Preferencias y valoración de los navegantes europeos en Canarias (España)

El turismo náutico es un sector estratégico para el desarrollo turístico de España y para la sostenibilidad de sus destinos tradicionales, aun cuando existen pocos estudios en esta área. Para Canarias el sector es prioritario, con una reconocida apuesta pública por la especialización del Archipiélago y su reposicionamiento como destino náutico de excelencia a nivel europeo. El presente artículo, resultado de encuestar a 122 navegantes de nacionalidad europea en tránsito por Canarias entre 2013 y 2014, aborda el estudio de las preferencias y motivaciones de viaje de estos turistas náuticos, y profundiza en el análisis contrastado de sus percepciones y valoraciones del puerto y el destino náutico. Los resultados obtenidos permiten elaborar una serie de recomendaciones en torno a la oferta náutico-turística, y a las estrategias de gestión y de promoción del destino

European nautical tourists: exploring destination image perceptions

Purpose – Nautical tourism is considered to be an under-exploited research area, if we take into account its evolution and growth prospects. This lack of knowledge is probably one of the main reasons the sector has not reached its maximum. The present paper aims at exploring the European nautical tourists´ perceptions of image, in relation to the type of nautical sport they carry out and the type of nautical destination they visit. Methodology – The research was conducted in the Canary Islands and Morocco during 2013 and 2014. The sample covered 433 European nautical tourists pursuing different nautical sports and was organised into two groups. Structured questionnaires with personal interviews were implemented. Choosing a mature nautical destination and an emerging one enriched the comparative approach for the study. The findings indicate there are clearly similar profiles amongst the groups of tourists visiting both regions, and that the perceived image varies between a nautical tourist doing sailing and a nautical tourist motivated by other nautical sports. The data analysis reveals that perceptions also vary according to the more intensive and extensive use of the destinations. Originality – This empirical study provides useful insights into the demand for nautical tourism, the perceptions and evaluations of the ports and marinas as well as the destinations themselves, which can be used as a guide for the tourism industry managers and the Government Authorities to develop more effective marketing and positioning strategies. The study of the destination image in nautical tourism is a contribution to the progress beyond the state of the sector

Highlights of consumption and satisfaction in nautical tourism. A comparative study of visitors to the Canary Islands and Morocco

Nautical tourism is considered to be an under-exploited research area, taking into account its evolution and growth prospects. The present study was conducted with nautical tourists during their visit to the Canary Islands and Morocco between 2013 and 2014. Our aim is to better guide the creation of new joint businesses by determining the most demanded activities among the nautical tourists that visit this part of the world. Some findings indicate that tourists’ consumption and satisfaction vary between a nautical tourist that sails and a tourist motivated by other nautical activities, regardless of the destination they choose. The study also differentiates the nautical tourists’ preferences according to the most popular activities carried out at the destinations they are visiting, highlighting the role that resources such as “sea” and “nature” play as the main tourists’ motivations behind the trip. Finally, the results also reveal which elements of the nautical tourism products and services in offer are the current destinations’ weaknesses, according to the nautical tourists

Economic Evaluation of Destination Image

El presente trabajo desarrolla una nueva metodología de valoración de la imagen de destinos que incorpora dos principales ventajas sobre los métodos empleados hasta ahora: (1) permite disociar la imagen de un lugar geográfico (destino), de la imagen del usuario con la experiencia vacacional objetiva en dicho destino; diferenciando así entre la medida de la dimensión de imagen percibida, la medida de la experiencia percibida, y finalmente, la medida de la experiencia percibida influida por la dimensión de la imagen percibida y (2) permite valorar económicamente la imagen de un destino turístico. Los resultados tienen implicaciones para la evaluación de los recursos económicos que los destinos invierten con la finalidad de ser más competitivos en el mercado, y ayudan a mejorar la planificación de los esfuerzos del marketing que se realizarán para mejorar la imagen de los destinos.This work develops a new methodology for economic evaluation of destination image, adding two main advantages over the traditional methods used before: (1) it allows to differentiate the geographical destination image from the subjective experience holydays of the tourist in that destination. Thus, it facilitates the differentiation between the destination perceived image measure, the experience perceived image and finally, the experience perceived image influenced by the destination perceived image; and (2) it allows the economic evaluation of the destination image and its attributes. The results show academic and practical implications for the economic evaluation of the destination investment to increase their competitiveness in the market, and facilitate to improve marketing planning to increase the destination image

Climate change, coastal tourism, and impact chains – a literature review

Climate change impacts tourism, since both supply and demand of tourism services depend on the quality and the management of a set of environmental attributes. This paper critically reviews the empirical evidence in the literature of the last twenty years (2000–2019), by identifying the potential impacts of climate change in coastal and maritime destinations. The concept of Impact Chains is the methodological framework through which the literature is systematically selected, classified and assessed. A great heterogeneity of results is found, with estimates of physical and socio-economic impacts of climate change differing across destinations and methodologies. Moreover, the majority of recent studies mainly deals with only a few of the most important impacts, hence future research should be re-directed to overlooked indicators and relationships, which are key for designing effective climate policies at tourism destinations

Effect of three commercial extenders on sperm motility and fertility in liquid ram semen stored at 15 °C or 5 °C

