Minimal residual disease assessment in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia by semi-automated identification of normal hematopoietic cells:A EuroFlow study

Presence of minimal residual disease (MRD), detected by flow cytometry, is an important prognostic biomarker in the management of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). However, data-analysis remains mainly expert-dependent. In this study, we designed and validated an Automated Gating &amp; Identification (AGI) tool for MRD analysis in BCP-ALL patients using the two tubes of the EuroFlow 8-color MRD panel. The accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility of the AGI tool was validated in a multicenter study using bone marrow follow-up samples from 174 BCP-ALL patients, stained with the EuroFlow BCP-ALL MRD panel. In these patients, MRD was assessed both by manual analysis and by AGI tool supported analysis. Comparison of MRD levels obtained between both approaches showed a concordance rate of 83%, with comparable concordances between MRD tubes (tube 1, 2 or both), treatment received (chemotherapy versus targeted therapy) and flow cytometers (FACSCanto versus FACSLyric). After review of discordant cases by additional experts, the concordance increased to 97%. Furthermore, the AGI tool showed excellent intra-expert concordance (100%) and good inter-expert concordance (90%). In addition to MRD levels, also percentages of normal cell populations showed excellent concordance between manual and AGI tool analysis. We conclude that the AGI tool may facilitate MRD analysis using the EuroFlow BCP-ALL MRD protocol and will contribute to a more standardized and objective MRD assessment. However, appropriate training is required for the correct analysis of MRD data.</p

Comments on EuroFlow standard operating procedures for instrument setup and compensation for BD FACS Canto II, Navios and BD FACS Lyric instruments

This commentary discusses particularities of application of the EuroFlow standardization of flow cytometric analyses on three different flow cytometers. The EuroFlow consortium developed a fully standardized approach for flow cytometric immunophenotyping of hematological malignancies and primary immunodeficiencies. Standardized instrument setup is an essential part of EuroFlow standardization. Initially, the EuroFlow Consortium developed and optimized a step-by-step standard operating procedure (SOP) to setup 8-color BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer (Canto), with the later inclusion of Navios (Beckman Coulter) and BD FACSLyric (Lyric). Those SOPs were developed to enable standardized and fully comparable fluorescence measurements in the three flow cytometers. In Canto and Navios, mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of a reference peak of Rainbow beads calibration particles is used to set up photomultiplier (PMT) voltages for each detector channel in individual instruments to reach the same MFI across distinct instruments. In turn, a new feature of Lyric instruments allows to share collection of attributes that are used to place the positive population at the same position among instruments in the form of assays, as one of its components integrated in the Cytometer Setup and Tracking (CS&T) module. The EuroFlow Lyric assays thus allow for standardized acquisition of 8-color EuroFlow panels on Lyric without the need to setup the PMT voltages on the individual instruments manually. In summary, the standardized instrument setup developed by EuroFlow enables cross-platform inter- and intra-laboratory standardization of flow cytometric measurements. This commentary provides a perspective on the modifications of the standardized EuroFlow instrument setup of Canto, Navios and Lyric instruments that are described in detail in individual instrument-specfic SOPs available at the EuroFlow website.TK and MN were supported by Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic, grant nr. NV18-03-00343, Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, NPU I project nr.LO1604 and EU-Prague project CZ.2.16/3.1.00/24505. JFM and AO were supported by CB16/12/00400 grant (CIBER-ONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Madrid, Spain and FONDOS FEDER).Peer reviewe

Accuracy, patient-perceived usability, and acceptance of two symptom checkers (Ada and Rheport) in rheumatology: interim results from a randomized controlled crossover trial

Background!#!Timely diagnosis and treatment are essential in the effective management of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). Symptom checkers (SCs) promise to accelerate diagnosis, reduce misdiagnoses, and guide patients more effectively through the health care system. Although SCs are increasingly used, there exists little supporting evidence.!##!Objective!#!To assess the diagnostic accuracy, patient-perceived usability, and acceptance of two SCs: (1) Ada and (2) Rheport.!##!Methods!#!Patients newly presenting to a German secondary rheumatology outpatient clinic were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to complete Ada or Rheport and consecutively the respective other SCs in a prospective non-blinded controlled randomized crossover trial. The primary outcome was the accuracy of the SCs regarding the diagnosis of an IRD compared to the physicians' diagnosis as the gold standard. The secondary outcomes were patient-perceived usability, acceptance, and time to complete the SC.!##!Results!#!In this interim analysis, the first 164 patients who completed the study were analyzed. 32.9% (54/164) of the study subjects were diagnosed with an IRD. Rheport showed a sensitivity of 53.7% and a specificity of 51.8% for IRDs. Ada's top 1 (D1) and top 5 disease suggestions (D5) showed a sensitivity of 42.6% and 53.7% and a specificity of 63.6% and 54.5% concerning IRDs, respectively. The correct diagnosis of the IRD patients was within the Ada D1 and D5 suggestions in 16.7% (9/54) and 25.9% (14/54), respectively. The median System Usability Scale (SUS) score of Ada and Rheport was 75.0/100 and 77.5/100, respectively. The median completion time for both Ada and Rheport was 7.0 and 8.5 min, respectively. Sixty-four percent and 67.1% would recommend using Ada and Rheport to friends and other patients, respectively.!##!Conclusions!#!While SCs are well accepted among patients, their diagnostic accuracy is limited to date.!##!Trial registration!#!DRKS.de, DRKS00017642 . Registered on 23 July 2019

Automated identification of leukocyte subsets improves standardization of database-guided expert-supervised diagnostic orientation in acute leukemia: a EuroFlow study

Precise classification of acute leukemia (AL) is crucial for adequate treatment. EuroFlow has previously designed an AL orientation tube (ALOT) to guide toward the relevant classification panel and final diagnosis. In this study, we designed and validated an algorithm for automated (database-supported) gating and identification (AGI tool) of cell subsets within samples stained with ALOT. A reference database of normal peripheral blood (PB,n = 41) and bone marrow (BM;n = 45) samples analyzed with the ALOT was constructed, and served as a reference for the AGI tool to automatically identify normal cells. Populations not unequivocally identified as normal cells were labeled as checks and were classified by an expert. Additional normal BM (n = 25) and PB (n = 43) and leukemic samples (n = 109), analyzed in parallel by experts and the AGI tool, were used to evaluate the AGI tool. Analysis of normal PB and BM samples showed low percentages of checks ( 0.95 for all cell types in PB andr(2) > 0.75 in BM) and resulted in highly concordant classification of leukemic cells by our previously published automated database-guided expert-supervised orientation tool for immunophenotypic diagnosis and classification of acute leukemia (Compass tool)

CMS : the TriDAS Project Technical Design Report; v.1, the Trigger Systems

CM