12 research outputs found

    Unraveling the safety of adjuvant radiotherapy in prostate cancer: impact of older age and hypofractionated regimens on acute and late toxicity - a multicenter comprehensive analysis

    Get PDF
    BackgroundThe objective of this study was to assess the impact of age and other patient and treatment characteristics on toxicity in prostate cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy (RT).Materials and methodsThis observational study (ICAROS-1) evaluated both acute (RTOG) and late (RTOG/EORTC) toxicity. Patient- (age; Charlson’s comorbidity index) and treatment-related characteristics (nodal irradiation; previous TURP; use, type, and duration of ADT, RT fractionation and technique, image-guidance systems, EQD2 delivered to the prostate bed and pelvic nodes) were recorded and analyzed.ResultsA total of 381 patients were enrolled. The median EQD2 to the prostate bed (α/ÎČ=1.5) was 71.4 Gy. The majority of patients (75.4%) were treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Acute G3 gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity rates were 0.5% and 1.3%, respectively. No patients experienced >G3 acute toxicity. The multivariable analysis of acute toxicity (binomial logistic regression) showed a statistically significant association between older age (> 65) and decreased odds of G≄2 GI acute toxicity (OR: 0.569; 95%CI: 0.329-0.973; p: 0.040) and decreased odds of G≄2 GU acute toxicity (OR: 0.956; 95%CI: 0.918-0.996; p: 0.031). The 5-year late toxicity-free survival rates for G≄3 GI and GU toxicity were 98.1% and 94.5%, respectively. The only significant correlation found (Cox’s regression model) was a reduced risk of late GI toxicity in patients undergoing hypofractionation (HR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.18-0.78; p: 0.008).ConclusionsThe unexpected results of this analysis could be explained by a “response shift bias” concerning the protective effect of older age and by treatment in later periods (using IMRT/VMAT) concerning the favorable effect of hypofractionation. However, overall, the study suggests that age should not be a reason to avoid adjuvant RT and that the latter is well-tolerated even with moderately hypofractionated regimens

    Disease-specific and general health-related quality of life in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients: The Pros-IT CNR study

    Get PDF

    Disease-specific and general health-related quality of life in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients: The Pros-IT CNR study

    Get PDF
    Background: The National Research Council (CNR) prostate cancer monitoring project in Italy (Pros-IT CNR) is an observational, prospective, ongoing, multicentre study aiming to monitor a sample of Italian males diagnosed as new cases of prostate cancer. The present study aims to present data on the quality of life at time prostate cancer is diagnosed. Methods: One thousand seven hundred five patients were enrolled. Quality of life is evaluated at the time cancer was diagnosed and at subsequent assessments via the Italian version of the University of California Los Angeles-Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI) and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Results: At diagnosis, lower scores on the physical component of the SF-12 were associated to older ages, obesity and the presence of 3+ moderate/severe comorbidities. Lower scores on the mental component were associated to younger ages, the presence of 3+ moderate/severe comorbidities and a T-score higher than one. Urinary and bowel functions according to UCLA-PCI were generally good. Almost 5% of the sample reported using at least one safety pad daily to control urinary loss; less than 3% reported moderate/severe problems attributable to bowel functions, and sexual function was a moderate/severe problem for 26.7%. Diabetes, 3+ moderate/severe comorbidities, T2 or T3-T4 categories and a Gleason score of eight or more were significantly associated with lower sexual function scores at diagnosis. Conclusions: Data collected by the Pros-IT CNR study have clarified the baseline status of newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. A comprehensive assessment of quality of life will allow to objectively evaluate outcomes of different profile of care

    Evaluating the influence of the Siemens IGRT carbon fibre tabletop in head and neck IMRT

