55 research outputs found

    Subducting slabs: jellyfishes in the Earth mantle

    Get PDF
    International audienceThe constantly improving resolution of geophysical data, seismic tomography and seismicity in particular, shows that the lithosphere does not subduct as a slab of uniform thickness but is rather thinned in the upper mantle and thickened around the transition zone between the upper and lower mantle. This observation has traditionally been interpreted as evidence for the buckling and piling of slabs at the boundary between the upper and lower mantle, where a strong contrast in viscosity may exist and cause resistance to the penetration of slabs into the lower mantle. The distribution and character of seismicity reveal, however, that slabs undergo vertical extension in the upper mantle and compression near the transition zone. In this paper, we demonstrate that during the subduction process, the shape of low viscosity slabs (1 to 100 times more viscous than the surrounding mantle) evolves toward an inverted plume shape that we coin jellyfish. Results of a 3D numerical model show that the leading tip of slabs deform toward a rounded head skirted by lateral tentacles that emerge from the sides of the jellyfish head. The head is linked to the body of the subducting slab by a thin tail. A complete parametric study reveals that subducting slabs may achieve a variety of shapes, in good agreement with the diversity of natural slab shapes evidenced by seismic tomography. Our work also suggests that the slab to mantle viscosity ratio in the Earth is most likely to be lower than 100. However, the sensitivity of slab shapes to upper and lower mantle viscosities and densities, which remain poorly constrained by independent evidence, precludes any systematic deciphering of the observations

    : DCSMM Cycle 3, 2024

    No full text

    : DCSMM Cycle 3, 2024

    No full text

    Construction des indicateurs socio-économiques sur la pêche professionnelle en France métropole : partie 2 - collecte de données

    No full text
    Within the European Data Collection Framework (DCF) regulation, member States are obliged to collect and provide socio-economic data on fisheries as a basis for advice on fisheries managements or for other uses. In mainland France, the data producer is the Service de la Statistique et de la Prospective (SSP) of the Ministry of Agriculture and Food. The SSP relies on its two partners for data collection: Ifremer, which carries out fieldworks surveys, and the Laboratoire d'Economie et de Management de Nantes-Atlantique (Lemna), which collects accounting data from management centers. This document presents step 2 of the data collection carried out by Ifremer, which follows the elaboration of the national sampling plan and the allocation of the sub-sample to Ifremer (step 1). This document therefore presents the second stage prior to the final validation of the data (step 3) and the construction of the socio-economic indicators.Dans le cadre du réglement européen DCF (Data Collection Framework), les états membres ont pour obligation de collecter et fournir des données socio-économiques concernant la pêche, pour servir de base de conseils sur la gestion des pêches ou pour d'autres usages. En France métropolitaine, le producteur de données est le Service de la Statistique et de la Prospective (SSP) du ministère de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation. Le SSP s'appuie sur ses deux partenaires pour la collecte de données : l'Ifremer qui met en œuvre des enquêtes sur le terrain et le Laboratoire d'Économie et de Management de Nantes-Atlantique (Lemna) qui collecte des données comptables auprès des centres de gestion. Ce document présente l'étape 2 de collecte de données opérée par l'Ifremer, qui fait suite à l'élaboration du plan d'échantillonnage national et à l'attribution du sous-échantillon destiné à l'Ifremer (étape 1). Ce document présente donc la deuxième étape préalable à la validation finale des données (étape 3) et à la construction des indicateurs socio-économiques
    corecore