15 research outputs found

    Flower fields and pesticide use interactively shape pollen beetle infestation and parasitism in oilseed rape fields

    Get PDF
    Pollen beetles (Brassicogethes spp.) are the main pests of oilseed rape (OSR, Brassica napus) in Europe and responsible for massive yield losses. Upcoming pesticide resistances highlight the need for other means of crop protection, such as natural pest control. Sown flower fields aim to counteract the decrease of insect biodiversity in agricultural landscapes by providing resources to ecosystem service providers. However, the optimal age and size of flower fields to increase natural pest control is still unclear. We conducted experiments on 31 OSR fields located along a gradient of landscape-scale semi-natural habitat (SNH). OSR fields were located adjacent to flower fields which differed in age, continuity and size, or adjacent to crop fields or calcareous grasslands. Pesticide-free areas were established to examine interactive effects of pesticide use and flower field characteristics. The abundance of pollen beetle adults and larvae, parasitism and superparasitism rates in OSR were recorded at increasing distances to the adjacent sites. Flower fields and calcareous grasslands increased pollen beetle parasitism when compared to OSR fields neighbouring crop fields. The threshold for effective natural pest control of 35% could be reached in the pesticide-free areas of OSR fields adjacent to calcareous grasslands and flower fields maintained continuously for at least 6 years. In pesticide-sprayed areas, pollen beetle parasitism and superparasitism declined with increasing distance to the adjacent field. Furthermore, flower fields larger than 1.5 ha were able to improve pollen beetle parasitism more than smaller fields. Synthesis and applications. To promote natural pest control in oilseed rape (OSR), large flower fields should be maintained for several years, to create stable habitats for natural enemies. The continuous maintenance of flower fields should be preferred, as ploughing and resowing after 5–6 years decreased the positive effects of the flower fields on natural pest control in adjacent OSR fields. However, pesticide use can abrogate positive effects of flower fields on pollen beetle parasitism. This study highlights that sown flower fields have the potential to increase natural pest control in OSR, but this potential is depending on its age, continuity and size and can be hindered by pesticide use. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Societ

    Using ecological and field survey data to establish a national list of the wild bee pollinators of crops

    Get PDF
    The importance of wild bees for crop pollination is well established, but less is known about which species contribute to service delivery to inform agricultural management, monitoring and conservation. Using sites in Great Britain as a case study, we use a novel qualitative approach combining ecological information and field survey data to establish a national list of crop pollinating bees for four economically important crops (apple, field bean, oilseed rape and strawberry). A traits data base was used to establish potential pollinators, and combined with field data to identify both dominant crop flower visiting bee species and other species that could be important crop pollinators, but which are not presently sampled in large numbers on crops flowers. Whilst we found evidence that a small number of common, generalist species make a disproportionate contribution to flower visits, many more species were identified as potential pollinators, including rare and specialist species. Furthermore, we found evidence of substantial variation in the bee communities of different crops. Establishing a national list of crop pollinators is important for practitioners and policy makers, allowing targeted management approaches for improved ecosystem services, conservation and species monitoring. Data can be used to make recommendations about how pollinator diversity could be promoted in agricultural landscapes. Our results suggest agri-environment schemes need to support a higher diversity of species than at present, notably of solitary bees. Management would also benefit from targeting specific species to enhance crop pollination services to particular crops. Whilst our study is focused upon Great Britain, our methodology can easily be applied to other countries, crops and groups of pollinating insects.LH was funded by NERC QMEE CDT. EJB was funded by a BBSRC Ph.D. studentship under grant BB/F016581/1. LB was was supported by the Scholarship Program of the German Federal Environmental Foundation (Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt, DBU, AZ 20014/302). AJC was funded by the BBSRC and Syngenta UK as part of a case award Ph.D. (grant no. 1518739). AE was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number 405940-115642). DG and A-MK were funded by grant PCIN2014-145-C02-02 (MinECo; EcoFruit project BiodivERsA-FACCE2014-74). MG was supported by Establishing a UK Pollinator Monitoring and Research Partnership (PMRP) a collaborative project funded by Defra, the Welsh and Scottish Governments, JNCC and project partners’. GAdG was funded via research projects BO-11-011.01-051 and BO-43-011.06-007, commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality. DK was funded by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs (BO-11-011.01-011). AK-H was funded by the NKFIH project (FK123813), the Bolyai János Fellowship of the MTA, the ÚNKP-19-4-SZIE-3 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology, and together with RF by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund OTKA 101940. MM was funded by Waitrose & Partners, Fruition PO, and the University of Worcester. MM was funded by grant INIA-RTA2013-00139-C03-01 (MinECo and FEDER). BBP and RFS were funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council as part of Wessex BESS (ref. NE/J014680/1). NJV was funded by the Walloon Region (Belgium) Direction générale opérationnelle de l’Agriculture, des Ressources naturelles et de l’Environnement (DGO3) for the "Modèle permaculturel" project on biodiversity in micro-farms, FNRS/FWO joint programme EOS — Excellence Of Science CliPS: Climate change and its impact on Pollination Services (project 30947854)". CW was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (Project number 405945293). BW was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) under research programme NE/N018125/1 ASSIST – Achieving Sustainable Agricultural Systems www.assist.ceh.ac.uk. TB and TO are supported by BBSRC, NERC, ESRC and the Scottish Government under the Global Food Security Programme (Grant BB/R00580X/1)

