Neonatal Screening in Europe Revisited: An ISNS Perspective on the Current State and Developments Since 2010

Neonatal screening (NBS) was initiated in Europe during the 1960s with the screening for phenylketonuria. The panel of screened disorders (“conditions”) then gradually expanded, with a boost in the late 1990s with the introduction of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), making it possible to screen for 40–50 conditions using a single blood spot. The most recent additions to screening programmes (screening for cystic fibrosis, severe combined immunodeficiency and spinal muscular atrophy) were assisted by or realised through the introduction of molecular technologies. For this survey, we collected data from 51 European countries. We report the developments between 2010 and 2020 and highlight the achievements reached with the progress made in this period. We also identify areas where further progress can be made, mainly by exchanging knowledge and learning from experiences in neighbouring countries. Between 2010 and 2020, most NBS programmes in geographical Europe matured considerably, both in terms of methodology (modernised) and with regard to the panel of conditions screened (expanded). These developments indicate that more collaboration in Europe through European organisations is gaining momentum. We can only accomplish the timely detection of newborn infants potentially suffering from one of the many rare diseases and take appropriate action by working together

Neonatal Screening in Europe Revisited: An ISNS Perspective on the Current State and Developments Since 2010

Neonatal screening (NBS) was initiated in Europe during the 1960s with the screening for phenylketonuria. The panel of screened disorders ("conditions") then gradually expanded, with a boost in the late 1990s with the introduction of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), making it possible to screen for 40-50 conditions using a single blood spot. The most recent additions to screening programmes (screening for cystic fibrosis, severe combined immunodeficiency and spinal muscular atrophy) were assisted by or realised through the introduction of molecular technologies. For this survey, we collected data from 51 European countries. We report the developments between 2010 and 2020 and highlight the achievements reached with the progress made in this period. We also identify areas where further progress can be made, mainly by exchanging knowledge and learning from experiences in neighbouring countries. Between 2010 and 2020, most NBS programmes in geographical Europe matured considerably, both in terms of methodology (modernised) and with regard to the panel of conditions screened (expanded). These developments indicate that more collaboration in Europe through European organisations is gaining momentum. We can only accomplish the timely detection of newborn infants potentially suffering from one of the many rare diseases and take appropriate action by working together

Reliability of Neonatal Screening Results

n/

Neonatal Screening in Europe Revisited: An ISNS Perspective on the Current State and Developments Since 2010

To access publisher's full text version of this article, please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field or click on the hyperlink at the top of the page marked DownloadNeonatal screening (NBS) was initiated in Europe during the 1960s with the screening for phenylketonuria. The panel of screened disorders ("conditions") then gradually expanded, with a boost in the late 1990s with the introduction of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), making it possible to screen for 40-50 conditions using a single blood spot. The most recent additions to screening programmes (screening for cystic fibrosis, severe combined immunodeficiency and spinal muscular atrophy) were assisted by or realised through the introduction of molecular technologies. For this survey, we collected data from 51 European countries. We report the developments between 2010 and 2020 and highlight the achievements reached with the progress made in this period. We also identify areas where further progress can be made, mainly by exchanging knowledge and learning from experiences in neighbouring countries. Between 2010 and 2020, most NBS programmes in geographical Europe matured considerably, both in terms of methodology (modernised) and with regard to the panel of conditions screened (expanded). These developments indicate that more collaboration in Europe through European organisations is gaining momentum. We can only accomplish the timely detection of newborn infants potentially suffering from one of the many rare diseases and take appropriate action by working together. Keywords: ISNS; International Society for Neonatal Screening; congenital endocrine disorders; congenital metabolic disorders; dried blood spot screening; neonatal screening; newborn screening; public health; rare diseases.Estonian Research Counci

Genetic and clinical characteristics including occurrence of testicular adrenal rest tumors in Slovak and Slovenian patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency

