Frequency of Certain Established Risk Factors in Soft Tissue Sarcomas in Adults: A Prospective Descriptive Study of 658 Cases

Soft tissue sarcomas are rare tumours with infrequent identified aetiological factors. Several genetic syndromes as well as previous radiation therapy and/or chronic lymphoedema have been suspected to predispose to some soft tissue sarcomas. Between January 1997 and September 2005, we carried out a prospective descriptive study to estimate the frequency of some particular etiological factors among 658 patients with soft tissue sarcomas. Sarcomas associated with a clinically identified genetic disease represent 2.8% out of all cases (95%CI: 1.5–3.8%). Most of these cases (14/19) are related to Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis. Radiation-induced sarcomas represent 3.3% out of all cases (95%CI: 1.7–5.1%). Most of these cases (9/22) are related to prior breast cancer treatment. We had observed only 1 case of Stewart-Treves syndrome. Liposarcoma, the most frequent histological subtype observed, is not associated with any particular aetiological entity. Finally, most of the adult soft tissue sarcomas are not related to any classical clinically identified genetic disease or previous radiation therapy and/or chronic lymphoedema risk factors. Frequency of underlying genetic syndrome which may predispose to soft tissue sarcomas could be higher than previously reported

Quel niveau d'harmonisation pour la réglementation des essais cliniques au sein de l'Union Européenne?

LILLE2-BU Santé-Recherche (593502101) / SudocSudocFranceF

"TNM" at study entry in phase I trials

International audienc

Rationale and study design of the chippi-1808 trial: a phase iii randomized clinical trial evaluating hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (hipec) for stage iii ovarian cancer patients treated with primary or interval cytoreductive surgery ^?

International audienceBACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer remains the most lethal gynecologic malignancy with high recurrence rates. Because recurrence involves primarily the peritoneum, intraperitoneal chemotherapy is being evaluated as a new approach to treat microscopic peritoneal disease. One trial showed that cisplatin-paclitaxel intraperitoneal chemotherapy with intravenous paclitaxel improved survival but increased morbidity. Another trial reported a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) without increasing the morbidity (P = 0.76) or mortality rates (hazard ratio 0.67, P = 0.02) after adding hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to interval cytoreduction. The current trial aims to evaluate the impact of adding HIPEC to primary or interval cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) on the efficacy, safety, treatment feasibility, and quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is an international, multicenter, open-label, randomized (1 : 1), two-arm, phase III clinical trial that will enroll 432 patients with newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III EOC. Patients are randomized to receive or not HIPEC with the standard of care. Inclusion criteria include patients with FIGO stage III EOC, Fallopian tube carcinoma or primary peritoneal cancer who undergo complete primary or interval cytoreduction. The primary objective is to assess DFS of the addition of HIPEC. Secondary objectives are the assessment of OS, safety, return to intended oncologic treatment, quality of life and the trade-off between efficacy and morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The results might help extend the indications of HIPEC to include patients undergoing primary cytoreduction, providing a standardized protocol for HIPEC in EOC management and reliable information on the quality of life after adding HIPEC

Reporting adverse events in cancer surgery randomized trials: A systematic review of published trials in oesophago-gastric and gynecological cancer patients

International audienceBackground: Few reports describe how adverse events (AEs) are reported in cancer surgery trials.Materials and methods: We systematically reviewed 179 consecutive study reports issued between January 1, 1990 and November 15, 2014, which investigated surgery in oesophago-gastric (OG) or gynecologic (GY) cancer patients. Based on the reviewed reports, we assessed how AEs were reported according to CONSORT statement.Results: Morbidity assessment was the primary objective of 56 studies (31.3%). Postoperative AEs were described in 161 studies (90%). Definition of AEs and grading scale (NCI-CTC AE, Dindo-Clavien scale, etc …) were given in 27.3% and 16.8% of studies, respectively. AEs were reported by event and grade in 8.3% of studies. Definition of expectedness, seriousness, causality and safety population were present in 0.5%, 1.1%, 7.8%, and 7.2% of the studies, respectively. Reporting of AEs did not improve over time nor better in high-impact factor journals.Conclusion: The reporting of AEs in cancer trials investigating surgery needs to be improved

Study protocol of regosarc trial: activity and safety of regorafenib in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase ii trial

International audienceBACKGROUND: Angiogenesis, among other signaling pathways, plays a key-role in sarcoma biology. Regorafenib (RE) has recently been shown to be effective in imatinib and sunitinib-refractory GIST in a phase III trial.METHODS: We are conducting an international trial (France, Austria and Germany) consisting in 4 parallel double-blind placebo-controlled randomized (1/1) phase II trials to assess the activity and safety of RE in doxorubicin-refractory STS (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01900743). Each phase II trial is dedicated to one of the 4 following histological subgroups: liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma and other sarcoma. Within each randomized trial the following stratification factors will be applied: countries and prior exposure to pazopanib. Key-eligibility criteria are: measurable disease, age ≥18, not > 3 previous systemic treatment lines for metastatic disease, metastatic disease not amenable to surgical resection. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) according to central radiological review. Secondary endpoints are: Toxicity (NCI-CTC AE V4.0); time to progression; Growth modulation index in pts receiving RE after randomization; 3 and 6 months PFS-Rates, best response rate and overall survival. Each phase II trial will be separately analyzed. In 3 trials, statistical assumptions are: PFS0 = 1.6 & PFS1 = 4.6 months; 1-sided α = 0.1; β = 0.05 with a total sample size of 192 pts. To take into account the rarity of synovial sarcoma, the statistical assumptions are: PFS0 = 1.6 & PFS1 = 4.6 months; 1-sided α = 0.1; β = 0.2 Tumor assessment is done monthly during the 4 first months, and every 3 months thereafter. After central radiological confirmation of tumor progression, an optional open-label option is offered to eligible patients.CONCLUSIONS: The design of this trial allows an assessment of regorafenib activity over placebo in four sarcoma strata and might provide evidence for launching a phase III trial. This study includes both integrative and exploratory translational research program. The study is enrolling since June 2013 (TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT N°: 2012-005743-24, on the 15(th) February 2012)

A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized phase II trial assessing the activity and safety of regorafenib in non-adipocytic sarcoma patients previously treated with both chemotherapy and pazopanib

International audienc