    Agrarumweltmaßnahmen und Ökosystemdienstleistungen: der Einfluss unterschiedlicher Blühflächen Merkmale auf Bestäubung, natürliche Schädlingskontrolle und Erträge

    No full text
    Insects are responsible for the major part of the ecosystem services pollination and natural pest control. If insects decline, these ecosystem services can not longer be reliably delivered. Agricultural intensification and the subsequent loss and fragmentation of habitats has among others been identified to cause insect decline. Ecological intensification aims to promote alternative and sustainable management practices in agricultural farming, for example to decrease the use of external inputs such as pesticides. Agri-environment schemes make amends for farmers if they integrate ecologically beneficial measures into their farming regime and can therefore promote ecological intensification. There is a wide variety of agri-environment schemes, but the implementation of sown flower fields on crop fields is often included. Flower fields offer foraging resources as well as nesting sites for many different insect species and should be able to support insect populations as well as to increase ecosystem services to adjacent fields. However, the potential of flower fields to exhibit these effects is depending on many factors. Among others, the age and size of the flower field can influence if and how different insects profit from the measure. Additionally, the complexity of the surrounding landscape and therefore the existing biodiversity is influencing the potential of flower fields to increase ecosystem services locally. The goal of this study is to disentangle to which degree these factors influence the ecosystem services pollination and natural pest control and if these factors interact with each other. Furthermore, it will be examined if and how flower fields and ecosystem services influence crop yield. Additional factors examined in this study are distance decay and pesticide use. The abundance of beneficial insects can decrease strongly with increasing distance to suitable habitats. Pesticide use in turn could abrogate positive effects of flower fields on beneficial insects. To examine these different aspects and to be able to make recommendations for flower field implementation, field experiments were conducted on differently composed sown flower fields and adjacent oilseed rape fields. Flower fields differed in their age and continuity as well as in their size. Additionally, flower and oilseed rape fields were chosen in landscapes with different amounts of semi-natural habitat. Oilseed rape fields adjacent to calcareous grasslands and conventional crop fields served as controls. Pollinator observations and pollen beetle and parasitism surveys were conducted in the oilseed rape fields. Additionally, different yield parameters of the oilseed rape plants were recorded. Observations were conducted and samples taken in increasing distance to the flower fields to examine distance decay functions. Spray windows were established to inspect the influence of pesticides on ecosystem services and crop yields. Linear mixed models were used for statistical analysis. The results show, that newly established flower fields with high amounts of flower cover are very attractive for pollinators. If the flower fields reached a certain size (> 1.5ha), the pollinators tended to stay in these fields and did not distribute into the surroundings. High amounts of semi-natural habitat in the surrounding landscape increased the value of small flower fields as starting points for pollinators and their subsequent spillover into crop fields. Additionally, high amounts of semi-natural habitat decreased the decay of pollinators with increasing distance to the flower fields. Based on these results, it can be recommended to establish many small flower fields in landscapes with high amounts of semi-natural habitat and large flower fields in landscapes with low amounts of semi-natural habitat. However, it is mentionable that flower fields are no substitute for perennial semi-natural habitats. These still must be actively conserved to increase pollination to crop fields. Furthermore, the lowest amount of pollen beetle infestation was found on oilseed rape fields adjacent to continuous flower fields