72 research outputs found
Solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from a nine-country interview study in Europe
Calls for solidarity have been an ubiquitous feature in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, we know little about how people have thought of and practised solidarity in their everyday lives since the beginning of the pandemic. What role does solidarity play in people’s lives, how does it relate to COVID-19 public health measures and how has it changed in different phases of the pandemic? Situated within the medical humanities at the intersection of philosophy, bioethics, social sciences and policy studies, this article explores how the practice-based understanding of solidarity formulated by Prainsack and Buyx helps shed light on these questions. Drawing on 643 qualitative interviews carried out in two phases (April–May 2020 and October 2020) in nine European countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, The Netherlands, German-speaking Switzerland and the UK), the data show that interpersonal acts of solidarity are important, but that they are not sustainable without consistent support at the institutional level. As the pandemic progressed, respondents expressed a longing for more institutionalised forms of solidarity. We argue that the medical humanities have much to gain from directing their attention to individual health issues, and to collective experiences of health or illness. The analysis of experiences through a collective lens such as solidarity offers unique insights to understandings of the individual and the collective. We propose three essential advances for research in the medical humanities that can help uncover collective experiences of disease and health crises: (1) an empirical and practice-oriented approach alongside more normative approaches; (2) the confidence to make recommendations for practice and policymaking and (3) the pursuit of cross-national and multidisciplinary research collaborations
Democratic research: Setting up a research commons for a qualitative, comparative, longitudinal interview study during the COVID-19 pandemic
The sudden and dramatic advent of the COVID-19 pandemic led to urgent demands for timely, relevant, yet rigorous research. This paper discusses the origin, design, and execution of the SolPan research commons, a large-scale, international, comparative, qualitative research project that sought to respond to the need for knowledge among researchers and policymakers in times of crisis. The form of organization as a research commons is characterized by an underlying solidaristic attitude of its members and its intrinsic organizational features in which research data and knowledge in the study is shared and jointly owned. As such, the project is peer-governed, rooted in (idealist) social values of academia, and aims at providing tools and benefits for its members. In this paper, we discuss challenges and solutions for qualitative studies that seek to operate as research commons
Dexamethasone action on caudal fin regeneration of carp Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus, 1758)
Review of Zwemmen in de oceaan
Item does not contain fulltextBespreking van: M. Rasch,Zwemmen in de oceaan. Berichten uit een post-digitale wereld Amsterdam:De bezige bij ,2017 978902346625
"Strongly Recommended". Revisiting Decisional Privacy to Judge Hypernudging in Self-Tracking Technologies
Contains fulltext :
207151.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)06 juni 201
Privacy protects the constitutional state
Het pleidooi van AIVD-hoofd Bertholee voor 'ontsleutelde' communicatie gaat uit van een valse tegenstelling tussen privacy en veiligheid.The plea of AIVD-president Bertholee for 'decrypted' communication is based on the false assumption that privacy and safety are each others opposites
- …