Pictograms to aid laypeople in identifying the addictiveness of gambling products (PictoGRRed study)

Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26963-9The structural addictive characteristics of gambling products are important targets for prevention, but can be unintuitive to laypeople. In the PictoGRRed (Pictograms for Gambling Risk Reduction) study, we aimed to develop pictograms that illustrate the main addictive characteristics of gambling products and to assess their impact on identifying the addictiveness of gambling products by laypeople. We conducted a three-step study: (1) use of a Delphi consensus method among 56 experts from 13 countries to reach a consensus on the 10 structural addictive characteristics of gambling products to be illustrated by pictograms and their associated definitions, (2) development of 10 pictograms and their definitions, and (3) study in the general population to assess the impact of exposure to the pictograms and their definitions (n = 900). French-speaking experts from the panel assessed the addictiveness of gambling products (n = 25), in which the mean of expert's ratings was considered as the true value. Participants were randomly provided with the pictograms and their definitions, or with a standard slogan, or with neither (control group). We considered the control group as representing the baseline ability of laypeople to assess the addictiveness of gambling products. Each group and the French-speaking experts rated the addictiveness of 14 gambling products. The judgment criterion was the intraclass coefficients (ICCs) between the mean ratings of each group and the experts, reflecting the level of agreement between each group and the experts. Exposure to the pictograms and their definition doubled the ability of laypeople to assess the addictiveness of gambling products compared with that of the group that read a slogan or the control group (ICC = 0.28 vs. 0.14 (Slogan) and 0.14 (Control)). Laypeople have limited awareness of the addictive characteristics of gambling products. The pictograms developed herein represent an innovative tool for universally empowering prevention and for selective prevention.Santé Publique Franc

Psychometric properties of the transaddiction craving triggers questionnaire in alcohol use disorder.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to develop the transaddiction craving triggers questionnaire (TCTQ), which assesses the propensity of specific situations and contexts to trigger craving and to test its psychometric properties in alcohol use disorder (AUD). METHODS: This study included a sample of 111 AUD outpatients. We performed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and calculated item-dimension correlations. Internal consistency was measured with Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Construct validity was assessed through Spearman correlations with craving, emotional symptoms, impulsivity, mindfulness, and drinking characteristics. RESULTS: The EFA suggested a 3-factor solution: unpleasant affect, pleasant affect, and cues and related thoughts. Cronbach's coefficient alpha ranged from .80 to .95 for the three factors and the total score. Weak positive correlations were identified between the TCTQ and drinking outcomes, and moderate correlation were found between the TCTQ and craving strength, impulsivity, anxiety, depression, and impact of alcohol on quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The 3-factor structure is congruent with the well-established propensity of emotions and cues to trigger craving. Construct validity is supported by close relations between the TCTQ and psychological well-being rather than between the TCTQ and drinking behaviors. Longitudinal validation is warranted to assess sensitivity to change of the TCTQ and to explore its psychometric properties in other addictive disorders

Harmonizing Screening for Gambling Problems in Epidemiological Surveys – Development of the Rapid Screener for Problem Gambling (RSPG)

Background and aims The aim of this study was to test the screening properties of several combinations of items from gambling scales, in order to harmonize screening of gambling problems in epidemiological surveys. The objective was to propose two brief screening tools (three items or less) for a use in interviews and self-administered questionnaires. Methods We tested the screening properties of combinations of items from several gambling scales, in a sample of 425 gamblers (301 non-problem gamblers and 124 disordered gamblers). Items tested included interview-based items (Pathological Gambling section of the DSM-IV, lifetime history of problem gambling, monthly expenses in gambling, and abstinence of 1 month or more) and self-report items (South Oaks Gambling Screen, Gambling Attitudes, and Beliefs Survey). The gold standard used was the diagnosis of a gambling disorder according to the DSM-5. Results Two versions of the Rapid Screener for Problem Gambling (RSPG) were developed: the RSPG-Interview (RSPG-I), being composed of two interview items (increasing bets and loss of control), and the RSPG-Self-Assessment (RSPG-SA), being composed of three self-report items (chasing, guiltiness, and perceived inability to stop). Discussion and conclusions We recommend using the RSPG-SA/I for screening problem gambling in epidemiological surveys, with the version adapted for each purpose (RSPG-I for interview-based surveys and RSPG-SA for self-administered surveys). This first triage of potential problem gamblers must be supplemented by further assessment, as it may overestimate the proportion of problem gamblers. However, a first triage has the great advantage of saving time and energy in large-scale screening for problem gambling

