4 research outputs found
Hyperdominance in the Amazonian tree flora
The vast extent of the Amazon Basin has historically restricted the study of its tree communities to the local and regional scales. Here, we provide empirical data on the commonness, rarity, and richness of lowland tree species across the entire Amazon Basin and Guiana Shield (Amazonia), collected in 1170 tree plots in all major forest types. Extrapolations suggest that Amazonia harbors roughly 16,000 tree species, of which just 227 (1.4%) account for half of all trees. Most of these are habitat specialists and only dominant in one or two regions of the basin. We discuss some implications of the finding that a small group of species--less diverse than the North American tree flora--accounts for half of the world's most diverse tree community.This work was
supported by Alberta Mennega Stichting; ALCOA Suriname;
Banco de la República; Center for Agricultural Research in
Suriname; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de
Nível Superior (Plano Nacional de Pós-Graduação); Conselho
Nacional de Desenvovimento Científico e Tecnológico of Brazil
(CNPq) projects Programa de Pesquisas Ecológicas de Longa
Duração (PELD) (558069/2009-6), Programa de Apoio a
Núcleos de Excelência da Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa
do Estado do Amazonas (PRONEX-FAPEAM) (1600/2006), Áreas
Úmidas, and MAUA; PELD (403792/2012-6), PPBio, CENBAM,
Universal (479599/2008-4), and Universal 307807-2009-6;
Fundação de Amparo À Pesquisa Do Estado Do Amazonas
(APEAM) projects DCR/2006, Hidroveg with FAPESP, and
PRONEX with CNPq; FAPESP; Colciencias; Duke University;
Ecopetrol; FEPIM 044/2003; the Field Museum; Conservation
International/DC (TEAM/INPA Manuas), Gordon and Betty
Moore Foundation; Guyana Forestry Commission; Investissement
d’Avenir grant of the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche
(ANR) (Centre d’Étude de la Biodiversité Amazonienne
ANR-10-LABX-0025); Margaret Mee Amazon Trust; Miquel
fonds; National Geographic Society (7754-04, 8047-06 to
P.M.J.); Netherlands Foundation for the Advancement of
Tropical Research WOTRO grants WB85- 335 and W84-581;
Primate Conservation Incorporated; Programme Ecosystèmes
Tropicaux (French Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable
Development; Shell Prospecting and Development Peru;
Smithsonian Institution’s Biological Diversity of the Guiana
Shield Program; Stichting het van Eeden-fonds; the Body
Shop; the Ministry of the Environment of Ecuador;
TROBIT; Tropenbos International; NSF (NSF-0743457 and
NSF-0101775 to P.M.J.); USAID; Variety Woods Guyana;
WWF-Brazil; WWF-Guianas; XIIéme Contrat de Plan Etat
Région-Guyane (French Government and European Union); and
grants to RAINFOR from the European Union, UK Natural
Environment Research Council, the Gordon and Betty Moore
Foundation, and U.S. National Geographic Society. O.L.P. is
supported by a European Research Council Advanced Grant and a
Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award
Recommended from our members
Geographic patterns of tree dispersal modes in Amazonia and their ecological correlates
Funder: Brazilian Program for Biodiversity ResearchFunder: Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas; Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004916Funder: National Institute for Amazonian BiodiversityAbstract: Aim: To investigate the geographic patterns and ecological correlates in the geographic distribution of the most common tree dispersal modes in Amazonia (endozoochory, synzoochory, anemochory and hydrochory). We examined if the proportional abundance of these dispersal modes could be explained by the availability of dispersal agents (disperser‐availability hypothesis) and/or the availability of resources for constructing zoochorous fruits (resource‐availability hypothesis). Time period: Tree‐inventory plots established between 1934 and 2019. Major taxa studied: Trees with a diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥ 9.55 cm. Location: Amazonia, here defined as the lowland rain forests of the Amazon River basin and the Guiana Shield. Methods: We assigned dispersal modes to a total of 5433 species and morphospecies within 1877 tree‐inventory plots across terra‐firme, seasonally flooded, and permanently flooded forests. We investigated geographic patterns in the proportional abundance of dispersal modes. We performed an abundance‐weighted mean pairwise distance (MPD) test and fit generalized linear models (GLMs) to explain the geographic distribution of dispersal modes. Results: Anemochory was significantly, positively associated with mean annual wind speed, and hydrochory was significantly higher in flooded forests. Dispersal modes did not consistently show significant associations with the availability of resources for constructing zoochorous fruits. A lower dissimilarity in dispersal modes, resulting from a higher dominance of endozoochory, occurred in terra‐firme forests (excluding podzols) compared to flooded forests. Main conclusions: The disperser‐availability hypothesis was well supported for abiotic dispersal modes (anemochory and hydrochory). The availability of resources for constructing zoochorous fruits seems an unlikely explanation for the distribution of dispersal modes in Amazonia. The association between frugivores and the proportional abundance of zoochory requires further research, as tree recruitment not only depends on dispersal vectors but also on conditions that favour or limit seedling recruitment across forest types
Disentangling regional and local tree diversity in the Amazon
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this recordWe analyzed the most extensive data set of tree inventory plots spread over the complete Amazon basin and Guiana shield. We aimed to separate the regional and local tree alpha‐diversity to investigate the drivers of diversity at the relevant scale. Our results are consistent with the partitioning of total tree alpha‐diversity into regional and local components, which are controlled by evolutionary‐ and ecological processes, respectively. Regional diversity is correlated with palaeo‐climatic stability (31%), and long‐term large‐scale ecosystem dynamics (14%), as represented by the age of the geological formation. Both mechanisms contribute to high diversity in the central to western Amazon. Actual rainfall seasonality is correlated with regional tree diversity to a certain extent (19%), but we argue that this is of little consequence for the evolutionary drivers of the regional species pool. Frequency of disturbance is the main process driving local diversity, although its explanatory power is relatively small (17%).The first author was supported by PAN‐AMAZONIA project, Inst. Internacional de Educação do Brasil (BECA program) and Conselho Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia (CNPq – Brazil)
The biogeography of the Amazonian tree flora
We describe the geographical variation in tree species composition across Amazonian forests and show how environmental conditions are associated with species turnover. Our analyses are based on 2023 forest inventory plots (1 ha) that provide abundance data for a total of 5188 tree species. Within-plot species composition reflected both local environmental conditions (especially soil nutrients and hydrology) and geographical regions. A broader-scale view of species turnover was obtained by interpolating the relative tree species abundances over Amazonia into 47,441 0.1-degree grid cells. Two main dimensions of spatial change in tree species composition were identified. The first was a gradient between western Amazonia at the Andean forelands (with young geology and relatively nutrient-rich soils) and central-eastern Amazonia associated with the Guiana and Brazilian Shields (with more ancient geology and poor soils). The second gradient was between the wet forests of the northwest and the drier forests in southern Amazonia. Isolines linking cells of similar composition crossed major Amazonian rivers, suggesting that tree species distributions are not limited by rivers. Even though some areas of relatively sharp species turnover were identified, mostly the tree species composition changed gradually over large extents, which does not support delimiting clear discrete biogeographic regions within Amazonia
