61 research outputs found
Pastele Leona WyczĆ³Åkowskiego z kolekcji portretĆ³w profesorĆ³w Muzeum Uniwersytetu JagielloÅskiego - zagadnienia technologiczne i konserwatorskie.
Leon WyczĆ³Åkowskiās pastels from the collections of professorsā portraits in the Jagiellonian University Museum ā technology and conservation issues The article deals with technology and conservation issues concerning Leon WyczĆ³Åkowskiās six portraits from the Jagiellonian University Museum at Collegium Maius. The characteristics of damage related to the type of ground is discussed. Non-typical canvas grounds sprinkled with woolen and cotton fibre, the so called velour canvas, are described, along with conservation methods
The relationship between phonological processing and lexical acquisition in a foreign language. A study on Polish primary school students learning English
WydziaÅ AnglistykiCelem projektu jest zbadanie wpÅywu czynnikĆ³w fonologicznych na uczenie siÄ sÅĆ³w. Badania nad akwizycjÄ
jÄzykowÄ
wskazujÄ
, że przetwarzanie fonologiczne i fonologiczna pamiÄÄ krĆ³tkotrwaÅa może odgrywaÄ ważnÄ
rolÄ w uczeniu siÄ nowych sÅĆ³w. Jednak nadal brakuje badaÅ, ktĆ³re zajmowaÅyby siÄ zwiÄ
zkiem pomiÄdzy przetwarzaniem fonologicznym a uczeniem siÄ sÅĆ³w obcego jÄzyka. Co wiÄcej, problemem w literaturze jest sam koncept przetwarzania fonologicznego, ktĆ³ry nie jest zbyt dobrze zdefiniowany. Poniższa praca zawiera przeglÄ
d literatury nt. przetwarzania fonologicznego i proponuje definicjÄ tego konceptu, a nastÄpnie przedstawia badanie na 44 polskich dziewiÄciolatkach uczÄ
cych siÄ angielskiego w szkole. Uczestnicy zbadani zostali bateriÄ
testĆ³w na przetwarzanie fonologiczne w jÄzyku polskim i angielskim, jak rĆ³wnież testami na krĆ³tkotrwaÅÄ
pamiÄÄ fonologicznÄ
. Dzieci byÅy też poproszone o wykonanie zadaÅ mierzÄ
cych uczenie siÄ sÅĆ³w w jÄzyku ojczystym (polskim), drugim (angielskim) i w zupeÅnie obcym jÄzyku (LX). Ponadto w badaniu mierzono postÄpy w akwizycji sÅownictwa angielskiego u uczestnikĆ³w badania w przeciÄ
gu roku szkolnego. Wyniki badania wskazujÄ
na zwiÄ
zek pomiÄdzy przetwarzaniem fonologicznym, a uczeniem siÄ sÅĆ³w obcego jÄzyka.Phonological short-term memory, phonological processing, lexical acquisition, second language acquisitionThe aim of this project to investigate the phonological factors in word learning. Literature on language acquisition indicates that phonological processing and phonological short-term memory might play an important role in acquiring new vocabulary. However, this topic is still understudied. In particular, there is a lack of studies on the relationship between phonological processing and word learning in a foreign language. Another problem is that the concept of phonological processing is not very well defined in itself. This dissertation provides a review of studies on phonological processing and offers a definition of the concept. Then it goes on to describe a study, in which 44 Polish 9-year olds, who learned English as a second language at schools, are tested on several measures of phonological processing in both Polish and English, and on measures of phonological short-term memory. The participants were also asked to perform four experimental novel word learning tasks in their native language (Polish), second language (English) and in a completely foreign language (LX) and they were tested on the progress they made in term of English vocabulary acquisition over the period of the school year. The results point to relationship between phonological processing and foreign word learning
Recommended from our members
Nonword repetition depends on the frequency of sublexical representations at different grain sizes: evidence from a multi-factorial analysis
The nonword repetition task (NWR) has been widely used in basic cognitive and clinical research, as well as in clinical assessment, and has been proposed as a clinical marker for Specific Language Impairment (SLI). Yet the mechanisms underlying performance on this task are not clear. This study offers insights into these mechanisms through a comprehensive examination of item-related variables identified in previous research as possibly contributing to NWR scores and through testing the predictive power of each in relation to the others. A unique feature of the study is that all factors are considered simultaneously. Fifty-seven typically developing children were tested with a NWR task containing 150 nonwords differing in length, phonotactic probability, lexical neighbourhood and phonological complexity. The results indicate that phonological processing of novel words draws on sublexical representations at all grain sizes and that these representations are phonological, unstructured and insensitive to morphemehood. We propose a novel index ā mean ngram frequency of all phonemes ā that best captures the extent to which a nonword draws on sublexical representations. The study demonstrates the primacy of sublexical representations in NWR performance with implications for the nature of the deficit in SLI
