Outcomes of patients with advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treated with nintedanib or pirfenidone in a real-world multicentre cohort

Background and objective Antifibrotic therapy with nintedanib or pirfenidone slows disease progression and reduces mortality in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, patients with advanced IPF, as defined by forced vital capacity (FVC) < 50% and/or diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) < 30% of predicted, have not been included in randomized trials, and the outcomes of such patients who initiate treatment are not well understood. We determined lung function, disease progression and mortality outcomes following initiation of antifibrotic therapy in patients with advanced IPF at the time of treatment initiation compared to those with mild-moderate IPF. Methods We included 502 patients enrolled in IPF registries from four Nordic countries. Linear mixed models were used to assess change in FVC and DLCO over time. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess transplant-free survival and progression- and transplant-free survival. Results Of 502 patients, 66 (13%) had advanced IPF. Annual change in FVC was -125 ml (95% CI -163, -87) among patients with mild-moderate IPF, and +28 ml (95% CI -96, +152) among those with advanced IPF. Advanced IPF at treatment initiation was associated with poorer transplant-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 2.39 [95% CI 1.66, 3.43]) and progression- and transplant-free survival (HR 1.60 [95% CI 1.15, 2.23]). Conclusion In a broadly representative IPF population, patients with advanced IPF at the initiation of antifibrotic therapy did not have greater lung function decline over time compared with those with mild-moderate IPF, but had substantially higher mortality. Prospective studies are needed to determine the effect of antifibrotic therapy in patients with advanced IPF.Peer reviewe

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis : disease presentation, clinical course and potential biomarkers

The interest and research within the area of the fatal lung disease idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has increased exponentially over the past decades. This has resulted in important insights into the nature and pathogenesis of the disease, which ultimately constitute the knowledge base upon which diagnostic, management, treatment decisions and guidelines are shaped. With a prognosis worse than many cancers and a complete absence of curative treatments apart from lung transplantation, the introduction of the first approved treatments, although not curative but disease modifying, has been a major leap forward for patients and the research community. Despite the increasing interest, many questions still remain unanswered. Observational studies based on registry data can provide important complementary information to data generated in clinical trials about the patient population, disease behavior and treatment. Combining clinical data with biological samples such as serum and lung tissue from patients with IPF, enables studies where associations between biological processes and the clinical behavior can be explored. This thesis attempts to address open questions in IPF by using data from patients enrolled in the Swedish IPF registry and samples from its biobank. The studies can be divided in two parts: In the first part, we have explored potential gender differences. Further, we have taken a comprehensive look into the patient population and explored patient characteristics, disease severity, evaluated antifibrotic treatment and discerned potential disease phenotypes with distinct disease trajectories. The second part comprises studies where we have leveraged register data with results generated from analyzes of serum samples. In these studies, we have taken different approaches in order to profile the repertoire of autoantibodies and proteins present. We demonstrate, both in an in vitro cell culture model and in patient serum, how proteins related to remodeling, inflammation and cell recruitment are upregulated in IPF and we describe their associations to disease severity and progression. Investigating the presence of antibodies related to rheumatoid arthritis in IPF revealed how autoimmune mechanisms are active and might play a role in a subgroup of IPF patients. Taken together, these discoveries contribute to the field by expanding established observations while also generating results and hypotheses that warrants further studies to refine and improve our understanding of IPF

Distal lung microenvironment triggers release of mediators recognized as potential systemic biomarkers for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive fibrotic lung disease with an unmet need of biomarkers that can aid in the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of the disease and response to treatment. In this two-part explorative proteomic study, we demonstrate how proteins associated with tissue remodeling, inflammation and chemotaxis such as MMP7, CXCL13 and CCL19 are released in response to aberrant extracellular matrix (ECM) in IPF lung. We used a novel ex vivo model where decellularized lung tissue from IPF patients and healthy donors were repopulated with healthy fibroblasts to monitor locally released mediators. Results were validated in longitudinally collected serum samples from 38 IPF patients and from 77 healthy controls. We demonstrate how proteins elevated in the ex vivo model (e.g., MMP7), and other serum proteins found elevated in IPF patients such as HGF, VEGFA, MCP-3, IL-6 and TNFRSF12A, are associated with disease severity and progression and their response to antifibrotic treatment. Our study supports the model’s applicability in studying mechanisms involved in IPF and provides additional evidence for both established and potentially new biomarkers in IPF