    No full text
    Background and purpose To investigate the impact of a commercial IMRT/IGRT carbon-fibre tabletop in radiotherapy planning optimization and clinical dose distribution. Materials and methods In this investigation the Siemens IGRT carbon fibre tabletop, routinely used for IMRT treatments in our Centre, has been incorporated into the CT volume of 6 IMRT patients. This was done by CT scanning the tabletop and by adding the obtained volume to the clinical dataset, acquired using the standard couch available in our CT scanner. This procedure was tested and validated for the purpose of this study. The radiotherapy plans have been optimized using both the original CT volume and the modified CT volume. Results IMRT optimization with the tabletop included in the clinical volume produced significantly different deliverable plans compared to standard optimized plans which did not include the treatment couch. Differences up to 6%/7% in terms of total number of MU were found in half of the clinical cases. Differences up to 37% in the number of MU per beam were also found. The number of iterations needed to reach an optimal solution also varied between −18% and +25%. Although the DVH analysis produced similar results, due to the fulfilment of the optimization objectives, differences higher than 10% were found in the dose calculated to superficial regions of the body. Conclusions The results of this investigation show that the presence of the carbon fibre tabletop significantly affects the outcome of the beam parameters optimization. We suggest including carbon fibre tabletops into patient treatment planning dose calculation and optimization

    Incremento dell\u2019attivit\ue0 di RM multiparametrica della prostata: esperienza di un centro a elevato volume di attivit\ue0

    No full text
    OBIETTIVO: Analizzare l\u2019incremento di attivit\ue0 di Risonanza Magnetica multiparametrica (RMmp) nella valutazione dei pazienti con tumore prostatico (CaP). METODI: Sono state catalogate le RMmp eseguite in un periodo di 25 mesi secondo le indicazioni cliniche (diagnosi, stadiazione, sorveglianza attiva e follow-up dopo trattamento primario). Sono stati valutati: i reperti PIRADS (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) v. 2, nella diagnosi; la presenza di estensione extra-capsulare (EEC) ed infiltrazione delle vescicole seminali (IVS), nella stadiazione; la conferma di malattia indolente oppure l\u2019upgrade radiologico, nella sorveglianza attiva; la presenza di recidiva locale, nel follow-up. Per tutti questi valori sono stati riportati i dati di incremento assoluti e percentuali. RISULTATI: Sono state effettuate 1034 RMmp della prostata con incremento del 341%. Le indicazioni erano cos\uec suddivise: diagnosi (73%), stadiazione (9%), sorveglianza attiva (13%) e follow-up (5%). Nella diagnosi, i risultati in termini di PIRADS erano: categorie 1 e 2 (69%), categoria 3 (19%), categorie 4 e 5 (12%). Nella stadiazione, EEC era presente in 26 su 94 (28%) e IVS in 10 su 94 (11%) pazienti. Nella sorveglianza attiva, la RMmp ha confermato una malattia indolente in 66 su 138 (48%) pazienti e ha dimostrato un upgrade radiologico in 72 su 138 (52%) pazienti. Nel follow-up, la RMmp ha dimostrato recidiva locale in 20 su 52 (38%) pazienti. CONCLUSIONI: I risultati di questo studio hanno dimostrato un notevole incremento dell\u2019attivit\ue0 di RMmp nell\u2019arco di 25 mesi per tutte le indicazioni cliniche ed in particolare nella diagnosi, in cui essa viene usata sempre pi\uf9 come screening, e nella sorveglianza attiva, sebbene in questo contesto il suo ruolo non sia ancora chiaramente stabilito

    COVID-19 Pandemic-Adapted Radiotherapy Guidelines: Are They Really Followed?

    No full text
    Background: In our department, we provided guidelines to the radiation oncologists (ROs) regarding the omission, delay, or shortening of radiotherapy (RT). The purpose was to reduce the patients’ exposure to the hospital environment and to minimize the departmental overcrowding. The aim was to evaluate the ROs’ compliance to these guidelines. Methods: ROs were asked to fill out a data collection form during patients’ first visits in May and June 2020. The collected data included the ROs’ age and gender, patient age and residence, RT purpose, treated tumor, the dose and fractionation that would have been prescribed, and RT changes. The chi-square test and binomial logistic regression were used to analyze the correlation between the treatment prescription and the collected parameters. Results: One hundred and twenty-six out of 205 prescribed treatments were included in this analysis. Treatment was modified in 61.1% of cases. More specifically, the treatment was omitted, delayed, or shortened in 7.9, 15.9, and 37.3% of patients, respectively. The number of delivered fractions was reduced by 27.9%. A statistically significant correlation (p = 0.028) between younger patients’ age and lower treatment modifications rate was recorded. Conclusion: Our analysis showed a reasonably high compliance of ROs to the pandemic-adapted guidelines. The adopted strategy was effective in reducing the number of admissions to our department

