Mutational analysis in podocin-associated hereditary nephrotic syndrome in Polish patients: founder effect in the Kashubian population

Hereditary nephrotic syndrome is caused by mutations in a number of different genes, the most common being NPHS2. The aim of the study was to identify the spectrum of NPHS2 mutations in Polish patients with the disease. A total of 141 children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) were enrolled in the study. Mutational analysis included the entire coding sequence and intron boundaries of the NPHS2 gene. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and TaqMan genotyping assay were applied to detect selected NPHS2 sequence variants in 575 population-matched controls. Twenty patients (14 %) had homozygous or compound heterozygous NPHS2 mutations, the most frequent being c.1032delT found in 11 children and p.R138Q found in four patients. Carriers of the c.1032delT allele were exclusively found in the Pomeranian (Kashubian) region, suggesting a founder effect origin. The 14 % NPHS2 gene mutation detection rate is similar to that observed in other populations. The heterogeneity of mutations detected in the studied group confirms the requirement of genetic testing the entire NPHS2 coding sequence in Polish patients, with the exception of Kashubs, who should be initially screened for the c.1032delT deletion

Validation of selected molecular methods for the mutations determination in codons 12 and 13 of K-RAS gene in five Polish oncological research centers

Chorzy na raka jelita grubego z przerzutami mogą osiągnąć korzyść z leczenia panitumumabem jedynie, jeśli w guzie nie stwierdzono mutacji w genie K-RAS. W związku z tym konieczne jest zbadanie statusu tego genu w celu wyłonienia chorych, którzy mogą być poddani takiemu leczeniu. Celem pracy było opracowanie standardowej procedury oznaczania statusu genu K-RAS w materiale izolowanym z bloczków parafinowych. Kolejnym celem była walidacja wybranych technik molekularnych oznaczania mutacji w pięciu ośrodkach w Polsce, w których odbywa się leczenie chorych na raka jelita grubego. Ocenie poddano cztery różne techniki oznaczania mutacji: SSCP, DHPLC, RFLP/PCR i bezpośrednie sekwencjonowanie. Stwierdzono, że wszystkie jednostki uczestniczące w procesie walidacji są odpowiednio przygotowane do podjęcia działalności diagnostycznej w zakresie oznaczania statusu genu K-RAS. Przyjęto następujące zalecenia dla laboratoriów diagnostycznych: 1. Materiał do izolacji DNA powinien zawierać przynajmniej 70% utkania nowotworowego; 2. Ujednolicenie procedury izolacji DNA ze skrawków parafinowych wymaga stosowania gotowego zestawu do izolacji DNA; 3. W przypadku braku jednoznacznego wyniku konieczne jest stosowanie dwóch metod oznaczania mutacji, przy czym jedną z nich powinno być sekwencjonowanie bezpośrednie.Metastatic colorectal cancer patients will benefit from treatment with panitumumab only when they don't have mutation in K-RAS gene. Therefore, estimation of mutational status of K-RAS is necessary for the selection of patients, who should be treated with panitumumab. The aim of this study was to evolve a standard method of estimation of K-RAS mutational status in the material isolated from paraffin blocs. The second aim was the validation of selected molecular methods of K-RAS mutation evaluation in five Polish oncological centers where mCRC patients are treated. Four methods were evaluated: SSCP, DHPLC, RFLP/PCR and direct sequencing. We found that all groups in five selected oncological centers, who took part in the validation process, were well prepared for molecular diagnosis of K-RAS mutational status. The following recommendations for diagnostic laboratories were approved: 1. At least 70% of cancer cells should be present in a tissue for DNA isolation; 2. The method of DNA isolation should be standardized, the most appropriate is usage of DNA isolation kits; 3. In case of equivocal results two independent molecular methods should be employed, one of them should be direct sequencing

A quality control program for mutation detection in KIT and PDGFRA in gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

International audienceBACKGROUND: Although most gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) carry oncogenic mutations in KIT exons 9, 11, 13 and 17, or in platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) exons 12, 14 and 18, around 10% of GIST are free of these mutations. Genotyping and accurate detection of KIT/PDGFRA mutations in GIST are becoming increasingly useful for clinicians in the management of the disease. METHOD: To evaluate and improve laboratory practice in GIST mutation detection, we developed a mutational screening quality control program. Eleven laboratories were enrolled in this program and 50 DNA samples were analysed, each of them by four different laboratories, giving 200 mutational reports. RESULTS: In total, eight mutations were not detected by at least one laboratory. One false positive result was reported in one sample. Thus, the mean global rate of error with clinical implication based on 200 reports was 4.5%. Concerning specific polymorphisms detection, the rate varied from 0 to 100%, depending on the laboratory. The way mutations were reported was very heterogeneous, and some errors were detected. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that such a program was necessary for laboratories to improve the quality of the analysis, because an error rate of 4.5% may have clinical consequences for the patient

A quality control program for mutation detection in KIT and PDGFRA in gastrointestinal stromal tumours

BACKGROUND: Although most gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) carry oncogenic mutations in KIT exons 9, 11, 13 and 17, or in platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) exons 12, 14 and 18, around 10% of GIST are free of these mutations. Genotyping and accurate detection of KIT/PDGFRA mutations in GIST are becoming increasingly useful for clinicians in the management of the disease. METHOD: To evaluate and improve laboratory practice in GIST mutation detection, we developed a mutational screening quality control program. Eleven laboratories were enrolled in this program and 50 DNA samples were analysed, each of them by four different laboratories, giving 200 mutational reports. RESULTS: In total, eight mutations were not detected by at least one laboratory. One false positive result was reported in one sample. Thus, the mean global rate of error with clinical implication based on 200 reports was 4.5%. Concerning specific polymorphisms detection, the rate varied from 0 to 100%, depending on the laboratory. The way mutations were reported was very heterogeneous, and some errors were detected. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that such a program was necessary for laboratories to improve the quality of the analysis, because an error rate of 4.5% may have clinical consequences for the patient.status: publishe