ObjectiveTo analyze the mutational spectrum, clinical characteristics, genotype–phenotype correlations, testicular adrenal rests tumor prevalence, and role of neonatal screening in congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) patients from Slovakia and Slovenia.Design and methodsData were obtained from 104 patients with CAH registered in Slovak and Slovenian databases. Low-resolution genotyping was performed to detect the most common point mutations. To detect deletions, conversions, point mutations, or other sequence changes in the CYP21A2 gene, high-resolution genotyping was performed. Genotypes were classified according to residual 21-hydroxylase activity (null, A, B, C).Results64% of the individuals had the salt-wasting form (SW-CAH), 15% the simple virilizing form (SV-CAH), and 21% the non-classic (NC-CAH). CYP21A2 gene deletion/conversion and c.293-13A/C>G pathogenic variant accounted together for 55.5% of the affected alleles. In SV-CAH p.Ile172Asn was the most common pathogenic variant (28.13%), while in NC-CAH p.Val282Leu (33.33%), CYP21A2 gene deletion/conversion (21.43%), c.293-13A/C>G (14.29%), Pro30Leu (11.90%). The frequency of alleles with multiple pathogenic variants was higher in Slovenian patients (15.83% of all alleles). Severe genotypes (0 and A) correlated well with the expected phenotype (SW in 94.74% and 97.3%), while less severe genotypes (B and C) correlated weaklier (SV in 50% and NC in 70.8%). The median age of SW-CAH patients at the time of diagnosis was 6 days in Slovakia vs. 28.5 days in Slovenia (p=0.01). Most of the Slovak patients in the cohort were detected by NBS. (24 out of 29). TARTs were identified in 7 out of 24 male patients, of whom all (100%) had SW-CAH and all had poor hormonal control. The median age at the diagnosis of TARTs was 13 years.ConclusionThe study confirmed the importance of neonatal screening, especially in the speed of diagnosis of severe forms of CAH. The prediction of the 21-OH deficiency phenotype was reasonably good in the case of severe pathogenic variants, but less reliable in the case of milder pathogenic variants, which is consistent compared to data from other populations. Screening for TARTs should be realized in all male patients with CAH, since there is possible remission when identified early

Neonatal Screening in Europe Revisited: An ISNS Perspective on the Current State and Developments Since 2010

Neonatal screening (NBS) was initiated in Europe during the 1960s with the screening for phenylketonuria. The panel of screened disorders (“conditions”) then gradually expanded, with a boost in the late 1990s with the introduction of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), making it possible to screen for 40–50 conditions using a single blood spot. The most recent additions to screening programmes (screening for cystic fibrosis, severe combined immunodeficiency and spinal muscular atrophy) were assisted by or realised through the introduction of molecular technologies. For this survey, we collected data from 51 European countries. We report the developments between 2010 and 2020 and highlight the achievements reached with the progress made in this period. We also identify areas where further progress can be made, mainly by exchanging knowledge and learning from experiences in neighbouring countries. Between 2010 and 2020, most NBS programmes in geographical Europe matured considerably, both in terms of methodology (modernised) and with regard to the panel of conditions screened (expanded). These developments indicate that more collaboration in Europe through European organisations is gaining momentum. We can only accomplish the timely detection of newborn infants potentially suffering from one of the many rare diseases and take appropriate action by working together

Neonatal Screening in Europe Revisited: An ISNS Perspective on the Current State and Developments Since 2010

Neonatal screening (NBS) was initiated in Europe during the 1960s with the screening for phenylketonuria. The panel of screened disorders (“conditions”) then gradually expanded, with a boost in the late 1990s with the introduction of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), making it possible to screen for 40–50 conditions using a single blood spot. The most recent additions to screening programmes (screening for cystic fibrosis, severe combined immunodeficiency and spinal muscular atrophy) were assisted by or realised through the introduction of molecular technologies. For this survey, we collected data from 51 European countries. We report the developments between 2010 and 2020 and highlight the achievements reached with the progress made in this period. We also identify areas where further progress can be made, mainly by exchanging knowledge and learning from experiences in neighbouring countries. Between 2010 and 2020, most NBS programmes in geographical Europe matured considerably, both in terms of methodology (modernised) and with regard to the panel of conditions screened (expanded). These developments indicate that more collaboration in Europe through European organisations is gaining momentum. We can only accomplish the timely detection of newborn infants potentially suffering from one of the many rare diseases and take appropriate action by working together