Bilingual children's phonology shows evidence of transfer, but not deceleration in their L1
Bilingual language development might be characterized by transfer, deceleration, and/or acceleration, the first two being relevant for the language impairment diagnosis. Studies on bilingual childrenās productive phonology show evidence of transfer, but little is known about deceleration in this population. Here, we focused on phonological transfer and deceleration in L1 speech of typically developing Polish-English bilingual children of Polish migrants to the United Kingdom (aged 4.7-7). We analyzed L1 speech samples of 30 bilinguals and 2 groups of Polish monolinguals, matched to the bilinguals on age or vocabulary size. We found that bilingual childrenā speech (both simultaneous and early sequential) was characterized by transfer, but not by deceleration, suggesting that while phonological deceleration phases out in children above the age of 4.7, transfer does not. We discuss our findings within the PRIMIR model of bilingual phonological acquisition (Curtin et al., 2011) and show their implications for SLT practices
How does L1 and L2 exposure impact L1 performance in bilingual children? : evidence from Polish-English migrants to the United Kingdom
Most studies on bilingual language development focus on childrenās second language (L2). Here, we investigated first language (L1) development of Polish-English early migrant bilinguals in four domains: vocabulary, grammar, phonological processing and discourse. We first compared Polish language skills between bilinguals and their Polish non-migrant monolingual peers, and then investigated the influence of the cumulative exposure to L1 and L2 on bilingualsā performance. We then examined whether high exposure to L1 could possibly minimize the gap between monolinguals and bilinguals. We analyzed data from 233 typically developing children (88 bilingual, 145 monolingual) aged 4;0 to 7;5 (years; months) on six language measures in Polish: receptive vocabulary, productive vocabulary, receptive grammar, productive grammar (sentence repetition), phonological processing (non-word repetition) and discourse abilities (narration). Information about language exposure was obtained via parental questionnaires. For each language task, we analyzed the data from the subsample of bilinguals who had completed all the tasks in question and from monolinguals matched one-on-one to the bilingual group on age, SES (measured by years of motherās education), gender, non-verbal IQ and short term memory. The bilingual children scored lower than monolinguals in all language domains, except discourse. The group differences were more pronounced on the productive tasks (vocabulary, grammar, phonological processing) and moderate on the receptive tasks (vocabulary and grammar). L1 exposure correlated positively with the vocabulary size and phonological processing. Grammar scores were not related to the levels of L1 exposure, but were predicted by general cognitive abilities. L2 exposure negatively influenced productive grammar in L1, suggesting possible L2 transfer effects on L1 grammatical performance. Childrenās narrative skills benefitted from exposure to two languages: both L1 and L2 exposure influenced story structure scores in L1. Importantly, we did not find any evidence (in any of the tasks in which the gap was present) that the performance gap between monolinguals and bilinguals could be fully closed with high amounts of L1 input
Kinetic models assessment for swelling of coal induced by methane and carbon dioxide sorption
Dimethyl fumarate in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial
Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) inhibits inflammasome-mediated inflammation and has been proposed as a treatment for patients hospitalised with COVID-19. This randomised, controlled, open-label platform trial (Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy [RECOVERY]), is assessing multiple treatments in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 (NCT04381936, ISRCTN50189673). In this assessment of DMF performed at 27 UK hospitals, adults were randomly allocated (1:1) to either usual standard of care alone or usual standard of care plus DMF. The primary outcome was clinical status on day 5 measured on a seven-point ordinal scale. Secondary outcomes were time to sustained improvement in clinical status, time to discharge, day 5 peripheral blood oxygenation, day 5 C-reactive protein, and improvement in day 10 clinical status. Between 2 March 2021 and 18 November 2021, 713 patients were enroled in the DMF evaluation, of whom 356 were randomly allocated to receive usual care plus DMF, and 357 to usual care alone. 95% of patients received corticosteroids as part of routine care. There was no evidence of a beneficial effect of DMF on clinical status at day 5 (common odds ratio of unfavourable outcome 1.12; 95% CI 0.86-1.47; pā=ā0.40). There was no significant effect of DMF on any secondary outcome
Dimethyl fumarate in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial
Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) inhibits inflammasome-mediated inflammation and has been proposed as a treatment for patients hospitalised with COVID-19. This randomised, controlled, open-label platform trial (Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy [RECOVERY]), is assessing multiple treatments in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 (NCT04381936, ISRCTN50189673). In this assessment of DMF performed at 27 UK hospitals, adults were randomly allocated (1:1) to either usual standard of care alone or usual standard of care plus DMF. The primary outcome was clinical status on day 5 measured on a seven-point ordinal scale. Secondary outcomes were time to sustained improvement in clinical status, time to discharge, day 5 peripheral blood oxygenation, day 5 C-reactive protein, and improvement in day 10 clinical status. Between 2 March 2021 and 18 November 2021, 713 patients were enroled in the DMF evaluation, of whom 356 were randomly allocated to receive usual care plus DMF, and 357 to usual care alone. 95% of patients received corticosteroids as part of routine care. There was no evidence of a beneficial effect of DMF on clinical status at day 5 (common odds ratio of unfavourable outcome 1.12; 95% CI 0.86-1.47; pā=ā0.40). There was no significant effect of DMF on any secondary outcome
Hyperglycemia treatment option in seniors in a family physicianās practice
MedicÄ«naVeselÄ«bas aprÅ«peMedicineHealth CareSenioru skaits un cukura diabÄta izplatÄ«ba populÄcijÄ pieaug. Senioriem ir augstÄks hipoglikÄmijas risks, tÄdÄļ ir svarÄ«ga loma Ärsta nozÄ«mÄtÄ terapijÄ. Pacientiem ir paaugstinÄts risks iegÅ«t kognitÄ«vus traucÄjumus, kas var bÅ«tiski sarežģīt pacienta slimÄ«bas kontroli. Ärstam ir svarÄ«gi panÄkt pacienta izpratni par slimÄ«bu. Ja pacients ir lÄ«dzestÄ«gs un gatavs paÅ”kontrolei, tas pozitÄ«vi atsaucas uz diabÄta kompensÄciju ilgtermiÅÄ un var bÅ«tiski samazinÄt komplikÄciju attÄ«stÄ«bu. DroÅ”ÄkÄ terapijas izvÄle ir cieÅ”i saistÄ«ta ar intensÄ«vu glikozes, asinsspiediena, lipÄ«du kontroli, pacientu piederÄ«go atbalstu, veselÄ«gu dzÄ«vesveidu un paÅ”aprÅ«pes iemaÅÄm.
Darba mÄrÄ·is bija izpÄtÄ«t glikÄmijas korekcijas iespÄjas un efektivitÄti senioriem. IzvÄlÄties pacientam droÅ”u terapiju glikÄmijas korekcijÄ.
PÄtÄ«jums aptvÄra 51 otrÄ tipa cukura diabÄta pacientus vecumÄ no 65 lÄ«dz 92 gadiem no 19 Ä£imenes Ärstu praksÄm. Dati tika analizÄti no endokrinoloÄ£ijas prakses ambulatorÄm kartÄm, kas ietvÄra analīžu rezultÄtus, anamnÄzi, objektÄ«vos rÄdÄ«tÄjus, dzÄ«vesveidu, saÅemto terapiju un uztura izvÄli.
KopumÄ glikozes lÄ«meni kontrolÄja 45 (88,2%) pacienti. PerorÄlos hipoglikemizÄjoÅ”os lÄ«dzekļus lietoja 35 pacienti un viÅu vidÄjais HbA1c bija 6,74%, insulÄ«nu 9 pacienti (HbA1c bija 7,66%), abus lietoja 7 pacienti (HbA1c bija 7,32%). VidÄjais sistoliskais asinsspiediens vÄ«rieÅ”iem bija 141 mmHg, sievietÄm 137,8 mmHg. 23 (45,1%) pacienti, kuri lietoja holesterÄ«nu samazinoÅ”u terapiju, vidÄjais ZBL bija 1,84 mmol/L. No 30 (58,8%) pacientiem, kuri dzÄ«voja kopÄ ar kÄdu, piederÄ«go atbalsts bija tikai 8 (26,7%) pacientiem (p<0,009). VidÄjais ĶMI vÄ«rieÅ”iem bija 30,1, bet sievietÄm 33,5. No 37 (72,5%) pacientiem, kuri nelietoja alkoholu, 31 (83,8%) veica fiziskas aktivitÄtes iekdienÄ (r = -0,353; p < 0,011). KÄ arÄ« no 45 (88,2%) pacientiem, kuri lietoja antihipertensÄ«vus medikamentus, 35 (77,8%) pacienti bija pÄrbaudÄ«juÅ”i redzi (r = 0,321; p < 0,05). VakcinÄti pret gripu bija 12 (23,5%), pret pneimokoku un gripu 1 (2%), bet 38 (74,5%) nebija vakcinÄti.
