The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology through a Distributed Collaborative Network

Concerns have been growing about the veracity of psychological research. Many findings in psychological science are based on studies with insufficient statistical power and nonrepresentative samples, or may otherwise be limited to specific, ungeneralizable settings or populations. Crowdsourced research, a type of large-scale collaboration in which one or more research projects are conducted across multiple lab sites, offers a pragmatic solution to these and other current methodological challenges. The Psychological Science Accelerator (PSA) is a distributed network of laboratories designed to enable and support crowdsourced research projects. These projects can focus on novel research questions, or attempt to replicate prior research, in large, diverse samples. The PSA\u27s mission is to accelerate the accumulation of reliable and generalizable evidence in psychological science. Here, we describe the background, structure, principles, procedures, benefits, and challenges of the PSA. In contrast to other crowdsourced research networks, the PSA is ongoing (as opposed to time-limited), efficient (in terms of re-using structures and principles for different projects), decentralized, diverse (in terms of participants and researchers), and inclusive (of proposals, contributions, and other relevant input from anyone inside or outside of the network). The PSA and other approaches to crowdsourced psychological science will advance our understanding of mental processes and behaviors by enabling rigorous research and systematically examining its generalizability

The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology Through a Distributed Collaborative Network

Source at https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607.Concerns about the veracity of psychological research have been growing. Many findings in psychological science are based on studies with insufficient statistical power and nonrepresentative samples, or may otherwise be limited to specific, ungeneralizable settings or populations. Crowdsourced research, a type of large-scale collaboration in which one or more research projects are conducted across multiple lab sites, offers a pragmatic solution to these and other current methodological challenges. The Psychological Science Accelerator (PSA) is a distributed network of laboratories designed to enable and support crowdsourced research projects. These projects can focus on novel research questions or replicate prior research in large, diverse samples. The PSA’s mission is to accelerate the accumulation of reliable and generalizable evidence in psychological science. Here, we describe the background, structure, principles, procedures, benefits, and challenges of the PSA. In contrast to other crowdsourced research networks, the PSA is ongoing (as opposed to time limited), efficient (in that structures and principles are reused for different projects), decentralized, diverse (in both subjects and researchers), and inclusive (of proposals, contributions, and other relevant input from anyone inside or outside the network). The PSA and other approaches to crowdsourced psychological science will advance understanding of mental processes and behaviors by enabling rigorous research and systematic examination of its generalizability

Keuneunong: Learning from Authority

Knowledge systems have been the focus of much anthropological work, although there have been shifts in definitions and perspectives. One aspect of knowledge is that it is learned, mostly informally through a process of trial and error. The keuneunong is one such knowledge system, known to be distributed among Acehnese farmers and used mainly to determine planting schedules and crop selection. Although it serves as a guide for agricultural activities, most farmers do not understand it fully, and leave its interpretation to an authority known as the kejrun blang. Research for this article was conducted in Mane, Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam. The findings suggest that the process of trial-and-error learning among farmers is hindered by authority, and that transmission of knowledge of the essence of keuneunong does not occur.Key words: keuneunong, knowledge, learnin

Evaluation of Blood Units with Isolated Anti HBC for the Presence of HBV DNA

We screened blood donors in one center in Saudi Arabia for a safety transfusion. We found that among 5043 blood donors negative for HCV and HIV, the incidence of HBsAg positivity was 2.97%. When antiHBc antibody was measured (HBcIg) in HBsAg negative donors, we observed that 21.47% were positive indicating previous exposure to hepatitis B virus. The HBcIg positive blood was further screened for HBsAb and the specimens were found to be reactive in 81.54%. Based on these data blood transfusion was permissible from donors who showed HBsAg negativity, HBcIg positive and HBsAb reactive blood. In order to ensure safety transfusion an aliquot of specimens (n = 80) was further analyzed for HBV DNA by PCR. We found only one specimen positive with incidence of 1.25%. So we recommended restricting transfusion from the previously mentioned donors to emergencies

Surgical confidence when operating among residents in surgery – a cross-sectional study (SCAR study)

Abstract Background Self-confidence, is one of the critical variables influencing surgical resident’s abilities, and lack of confidence maybe a reason for not entering medical practice immediately. Measuring the level of confidence of senior surgical residents (SSRs) is a crucial step in assessing preparedness to practice. In this study, we aim to measure their confidence level and the factors that might contribute to it. Methods Cross-sectional survey conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital on SSRs in Saudi Arabia (SA). We approached 142 SSRs, 127 responded. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio v 3.6.2. Descriptive statistics were performed using counts and percentages for categorical variables and using mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables. Multivariate linear regression (t-statistics) was used to assess the factors associated with confidence in performing essential procedures, while the association between demographics and residency-related factor with the number of completed cases was tested using Chi-square. The level of significance was determined as 0.05. Results Response rate was 89.4%. Among surveyed residents, 66% had completed < 750 cases as a primary surgeon. More than 90% of SSRs were confident in performing appendectomy, open inguinal hernia repair, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and trauma laparotomy, while 88% were confident in being on-call in level-I trauma center. No difference was noted in confidence level in relation to the number of performed cases. Residents from the Ministry of Health accounted for 56.3% of the study population and showed a higher confidence level compared to others. 94% of SSRs plan to pursue fellowship training program. Conclusion The study showed that the confidence of SSRs in performing common general surgery procedures was as expected. However, it’s important to recognize that confidence doesn’t necessarily reflect competence. Considering the majority of SSRs planned to pursue fellowship training programs, it may be time to consider changing the structure of surgical training in SA to a modular format to allow earlier and more intensive exposure

Not Available

Not AvailableNot AvailableNot Availabl