The effect of different extenders on sperm motility and fertility was evaluated during liquid storage of ram semen at 5 °C and 15 °C. The semen was collected, pooled and diluted in three commercial extenders: Inra 96® (INRA) based on skimmed milk, Biladyl® A fraction (BIL) based on egg yolk, and Ovixcell® (OVIX) based on soybean lecithin. Then, sperm motility was evaluated at 0, 6, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. In order to evaluate fertility, samples stored at 15 °C were used after dilution in INRA and OVIX. Results showed that progressive motility was significantly higher up to 72 h of storage in sperm samples maintained at 5 °C in comparison with 15 °C, similarly for each tested diluent. When samples were stored at 5 °C in OVIX, kinematic parameters such as velocity (except curvilinear velocity, VCL), trajectory [linearity (LIN), straightness (STR), wobble (WOB)], amplitude of lateral head displacement (ALH) and beat/cross frequency (BCF) were higher than in INRA and BIL. No significant differences in pregnancy rate were detected between INRA (62.6%) and OVIX (58.9%). In conclusion, liquid storage at 5 °C with OVIX extender is an interesting option since non-animal components are used, and this extender offers similar in vitro and in vivo efficacy as other extenders containing animal components

Evaluation of antimony availability in a mining context: Impact for the environment, and for mineral exploration and exploitation.

This work aims to establish Sb mobility, its transfer to biota and its effect on soil health in a semi-arid climate. The results show the presence of stibnite (Sb2S3) as the main primary Sb compound, bindhemite (Pb2Sb2O6(O,OH)), and minor proportions of stibiconite (Sb3+(Sb5+)2O6(OH)) as oxidised Sb species. This research also observes very high total Sb contents in mining materials (max: 20,000 mg kg−1) and soils (400–3000 mg kg−1), with physical dispersion around mining materials restricted to 450 m. The soil-to-plant transfer is very low, (bioaccumulation factor: 0.0002–0.1520). Most Sb remains in a residual fraction (99.9%), a very low fraction is bound to Fe and Mn oxy-hydroxides or organic matter, and a negligible proportion of Sb is leachable. The higher Sb mobility rates has been found under oxidising conditions with a long contact time between solids and water. The main factors that explain the poor Sb mobility and dispersion in the mining area are the low annual rainfall rates that slow down the Sb mobilisation process and the scarce formation of oxidised Sb compounds. All these data suggest poor Sb (III) formation and a low toxicological risk in the area associated with past mining activities. The low mobility of Sb suggests advantages for future sustainable mining of such ore deposits in a semi-arid climate and is also indicative of the limitations of geochemical exploration in the search for new Sb deposits

Observatorio turístico de Canarias. Sostenibilidad del Turismo en Canarias. Informe 2022

Canarias se incorporó a la Red Internacional de Observatorios de Turismo Sostenible de la OMT en octubre de 2020. El Observatorio de Turismo de Canarias tiene como objetivo promover la sostenibilidad del destino, mejorando la medición y supervisión de indicadores clave. La monitorización de la sostenibilidad servirá de apoyo para una mejor toma de decisiones en la gestión del destino. 1. Llegada de turistas: 6,7 mill. (2021); 4,6 mill. (2020) y 15,1 mill. (2019). En 2021, el 79% de los turistas proceden del extranjero y el 21% de la España peninsular (FRONTUR). 2. Canarias es la región de la UE con el número de pernoctaciones en alojamientos turísticos más alto en 2019 (96,1 millones de pernoctaciones) (Eurostat, 2021). 3. El 80% de la población está de acuerdo con que “el desarrollo turístico ha sido positivo para la isla y sus habitantes” (ISTAC, 2019). 4. Elevada tasa de paro (en torno al 20% en 2018 y 2019), entre las más altas de España y Europa (ISTAC). Es una de las comunidades autónomas españolas y regiones europeas con mayor tasa AROPE (Personas en Riesgo de Pobreza y/o Exclusión): 36,3% (INE, 2020). 5. Canarias es una de las comunidades con menor gasto por habitante en actividades de I+D: 98 €. España: 328,60 € (INE, 2020). 6. Ausencia de un comportamiento estacional pronunciado. La temporada alta corresponde al invierno. Máximo gasto turístico agregado total en un trimestre (2019): 4.216 millones de euros en el cuarto trimestre (ISTAC). 7. Valoración media 8,7/10 de la experiencia turística en las Islas (ISTAC, 2019). 8. El 17% de la energía producida en Canarias en 2020 procede de fuentes renovables (Anuario Energético de Canarias). 9. No existe una estimación oficial que aproxime el consumo de agua por el turismo de forma anual y homogénea. 10. Los residuos del turismo permanecen ocultos tras los flujos de residuos residenciales dado que ambos tipos de residuos se gestionan conjuntamente. 11. Canarias, debido a su dependencia de los combustibles fósiles, tiene una alta tasa de emisión de gases de efecto invernadero. 12. Falta de información sobre la coordinación y cooperación entre los agentes del destino, siendo un área en la que se aprecian debilidades. 13. Dependencia de las compañías aéreas y de los principales turoperadores europeos. El 56% de los turistas que llegan a las islas han comprado un paquete turístico (FRONTUR, 2019). 14. El 68% de los turistas está dispuesto a realizar un gasto extra para reducir su huella de carbono (ISTAC, 2022). 15. La oferta y demanda se encuentran muy concentradas en el territorio. 47 microdestinos turísticos que representan un 1,7% del territorio generan el 89,3% de las pernoctaciones en hoteles y apartamentos. 16. Crecimiento medio anual de la inversión turística privada del 8,5% en el periodo 2015-2019 (IMPACTUR, 2020). 17. La Red Canaria de Espacios Protegidos se compone de 146 espacios (40% de la superficie del Archipiélago) (Gobierno de Canarias).” Alta vulnerabilidad. El urbanismo costero turístico y residencial añade presión a los hábitats. 18. Falta de información y ausencia de indicadores específicos sobre accesibilidad y turismo.Gobierno de Canarias. Consejería de Turismo, Industria y Comerci