Giving room to subjectivity in understanding and assessing problem gambling: A patient-centered approach focused on quality of life

Background and aims: Problem gambling is characterized by high stigma and self-stigma, making relevant measurement of the burden of the disorder complex. The aim of our qualitative study was to describe health-related quality of life (HRQOL) impacted by problem gambling from the patients’ perspective. Methods: We conducted 6 focus groups with 25 current or lifetime at-risk problem gamblers to identify key domains of quality of life impacted by problem gambling. A content analysis from the focus groups data was conducted using Alceste© software, using descendant hierarchical classification analysis, to obtain stable classes and the significant presences of reduced forms. The class of interest, detailing the core of impacted quality of life, was described using a cluster analysis. Results: Thematic content analysis identified three stable classes. Class 1 contained the interviewers’ speech. Class 3 was composed of the vocabulary related to gambling practice, games and gambling venues (casino, horse betting, etc.). Class 2 described the core of impact of gambling on quality of life and corresponded to 43% of the analyzed elementary context units. This analysis revealed seven key domains of impact of problem gambling: loneliness, financial pressure, relationships deterioration, feeling of incomprehension, preoccupation with gambling, negative emotions, and avoidance of helping relationships. Conclusions: We identified, beyond objective damage, the subjective distress felt by problem gamblers over the course of the disorder and in the helping process, marked in particular by stigma and self-stigma. Four impacted HRQOL areas were new and gambling-specific: loneliness, feeling of incomprehension, avoidance of helping relationships, and preoccupation with gambling. These results support the relevance of developing, in a next step, a specific HRQOL scale in the context of gambling

Cognitive distortions and ADHD in pathological gambling: A national longitudinal case-control cohort study

Introduction The primary outcome of our study was to assess the links between the level of cognitive distortions and the severity of gambling disorder. We also aimed at assessing the links between patient gambling trajectories and attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Materials and methods The study population (n = 628) was comprised of problem and non-problem gamblers of both sexes between 18 and 65 years of age, who reported gambling on at least one occasion during the previous year. Data encompassed socio-demographic characteristics, gambling habits, the South Oaks Gambling Screen, the Gambling Attitudes and Beliefs Survey – 23, the Wender Utah Rating Scale – Child, and the Adult ADHD Self-report Scale. Results The cognitive distortions with the greatest correlation to the severity of gambling disorder were the “Chasing” and “Emotions.” These two dimensions were able to distinguish between problem gamblers seeking treatment or not. While age of onset of gambling and length of gambling practice were not associated with the level of distorted cognitions, a period of abstinence of at least 1 month was associated with a lower level of distorted cognitions. The presence of ADHD resulted in a higher level of distorted cognitions. Conclusion Cognitive work is essential to the prevention, and the treatment, of pathological gambling, especially with respect to emotional biases and chasing behavior. The instauration of an abstinence period of at least 1 month under medical supervision could be a promising therapeutic lead for reducing gambling-related erroneous thoughts and for improving care strategies of pathological gamblers

Qualité de vie dans le trouble d'usage d'alcool : une mesure de l'effet thérapeutique du point de vue des patients

