Life Expectancy at Birth for People with Serious Mental Illness and Other Major Disorders from a Secondary Mental Health Care Case Register in London

Despite improving healthcare, the gap in mortality between people with serious mental illness (SMI) and general population persists, especially for younger age groups. The electronic database from a large and comprehensive secondary mental healthcare provider in London was utilized to assess the impact of SMI diagnoses on life expectancy at birth.People who were diagnosed with SMI (schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder), substance use disorder, and depressive episode/disorder before the end of 2009 and under active review by the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLAM) in southeast London during 2007-09 comprised the sample, retrieved by the SLAM Case Register Interactive Search (CRIS) system. We estimated life expectancy at birth for people with SMI and each diagnosis, from national mortality returns between 2007-09, using a life table method.A total of 31,719 eligible people, aged 15 years or older, with SMI were analyzed. Among them, 1,370 died during 2007-09. Compared to national figures, all disorders were associated with substantially lower life expectancy: 8.0 to 14.6 life years lost for men and 9.8 to 17.5 life years lost for women. Highest reductions were found for men with schizophrenia (14.6 years lost) and women with schizoaffective disorders (17.5 years lost).The impact of serious mental illness on life expectancy is marked and generally higher than similarly calculated impacts of well-recognised adverse exposures such as smoking, diabetes and obesity. Strategies to identify and prevent causes of premature death are urgently required

Annual mortality risk (%) by age groups and diagnoses of mental illness, compared to England and Wales population in 2008.

<p>Annual mortality risk (%) by age groups and diagnoses of mental illness, compared to England and Wales population in 2008.</p

Mortality, demographic characteristics and serious mental illness diagnosis of SLAM in the period of 2007–09 (N = 31,719; death = 1,370)^∧.

∧<p>Number of missing gender information = 27.</p

The Sri Lankan Twin Registry: 2012 Update.

The Sri Lankan Twin Registry (SLTR), established in 1997, is a unique resource for twin and genetic research in a low- and middle-income country (LMIC). It comprises of a volunteer cohort of 14,120 twins (7,060 pairs) and 119 sets of triplets, and a population-based cohort of 19,040 (9,520 pairs) twins and 89 sets of triplets. Several studies have been conducted using this registry, including the Colombo Twin and Singleton Study (CoTaSS 1; 4,387 twins, 2,311 singletons), which have explored the prevalence and heritability of a range of psychiatric disorders as well as gene-environmental interplay. Currently, a follow-up study (CoTaSS 2) of the same cohort is underway, looking at the prevalence and interrelationship of key cardiovascular and metabolic risk markers (e.g., metabolic syndrome). A significant feature of CoTaSS 2 is the establishment of a biobank. Current SLTR work is extending beyond mental health and the interface between mental and physical health to new horizons, extending collaborations with the wider global twin research community. Ethics and governance have been given special emphasis in the initiative. Capacity building and public engagement are two crucial components. Establishment of a state-of-the-art genetic laboratory was a major accomplishment. SLTR is a classic showcase of successful North–South partnership in building a progressive research infrastructure in a LMIC

Investigating the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on adults with a recent history of recurrent major depressive disorder: a multi-Centre study using remote measurement technology.

Background: The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes a clinical illness Covid-19, has had a major impact on mental health globally. Those diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) may be negatively impacted by the global pandemic due to social isolation, feelings of loneliness or lack of access to care. This study seeks to assess the impact of the 1st lockdown - pre-, during and post - in adults with a recent history of MDD across multiple centres. Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of an on-going cohort study, RADAR-MDD project, a multi-centre study examining the use of remote measurement technology (RMT) in monitoring MDD. Self-reported questionnaire and passive data streams were analysed from participants who had joined the project prior to 1st December 2019 and had completed Patient Health and Self-esteem Questionnaires during the pandemic (n = 252). We used mixed models for repeated measures to estimate trajectories of depressive symptoms, self-esteem, and sleep duration. Results: In our sample of 252 participants, 48% (n = 121) had clinically relevant depressive symptoms shortly before the pandemic. For the sample as a whole, we found no evidence that depressive symptoms or self-esteem changed between pre-, during- and post-lockdown. However, we found evidence that mean sleep duration (in minutes) decreased significantly between during- and post- lockdown (- 12.16; 95% CI - 18.39 to - 5.92; p < 0.001). We also found that those experiencing clinically relevant depressive symptoms shortly before the pandemic showed a decrease in depressive symptoms, self-esteem and sleep duration between pre- and during- lockdown (interaction p = 0.047, p = 0.045 and p < 0.001, respectively) as compared to those who were not. Conclusions: We identified changes in depressive symptoms and sleep duration over the course of lockdown, some of which varied according to whether participants were experiencing clinically relevant depressive symptoms shortly prior to the pandemic. However, the results of this study suggest that those with MDD do not experience a significant worsening in symptoms during the first months of the Covid - 19 pandemic

Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for preventing migraine and tension-type headaches

BACKGROUND: Headache is a common medical problem. In view of recent discoveries about the role of serotonin in pain mechanisms, selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been evaluated for the prevention of migraine and tension-type headaches (TTH). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of SSRIs for preventing migraine and TTH. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE (1966-2004), EMBASE (1994-2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 4, 2003), and reference lists of retrieved articles. Headache Quarterly was hand searched from 1990 to 2003. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials comparing SSRIs with any type of control intervention in patients of either sex, over 18 years of age, with migraine or TTH. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted data (headache frequency, index, severity, and duration; use of symptomatic/analgesic medication; days off work; quality of life; mood improvement; cost-effectiveness; and adverse events) and assessed the methodological quality of trials. MAIN RESULTS: Thirteen studies utilizing five SSRIs met the inclusion criteria (636 participants). Most of the included studies had methodological and/or reporting shortcomings; follow up rarely extended beyond 3 months. After 2 months SSRIs did not significantly lower headache index scores in patients with migraine when compared to placebo (SMD -0.14; 95% CI -0.57 to 0.30). Patients with chronic TTH treated with an SSRI had a significantly higher analgesic intake of 5 more doses per month when compared to patients treated with a tricyclic antidepressant (WMD 4.98; 95% CI 1.12 to 8.84). Tricyclics also significantly reduced headache duration by 1.26 hours per day (WMD 1.26; 95% CI 0.06 to 2.45) and marginally reduced headache indexes (SMD 0.42; 95% CI 0.00 to 0.85) when compared to SSRIs in patients with chronic TTH. When the data on adverse events were considered without regard to headache diagnostic subgroups, there were no significant differences between SSRIs and placebo for withdrawals due to adverse events (Peto OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.31 to 3.34). For minor adverse events, SSRIs were generally more tolerable than tricyclics (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.92). However, there were no differences in the number of patients withdrawing due to any reason in the SSRI and tricyclic groups (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.80). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Over 2 months of treatment, SSRIs are no more efficacious than placebo in patients with migraine. In patients with chronic TTH, SSRIs are less efficacious than tricyclic antidepressants. In comparison with SSRIs, the burden of adverse events in patients receiving tricyclics was greater. These results are based on short-term trials and may not generalise to longer-term treatment