31 research outputs found

    The ESTMJS (European Society of Temporomandibular Joint Surgeons) consensus and evidence-based recommendations on management of Condylar dislocation

    Get PDF
    © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Although condylar dislocation is not uncommon, terminology, diagnostics, and treatment concepts vary considerably worldwide. This study aims to present a consensus recommendation based on systematically reviewed literature and approved by the European Society of TMJ Surgeons (ESTMJS). Based on the template of the evidence-based German guideline (register # 007-063) the ESTMJS members voted on 30 draft recommendations regarding terminology, diagnostics, and treatment initially via a blinded modified Delphi procedure. After unblinding, a discussion and voting followed, using a structured consensus process in 2019. An independent moderator documented and evaluated voting results and alterations from the original draft. Although the results of the preliminary voting were very heterogenous and differed significantly from the German S3 guideline (p < 0.0005), a strong consensus was achieved in the final voting on terminology, diagnostics, and treatment. In this voting, multiple alterations, including adding and discarding recommendations, led to 24 final recommendations on assessment and management of TMJ dislocation. To our knowledge, the ESTMJS condylar dislocation recommendations are the first both evidence and consensus-based international recommendations in the field of TMJ surgery. We recommend they form the basis for clinical practice guidelines for the management of dislocations of the mandibular condyle.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    Hyperoxemia and excess oxygen use in early acute respiratory distress syndrome : Insights from the LUNG SAFE study

    Get PDF
    Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s). Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.Background: Concerns exist regarding the prevalence and impact of unnecessary oxygen use in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We examined this issue in patients with ARDS enrolled in the Large observational study to UNderstand the Global impact of Severe Acute respiratory FailurE (LUNG SAFE) study. Methods: In this secondary analysis of the LUNG SAFE study, we wished to determine the prevalence and the outcomes associated with hyperoxemia on day 1, sustained hyperoxemia, and excessive oxygen use in patients with early ARDS. Patients who fulfilled criteria of ARDS on day 1 and day 2 of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure were categorized based on the presence of hyperoxemia (PaO2 > 100 mmHg) on day 1, sustained (i.e., present on day 1 and day 2) hyperoxemia, or excessive oxygen use (FIO2 ≥ 0.60 during hyperoxemia). Results: Of 2005 patients that met the inclusion criteria, 131 (6.5%) were hypoxemic (PaO2 < 55 mmHg), 607 (30%) had hyperoxemia on day 1, and 250 (12%) had sustained hyperoxemia. Excess FIO2 use occurred in 400 (66%) out of 607 patients with hyperoxemia. Excess FIO2 use decreased from day 1 to day 2 of ARDS, with most hyperoxemic patients on day 2 receiving relatively low FIO2. Multivariate analyses found no independent relationship between day 1 hyperoxemia, sustained hyperoxemia, or excess FIO2 use and adverse clinical outcomes. Mortality was 42% in patients with excess FIO2 use, compared to 39% in a propensity-matched sample of normoxemic (PaO2 55-100 mmHg) patients (P = 0.47). Conclusions: Hyperoxemia and excess oxygen use are both prevalent in early ARDS but are most often non-sustained. No relationship was found between hyperoxemia or excessive oxygen use and patient outcome in this cohort. Trial registration: LUNG-SAFE is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02010073publishersversionPeer reviewe

    In vitro effect of bisphosphonates on oral keratinocytes and fibroblasts

    No full text
    IntroductionOsteonecrosis of the jaws is a potential complication of bisphosphonate therapy. The underlying mechanism(s) remain unclear. While most research has concentrated on the effects of bisphosphonates on osteoclast and osteoblast function, the disease is diagnosed and classified on the basis of mucosal breakdown, suggesting that oral soft tissues may be involved in its pathogenesis.AimsTo determine the effect of three different bisphosphonate drugs (aledronate, zoledronate and clodronate) on the function of oral keratinocytes and fibroblasts.MethodsHuman oral keratinocytes (OKF6) and fetal foreskin fibroblasts (HFFF2) were exposed to each drug at several concentrations and the effect on cell proliferation was assessed by counting the viable cells after different lengths of treatment. The effect on cell migration was examined using Transwell migration assays. An organotypic co-culture model using keratinocytes and fibroblasts, which recapitulates the morphology of the oral mucosa, was used to assess the effect of the drugs on epithelial stratification and differentiation.ResultsThe three bisphosphonates affected the viability and proliferation of OKF6 and HFFF2 cells at concentrations in keeping with their known relative in vitro potencies. There was no effect on cell migration or tissue architecture in organotypic cultures at subtoxic concentrations.DiscussionThe lack of effect of these drugs on cell migration below concentrations known to affect cell viability suggests that bisphosphonate related osteonecrosis is not caused through suppression of keratinocyte or fibroblast motility
    corecore