Context : The evolution of practices in alcohol use disorder field, following the model of patient-centered care, lets revisit the concept of remission for a better consideration of the patient's point of view, participating predominantly in the definition of therapeutic objectives and in their assessment. Yet few of these subjective criteria of the evaluation of patient outcomes have actually included the patient in their development. Until recently, quality of life instruments the most used among patients with alcohol use disorder were generic ones, and their development and particularly generation of items did not involve patients, but rather experts and were based on existing literature. Methods : we conducted a systematic literature review identifying randomized clinical trials testing an intervention in alcohol-dependent patients, and measuring its effectiveness on quality of life. We have listed the dimensions explored in the existing instruments. It has been shown that these instruments did not optimally explore the impact of alcohol dependence on quality of life in this population. On this, we have developed a scale specific for patients with alcohol use disorder, following the recommendations of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the development of "Patient-Reported Outcomes", namely involving patients extensively. We used the method of focus groups conducted in parallel in France and Great Britain with 38 patients with alcohol use disorder. These groups allowed the generation of a pool of items, secondarily tested by individual cognitive interviews with 31 patients, resulting in the final scale "Alcohol Quality of Life Scale" (AQoLS). We then validated the AQoLS scale on a sample of 285 French patients with alcoho use disorder, recruited from randomly selected centers in France. Results: The scale has 34 items developed, distributed in seven dimensions: social relationships, activities, living conditions, looking after self, negative emotions, sleep and loss of control. The validation study confirmed six of the seven dimensions, with a slightly different distribution of the items. The "looking after self" dimension disappeared in favor of a new dimension of self-esteem. Control and self-esteem dimensions are innovative in a health-related quality of life instrument in adults. The scale showed good psychometric properties, with good internal consistency (Cronbach = 0.96), and a moderate correlation with sub-scores of the SF-36 and EQ-5D. A qualitative complementary work could illustrate the links between the different affected areas, including the proximity in patients’ perception between self-esteem, loss of control and cognitive impairment. Conclusion : The move towards a model of patient-centered care allows considering a different approach of remission and to build and validate a measure of health-related quality of life close to the concerns of patients with a alcohol use disorder, AQoLS scale. Two innovative dimensions were attached to this concept: loss of control from the patient's perspective, and self-esteem.Contexte : L'évolution des pratiques en alcoologie, suivant le modèle des soins centrés sur la patient, permet de revisiter le concept de rémission pour une meilleure prise en compte du point de vue du patient, participant de façon prépondérante dans la définition de ses objectifs thérapeutiques et dans leur évaluation. Pourtant, peu de ces critères subjectifs de l’évaluation du devenir des patients ont véritablement inclus le patient dans leur développement. Jusqu'à récemment, les instruments mesurant la qualité de vie les plus utilisés en alcoologie étaient génériques, constitués d'items générés par les experts et s'appuyant sur la littérature existante, mais n'ayant pas impliqué de patient dans leur développement, c’est-à-dire dans la génération des items. Méthodes : nous avons réalisé une revue systématique de la littérature recensant les essais thérapeutiques randomisés testant une intervention chez les patients alcoolodépendants, et mesurant son efficacité sur la qualité de vie. Nous avons répertorié les dimensions explorées dans les instruments existants. Il a été montré que ces instruments n'exploraient pas de façon optimale l’impact de l’alcoolodépendance sur la qualité de vie. Sur ce constat, nous avons développé conformément aux recommandations de la Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sur le développement des « Patients-Reported Outcomes » une échelle spécifique au trouble d'usage d'alcool, à partir du vécu rapporté par les patients. Nous avons utilisé la méthode des groupes focus, réalisés en parallèle en France et en Grande-Bretagne auprès de 38 patients présentant un trouble d’usage d’alcool. Ces groupes ont pu générer un pool d’items, testés secondairement par des entretiens cognitifs individuels auprès de 31 patients, aboutissant à l’échelle finale « Alcohol Quality of life Scale » (AQoLS). Nous avons ensuite validé l’échelle AQoLS sur un échantillon de 285 patients français présentant un trouble d’usage d’alcool, recrutés dans des centres sélectionnés de façon aléatoire en France. Résultats : L’échelle développée comporte 34 items, répartis selon 7 dimensions : les relations sociales, les activités, les conditions de vie, s’occuper de soi, les émotions négatives, le sommeil et la perte de contrôle. L’analyse de l’échelle a pu confirmer 6 de ces sept dimensions, avec une répartition légèrement différente des items. La dimension « s’occuper de soi » a disparu au profit d’une nouvelle dimension, l’estime de soi. Les dimensions de contrôle et d’estime de soi sont novatrices dans un instrument de qualité de vie liée à la santé, chez l’adulte. L’échelle a montré de bonnes propriétés psychométriques, avec une bonne consistance interne (Cronbach = 0.96), et une corrélation modérée mais significative avec certains sous-scores de la SF-36 et l’EQ-5D. Un travail complémentaire qualitatif a pu illustrer les liens entre les différents domaines impactés, et notamment la proximité de perception dans les propos des patients, entre l’estime de soi, la perte de contrôle et les troubles cognitifs. Conclusion : L’évolution vers un modèle des soins centrés sur le patient permet d’envisager une conception différente de la rémission et de construire et valider une mesure de la qualité de vie se rapprochant des préoccupations des patients, l’échelle AQoLS. Deux dimensions novatrices ont été rattachées à ce concept : la perte de contrôle du point de vue du patient, et l’estime de soi

