9 research outputs found
Pentobarbital versus thiopental in the treatment of refractory intracranial hypertension in patients with traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial
Introduction: Experimental research has demonstrated that the level of neuroprotection conferred by the various barbiturates is not equal. Until now no controlled studies have been conducted to compare their effectiveness, even though the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines recommend that such studies be undertaken. The objectives of the present study were to assess the effectiveness of pentobarbital and thiopental in terms of controlling refractory intracranial hypertension in patients with severe traumatic brain injury, and to evaluate the adverse effects of treatment. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, cohort study comparing two treatments: pentobarbital and thiopental. Patients who had suffered a severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score after resuscitation ≤ 8 points or neurological deterioration during the first week after trauma) and with refractory intracranial hypertension (intracranial pressure > 20 mmHg) first-tier measures, in accordance with the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines. Results: A total of 44 patients (22 in each group) were included over a 5-year period. There were no statistically significant differences in ' baseline characteristics, except for admission computed cranial tomography characteristics, using the Traumatic Coma Data Bank classification. Uncontrollable intracranial pressure occurred in 11 patients (50%) in the thiopental treatment group and in 18 patients (82%) in the pentobarbital group (P = 0.03). Under logistic regression analysis - undertaken in an effort to adjust for the cranial tomography characteristics, which were unfavourable for pentobarbital - thiopental was more effective than pentobarbital in terms of controlling intracranial pressure (odds ratio = 5.1, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 21.9; P = 0.027). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the incidence of arterial hypotension or infection. Conclusions: Thiopental appeared to be more effective than pentobarbital in controlling intracranial hypertension refractory to first-tier measures. These findings should be interpreted with caution because of the imbalance in cranial tomography characteristics and the different dosages employed in the two arms of the study. The incidence of adverse effects was similar in both groups
Pentobarbital versus thiopental in the treatment of refractory intracranial hypertension in patients with traumatic brain injury : a randomized controlled trial
Introduction: Experimental research has demonstrated that the level of neuroprotection conferred by the various barbiturates is not equal. Until now no controlled studies have been conducted to compare their effectiveness, even though the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines recommend that such studies be undertaken. The objectives of the present study were to assess the effectiveness of pentobarbital and thiopental in terms of controlling refractory intracranial hypertension in patients with severe traumatic brain injury, and to evaluate the adverse effects of treatment. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, cohort study comparing two treatments: pentobarbital and thiopental. Patients who had suffered a severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score after resuscitation ≤ 8 points or neurological deterioration during the first week after trauma) and with refractory intracranial hypertension (intracranial pressure > 20 mmHg) first-tier measures, in accordance with the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines. Results: A total of 44 patients (22 in each group) were included over a 5-year period. There were no statistically significant differences in ' baseline characteristics, except for admission computed cranial tomography characteristics, using the Traumatic Coma Data Bank classification. Uncontrollable intracranial pressure occurred in 11 patients (50%) in the thiopental treatment group and in 18 patients (82%) in the pentobarbital group (P = 0.03). Under logistic regression analysis - undertaken in an effort to adjust for the cranial tomography characteristics, which were unfavourable for pentobarbital - thiopental was more effective than pentobarbital in terms of controlling intracranial pressure (odds ratio = 5.1, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 21.9; P = 0.027). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the incidence of arterial hypotension or infection. Conclusions: Thiopental appeared to be more effective than pentobarbital in controlling intracranial hypertension refractory to first-tier measures. These findings should be interpreted with caution because of the imbalance in cranial tomography characteristics and the different dosages employed in the two arms of the study. The incidence of adverse effects was similar in both groups
Correlation between Thyroid Responses and Inflammatory Cytokines in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients
Mechanisms involved in thyroid dysfunction in critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients are not clear. Our objective was to correlate the thyroid response with the pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines profile in critically ill COVID-19 patients. This was a prospective single-center study. We studied the relationship between continuous variables by using Pearson correlation and simple linear regression. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the factors independently associated with mortality. Seventy-eight patients were included in the study at intensive care unit (ICU) admission and 72 had a measurement of the thyroid and inflammatory profile at day 5. No significant correlations were found between thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free triiodothyronine (fT3) and free thyroxine (fT4) and inflammatory cytokines at ICU admission. At day 5, fT4, was inversely correlated with IL-10 (p = 0.035). IL-10 was associated with maximum lactate (p p = 0.012). The multiple logistic regression analysis showed that there was a significant relationship between IL-10 (day 5) and in-hospital mortality after adjusting by age and severity of illness. In conclusion, we found that the thyroid hormone profile and inflammatory cytokines had a weak correlation at ICU admission. Associations of interest between fT4 and IL-10 were found at day 5. IL-10 at day 5 was found to be correlated with low fT4 and markers of organ failure and death
Acute Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal Response in Traumatic Brain Injury with and Without Extracerebral Trauma
Consenso internacional sobre la monitorizaciĂłn de la presiĂłn tisular cerebral de oxĂgeno en pacientes neurocrĂticos
[ES] La monitorizaciĂłn continua de la oxigenaciĂłn cerebral y su aplicaciĂłn al manejo del paciente neurolĂłgico grave es uno de los grandes retos actuales de la medicina crĂtica. Aunque han sido descritas diversas tĂ©cnicas para la monitorizaciĂłn de la oxigenaciĂłn cerebral, la monitorizaciĂłn tisular cerebral de oxĂgeno proporciona una relevante informaciĂłn sobre los niveles de oxĂgeno a nivel del tejido cerebral. Su desarrollo se ha asociado a la necesidad de responder no solamente aspectos tĂ©cnicos sobre la misma, sino tambiĂ©n al significado de la alteraciĂłn de los valores de la oxigenaciĂłn cerebral en el paciente neurocrĂtico. El documento de consenso da respuesta a diversas cuestiones relativas a la monitorizaciĂłn de la oxigenaciĂłn cerebral mediante sensor de presiĂłn tisular cerebral de oxĂgeno. Para ello se elaborĂł un panel de preguntas y se realizĂł una revisiĂłn de la literatura mĂ©dica, y evaluando la calidad de la evidencia y el nivel de recomendaciĂłn mediante la metodologĂa GRADE.[EN] Continuous monitoring of cerebral oxygenation and its application to the management of the severe neurological patient is a challenge for the management of patients with acute critical brain damage. Although several techniques have been described for monitoring brain, brain tissue oxygen monitoring provides relevant information about oxygen levels of brain tissue. However, the development of this technique has been associated with the need to answer not only some technical aspects of it as well as the meaning of the changes of the cerebral oxygenation in the neurocritical patient. The consensus document responds to various questions related to the monitoring of cerebral oxygenation by means of a cerebral oxygen tissue pressure sensor. For this purpose, a list of questions was prepared and a reviewed of the medical literature was made. The quality of the evidence and the degree of recommendation was evaluated using the GRADE methodology