European survey of newborn bloodspot screening for CF: opportunity to address challenges and improve performance

European CF Society Neonatal Screening Working Group (ECFS NSWG): Sabine Renner , Max Zeyda , Elke de Wachter , Luc Regal , Felix Votava, Andrea Holubova, Marianne Skov , Tessa Morgan, Paul Bregeaut , Loretta O'Grady, Ines Bucci , Stefano Pantano , Simonetta Simonetti, Domenica De Venuto, Donatello Salvatore, Nicola Perrotti, Mimma Caloiero, Giuseppe Castaldo, Antonella Tosco, Francesca Righetti, Giovanna Pisi, Fiorella Battistini, Antonio Angeloni, Giuseppe Cimino, Giovanni Fiocchi, Antonella Angiolillo, Michela Cassanello, Luisella Alberti, Laura E Claut, Raffaele Badolato, Enza Pavanello, Benedetta Fabrizzi, Elisabetta Bignamini, Anna Cardillo, Mariangela Lombardo, Letizia Cocciadiferro, Lisa Termini, Daniela Dolce, Vito Terlizzi, Anna Tamanini, Francesca Pauro, Giancarlo la Marca, Elina Aleksejeva, Dita Gaidule-Logina, Stoika Fustik, Violeta Anastasovska, Marelle Bouva, Alastair Reid, Jennifer Cundick, Emma Lundman, Egil Bakkeheim, Katarzyna Zybert, Mariusz Oltarzewski, Laura Vilarinho, Victoria Sherman, Elena Kondratyeva, Sarah Smith, Gordana Vilotijevic Dautovic, Maria Knapkova, Zuzana Mydlova, Rosa Mª López, Valle Velasco, Felicitas Díaz Flores, Cristóbal Colón Mejeras, Eva Sl Pedersen, Ugur Ozcelik, Bulent Karadag, Halyna Makukh, Moat Stuart.European CF Society Neonatal Screening Working Group (ECFS NSWG): INSA - Laura VilarinhoBackground: The aim of this study was to record the current status of newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) for CF across Europe and assess performance. Methods: Survey of representatives of NBS for CF programmes across Europe. Performance was assessed through a framework developed in a previous exercise. Results: In 2022, we identified 22 national and 34 regional programmes in Europe. Barriers to establishing NBS included cost and political inertia. Performance was assessed from 2019 data reported by 21 national and 21 regional programmes. All programmes employed different protocols, with IRT-DNA the most common strategy. Six national and 11 regional programmes did not use DNA analysis. Conclusions: Integrating DNA analysis into the NBS protocol improves PPV, but at the expense of increased carrier and CFSPID recognition. Some programmes employ strategies to mitigate these outcomes. Programmes should constantly strive to improve performance but large datasets are needed to assess outcomes reliably.Highlights: In 2022, newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) for CF is undertaken in 30 European countries, 26 of them are national programmes; Some programmes are still not achieving ECFS standards. Compared to 2014, there is an improvement in sensitivity but a deterioration in achieving a sufficient PPV; There continues to be a wide variety of approaches, but the majority of national programmes are now using DNA analysis as a 2nd tier; This survey demonstrates areas of good practice, but there is considerable scope for improvement in the quality of NBS for CF across Europe; The framework of the 20 parameters to calculate the 8 key outcomes should be part of any annual report of a CF NBS programme, and thus improve future surveys.The survey was funded by the European CF Societyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio