A mixed method, phase 2 clinical evaluation of a novel device to treat postpartum haemorrhage

Background: We evaluated the safety, efficacy, and acceptability of a new device designed to facilitate uterine compression in women with postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). Methods: A prospective, phase two clinical device trial with concurrent qualitative study, conducted in a UK consultant obstetric unit. The device was used in addition to standard care in women unresponsive to initial oxytocin therapy. The primary effectiveness outcome was additional blood loss of over 1000mls, whilst safety was assessed through adverse events. Interviews assessed device feasibility and acceptability, and were analysed using framework analysis. Results: We recruited 57 women with clinical PPH after vaginal birth; 67% were primiparous and 47% had undergone operative birth. All but two (96%) had atony as a cause of the haemorrhage; in addition, 30% also had bleeding from lacerations and 11% had retained tissue. After device use, only one woman had additional blood loss over 1000mls, although 3 women (7%) needed a Bakri balloon and 14% received a blood transfusion. All but one clinician felt that the device was easy to use. Clinicians stated that the device assisted management in 85% of cases. All 56 women who responded stated that if they bled in a future birth they would want the device to be used again. There were no serious adverse events related to the device. However, 3 events were judged as 'possibly' being caused by the device - 2 minor vaginal grazes and one postnatal episiotomy infection and breakdown. Lax vaginal tissue complicated the use of the device in three women. In 47 interviews, participants, birth partners, clinician users and attending midwives viewed the device positively. Clinicians found it useful as a way of stopping blood loss and as an aid to diagnose the source of bleeding. Conclusions: The PPH Butterfly may provide a rapid, acceptable and effective treatment for postpartum haemorrhage

PPH Butterfly:A novel device to treat postpartum haemorrhage through uterine compression

Objective Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a significant cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. The most common cause is an inability of the uterus to contract adequately after childbirth. In bimanual compression (BMC), one hand is placed within the vagina and the other hand is on the abdominal wall to compress the uterus. It is effective, but very uncomfortable for the woman. We designed a device that could replicate BMC without inserting a hand vaginally, therefore being less invasive. It could also help in diagnosing the source of the bleeding. Design Mixed methods, combining an iterative design process with input from clinicians in simulations, and focus groups of clinicians and consumers. Setting Department of Women's and Children's Health and Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, University of Liverpool, UK. Methods A multidisciplinary team developed the design, using an obstetric manikin. Clinician and consumer groups also gave input on the concept and design. A healthcare product company and prototype manufacturer provided input into strategy, design and manufacture. Results The PPH Butterfly is a single piece, plastic medical device that replicates BMC. It is designed to be easy to use and low-cost and allows for smooth insertion and removal. It is acceptable to clinicians and consumers and performs well in tests. Conclusions This is the first device designed to replicate BMC while being less invasive. It could potentially be an effective form of PPH management, while also diagnosing the source of the bleeding. The device will now be tested in humans

A mixed method, phase 2 clinical evaluation of a novel device to treat postpartum haemorrhage.

We evaluated the safety, efficacy, and acceptability of a new device designed to facilitate uterine compression in women with postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). A prospective, phase two clinical device trial with concurrent qualitative study, conducted in a UK consultant obstetric unit. The device was used in addition to standard care in women unresponsive to initial oxytocin therapy. The primary effectiveness outcome was additional blood loss of over 1000mls, whilst safety was assessed through adverse events. Interviews assessed device feasibility and acceptability, and were analysed using framework analysis. We recruited 57 women with clinical PPH after vaginal birth; 67% were primiparous and 47% had undergone operative birth. All but two (96%) had atony as a cause of the haemorrhage; in addition, 30% also had bleeding from lacerations and 11% had retained tissue. After device use, only one woman had additional blood loss over 1000mls, although 3 women (7%) needed a Bakri balloon and 14% received a blood transfusion. All but one clinician felt that the device was easy to use. Clinicians stated that the device assisted management in 85% of cases. All 56 women who responded stated that if they bled in a future birth they would want the device to be used again. There were no serious adverse events related to the device. However, 3 events were judged as 'possibly' being caused by the device - 2 minor vaginal grazes and one postnatal episiotomy infection and breakdown. Lax vaginal tissue complicated the use of the device in three women. In 47 interviews, participants, birth partners, clinician users and attending midwives viewed the device positively. Clinicians found it useful as a way of stopping blood loss and as an aid to diagnose the source of bleeding. The PPH Butterfly may provide a rapid, acceptable and effective treatment for postpartum haemorrhage. Clinical Trial Registration prospective with ISRCTN15452399 11/09/2017 (www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15452399)

A phase 2 clinical trial of the PPH Butterfly, a new device to ‘turn off the tap’ of Post-Partum Hemorrhage.

Objective: To assess the acceptability, safety and efficacy of the PPH Butterfly, a new uterine compression device, in women with postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). Design: A phase two clinical device trial using matched historical controls, with accompanying grounded theory study. Setting: UK university consultant obstetric unit. Population: women with PPH after vaginal birth unresponsive to initial oxytocin therapy. Outcomes were compared to historical controls matched on blood loss, parity and type of birth. Methods: after oral consent, trained staff used the device in additional to normal care. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was additional blood loss &gt;1000mls. Qualitative interviews assessed device feasibility and acceptability. Results: Of the 57 recruits, two-thirds were primiparous and almost half had undergone operative birth. Two percent of recruited women had additional blood loss of over 1000mls compared to 8% of 113 controls (adjusted odds ratio 0.13, 95% CI (0.02 to 1.09)). Women treated with the device received significantly more additional treatments and had higher rates of exclusive breast-feeding at discharge. There were no serious adverse events related to the device. In 47 interviews, participants, birth partners, clinicians and attending midwives viewed the device positively. Clinicians found it useful to stop blood loss and diagnose the source of bleeding. Conclusions: the PPH Butterfly is acceptable and may have clinical benefits: it is a promising device for PPH management. Funding: National Institute for Health Research invention for innovation (i4i) program (II-LA-0715-200008) Keywords: postpartum haemorrhage, childbirth, oxytocin, third stage of labour, uterine compression. Registration: prospective ISRCTN (15452399); www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15452399</jats:p