aged older than 6 years. Flower fields and calcareous grasslands in general increased pollen beetle parasitism in adjacent oilseed rape fields compared to conventional crop fields. The threshold for effective natural pest control could only be reached in the pesticide free areas in the oilseed rape fields adjacent to continuous flower fields and calcareous grasslands. Parasitism and superparasitism declined with increasing distance to the adjacent fields in pesticide treated areas of the oilseed rape fields. However, they remained on a similar level in spray windows without pesticides. Large flower fields increased parasitism and superparasitism more than small flower fields. Flower fields generally have the potential to increase pollen beetle parasitism rates, but pesticides can abrogate these positive effects of flower fields on natural pest control. Last but not least, effects of flower fields and ecosystem services on oilseed rape yield were examined. No positive effects of pollination on oilseed rape yield could be found. Old and continuous flower fields increased natural pest control in oilseed rape fields, which in turn increased seed set and total seed weight of oilseed rape plants. The pesticide treatment had negative effects on natural pest control, but positive effects on crop yield. Pollination and natural pest control decreased with increasing distance to the field edge, but fruit set slightly increased. The quality of the field in terms of soil and climatic conditions did not influence the yield parameters examined in this study. Yield formation in oilseed rape plants is a complex process with many factors involved, and it is difficult to disentangle indirect effects of flower fields on yield. However, perennial flower fields can promote ecological intensification by increasing crop yield via natural pest control. This study contributes to a better understanding of the effects of differently composed flower fields on pollination, natural pest control and oilseed rape yield.Insekten sind für einen Großteil der Ökosystemdienstleistungen Bestäubung und natürliche Schädlingskontrolle zuständig. Schwinden die Insekten, so können diese Dienstleistungen nicht mehr zuverlässig gewährleistet werden. Als Ursachen für den Rückgang an Insekten wurde unter anderem die Intensivierung der Landwirtschaft und damit einhergehend der Verlust und die Fragmentierung von Lebensraum identifiziert. Ökologische Intensivierung hat das Ziel, alternative und nachhaltige Bewirtschaftungsmethoden in der Landwirtschaft zu fördern und beispielsweise den Einsatz von Spritzmitteln zu verringern. Agrarumweltmaßnahmen entschädigen Landwirte, wenn sie ökologisch wertvolle Maßnahmen in ihren Betrieb integrieren und können dadurch ökologische Intensivierung unterstützen. Die Bandbreite an Agrarumweltmaßnahmen ist groß, beinhaltet aber häufig das Anlegen von Blühflächen auf Ackerflächen. Blühflächen liefern Nahrungsressourcen und Lebensraum für eine Vielzahl von Insekten und sollten daher in der Lage sein Insektenpopulationen zu unterstützen und Ökosystemdienstleistungen auf angrenzenden Feldern zu verstärken. Jedoch ist das ökologische Potential von Blühflächen von einer Vielzahl von Faktoren abhängig. Unter anderem können das Alter und die Größe der Blühfläche entscheidend beeinflussen, inwiefern unterschiedliche Insektengruppen profitieren. Zusätzlich hat die Landschaftskomplexität der direkten Umgebung, und damit die potentiell vorhandene Biodiversität, großen Einfluss auf die Fähigkeit von Blühflächen Ökosystemdienstleistungen lokal zu erhöhen. In dieser Studie geht es darum zu entschlüsseln, wie sich diese verschiedenen Faktoren sich auf die beiden Ökosystemdienstleistungen Bestäubung und natürliche Schädlingskontrolle auswirken und ob sie sich gegenseitig beeinflussen. Zusätzlich soll untersucht werden, inwiefern Blühflächen und Ökosystemdienstleistungen Erträge beeinflussen können. Weitere in dieser Studie untersuchte Einflussfaktoren sind die Distanz zur Blühfläche und der Einsatz von Pestiziden. Die Abundanz von Nützlingen kann mit der Distanz zu geeigneten Habitaten stark abnehmen. Der Einsatz von Spritzmitteln wiederum könnte die positiven Einflüsse der Blühflächen auf Nützlinge aufheben. Um diese verschiedenen Aspekte zu untersuchen und letztendlich Empfehlung