Alcohol policy enforcement and changes in student drinking rates in a statewide public college system: a follow-up study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Heavy alcohol use among U.S. college students is a major contributor to young adult morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to examine whether college alcohol policy enforcement levels predict changes in student drinking and related behaviors in a state system of public colleges and universities, following a system-wide change to a stricter policy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Students and administrators at 11 Massachusetts public colleges/universities completed surveys in 1999 (N of students = 1252), one year after the policy change, and again in 2001 (N = 1074). We calculated policy enforcement scores for each school based on the reports of deans of students, campus security chiefs, and students, and examined the correlations between perceived enforcement levels and the change in student drinking rates over the subsequent two year period, after weighting the 2001 data to adjust for demographic changes in the student body.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Overall rates of any past-30-days drinking, heavy episodic drinking, and usual heavy drinking among past-30-days drinkers were all lower in 2001 compared to 1999. School-level analyses (N = 11) found deans' baseline reports of stricter enforcement were strongly correlated with subsequent declines in heavy episodic drinking (Pearson's r = -0.73, p = 0.011). Moreover, consistently high enforcement levels across time, as reported by deans, were associated with greater declines in heavy episodic drinking. Such relationships were not found for students' and security chiefs' reports of enforcement. Marijuana use did not rise during this period of decline in heavy drinking.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Study findings suggest that stronger enforcement of a stricter alcohol policy may be associated with reductions in student heavy drinking rates over time. An aggressive enforcement stance by deans may be an important element of an effective college alcohol policy.</p

Proceedings of the 13th annual conference of INEBRIA

CITATION: Watson, R., et al. 2016. Proceedings of the 13th annual conference of INEBRIA. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 11:13, doi:10.1186/s13722-016-0062-9.The original publication is available at https://ascpjournal.biomedcentral.comENGLISH SUMMARY : Meeting abstracts.https://ascpjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13722-016-0062-9Publisher's versio

Teaching Residents about Child Neglect and Parental Alcoholism: A Controlled Pilot Study

Abstract: Objective: To assess in pediatric residents the effects of a case-based educational exercise about child neglect and parental alcoholism on their knowledge and attitudes. Design: Quasi-experimental controlled trial of a standardized educational intervention and qualitative analysis of residents ’ reactions. Setting: Resident continuity clinic conferences at a large pediatric teaching hospital. Participants: Convenience sample of pediatric residents (n=37). The residents in the control group received no intervention at all, while residents in the intervention group received the educational intervention. Intervention: A structured, 40-minute case discussion (“The Silent Cry”) facilitated by trained faculty. Main Outcome Measures: Learner ratings of materials and methods. Pre/post change in scores on a knowledge quiz and attitude scale. Codes and themes generated from qualitative analysis of focus group transcripts. Results: Intervention group residents rated the experience highly. The two groups did not differ significantly in mean pre-post change on the knowledge quiz or attitude scale. Focus group discussions revealed feelings of frustration and powerlessness when dealing with child neglect and parental alcoholism. Conclusions: While this standardized educational intervention was well received by residents, more time is needed for discussion and multiple teaching sessions may be required. Discussion of emotional responses should be included as a standard part of the educational experience

Variations in state-level definitions: children with special health care needs.

Multiple agencies at the federal and state level provide for children with special health care needs (CSHCN), with variation in eligibility criteria. Epidemiological studies show that 3.8%-32% of children could be classified as children with special health care needs, depending on the definition and method of determination used. OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent of variation between definitions used and funding by Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Title V, and Medicaid for CSHCN. METHODS: Statistics on children receiving SSI and the amount of funding were obtained from the SSI website. This was compared to information on Title V children from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB) website and eligibility definitions published by the Institute of Child Health Policy in Gainesville, Florida. Medicaid definitions were obtained through interviews with state Medicaid agencies and confirmed with state regulations. RESULTS: The population enrolled in SSI has varied with alterations in eligibility criteria. The number of children enrolled in SSI and the amount of funding per child in each state correlate with the state poverty rate (r=0.56, p<0.0001; r=0.44, p<0.001). Enrollment in Title V does not correlate with state poverty rates (r=0.16, p=0.25). Title V definitions vary widely among states, but there was no correlation between the number of children served or amount of funding per child and the type of definition used (Z=-0.12, p=0.91; Z=-0.59, p=0.55). State Medicaid agencies rarely define CSHCN. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variation in definitions used by agencies serving CSHCN. Agencies need to be more explicit with eligibility criteria so the definitions are logical to those making referrals for services