Declining free healthcare and rising treatment costs in India: an analysis of national sample surveys 1986-2004

The article focuses on trends in health-seeking behaviour of people and choosing between government and private sources, reasons for not accessing health care and the cost of treatment by examining three rounds of NSS data on health care use and morbidity pattern during 1986–87, 1995–96 and 2004. With variation across states, treatment-seeking from public providers has declined and preference for private providers has increased over the period. Although overall health-seeking behaviour has improved for both males and females, a significant percentage of people, more in rural than urban areas, do not seek treatment due to lack of accessibility and consider that the illness is not serious enough to require treatment. The financial reason for not seeking treatment was also an important issue in rural areas. There has also been change in the cost of health care over time. While the health care cost has increased, the gap between the public and the private has reduced, owing to perhaps increased cost of treatment in public health facilities following the levying of user-fees and curtailing distribution of free medicine. Practically all states reported decline in availability of free both out-patient and in-patient care. The article concludes with supporting the adaptation of innovative public-private partnership in health sector for various services realizing the limitations of the state provision of health, particularly in rural and remote areas, and the growing preference of consumers for private health providers. As effectiveness of public spending also depends on the choice of health interventions, target population and technical efficiency partnering with private health providers could work towards reducing the health inequalities in the country

Parallel Systems and Human Resource Management in India's Public Health Services: A View from the Front Lines

There is building evidence in India that the delivery of health services suffers from an actual shortfall in trained health professionals, but also from unsatisfactory results of existing service providers working in the public and private sectors. This study focusses on the public sector and examines de facto institutional and governance arrangements that may give rise to well-documented provider behaviors such as absenteeism, which can adversely affect service delivery processes and outcomes. The paper considers four human resource management subsystems: postings, transfers, promotions, and disciplinary practices. The four subsystems are analyzed from the perspective of front line workers, that is, physicians working in rural health care facilities operated by two state governments. Physicians were sampled in one post-reform state that has instituted human resource management reforms and one pre-reform state that has not. The findings are based on quantitative and qualitative measurement. The results show that formal rules are undermined by a parallel modus operandi in which desirable posts are often determined by political connections and side payments. The evidence suggests an institutional environment in which formal rules of accountability are trumped by a parallel set of accountabilities. These systems appear so entrenched that reforms have borne no significant effect