Qualité de vie dans le trouble d'usage d'alcool : une mesure de l'effet thérapeutique du point de vue des patients

Context : The evolution of practices in alcohol use disorder field, following the model of patient-centered care, lets revisit the concept of remission for a better consideration of the patient's point of view, participating predominantly in the definition of therapeutic objectives and in their assessment. Yet few of these subjective criteria of the evaluation of patient outcomes have actually included the patient in their development. Until recently, quality of life instruments the most used among patients with alcohol use disorder were generic ones, and their development and particularly generation of items did not involve patients, but rather experts and were based on existing literature. Methods : we conducted a systematic literature review identifying randomized clinical trials testing an intervention in alcohol-dependent patients, and measuring its effectiveness on quality of life. We have listed the dimensions explored in the existing instruments. It has been shown that these instruments did not optimally explore the impact of alcohol dependence on quality of life in this population. On this, we have developed a scale specific for patients with alcohol use disorder, following the recommendations of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the development of "Patient-Reported Outcomes", namely involving patients extensively. We used the method of focus groups conducted in parallel in France and Great Britain with 38 patients with alcohol use disorder. These groups allowed the generation of a pool of items, secondarily tested by individual cognitive interviews with 31 patients, resulting in the final scale "Alcohol Quality of Life Scale" (AQoLS). We then validated the AQoLS scale on a sample of 285 French patients with alcoho use disorder, recruited from randomly selected centers in France. Results: The scale has 34 items developed, distributed in seven dimensions: social relationships, activities, living conditions, looking after self, negative emotions, sleep and loss of control. The validation study confirmed six of the seven dimensions, with a slightly different distribution of the items. The "looking after self" dimension disappeared in favor of a new dimension of self-esteem. Control and self-esteem dimensions are innovative in a health-related quality of life instrument in adults. The scale showed good psychometric properties, with good internal consistency (Cronbach = 0.96), and a moderate correlation with sub-scores of the SF-36 and EQ-5D. A qualitative complementary work could illustrate the links between the different affected areas, including the proximity in patients’ perception between self-esteem, loss of control and cognitive impairment. Conclusion : The move towards a model of patient-centered care allows considering a different approach of remission and to build and validate a measure of health-related quality of life close to the concerns of patients with a alcohol use disorder, AQoLS scale. Two innovative dimensions were attached to this concept: loss of control from the patient's perspective, and self-esteem.Contexte : L'évolution des pratiques en alcoologie, suivant le modèle des soins centrés sur la patient, permet de revisiter