Prospective observational cohort study on grading the severity of postoperative complications in global surgery research

Background The Clavien–Dindo classification is perhaps the most widely used approach for reporting postoperative complications in clinical trials. This system classifies complication severity by the treatment provided. However, it is unclear whether the Clavien–Dindo system can be used internationally in studies across differing healthcare systems in high- (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods This was a secondary analysis of the International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS), a prospective observational cohort study of elective surgery in adults. Data collection occurred over a 7-day period. Severity of complications was graded using Clavien–Dindo and the simpler ISOS grading (mild, moderate or severe, based on guided investigator judgement). Severity grading was compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Data are presented as frequencies and ICC values (with 95 per cent c.i.). The analysis was stratified by income status of the country, comparing HICs with LMICs. Results A total of 44 814 patients were recruited from 474 hospitals in 27 countries (19 HICs and 8 LMICs). Some 7508 patients (16·8 per cent) experienced at least one postoperative complication, equivalent to 11 664 complications in total. Using the ISOS classification, 5504 of 11 664 complications (47·2 per cent) were graded as mild, 4244 (36·4 per cent) as moderate and 1916 (16·4 per cent) as severe. Using Clavien–Dindo, 6781 of 11 664 complications (58·1 per cent) were graded as I or II, 1740 (14·9 per cent) as III, 2408 (20·6 per cent) as IV and 735 (6·3 per cent) as V. Agreement between classification systems was poor overall (ICC 0·41, 95 per cent c.i. 0·20 to 0·55), and in LMICs (ICC 0·23, 0·05 to 0·38) and HICs (ICC 0·46, 0·25 to 0·59). Conclusion Caution is recommended when using a treatment approach to grade complications in global surgery studies, as this may introduce bias unintentionally

The surgical safety checklist and patient outcomes after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis

© 2017 British Journal of Anaesthesia Background: The surgical safety checklist is widely used to improve the quality of perioperative care. However, clinicians continue to debate the clinical effectiveness of this tool. Methods: Prospective analysis of data from the International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS), an international observational study of elective in-patient surgery, accompanied by a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature. The exposure was surgical safety checklist use. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcome was postoperative complications. In the ISOS cohort, a multivariable multi-level generalized linear model was used to test associations. To further contextualise these findings, we included the results from the ISOS cohort in a meta-analysis. Results are reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: We included 44 814 patients from 497 hospitals in 27 countries in the ISOS analysis. There were 40 245 (89.8%) patients exposed to the checklist, whilst 7508 (16.8%) sustained ≥1 postoperative complications and 207 (0.5%) died before hospital discharge. Checklist exposure was associated with reduced mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.49 (0.32–0.77); P\u3c0.01], but no difference in complication rates [OR 1.02 (0.88–1.19); P=0.75]. In a systematic review, we screened 3732 records and identified 11 eligible studies of 453 292 patients including the ISOS cohort. Checklist exposure was associated with both reduced postoperative mortality [OR 0.75 (0.62–0.92); P\u3c0.01; I2=87%] and reduced complication rates [OR 0.73 (0.61–0.88); P\u3c0.01; I2=89%). Conclusions: Patients exposed to a surgical safety checklist experience better postoperative outcomes, but this could simply reflect wider quality of care in hospitals where checklist use is routine

Critical care admission following elective surgery was not associated with survival benefit: prospective analysis of data from 27 countries

This was an investigator initiated study funded by Nestle Health Sciences through an unrestricted research grant, and by a National Institute for Health Research (UK) Professorship held by RP. The study was sponsored by Queen Mary University of London