12 research outputs found

    Validation of a 40-Gene Expression Profile Test to Predict Metastatic Risk in Localized High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

    Get PDF
    Background: Current staging systems for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) have limited positive predictive value (PPV) for identifying patients who will experience metastasis. Objective: To develop and validate a gene expression profile (GEP) test for predicting risk for metastasis in localized, high-risk cSCC with the goal of improving risk-directed patient management. Methods: Archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary cSCC tissue and clinicopathologic data (n=586) were collected from 23 independent centers in a prospectively designed study. A GEP signature was developed using a discovery cohort (n=202) and validated in a separate, non-overlaping, independent cohort (n=324). Results: A prognostic, 40-gene expression profile (40-GEP) test was developed and validated, stratifying high-risk cSCC patients into classes based on metastasis risk: Class 1 (low-risk), Class 2A (high-risk), and Class 2B (highest-risk). For the validation cohort, 3-year metastasis-free survival (MFS) rates were 91.4%, 80.6%, and 44.0%, respectively. A PPV of 60% was achieved for the highest-risk group (Class 2B), an improvement over staging systems; while negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity were comparable to staging systems. Limitations: Potential understaging of cases could affect metastasis rate accuracy.Conclusion: The 40-GEP test is an independent predictor of metastatic risk that can complement current staging systems for patients with high-risk cSCC

    Mast Cells and Gastrointestinal Dysmotility in the Cystic Fibrosis Mouse

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) has many effects on the gastrointestinal tract and a common problem in this disease is poor nutrition. In the CF mouse there is an innate immune response with a large influx of mast cells into the muscularis externa of the small intestine and gastrointestinal dysmotility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential role of mast cells in gastrointestinal dysmotility using the CF mouse (Cftr(tm1UNC), Cftr knockout). METHODOLOGY: Wild type (WT) and CF mice were treated for 3 weeks with mast cell stabilizing drugs (ketotifen, cromolyn, doxantrazole) or were treated acutely with a mast cell activator (compound 48/80). Gastrointestinal transit was measured using gavage of a fluorescent tracer. RESULTS: In CF mice gastric emptying at 20 min post-gavage did not differ from WT, but was significantly less than in WT at 90 min post-gavage. Gastric emptying was significantly increased in WT mice by doxantrazole, but none of the mast cell stabilizers had any significant effect on gastric emptying in CF mice. Mast cell activation significantly enhanced gastric emptying in WT mice but not in CF mice. Small intestinal transit was significantly less in CF mice as compared to WT. Of the mast cell stabilizers, only doxantrazole significantly affected small intestinal transit in WT mice and none had any effect in CF mice. Mast cell activation resulted in a small but significant increase in small intestinal transit in CF mice but not WT mice. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that mast cells are not involved in gastrointestinal dysmotility but their activation can stimulate small intestinal transit in cystic fibrosis

    Transit of rhodamine dextran in the small intestine and effect of mast cell agents.

    No full text
    <p>Overnight fasted mice were gavaged with a bolus of rhodamine dextran (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0004283#s2" target="_blank">Methods</a>). At 20 min post-gavage the mice were sacrificed and the distribution of the fluorescence in 10 segments (proximal to distal) of the small intestine was measured and expressed relative to the total fluorescence. (A) WT Control (n = 28); (B) CF Control (n = 14); (C) Ketotifen, 3 week treatment of WT (n = 10); (D) Ketotifen, 3 week treatment of CF (n = 6); (E) Cromolyn, 3 week treatment of WT (n = 11); (F) Cromolyn, 3 week treatment of CF (n = 7); (G) Doxantrazole, 3 week treatment of WT (n = 5); (H) Doxantrazole, 3 week treatment of CF (n = 8); (I) Compound 48/80, acute i.p. injection of WT (n = 4); (J) Compound 48/80, acute i.p. injection of CF (n = 6). Data are means ± SEM. (*) <i>P</i><0.05 vs control, same genotype and same intestinal segment; (+) <i>P</i><0.05 CF vs WT, same segment and treatment group. Data for the control WT and CF mice include values from previous work <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0004283#pone.0004283-DeLisle1" target="_blank">[1]</a>.</p

    Gastric emptying in WT and CF mice and effect of mast cell agents.

    No full text
    <p>Overnight fasted mice were gavaged with a bolus of rhodamine dextran (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0004283#s2" target="_blank">Methods</a>). At 20 min post-gavage the mice were sacrificed and the distribution of the fluorescence in the stomach and small intestine was measured. Gastric emptying is expressed as fraction of total fluorescence which has exited the stomach in the 20 min post-gavage period. Con = control (n = 28 WT, n = 14 CF); Ket = ketotifen, 3 week treatment (n = 10 WT, n = 6 CF); Crom = cromolyn 3 week treatment (n = 11 WT, n = 7 CF); Dox = doxantrazole 3 week treatment (n = 5 WT , n = 8 CF); 48/80 = compound 48/80 acute i.p. injection (n = 4 WT, n = 6 CF). Data are means ± SEM. (*) <i>P</i><0.05 vs Control of the same genotype. Data for the control WT and CF mice include values from previous work <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0004283#pone.0004283-DeLisle1" target="_blank">[1]</a>.</p

    Distribution of rhodamine dextran along the gastrointestinal tract of WT and CF mice at 20 min and 90 min post-gavage.

    No full text
    <p>Overnight fasted mice were gavaged with a bolus of rhodamine dextran (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0004283#s2" target="_blank">Methods</a>). At either 20 min or 90 min post-gavage the mice were sacrificed and the distribution of the fluorescence in the stomach (St), small intestine (SI) and large intestine (LI) was measured and expressed relative to the total. (A) WT mice (n = 28 mice 20 min post-gavage, n = 8 mice 90 min post-gavage); (B) CF mice (n = 14 mice 20 min post-gavage, n = 7 mice 90 min post-gavage). Data are means ± SEM. (*) <i>P</i><0.05 comparing 20 min vs 90 min data for the same organ and genotype of mice. (+) <i>P</i><0.05 comparing CF vs WT for the same organ and post-gavage time.</p
    corecore