für die Etablierung von Blühflächen geben zu können, wurden Feldversuche auf Blühflächen mit unterschiedlicher Beschaffenheit und auf angrenzenden Rapsflächen durchgeführt. Die Blühflächen unterschieden sich hierbei in ihrem Alter und ihrer Kontinuität. Zusätzlich wurden Blühflächen mit unterschiedlicher Größe getestet. Außerdem wurden die Blühflächen und ihre benachbarten Rapsfelder so ausgewählt, dass sie sich in Landschaften mit unterschiedlichem Anteil an halbnatürlichen Habitaten befinden. Rapsflächen neben Kalkmagerrasen und Äckern mit konventionellen Feldfrüchten dienten als Kontrollflächen. Auf den Rapsflächen wurden Bestäuberbeobachtungen sowie Aufnahmen von Rapsglanzkäferbefall und deren Parasitierung durchgeführt. Zusätzlich wurden verschiedene Ertragsparameter von Raps aufgenommen. Die Untersuchungen fanden jeweils in unterschiedlichen Distanzen zur Blühfläche innerhalb des Rapsfeldes statt, um Distanz-Abnahme Funktionen zu untersuchen. Spritzfenster wurden etabliert, um den Einfluss von Pestiziden auf Ökosystemdienstleistungen und Erträge zu untersuchen. Für die statistische Auswertung wurden lineare gemischte Modelle verwendet. Die Ergebnisse haben zum einen gezeigt, dass frisch angelegte Blühflächen mit hoher Blütendeckung sehr attraktiv für Bestäuber sind. Jedoch blieben die Bestäuber in den Blühflächen, wenn diese eine gewisse Größe hatten (> 1.5ha) und verteilten sich nicht auf die umgebenden Flächen. Ein hoher Anteil an halbnatürlichen Habitaten in der umgebenden Landschaft erhöhte den Wert von kleinen Blühflächen als Ausgangspunkt für Bestäuber und ihren anschließenden Übergang auf Ackerflächen. Hohe Mengen an halbnatürlichen Habitaten verringerten außerdem den Rückgang der Bestäuber mit steigender Entfernung zur Blühfläche. Auf Grundlage dieser Ergenisse wäre es zu empfehlen, kleine Blühflächen in Landschaften mit viel halbnatürlichem Habitat und große Blühflächen in Landschaften mit wenig halbnatürlichem Habitat anzulegen. Außerdem ist anzumerken, dass Blühflächen keinen adequaten Ersatz für dauerhafte halbantürliche Habitate darstellen. Diese müssen weiterhin aktiv geschützt und erhalten werden, um Bestäubung auf Ackerflächen zu fördern. Des Weiteren wurde auf Rapsflächen neben kontinuierlichen Blühflächen mit einem Alter über 6 Jahre der niedrigste Befall mit Rapsglanzkäferlarven festgestellt. Blühflächen und Kalkmagerrasen erhöhten die Parasitierung von Rapsglanzkäfern in benachbarten Rapsflächen im Vergleich zu Rapsflächen die neben Ackerflächen liegen. Der Schwellenwert für eine effektive natürliche Schädlingskontrolle wurde nur in den pestizidfreien Bereichen in Rapsflächen neben kontinuierlichen Blühflächen und Kalkmagerasen erreicht. In mit Pestiziden behandelten Bereichen nahmen Parasitismus und Superparasitismus mit zunehmender Entfernung zum benachbarten Feld ab. In den Spritzfenstern ohne Pestizide blieben sie jedoch auf dem gleichen Niveau. Große Blühflächen erhöhten Parasitismus und Superparasitismus mehr als kleine. Insgesamt können Blühflächen die Parasitierungsraten von Rapsglanzkäfern auf Rapsflächen erhöhen, jedoch können Pestizide diese positiven Effekte aufheben. Zuletzt wurden die Effekte von Blühflächen und Ökosystemdienstleistungen auf den Rapsertrag untersucht. Hier stellte sich heraus, dass Bestäubung keine positiven Effekte auf den Rapsertrag hatte. Alte und kontinuierliche Blühflächen erhöhten die natürliche Schädlingskontrolle in den Rapsfeldern, welche wiederrum den Samenansatz und das absolute Samengewicht erhöhten. Die Behandlung mit Pestiziden hatte negative Asuwirkungen auf natürliche Schädlingskontrolle, aber positive Auswirkungen auf den Ertrag. Bestäubung und natürliche Schädlingskontrolle nahmen mit der zunehmenden Entfernung zum Feldrand ab, aber der Fruchtansatz nahm leicht zu. Die Feldqualität hatte keine Auswirkungen auf die im Modell untersuchten Rapsertrag Messwerte. Ertragsbildung bei Rapspflanzen ist ein komplexer Vorgang an dem viele Faktoren beteiligt sind. Mehrjährige Blühflächen können ökologische Intensivierung fördern indem sie den Ertrag durch natürliche Schädlingskontrolle erhöhen. Diese Studie leistet einen wertvollen Beitrag zum besseren Verständnis der Auswirkungen von unterschiedlich beschaffenen Blühflächen auf Bestäubung, natürliche Schädlingskontrolle und Rapsertrag

