68 research outputs found
Educational material about influenza viruses
To supplement a special edition of the journal Viruses, entitled “What’s New with Flu?”, influenza virus researchers have worked together to generate simple educational material to communicate their science to school students. Educational materials suitable for a range of ages are included, from coloring exercises for younger students through to explanations of cutting-edge science in straightforward language for older students. This article contains a handout with influenza facts, a coloring page, a glossary and word find and a connect-the-dots exercise explaining the ideas behind recently published scientific papers. Together, these materials are intended to make research on influenza viruses more accessible to students and teachers
Receptor specificity does not affect replication or virulence of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus in mice and ferrets
Human influenza viruses predominantly bind α2,6 linked sialic acid (SA) while avian viruses bind α2,3 SA-containing complex glycans. Virulence and tissue tropism of influenza viruses have been ascribed to this binding preference. We generated 2009 pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1) viruses with either predominant α2,3 or α2,6 SA binding and evaluated these viruses in mice and ferrets. The α2,3 pH1N1 virus had similar virulence in mice and replicated to similar titers in the respiratory tract of mice and ferrets as the α2,6 and WT pH1N1 viruses. Immunohistochemical analysis determined that all viruses infected similar cell types in ferret lungs. There is increasing evidence that receptor specificity of influenza viruses is more complex than the binary model of α2,6 and α2,3 SA binding and our data suggest that influenza viruses use a wide range of SA moieties to infect host cells.National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U.S.) (Intramural Research Program)National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (R37 GM057073-13)Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technolog
Influenza Virus Infectivity Is Retained in Aerosols and Droplets Independent of Relative Humidity
Pandemic and seasonal influenza viruses can be transmitted through aerosols and droplets, in which viruses must remain stable and infectious across a wide range of environmental conditions. Using humidity-controlled chambers, we studied the impact of relative humidity on the stability of 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus in suspended aerosols and stationary droplets. Contrary to the prevailing paradigm that humidity modulates the stability of respiratory viruses in aerosols, we found that viruses supplemented with material from the apical surface of differentiated primary human airway epithelial cells remained equally infectious for 1 hour at all relative humidities tested. This sustained infectivity was observed in both fine aerosols and stationary droplets. Our data suggest, for the first time, that influenza viruses remain highly stable and infectious in aerosols across a wide range of relative humidities. These results have significant implications for understanding the mechanisms of transmission of influenza and its seasonality
Field Research Is Essential to Counter Virological Threats
The interface between humans and wildlife is changing and, with it, the potential for pathogen introduction into humans has increased. Avian influenza is a prominent example, with an ongoing outbreak showing the unprecedented expansion of both geographic and host ranges. Research in the field is essential to understand this and other zoonotic threats. Only by monitoring dynamic viral populations and defining their biology in situ can we gather the information needed to ensure effective pandemic preparation.</p
Role of influenza A virus NP acetylation on viral growth and replication
Lysine acetylation is a post-translational modification known to regulate protein functions. Here we identify several acetylation sites of the influenza A virus nucleoprotein (NP), including the lysine residues K77, K113 and K229. Viral growth of mutant virus encoding K229R, mimicking a non-acetylated NP lysine residue, is severely impaired compared to wildtype or the mutant viruses encoding K77R or K113R. This attenuation is not the result of decreased polymerase activity, altered protein expression or disordered vRNP co-segregation but rather caused by impaired particle release. Interestingly, release deficiency is also observed mimicking constant acetylation at this site (K229Q), whereas virus encoding NP-K113Q could not be generated. However, mimicking NP hyper-acetylation at K77 and K229 severely diminishes viral polymerase activity, while mimicking NP hypo-acetylation at these sites has no effect on viral replication. These results suggest that NP acetylation at K77, K113 and K229 impacts multiple steps in viral replication of influenza A viruses
Enhanced Enterovirus D68 Replication in Neuroblastoma Cells Is Associated with a Cell Culture-Adaptive Amino Acid Substitution in VP1
Since its emergence in the United States in 2014, enterovirus D68 (EV-D68)
has been and is associated with severe respiratory diseases and acute flaccid myelitis.
Even though EV-D68 has been shown to replicate in different neuronal cells in vitro, it is
currently poorly understood which viral factors contribute to the ability to replicate efficiently in cells of the central nervous system and whether this feature is a clade-specific
feature. Here, we determined the replication kinetics of clinical EV-D68 isolates from
(sub)clades A, B1, B2, B3, and D1 in human neuroblastoma cells (SK-N-SH). Subsequently,
we compared sequences to identify viral factors associated with increased viral replication. All clinical isolates replicated in SK-N-SH cells, although there was a large difference
in efficiency. Efficient replication of clinical isolates was associated with an amino acid
substitution at position 271 of VP1 (E271K), which was acquired during virus propagation in vitro. Recognition of heparan sulfate in addition to sialic acids was associated
with increased attachment, infection, and replication. Removal of heparan sulfate resulted in a decrease in attachment, internalization, and replication of viruses with E271K.