le concept de rémission pour une meilleure prise en compte du point de vue du patient, participant de façon prépondérante dans la définition de ses objectifs thérapeutiques et dans leur évaluation. Pourtant, peu de ces critères subjectifs de l’évaluation du devenir des patients ont véritablement inclus le patient dans leur développement. Jusqu'à récemment, les instruments mesurant la qualité de vie les plus utilisés en alcoologie étaient génériques, constitués d'items générés par les experts et s'appuyant sur la littérature existante, mais n'ayant pas impliqué de patient dans leur développement, c’est-à-dire dans la génération des items. Méthodes : nous avons réalisé une revue systématique de la littérature recensant les essais thérapeutiques randomisés testant une intervention chez les patients alcoolodépendants, et mesurant son efficacité sur la qualité de vie. Nous avons répertorié les dimensions explorées dans les instruments existants. Il a été montré que ces instruments n'exploraient pas de façon optimale l’impact de l’alcoolodépendance sur la qualité de vie. Sur ce constat, nous avons développé conformément aux recommandations de la Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sur le développement des « Patients-Reported Outcomes » une échelle spécifique au trouble d'usage d'alcool, à partir du vécu rapporté par les patients. Nous avons utilisé la méthode des groupes focus, réalisés en parallèle en France et en Grande-Bretagne auprès de 38 patients présentant un trouble d’usage d’alcool. Ces groupes ont pu générer un pool d’items, testés secondairement par des entretiens cognitifs individuels auprès de 31 patients, aboutissant à l’échelle finale « Alcohol Quality of life Scale » (AQoLS). Nous avons ensuite validé l’échelle AQoLS sur un échantillon de 285 patients français présentant un trouble d’usage d’alcool, recrutés dans des centres sélectionnés de façon aléatoire en France. Résultats : L’échelle développée comporte 34 items, répartis selon 7 dimensions : les relations sociales, les activités, les conditions de vie, s’occuper de soi, les émotions négatives, le sommeil et la perte de contrôle. L’analyse de l’échelle a pu confirmer 6 de ces sept dimensions, avec une répartition légèrement différente des items. La dimension « s’occuper de soi » a disparu au profit d’une nouvelle dimension, l’estime de soi. Les dimensions de contrôle et d’estime de soi sont novatrices dans un instrument de qualité de vie liée à la santé, chez l’adulte. L’échelle a montré de bonnes propriétés psychométriques, avec une bonne consistance interne (Cronbach = 0.96), et une corrélation modérée mais significative avec certains sous-scores de la SF-36 et l’EQ-5D. Un travail complémentaire qualitatif a pu illustrer les liens entre les différents domaines impactés, et notamment la proximité de perception dans les propos des patients, entre l’estime de soi, la perte de contrôle et les troubles cognitifs. Conclusion : L’évolution vers un modèle des soins centrés sur le patient permet d’envisager une conception différente de la rémission et de construire et valider une mesure de la qualité de vie se rapprochant des préoccupations des patients, l’échelle AQoLS. Deux dimensions novatrices ont été rattachées à ce concept : la perte de contrôle du point de vue du patient, et l’estime de soi