    activity denisties

    No full text
    site = study site; position = trap position within the transect; interval = sampling interval; transect = transect number; setup & sorted = individuals who set up and sorted the tranps & trap samples; comment = loss (reason specified in additional_comment

    Data from: Agri-environmental schemes promote ground-dwelling predators in adjacent oilseed rape fields: diversity, species traits and distance-decay functions

    No full text
    1. Rising demands for agricultural products and high environmental costs of intensive agriculture reinforce the need for ecological replacements in agricultural management. In Europe, agri-environmental schemes (AES) are implemented to enhance species richness and provision of ecosystem services, but the effectiveness of different AES types and the spatial extent of possible beneficial effects are little understood. In this study we assessed the effects of different AES types on diversity, species traits and distance-decay functions of ground- dwelling predators in adjacent crop fields. 2. On 31 study sites with winter oilseed rape (OSR) adjacent to four types of AES differing in management intensity and habitat age we recorded ground-dwelling predators (carabid beetles, staphylinid beetles and spiders) during OSR growth from April to July. Effects of the AES on species richness, activity densities and different traits of these taxa were examined with transects of pitfall traps running along a continuous distance gradient from the AES across the habitat border into the OSR fields. 3. Ground-dwelling predator communities benefitted similarly from the different AES types. In adjacent OSR, activity densities, carabid species richness and the proportion of predatory carabid beetles declined from the field edge while mean body size increased. Adjacent AES increased the proportion of predatory species and simultaneously decreased the proportion of granivorous or frugivorous species in adjacent OSR fields. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our results indicate a beneficial effect of adjacent agri-environmental schemes (AES) on ground-dwelling predators in oilseed rape (OSR), mostly irrespective of AES type and therefore management intensity and habitat age. The short-ranged distance decay effects on natural enemies in OSR underpin that a strategic spatial placement of AES in agricultural landscapes is required to maximise biological pest control. This could help replace anthropogenic input in modern agriculture and secure adequate yields

    The effects of flower-rich fields on biodiversity-based ecosystem services in the agricultural landscape.

