Asthma (ATA)” questionnaire, a newly developed questionnaire, which evaluates both asthma control and risk factors associated with asthma control with a single instrument. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 810 cases from 14 clinics in 9 Turkish cities. The ATA questionnaire and Asthma Control Test (ACT) were administered. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the control status of 100 randomized cases. ATA is an eight-item physician-administered questionnaire. It comprises the following two sections-ATA1, assesses symptomatic control criteria, and the remaining section, queries the flre-up of asthma, control of comorbidities, treatment adherence, and inhaler technique. RESULTS: The mean scores for ATA1, ATA total, VAS, and ACT were 24.7±14.8, 53.8±19, 7.1±3, and 18.8±5.5, respectively. According to the ATA questionnaire, among all patients, 34.3% had controlled, 18.8% had partly controlled, and 46.9% had uncontrolled asthma. Furthermore, 16.6% patients had flre-ups between visits, 96.4% patients had uncontrolled comorbidity, 17% patients had irregular asthma treatment, and only 8.4% patients used the incorrect inhaler technique. The ATA questionnaire showed internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coeffiient=0.683). ACT, ATA1, and two specialists’ evaluations using VAS correlated strongly with the ATA total scores (Spearman correlation coeffiient (r) values: 0.776, 0.783, and 0.909, respectively; p-values: p<0.001, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively). According to Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis, the cut-off value of ATA was 50 (sensitivity=84.4%, specifiity=82.40%). CONCLUSION: The validated ATA questionnaire may be a practical tool for physicians in asthma management

    Work related symptoms of adult patients with asthma: A multicenter, national, questionnaire based study

    No full text
    Akgun, Metin/0000-0003-3404-4274; Bulbul, Yilmaz/0000-0002-8488-3650WOS: 000451979402225

    Therapy with omalizumab in patients with severe persistant allergic asthma: A real life data in Turkey Aǧir allerjik astimli hastalarda anti-IgE (omalizumab) tedavisi: Gerçek yaşam verileri

    No full text
    Omalizumab is a biologic agent, which has been shown to be effective in clinical trials in allergic, severe asthmatics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, functional effectiveness, and side effects of omalizumab in real-life conditions respectively. A total of 18 patients (female/male: 11/7) were included to the study. The mean ± SD age, total IgE, disease duration were 41.8 ± 11.2 years, 255.1 ± 197.3 kU/L, 12.8 ± 9.4 years, respectively. Eight patients had isolated mite, seven patiens had mite + other inhalant allergen, three patients had only other allergen sensitivity. Mean duration of omalizumab treatment (months ± SD) was 15.1 ± 8.6 (min-max 1-29) months. Omalizumab dose was 150 mg/month in five patients, 300 mg/month in five, 300 mg/15 days in three, 375 mg/15 days in four, 225 mg/15 days in one patient. Data at the date of last visit were compared with one year prior to omalizumab treatment. Mean systemic steroid dose reduced by 83% (14.7 ± 14.6 vs. 3.2 ± 8 mg), number of other asthma medications reduced by 28% (3.6 ± 1.3 vs. 2.5 ± 1.3) (p< 0.05). FEV1% values (53.5 ± 21.2 vs. 64.5 ± 23.5) did not significantly change. Mean numbers of exacerbations (20 ± 57.6 vs. 0.4 ± 0.7), emergency visits (16.5 ± 46.1 vs. 0.4 ± 1.2), hospitalizations (2.1 ± 2.6 vs. 0.1 ± 0.3) decreased by 93%, 95%, 86%, respectively (p< 0.05). ACT scores increased by 94% (10.4 ± 3.4 vs. 20.4 ± 5.7) (p< 0.05). Fifteen patients (88%) were stated as responsive to treatment with omalizumab. Eleven patients (64.8%) stated that their expectations are met, three patients (17.6%) stated that their expectations are close to being met, three patients (17.6%) stated that their expectations are not met. A local side effect was seen in one patient. In conclusion, our data has shown that omalizumab is effective, and safe in severe allergic asthmatics under real-life conditions
    corecore