PÄtÄ«jums rÄda, lai arÄ« lielÄkÄ daļa pacientu dzÄ«vo vieni un nav tuvinieku atbalsta, tomÄr pacientiem ir labi glikozes kontroles rÄdÄ«tÄji, kas liek secinÄt par labu lÄ«dzestÄ«bu un sadarbÄ«bu ar Ärstu. LielÄkÄ daļai pacientu ir veselÄ«gs dzÄ«vesveids. Pacientiem, kuri lieto hipolipidimizÄjoÅ”us lÄ«dzekļus, ir labÄki lipÄ«du rÄdÄ«tÄji. PrimÄrÄs aprÅ«pes Ärstiem vajadzÄtu vairÄk informÄt pacientus par vakcÄ«nu nozÄ«mÄ«gumu. LielÄkÄ daļa pacientu nejÅ«t zemu cukura lÄ«meni asinÄ«s. Pacientiem, kuri lieto medikamentus ar lielÄku risku attÄ«stÄ«ties hipoglikÄmijai, vidÄjais HbA1c ir augstÄks (virs 7%). No perorÄliem hipoglikemizÄjoÅ”iem lÄ«dzekļiem lielÄkÄ daļa lietoja metformÄ«nu, kam ir zems hipoglikÄmiju risks.Despite the aging population prevalence of diabetes increases. Seniors have a higher risk of hypoglycemia, therefore doctors prescribed therapy plays very important role. Patients are at increased risk of developing cognitive impairment, which can significantly complicate control of the disease. It is very important for doctor to get patient educated regarding current disease. If the patient is compliant and ready for self-control, it positively refers to long term diabetes compensation and can significantly reduce the development of complications.The safest treatment option is closely related to intensive glycemic, blood pressure, lipid control, caregiver support, healthy lifestyle and self-management knowledge skills.
The aim of the study was to explore glycemic correction options and efficiency in seniors. To explore the safest hypoglycemic therapy for older patients.
The study included 51 type two diabetes mellitus patients from 65 ā 92 years of age from 19 general practitioners praxis. Data were obtained from endocrinological praxis patients' cards including laboratory tests, anamnesis, physical examinations, lyfestyle, prescribed medication and nutrition choice.
Overall glucose levels controlled 45 (88,2%) patients. Oral hypoglycemic medication used 35 patients and their average HbA1c was 6,74%, Insulin used 9 patients and their average HbA1c was 7,66%, both agents used 7 patients and their average HbA1c was 7,32%. Average sistolic blood pressure for men was 141 mmHg and for women 137,8 mmHg. 23 (45,1%) patients, who used lipid-lowering drugs average low-density lipoprotein was 1,84 mmol/L. From 30 (58,8%) patients who lived with someone support from their relatives had only 8 (26,7%) patients (p<0,009). Mean BMI for men 30,1 and for women 33,5. Daily physical activities did 41 (80,4%) patients. From 37 (72.5%) non-alcoholic patients, 31 (83.8%) performed daily physical activities (r = -0.353; p <0.011). As well as of 45 (88.2%) patients who used antihypertensive drugs, 35 (77.8%) patients had visual inspection (r = 0.321; p <0.05). Vaccinated against influenza were 12 (23,5%), against influenza and pneumococcus 1 (2%) and 38 (74,5%) were not vaccinated.
The study showed that even though most patients lived alone and had no support from their relatives, they still had good glucose control rates, which can be concluded that patients had good compliance and cooperation with their doctor. Most patients had healthy lifestyle. Patients who used hypolipidimizing agents, had better lipid profiles. Primary care physicians should more inform patients of the importance of vaccines. Most patients did not feel low blood glucose. Patients who used mediacation at higher risk for developing hypoglycaemia had a higher average HbA1c (above 7%). Most patients used metformin, which has low risk of hypoglycaemia
- ā¦