Microwave-Specific Enhancement of the Carbon–Carbon Dioxide (Boudouard) Reaction

The Boudouard reaction, which is the reaction of carbon and carbon dioxide to produce carbon monoxide, represents a simple and straightforward method for the remediation of carbon dioxide in the environment through reduction: CO₂(g) + C(s) ⇌ 2CO. However, due to the large positive enthalpy, typically reported to be 172 kJ/mol under standard conditions at 298 K, the equilibrium does not favor CO production until temperatures >700 °C, when the entropic term, −<i>T</i>Δ<i>S</i>, begins to dominate and the free energy becomes negative. We have found that, under microwave irradiation to selectively heat the carbon, dramatically different thermodynamics for the reaction are observed. During kinetic studies of the reaction under conditions of flowing CO₂, the apparent activation energy dropped from 118.4 kJ/mol under conventional convective heating to 38.5 kJ/mol under microwave irradiation. From measurement of the equilibrium constants as a function of temperature, the enthalpy of the reaction dropped from 183.3 kJ/mol at ∼1100 K to 33.4 kJ/mol at the same temperature under microwave irradiation. This changes the position of the equilibrium so that the temperature at which CO becomes the major product drops from 643 °C in the conventional thermal reaction to 213 °C in the microwave. The observed reduction in the apparent enthalpy of the microwave driven reaction, compared to what is determined for the thermal reaction from standard heats of formation, can be thought of as arising from additional energy being put into the carbon by the microwaves, effectively increasing its apparent standard enthalpy. Mechanistically, it is hypothesized that the enhanced reactivity arises from the interaction of CO₂ with the steady-state concentration of electron–hole pairs that are present at the surface of the carbon due to the space-charge mechanism, by which microwaves are known to heat carbon. Such a mechanism is unique to microwave-induced heating and, given the effect it has on the thermodynamics of the Boudouard reaction, suggests that its use may yield energy savings in driving the general class of gas–carbon reactions

Development of Magnetic Nanoparticles as Microwave-Specific Catalysts for the Rapid, Low-Temperature Synthesis of Formalin Solutions

A series of heterogeneous catalyst materials possessing good microwave absorption properties were investigated for their activity as oxidation catalysts under microwave irradiation. These catalysts, a series of nanoscale magnetic spinel oxides of the composition MCr₂O₄ (M = Cu, Co, Fe), were irradiated in aqueous methanol solution (1:1 MeOH:H₂O v:v). This resulted in rapid conversion of methanol to formaldehyde, directly generating aqueous formalin solutions. The catalytic reaction occurred under relatively mild conditions (1 atm O₂, 60 °C), with irradiation times of 80 min converting 24.5%, 17.7%, and 13.2% of the available methanol to formaldehyde by the Cu, Fe, and Co chromite spinel catalysts, respectively. Importantly, reactions run under identical conditions of concentration, time, and temperature using traditional convective heating yielded dramatically lower amounts of conversions; specifically, 1.0% and 0.21% conversions were observed with Cu and Co spinels, and no observable thermal products were obtained from the Fe spinels. This work provides a clear demonstration that microwave-driven catalysis can yield enhanced reactivity and can afford new catalytic pathways

Non-Targeted Chemical Characterization of JUUL-Menthol-Flavored Aerosols Using Liquid and Gas Chromatography

The aerosol constituents generated from JUUL Menthol pods with 3.0% and 5.0% nicotine by weight (Me3 and Me5) are characterized by a non-targeted approach, which was developed to detect aerosol constituents that are not known to be present beforehand or that may be measured with targeted methods. Three replicates from three production batches (n = 9) were aerosolized using two puffing regimens (intense and non-intense). Each of the 18 samples were analyzed by gas chromatography electron ionization mass spectrometry and by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization high-resolving power mass spectrometry. All chemical constituents determined to differ from control were identified and semi-quantified. To have a complete understanding of the aerosol constituents and chemistry, each chemical constituent was categorized into one of five groups: (1) flavorants, (2) harmful and potentially harmful constituents, (3) leachables, (4) reaction products, and (5) chemical constituents that were unable to be identified or rationalized (e.g., chemical constituents that could not be categorized in groups (1–4). Under intense puffing, 74 chemical constituents were identified in Me3 aerosols and 68 under non-intense puffing, with 53 chemical constituents common between both regimens. Eighty-three chemical constituents were identified in Me5 aerosol using an intense puffing regimen and seventy-five with a non-intense puffing regimen, with sixty-two chemical constituents in common. Excluding primary constituents, reaction products accounted for the greatest number of chemical constituents (approximately 60% in all cases, ranging from about 0.05% to 0.1% by mass), and flavorants—excluding menthol—comprised the second largest number of chemical constituents (approximately 25%, ranging consistently around 0.01% by mass). The chemical constituents detected in JUUL aerosols were then compared to known constituents from cigarette smoke to determine the relative chemical complexities and commonalities/differences between the two. This revealed (1) a substantial decrease in the chemical complexity of JUUL aerosols vs. cigarette smoke and (2) that there are between 55 (Me3) and 61 (Me5) unique chemical constituents in JUUL aerosols not reported in cigarette smoke. Understanding the chemical complexity of JUUL aerosols is important because the health effects of combustible cigarette smoke are related to the combined effect of these chemical constituents through multiple mechanisms, not just the effects of any single smoke constituent

Propagation Techniques for Desert Plants

Desert Plants is published by The University of Arizona for the Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum. For more information about this unique botanical journal, please email the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Publications Office at [email protected]