Quality of life in alcohol use disorder : a patient-centered assessment of efficacy

Contexte : L'évolution des pratiques en alcoologie, suivant le modèle des soins centrés sur la patient, permet de revisiter le concept de rémission pour une meilleure prise en compte du point de vue du patient, participant de façon prépondérante dans la définition de ses objectifs thérapeutiques et dans leur évaluation. Pourtant, peu de ces critères subjectifs de l’évaluation du devenir des patients ont véritablement inclus le patient dans leur développement. Jusqu'à récemment, les instruments mesurant la qualité de vie les plus utilisés en alcoologie étaient génériques, constitués d'items générés par les experts et s'appuyant sur la littérature existante, mais n'ayant pas impliqué de patient dans leur développement, c’est-à-dire dans la génération des items. Méthodes : nous avons réalisé une revue systématique de la littérature recensant les essais thérapeutiques randomisés testant une intervention chez les patients alcoolodépendants, et mesurant son efficacité sur la qualité de vie. Nous avons répertorié les dimensions explorées dans les instruments existants. Il a été montré que ces instruments n'exploraient pas de façon optimale l’impact de l’alcoolodépendance sur la qualité de vie. Sur ce constat, nous avons développé conformément aux recommandations de la Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sur le développement des « Patients-Reported Outcomes » une échelle spécifique au trouble d'usage d'alcool, à partir du vécu rapporté par les patients. Nous avons utilisé la méthode des groupes focus, réalisés en parallèle en France et en Grande-Bretagne auprès de 38 patients présentant un trouble d’usage d’alcool. Ces groupes ont pu générer un pool d’items, testés secondairement par des entretiens cognitifs individuels auprès de 31 patients, aboutissant à l’échelle finale « Alcohol Quality of life Scale » (AQoLS). Nous avons ensuite validé l’échelle AQoLS sur un échantillon de 285 patients français présentant un trouble d’usage d’alcool, recrutés dans des centres sélectionnés de façon aléatoire en France. Résultats : L’échelle développée comporte 34 items, répartis selon 7 dimensions : les relations sociales, les activités, les conditions de vie, s’occuper de soi, les émotions négatives, le sommeil et la perte de contrôle. L’analyse de l’échelle a pu confirmer 6 de ces sept dimensions, avec une répartition légèrement différente des items. La dimension « s’occuper de soi » a disparu au profit d’une nouvelle dimension, l’estime de soi. Les dimensions de contrôle et d’estime de soi sont novatrices dans un instrument de qualité de vie liée à la santé, chez l’adulte. L’échelle a montré de bonnes propriétés psychométriques, avec une bonne consistance interne (Cronbach = 0.96), et une corrélation modérée mais significative avec certains sous-scores de la SF-36 et l’EQ-5D. Un travail complémentaire qualitatif a pu illustrer les liens entre les différents domaines impactés, et notamment la proximité de perception dans les propos des patients, entre l’estime de soi, la perte de contrôle et les troubles cognitifs. Conclusion : L’évolution vers un modèle des soins centrés sur le patient permet d’envisager une conception différente de la rémission et de construire et valider une mesure de la qualité de vie se rapprochant des préoccupations des patients, l’échelle AQoLS. Deux dimensions novatrices ont été rattachées à ce concept : la perte de contrôle du point de vue du patient, et l’estime de soi.Context : The evolution of practices in alcohol use disorder field, following the model of patient-centered care, lets revisit the concept of remission for a better consideration of the patient's point of view, participating predominantly in the definition of therapeutic objectives and in their assessment. Yet few of these subjective criteria of the evaluation of patient outcomes have actually included the patient in their development. Until recently, quality of life instruments the most used among patients with alcohol use disorder were generic ones, and their development and particularly generation of items did not involve patients, but rather experts and were based on existing literature. Methods : we conducted a systematic literature review identifying randomized clinical trials testing an intervention in alcohol-dependent patients, and measuring its effectiveness on quality of life. We have listed the dimensions explored in the existing instruments. It has been shown that these instruments did not optimally explore the impact of alcohol dependence on quality of life in this population. On this, we have developed a scale specific for patients with alcohol use disorder, following the recommendations of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the development of "Patient-Reported Outcomes", namely involving patients extensively. We used the method of focus groups conducted in parallel in France and Great Britain with 38 patients with alcohol use disorder. These groups allowed the generation of a pool of items, secondarily tested by individual cognitive interviews with 31 patients, resulting in the final scale "Alcohol Quality of Life Scale" (AQoLS). We then validated the AQoLS scale on a sample of 285 French patients with alcoho use disorder, recruited from randomly selected centers in France. Results: The scale has 34 items developed, distributed in seven dimensions: social relationships, activities, living conditions, looking after self, negative emotions, sleep and loss of control. The validation study confirmed six of the seven dimensions, with a slightly different distribution of the items. The "looking after self" dimension disappeared in favor of a new dimension of self-esteem. Control and self-esteem dimensions are innovative in a health-related quality of life instrument in adults. The scale showed good psychometric properties, with good internal consistency (Cronbach = 0.96), and a moderate correlation with sub-scores of the SF-36 and EQ-5D. A qualitative complementary work could illustrate the links between the different affected areas, including the proximity in patients’ perception between self-esteem, loss of control and cognitive impairment. Conclusion : The move towards a model of patient-centered care allows considering a different approach of remission and to build and validate a measure of health-related quality of life close to the concerns of patients with a alcohol use disorder, AQoLS scale. Two innovative dimensions were attached to this concept: loss of control from the patient's perspective, and self-esteem