    Hypofractionated postoperative IMRT in prostate carcinoma: A phase I/II study

    No full text
    Aim: To report the outcome of hypofractionated radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa) using simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT). Patients and Methods: A total of 124 patients with PCa at high risk of relapse after RP or diagnosis of biochemical relapse were included. Patients received 62.5 Gy to the prostate bed and 45 Gy to pelvic nodes in 25 fractions. Androgen-suppressive therapy was prescribed based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk categories. Results: Median follow-up was 30 months. Only two patients (1.6%) developed grade 3 or more acute toxicity: one grade 3 skin toxicity (0.8%) and one grade 4 genitourinary toxicity (0.8%). Grade 2 acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity was recorded in 24.2% and 17.7% of patients, respectively. Five-year grade 2 or more gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity was 1.1% and 7.3%, respectively. Five-year biochemical relapse-free survival was 86.5%. Conclusion: After RP, hypofractionated IMRT-SIB demonstrated a favorable toxicity profile and encouraging results in terms of relapse-free survival

    Disease-specific and general health-related quality of life in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients: the Pros-IT CNR study

    Get PDF
    Background: The National Research Council (CNR) prostate cancer monitoring project in Italy (Pros-IT CNR) is an observational, prospective, ongoing, multicentre study aiming to monitor a sample of Italian males diagnosed as new cases of prostate cancer. The present study aims to present data on the quality of life at time prostate cancer is diagnosed. Methods: One thousand seven hundred five patients were enrolled. Quality of life is evaluated at the time cancer was diagnosed and at subsequent assessments via the Italian version of the University of California Los Angeles-Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI) and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Results: At diagnosis, lower scores on the physical component of the SF-12 were associated to older ages, obesity and the presence of 3+ moderate/severe comorbidities. Lower scores on the mental component were associated to younger ages, the presence of 3+ moderate/severe comorbidities and a T-score higher than one. Urinary and bowel functions according to UCLA-PCI were generally good. Almost 5% of the sample reported using at least one safety pad daily to control urinary loss; less than 3% reported moderate/severe problems attributable to bowel functions, and sexual function was a moderate/severe problem for 26.7%. Diabetes, 3+ moderate/severe comorbidities, T2 or T3-T4 categories and a Gleason score of eight or more were significantly associated with lower sexual function scores at diagnosis. Conclusions: Data collected by the Pros-IT CNR study have clarified the baseline status of newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. A comprehensive assessment of quality of life will allow to objectively evaluate outcomes of different profile of care

    Disease-specific and general health-related quality of life in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients: The Pros-IT CNR study

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The National Research Council (CNR) prostate cancer monitoring project in Italy (Pros-IT CNR) is an observational, prospective, ongoing, multicentre study aiming to monitor a sample of Italian males diagnosed as new cases of prostate cancer. The present study aims to present data on the quality of life at time prostate cancer is diagnosed. METHODS: One thousand seven hundred five patients were enrolled. Quality of life is evaluated at the time cancer was diagnosed and at subsequent assessments via the Italian version of the University of California Los Angeles-Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI) and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). RESULTS: At diagnosis, lower scores on the physical component of the SF-12 were associated to older ages, obesity and the presence of 3+ moderate/severe comorbidities. Lower scores on the mental component were associated to younger ages, the presence of 3+ moderate/severe comorbidities and a T-score higher than one. Urinary and bowel functions according to UCLA-PCI were generally good. Almost 5% of the sample reported using at least one safety pad daily to control urinary loss; less than 3% reported moderate/severe problems attributable to bowel functions, and sexual function was a moderate/severe problem for 26.7%. Diabetes, 3+ moderate/severe comorbidities, T2 or T3-T4 categories and a Gleason score of eight or more were significantly associated with lower sexual function scores at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Data collected by the Pros-IT CNR study have clarified the baseline status of newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. A comprehensive assessment of quality of life will allow to objectively evaluate outcomes of different profile of care
    corecore