Factors associated with failed treatment : an analysis of 121,744 women embarking on their first IVF cycles

Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: pharmacokinetics and clinical outcome of paclitaxel and carboplatin treatment

Purpose: Administration of chemotherapy in patients with renal failure, treated with hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is still a challenge and literature data is scarce. Here we present a case study of a patient on CAPD, treated with weekly and three-weekly paclitaxel/ carboplatin for recurrent ovarian cancer. Experimental: During the first, second and ninth cycle of treatment, blood, urine and CAPD samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis of paclitaxel and total and unbound carboplatin-derived platinum. Results: Treatment was well tolerated by the patient. No excessive toxicity was observed and at the e

The OPTIMIST study: optimisation of cost effectiveness through individualised FSH stimulation dosages for IVF treatment. A randomised controlled trial

Contains fulltext : 109739.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Costs of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) are high, which is partly due to the use of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). FSH is usually administered in a standard dose. However, due to differences in ovarian reserve between women, ovarian response also differs with potential negative consequences on pregnancy rates. A Markov decision-analytic model showed that FSH dose individualisation according to ovarian reserve is likely to be cost-effective in women who are eligible for IVF. However, this has never been confirmed in a large randomised controlled trial (RCT). The aim of the present study is to assess whether an individualised FSH dose regime based on an ovarian reserve test (ORT) is more cost-effective than a standard dose regime. METHODS/DESIGN: Multicentre RCT in subfertile women indicated for a first IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle, who are aged < 44 years, have a regular menstrual cycle and no major abnormalities at transvaginal sonography. Women with polycystic ovary syndrome, endocrine or metabolic abnormalities and women undergoing IVF with oocyte donation, will not be included. Ovarian reserve will be assessed by measuring the antral follicle count. Women with a predicted poor response or hyperresponse will be randomised for a standard versus an individualised FSH regime (150 IU/day, 225-450 IU/day and 100 IU/day, respectively). Participants will undergo a maximum of three stimulation cycles during maximally 18 months. The primary study outcome is the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate resulting in live birth achieved within 18 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes are parameters for ovarian response, multiple pregnancies, number of cycles needed per live birth, total IU of FSH per stimulation cycle, and costs. All data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed to assess whether the health and associated economic benefits of individualised treatment of subfertile women outweigh the additional costs of an ORT. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will be integrated into a decision model that compares cost-effectiveness of the three dose-adjustment strategies to a standard dose strategy. The study outcomes will provide scientific foundation for national and international guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR2657

Optimum number of oocytes for a successful first IVF treatment cycle

Ovarian stimulation in IVF allows selection of embryos for transfer, but may have detrimental effects on oocyte and embryo quality and endometrial receptivity. This study investigated the optimal response to ovarian stimulation in terms of number of oocytes for achieving pregnancy in a first IVF cycle. Data from 7422 women who underwent their first IVF cycle for standard indications were analysed. All had been treated with exogenous gonadotrophins and gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist co-treatment in a long down-regulation protocol between 1990 and 1995. Pregnancy rates in relation to the number of obtained oocytes were adjusted for age, fecundity, subfertility cause, gonadotrophin dosage, type of luteal support, and number of transferred embryos by multivariate analysis. Of the 7422 women who underwent oocyte retrieval, overall 85% had an embryo transfer and 24% conceived. The highest pregnancy rates per embryo transfer and per started cycle were observed when 13 oocytes were obtained (31 and 28%, respectively). This study supports the concept of an optimal range of oocytes obtained in response to ovarian stimulation for IVF, below and above which outcomes are compromised

Endometrial secretion aspiration prior to embryo transfer does not reduce implantation rates

Analysis of protein patterns in endometrial secretion fluid may offer a relatively non-invasive means of assessing endometrial receptivity during fertility treatment cycles. In order to study the impact of the removal of endometrial secretions on embryo implantation, a prospective matched controlled study was performed. In 66 women undergoing IVF, endometrial fluid was obtained transcervically by aspiration just prior to embryo transfer (study group). Biochemical and ongoing pregnancy rates were compared with 66 control patients matched for stimulation treatment protocol, age, number of collected oocytes and number of high quality embryos. The protein content and uterine fluid protein profile in each sample was determined. Respective biochemical and ongoing pregnancy rates per embryo transfer were 36 and 33% in patients who underwent aspiration of endometrial secretion, compared with 33 and 30% respectively in matched control patients (P = 0.84 and P = 0.85). The protein content in endometrial fluid was sufficient for protein pattern analysis. Uterine fluid aspiration prior to IVF embryo transfer is a safe method for obtaining sufficient material for uterine secretion electrophoresis, thus allowing analysis of protein patterns serving as receptivity markers during treatment cycles. This technique may offer a novel tool for assessing endometrial receptivity during treatment cycles without affecting implantation rates