Biophysical, Grazing-Season Management, and Animal Traits Effects on Individual Animal Performance of Cow-Calf Systems: Insights from a Long-Term Experiment in the US Western Great Plains

Beef grazing systems require information on management, biophysical, and individual animal influences on performance metrics. However, long-term controlled experiments are lacking to comprehensively ascertain these individual and likely interacting influences. We used a legacy data set from the USDA Agricultural Research Service where individual weight gains were determined from on and off weights of Hereford cows and calves grazing native northern mixed-grass prairie, during the June through September season, from 1975-2001 near Cheyenne, Wyoming, USA. The herd size varied from a minimum of 10 to a maximum of 48 pairs across years. Management (on and off grazing dates and stocking rate, kg BW/ha), biophysical (forage production estimated through NDVI LANDSAT time series, temperature, and precipitation variability), and individual animal (cow age, cow body weight at beginning of grazing season, and calf gender) influences were evaluated for effects on calf weight gain (WG, kg/head). Linear mixed models were used for analyses where the above mentioned were fixed factors, and year and individual cow were random ones. Calf performance was influenced by three animal traits: gender with steer WG 4 kg more than heifer, cow body weight with calf WG increased 2kg for each 100kg of cow body weight, and cow age as optimum calf WG occurred with 5-year-old cows. Management influenced calf WG through the on and off dates. Delaying the start of a grazing season decreased calf WG by 0.80 kg per delayed day. On the contrary, extending the grazing season increased calf WG by about the same amount. Biophysical effects on calf WG were not significant suggesting that the cow performance was mitigating these effects of variability. Results suggest that calf individual performance in this resilient rangeland ecosystem relies on cows’ body weight at beginning of the grazing, their age, and the timing to enter and remove animals from pastures

Adaptive, Multi-Paddock, Rotational Grazing Management: An Experimental, Ranch-Scale Assessment of Effects on Multiple Ecosystem Services

Decisions on how to move livestock in space and time are central to rangeland management. Despite decades of small-scale research, substantial uncertainty exists regarding the relative importance of cattle stocking rates per se, versus the movement of cattle in both space and time, in achieving desired vegetation and livestock outcomes at scales relevant to livestock producers. We report on a ranch-scale experiment comparing effects of collaborative, adaptive, multi-paddock, rotational management (CARM) versus more traditional, season-long, continuous rangeland management (TRM) on perennial grass density and production, cattle performance, and wildlife habitat, while holding the annual stocking rate the same in both systems. We collaborated with stakeholders to develop an adaptive grazing management plan, collected pre-treatment data in 2013, and implemented treatments during 2014 – 2020. Results for 2014 – 2018 were reported by Augustine et al. (2020); here we report on two additional years of results, covering a 7-year period of treatments from 2014 – 2020. With two additional years of measurements, we found no significant difference in total forage production in CARM vs. TRM treatments, averaged across all soil types in the experiment. In one year, we found that CARM increased forage production on loamy soils and decreased forage production on alkaline soils, but these differences were minor and in opposite directions, resulting in no net overall effect. Furthermore, we found that adaptive, rotational grazing management substantially reduced livestock weight gains in each of the first 6 years of the experiment, when cattle were managed as a single, large herd occupying each paddock sequentially. Across the 6 years, cattle weight gain averaged 15% lower in CARM vs. TRM. In the 7th year, stocking density in CARM was reduced 50% by giving cattle access to two paddocks at a time. This year also coincided with a drought. Under these conditions, cattle weight gains were identical in both treatments. Results emphasize the importance of replicated controls in assessing grazing management effects. Even in heterogeneous landscapes where livestock are moved adaptively among paddocks to match seasonal patterns of forage growth, such management may not lead to desired outcomes for vegetation and livestock

Adaptive Rotational Grazing and the Story of the Regrazed Grass Plant

Livestock stocking rates and decisions about how to move animals in time and space impact plant responses to livestock grazing. We report on a ranch-scale collaborative experiment comparing adaptive rotational grazing management to season-long continuous grazing during a 4.5-month grazing period during the growing season. As part of this project, stakeholders and scientists worked together to articulate their hypotheses about the mechanisms linking rotational grazing with expected vegetation outcomes. Several stakeholders expected rotational grazing to enhance the production and diversity of grazing-sensitive perennial grass species. The main hypothesized mechanism underlying this expectation was that rotation grazing should reduce regrazing of these grass plants. To test this hypothesis, we monitored patterns of grazing and regrazing on individual tillers (ramets) of a grazing-sensitive grass species, Pascopyrum smithii (western wheatgrass) for three consecutive years. We measured regrazing rates in paddocks managed using moderate stocking and adaptive rotational grazing as well as paddocks grazed continuously, season-long at light, moderate, or heavy stocking rates. Tillers in heavily grazed paddocks were regrazed more than three times as frequently as tillers in moderately grazed pastures, reinforcing the importance of stocking rate as a driver of vegetation impact. At the ranch-scale, tillers were regrazed equally often under adaptive rotational and season-long continuous grazing management, and this result did not vary across years. Adaptive rotational grazing greatly increased heterogeneity among paddocks in patterns of regrazing, with some paddocks experiencing high utilization and others experiencing low utilization. In this semi-arid rangeland, tiller defoliation data do not support the hypothesis that adaptive rotational grazing leads to less regrazing at the ranch-scale. In line with these mechanistic results, the production and diversity of grazing-sensitive perennial grasses also failed to respond to adaptive rotational grazing after five years. However, adaptive rotational grazing may enhance management flexibility and provide opportunities to work towards other objectives, such as wildlife habitat

Invasive annual grasses—Reenvisioning approaches in a changing climate

For nearly a century, invasive annual grasses have increasingly impacted terrestrial ecosystems across the western United States. Weather variability associated with climate change and increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) are making even more difficult the challenges of managing invasive annual grasses. As part of a special issue on climate change impacts on soil and water conservation, the topic of invasive annual grasses is being addressed by scientists at the USDA Agricultural Research Service to emphasize the need for additional research and future studies that build on current knowledge and account for (extreme) changes in abiotic and biotic conditions. Much research has focused on understanding the mechanisms underlying annual grass invasion, as well as assessing patterns and responses from a wide range of disturbances and management approaches. Weather extremes and the increasing occurrences of wildfire are contributing to the complexity of the problem. In broad terms, invasive annual grass management, including restoration, must be proactive to consider human values and ecosystem resiliency. Models capable of synthesizing vast amounts of diverse information are necessary for creating trajectories that could result in the establishment of perennial systems. Organization and collaboration are needed across the research community and with land managers to strategically develop and implement practices that limit invasive annual grasses. In the future, research will need to address invasive annual grasses in an adaptive integrated weed management (AIWM) framework that utilizes models and accounts for climate change that is resulting in altered/new approaches to management and restoration

Enhancing wind erosion monitoring and assessment for U.S. rangelands

Wind erosion is a major resource concern for rangeland managers because it can impact soil health, ecosystem structure and function, hydrologic processes, agricultural production, and air quality. Despite its significance, little is known about which landscapes are eroding, by how much, and when. The National Wind Erosion Research Network was established in 2014 to develop tools for monitoring and assessing wind erosion and dust emissions across the United States. The Network, currently consisting of 13 sites, creates opportunities to enhance existing rangeland soil, vegetation, and air quality monitoring programs. Decision-support tools developed by the Network will improve the prediction and management of wind erosion across rangeland ecosystems. © 2017 The Author(s)The Rangelands archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact [email protected] for further information

Long-term ecological research on Colorado Shortgrass Steppe

The SGS-LTER research site was established in 1980 by researchers at Colorado State University as part of a network of long-term research sites within the US LTER Network, supported by the National Science Foundation. Scientists within the Natural Resource Ecology Lab, Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, and Biology Department at CSU, California State Fullerton, USDA Agricultural Research Service, University of Northern Colorado, and the University of Wyoming, among others, have contributed to our understanding of the structure and functions of the shortgrass steppe and other diverse ecosystems across the network while maintaining a common mission and sharing expertise, data and infrastructure.Poster presented at the LTER All Scientists Meeting held in Estes Park, CO on September 10-13, 2012

Synthesis Paper: Targeted Livestock Grazing: Prescription for Healthy Rangelands

Targeted livestock grazing is a proven tool for manipulating rangeland vegetation, and current knowledge about targeted livestock grazing is extensive and expanding rapidly. Targeted grazing prescriptions optimize the timing, frequency, intensity, and selectivity of grazing (or browsing) in combinations that purposely exert grazing/browsing pressure on specific plant species or portions of the landscape. Targeted grazing differs from traditional grazing management in that the goal of targeted grazing is to apply defoliation or trampling to achieve specific vegetation management objectives, whereas the goal of traditional livestock grazing management is generally the production of livestock commodities. A shared aim of targeted livestock grazing and traditional grazing management is to sustain healthy soils, flora, fauna, and water resources that, in turn, can sustain natural ecological processes (e.g., nutrient cycle, water cycle, energy flow). Targeted grazing prescriptions integrate knowledge of plant ecology, livestock nutrition, and livestock foraging behavior. Livestock can be focused on target areas through fencing, herding, or supplement placement. Although practices can be developed to minimize the impact of toxins contained in target plants, the welfare of the animals used in targeted grazing must be a priority. Monitoring is needed to determine if targeted grazing is successful and to refine techniques to improve efficacy and efficiency. Examples of previous research studies and approaches are presented to highlight the ecological benefits that can be achieved when targeted grazing is applied properly. These cases include ways to suppress invasive plants and ways to enhance wildlife habitat and biodiversity. Future research should address the potential to select more adapted and effective livestock for targeted grazing and the associated animal welfare concerns with this practice. Targeted livestock grazing provides land managers a viable alternative to mechanical, chemical, and prescribed fire treatments to manipulate rangeland vegetation