    No full text
    The rising demand of agricultural products has led to agricultural intensification based on external inputs. Therefore, biodiversity and semi-natural habitats in agricultural landscapes have decreased in the last decades. Biodiversity-dependent ecosystem services like pollination and natural pest control are negatively affected by this development. Pollination provided by animals is of major importance to a wide variety of crops as well as the majority of wild plants. Furthermore, natural pest control gains importance due to increasingly frequent pesticide resistances. In Germany, Agri-environmental schemes (AES) aim to restore biodiversity in the agricultural landscape and to compensate at least partly for the lack of perennial semi-natural habitats by providing key resources for wild animals. For example, sown flower-rich fields are implemented to provide nectar, pollen and nesting sites to insects. The optimal management, composition and distribution of these flowering fields are still matters of ongoing discussion, especially concerning their interaction with the surrounding landscape in terms of maximizing ecosystem services. In addition, knowledge gaps exist about trade-offs and synergies among pollination and pest control services in response to AES and landscape context. Experiments were carried out in Lower Franconia, Germany in 2016 to address these questions. A total of 31 oilseed rape fields with adjacent flowering fields differing in age/continuity, size and management or with adjacent oilseed rape controls located in 1km radius landscapes along a semi-natural habitat gradient were selected for this study. In the oilseed rape fields, transects leading away from the flowering fields were established to examine distance decay effects of the AES by conducting pollinator observations, pest density and yield measurements. We present results on pollinator visitation rates, pollinator richness, pest control efficiency and crop yields. In doing so, we consider interactive effects of landscape context, different types of AES and within field distance-decay functions.peerReviewe

    Flower fields and pesticide use interactively shape pollen beetle infestation and parasitism in oilseed rape fields

    Get PDF
    Pollen beetles (Brassicogethes spp.) are the main pests of oilseed rape (OSR, Brassica napus) in Europe and responsible for massive yield losses. Upcoming pesticide resistances highlight the need for other means of crop protection, such as natural pest control. Sown flower fields aim to counteract the decrease of insect biodiversity in agricultural landscapes by providing resources to ecosystem service providers. However, the optimal age and size of flower fields to increase natural pest control is still unclear. We conducted experiments on 31 OSR fields located along a gradient of landscape-scale semi-natural habitat (SNH). OSR fields were located adjacent to flower fields which differed in age, continuity and size, or adjacent to crop fields or calcareous grasslands. Pesticide-free areas were established to examine interactive effects of pesticide use and flower field characteristics. The abundance of pollen beetle adults and larvae, parasitism and superparasitism rates in OSR were recorded at increasing distances to the adjacent sites. Flower fields and calcareous grasslands increased pollen beetle parasitism when compared to OSR fields neighbouring crop fields. The threshold for effective natural pest control of 35% could be reached in the pesticide-free areas of OSR fields adjacent to calcareous grasslands and flower fields maintained continuously for at least 6 years. In pesticide-sprayed areas, pollen beetle parasitism and superparasitism declined with increasing distance to the adjacent field. Furthermore, flower fields larger than 1.5 ha were able to improve pollen beetle parasitism more than smaller fields. Synthesis and applications. To promote natural pest control in oilseed rape (OSR), large flower fields should be maintained for several years, to create stable habitats for natural enemies. The continuous maintenance of flower fields should be preferred, as ploughing and resowing after 5–6 years decreased the positive effects of the flower fields on natural pest control in adjacent OSR fields. However, pesticide use can abrogate positive effects of flower fields on pollen beetle parasitism. This study highlights that sown flower fields have the potential to increase natural pest control in OSR, but this potential is depending on its age, continuity and size and can be hindered by pesticide use

    carabids

    No full text
    site = study site; position = trap position within the transect; interval = sampling interval; transect = transect number; species_name = species name; abundance = abundance; stored = where the specimen is locate

    environment

    No full text
    site = study site; Lat & Lon_AES = latitude and longitude of the AES sites; Area_AES & Area_OSR = field sizes in [ha]; EDGE, MID & CENTRE = distances to the field edge of the transect position in [m]; SNH = percentage of SNH in 1km radius surrounding the study sites

    original data

    No full text
    Excel file containing original data data from the stud
    corecore