The legacy of A.H. Wapstra and the future of the Atomic Mass Evaluation

This contribution pays homage to Aaldert Wapstra, the founder of the Atomic Mass Evaluation (AME) in its present form. Producing an atomic mass table requires detailed evaluation and combination of the various decay and reaction energies as well as data from inertial mass measurements. Therefore, a brief summary of all mass measurements published since the last ENAM (2004) is given (as of 2008). The status of the AME is then discussed and as well as attempts for its continuation. (Since this paper was the written, coordination of the Atomic Mass Evaluation was taken over by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Modern Physics, in Lanzhou.)Comment: Contribution presented at the 5th International Conference of Exotic Nuclei and Atomic Masses (ENAM) held in Ryn, Poland in 2008, which was distributed in a DVD but not included in an associated Topical Issue published in the European Physics Journal A (https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2009-10897-y

Piégeage et accumulation de positons issus d'un faisceau pulsé produit par un accélérateur pour l'étude de l'interaction gravitationnelle de l'antimatière

L'expérience GBAR - Gravitational Behaviour of Antihydrogen at Rest - est conçue pour réaliser un test direct du principe d'équivalence faible sur l'antimatière. Son objectif est de mesurer l'accélération d'un antiatome d'hydrogène en chute libre, appelée Gbar. Son originalité réside dans la production d'antiions Hbar+ pour appliquer le refroidissement sympathique afin d'obtenir une température de l'ordre du K, indispensable à la réalisation de la mesure. Les ions Hbar+ sont produits par les réactions : pbar + Ps -> Hbar + e-, puis Hbar + Ps -> Hbar+ + e-, où pbar représente l'antiproton, Ps le positronium (l'état lié entre le positon et l'électron), Hbar l'antihydrogène et Hbar+ l'antiion associé. Pour produire la quantité de Ps nécessaire à l'expérience GBAR, 2x10^10 positons doivent être injectés sur une cible mésoporeuse de SiO2 en moins de 100ns. Un tel flux nécessite l'accumulation et le refroidissement des positons dans un piège à particules.Cette thèse décrit l'injecteur de positons en phase de démonstration à Saclay pour l'expérience GBAR. Il est constitué d'un piège de Penning-Malmberg (emprunté au laboratoire du RIKEN) alimenté par un faisceau de positons lents. Un accélérateur linéaire d'électrons de 4.3MeV produit le faisceau pulsé de positons en tirant sur une cible de tungstène, modéré ensuite par un modérateur constitué de multiples couches de grilles de tungstène. Le flux de positons lents est de 10^4 e+/pulse, soit 2x10^6 e+/s à 200Hz. Nous présentons dans ce document la toute première accumulation de positons produit par un accélérateur (plutôt qu'une source radioactive), et leur refroidissement dans un plasma de 2x10^10 électrons préalablement chargés dans le piège.The Gravitational Behaviour of Antihydrogen at Rest experiment - GBAR - is designed to perform a direct measurement of the weak equivalence principle on antimatter by measuring the acceleration (gbar) of antihydrogen atoms in free fall. Its originality is to produce Hbar+ ions and use sympathetic cooling to achieve K temperature. Hbar+ ions are produced by the reactions : pbar + Ps -> Hbar + e-, and Hbar + Ps -> Hbar+ + e-, where pbar is an antiproton, Ps stands for positronium (the bound-state of a positron and an electron), Hbar is the antihydrogen and Hbar+ the antiion associated. To produce enough Ps atoms, 2x10^10 positrons must be impinged on a porous SiO2 target within 100ns. Such an intense flux requires the accumulation (collection and cooling) of the positrons in a particle trap. This thesis describes the injector being commissioned at CEA Saclay for GBAR. It consists of a Penning-Malmberg trap (moved from RIKEN) fed by a slow positron beam. A 4.3MeV linear accelerator shooting electrons on a tungsten target produces the pulsed positron beam, which is moderated by a multi-grid tungsten moderator. The slow positron flux is 10^4 e+/pulse, or 2x10^6 e+/s at 200Hz. This work presents the first ever accumulation of low-energy positrons produced by an accelerator (rather than a radioactive source) and their cooling by a prepared reservoir of 2x10^10 cold electrons.PARIS11-SCD-Bib. électronique (914719901) / SudocSudocFranceF

Researching Mathematics Pedagogy

Author's accepted manuscript.acceptedVersio

ERIS: revitalising an adaptive optics instrument for the VLT

ERIS is an instrument that will both extend and enhance the fundamental diffraction limited imaging and spectroscopy capability for the VLT. It will replace two instruments that are now being maintained beyond their operational lifetimes, combine their functionality on a single focus, provide a new wavefront sensing module that makes use of the facility Adaptive Optics System, and considerably improve their performance. The instrument will be competitive with respect to JWST in several regimes, and has outstanding potential for studies of the Galactic Center, exoplanets, and high redshift galaxies. ERIS had its final design review in 2017, and is expected to be on sky in 2020. This contribution describes the instrument concept, outlines its expected performance, and highlights where it will most excel.Comment: 12 pages, Proc SPIE 10702 "Ground-Based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII

The L&E of Intellectual Property – Do we get maximum innovation with the current regime?

Innovation is crucial to economic growth – the essential path for lifting much of the world population out of dire poverty and for maintaining the living standard of those who already have. To stimulate innovation, the legal system has to support the means through which innovators seek to get rewarded for their efforts. Amongst these means, some, such as the first mover advantage or 'lead time,' are not directly legal; but secrets and intellectual property rights are legal institutions supported for the specific purpose of stimulating innovation. Whilst the protection of secrets has not changed very much over recent years, intellectual property (or IP) has. IP borrows some features from ordinary property rights, but is also distinct, in that, unlike physical goods, information, the object of IP, is not inherently scarce; indeed as information and communication technologies expand, the creation and distribution of information is becoming ever cheaper and in many circumstances abundant, so that selection is of the essence ('on the internet, point of view is everything'). Where rights on information extend too far, their monopolising effect may hamper innovation. The paper investigates the underlying structure of IP rights and surveys what we know empirically about the incentive effects of IP as about industries that flourish without formal IP

Limits To The Use Of Threatened Species Lists

Threatened species lists are designed primarily to provide an easily understood qualitative estimate of risk of extinction. Although these estimates of risk can be accurate, the lists have inevitably become linked to several decision-making processes. There are four ways in which such lists are commonly used: to set priorities for resource allocation for species recovery; to inform reserve system design; to constrain development and exploitation; and to report on the state of the environment. The lists were not designed for any one of these purposes, and consequently perform some of them poorly. We discuss why, if and how they should be used to achieve these purposes