Taken together, our study suggests that the replication kinetics of EV-D68 isolates in SKN-SH cells is not a clade-specific feature. However, recognition of heparan sulfate as an
additional receptor had a large effect on phenotypic characteristics in vitro. These observations emphasize the need to compare sequences from virus stocks with clinical isolates in order to retrieve phenotypic characteristics from original virus isolates.
IMPORTANCE Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) causes mild to severe respiratory disease and is
associated with acute flaccid myelitis since 2014. Currently, the understanding of the
ability of EV-D68 to replicate in the central nervous system (CNS), and whether it is associated with a specific clade of EV-D68 viruses or specific viral factors, is lacking. Comparing different EV-D68 clad
Eurasian-Origin Gene Segments Contribute to the Transmissibility, Aerosol Release, and Morphology of the 2009 Pandemic H1N1 Influenza Virus
The epidemiological success of pandemic and epidemic influenza A viruses relies on the ability to transmit efficiently from person-to-person via respiratory droplets. Respiratory droplet (RD) transmission of influenza viruses requires efficient replication and release of infectious influenza particles into the air. The 2009 pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1) virus originated by reassortment of a North American triple reassortant swine (TRS) virus with a Eurasian swine virus that contributed the neuraminidase (NA) and M gene segments. Both the TRS and Eurasian swine viruses caused sporadic infections in humans, but failed to spread from person-to-person, unlike the pH1N1 virus. We evaluated the pH1N1 and its precursor viruses in a ferret model to determine the contribution of different viral gene segments on the release of influenza virus particles into the air and on the transmissibility of the pH1N1 virus. We found that the Eurasian-origin gene segments contributed to efficient RD transmission of the pH1N1 virus likely by modulating the release of influenza viral RNA-containing particles into the air. All viruses replicated well in the upper respiratory tract of infected ferrets, suggesting that factors other than viral replication are important for the release of influenza virus particles and transmission. Our studies demonstrate that the release of influenza viral RNA-containing particles into the air correlates with increased NA activity. Additionally, the pleomorphic phenotype of the pH1N1 virus is dependent upon the Eurasian-origin gene segments, suggesting a link between transmission and virus morphology. We have demonstrated that the viruses are released into exhaled air to varying degrees and a constellation of genes influences the transmissibility of the pH1N1 virus
Virology under the microscope—a call for rational discourse
Viruses have brought humanity many challenges: respiratory infection, cancer, neurological impairment and immunosuppression to name a few. Virology research over the last 60+ years has responded to reduce this disease burden with vaccines and antivirals. Despite this long history, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented attention to the field of virology. Some of this attention is focused on concern about the safe conduct of research with human pathogens. A small but vocal group of individuals has seized upon these concerns – conflating legitimate questions about safely conducting virus-related research with uncertainties over the origins of SARS-CoV-2. The result has fueled public confusion and, in many instances, ill-informed condemnation of virology. With this article, we seek to promote a return to rational discourse. We explain the use of gain-of-function approaches in science, discuss the possible origins of SARS-CoV-2 and outline current regulatory structures that provide oversight for virological research in the United States. By offering our expertise, we – a broad group of working virologists – seek to aid policy makers in navigating these controversial issues. Balanced, evidence-based discourse is essential to addressing public concern while maintaining and expanding much-needed research in virology
Recommended from our members
Impact of DNA damage proteins on the adenoviral lifecycle
Viruses manipulate the cellular environment to promote productive infection. Cells mount anti-viral defenses to combat and limit viral productivity. Viruses in turn either hijack the anti-viral responses or inactivate them in order to overcome cellular defenses. Adenovirus (Ad) has been shown to inactivate the cellular DNA damage response by targeting the sensor for DNA damage, the MRN complex (composed of Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1). Our lab has shown that the adenoviral E1B55K/E4orf6 complex and E4orf3 proteins inactivate MRN. E1B55K/E4orf6 promote the degradation of the MRN complex, while E4orf3 mislocalizes MRN into intranuclear tracks. Infection with adenovirus lacking the E4 region is less productive than wild type Ad5 infection and fails to inactivate MRN, which results in activation of the DNA damage response and concatemerization of viral genomes. The impact of the DNA damage response proteins on the viral lifecycle was not well understood. The work presented in this thesis provides evidence that the DNA damage response proteins negatively affect the adenoviral lifecycle at multiple stages. Using mutants of E1B55K, we found that degradation of MRN requires distinct domains of E1B55K and promotes viral late protein synthesis. We demonstrated that production of viral late proteins occurs independently of concatemer formation. Using hypomorphic cell lines we have found that the MRN complex negatively impacts viral DNA replication independently of both concatemer formation and signaling by DNA damage response kinases, ATM and ATR. We concluded that the viral proteins E1B55K, E4orf6, and E4orf3, promote viral DNA replication by inactivating the MRN complex. Additionally, we found that ATR signaling, but not ATM signaling, negatively impacts the accumulation of late viral mRNA during [Delta]viral infection. We believe that the DNA damage response has multiple ways to limit adenoviral infection and that the virus has evolved strategies to inactivate these responses. Our data elucidate the anti-viral activity of the MRN complex during adenoviral infection, and provides further insight into the functions of MRN and ATR signalin
- …