Organisation et régulation différentielles des sous-types de Récepteurs NMDA révélées par imagerie de super résolution

NMDA-type glutamate receptors (NMDARs) are a type of ion permeable channels playing critical roles in excitatory neurotransmission in the central nervous system by mediating different forms of synaptic plasticity, a mechanism thought to be the molecular basis of neuronal development, learning and memory formation. NMDARs form tetramers in the postsynaptic membrane, most generally associating two obligatory GluN1 subunits and two modulatory GluN2 (GluN2A-D) or GluN3 (GluN3A-B) subunits. In the hippocampus, the dominant GluN2 subunits are GluN2A and GluN2B, displaying different expression patterns, with GluN2B being highly expressed in early development while GluN2A levels increase gradually during postnatal development. In the forebrain, the plastic processes mediated by NMDARs, such as the adaptation of glutamate synapses and excitatory neuronal networks, mostly rely on the relative implication of GluN2A- and GluN2B-containing NMDARs that have different signaling properties. Although the molecular regulation of synaptic NMDARs has been under intense investigation over the last decades, the exact topology of these two subtypes within the postsynaptic membrane has remained elusive. Here we used a combination of super-resolution microscopy techniques such as direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM) and stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy to characterize the surface distribution of GluN2A- or GluN2B-containing NMDARs. Both dSTORM and STED microscopy, based on different principles, enable to overcome the resolution barrier due to the diffraction limit of light. Using these techniques, we here unveil a differential nanoscale organization of native GluN2A- and GluN2B-NMDARs in rat hippocampal neurons. Both NMDAR subtypes are organized in nanoscale structures (termed nanodomains) that differ in their number, area, and shape. These observed differences are also maintained in synaptic structures. During development of hippocampal cultures, the membrane organization of both NMDAR subtypes evolves, with marked changes for the topology of GluN2A-NMDARs. Furthermore, GluN2A- and GluN2B-NMDAR nanoscale organizations are differentially affected by alterations of either interactions with PDZ scaffold proteins or CaMKII activity. The regulation of GluN2A-NMDARs mostly implicates changes in the number of receptors in fixed nanodomains, whereas the regulation of GluN2B-NMDARs mostly implicates changes in the nanodomain topography with fixed numbers of receptors. Thus, GluN2A- and GluN2B-NMDARs have distinct organizations in the postsynaptic membrane, likely implicating different regulatory pathways and signaling complexes.Résumé: Les récepteurs du glutamate de type NMDA (NMDAR) sont des canaux ioniques impliqués dans les phénomènes de plasticité de la transmission synaptique dans le système nerveux central, des mécanismes supposés être à la base du développement neuronal, de l’apprentissage et de la formation de la mémoire. Les NMDAR forment des tétramères à la membrane plasmique, constitués de deux sous-unités obligatoires GluN1 et deux sous-unités variables GluN2 (GluN2A-D) ou GluN3. Dans le prosencéphale, les récepteurs comportant les sous-unités GluN2A (GluN2A-NMDAR) et GluN2B (GluN2B-NMDAR) sont les plus abondants et présentent des profils d’expression différents au cours du développement, les GluN2B-NMDAR étant fortement exprimés aux stades précoces tandis que l’expression des GluN2A-NMDAR augmente progressivement au cours du développement postnatal. Des contributions relatives de ces deux sous-types majoritaires de NMDAR aux propriétés de signalisation distinctes dépendent directement les phénomènes de plasticité neuronale, tels que l’adaptation des synapses glutamatergiques et des circuits neuronaux excitateurs. Bien que la régulation moléculaire des NMDAR ait fait l’objet d’intenses recherches ces dernières décennies, la localisation précise de ces deux sous-types de récepteurs dans la membrane postsynaptique demeurait méconnue. Pour répondre à cette question, nous avons étudié la distribution des NMDAR à la surface de neurones d’hippocampe de rats en combinant deux techniques de microscopie de super-résolution - la microscopie de reconstruction optique stochastique directe (dSTORM) et la déplétion d’émission stimulée (STED) - permettant de dépasser la limite de résolution inhérente à la diffraction de la lumière. Ces techniques nous ont permis de mettre en évidence que les sous-types de récepteurs GluN2A- et GluN2B-NMDAR présentent une nano-organisation différente à la surface neuronale. En effet, ils sont organisés en structures nanoscopiques (nanodomaines) qui diffèrent en nombre, en surface et en morphologie, notamment au niveau des synapses. Au cours du développement, l’organisation membranaire des deux sous-types de NMDAR évolue, avec en particulier de profonds changements de distribution des GluN2A-NMDAR. De plus, cette organisation nanoscopique est impactée différemment par des modulations de l’interaction avec les protéines d’échafaudage à domaine PDZ ou de l’activité de la kinase CaMKII suivant le sous-type de NMDAR considéré. En effet, la réorganisation des GluN2A-NMDAR implique principalement des changements de nombre de récepteurs dans les nanodomaines sans modification de leur localisation, tandis que la réorganisation des GluN2B-NMDAR passe essentiellement par des modifications de localisation des nanodomaines sans changements du nombre de récepteurs qu’ils contiennent. Ainsi, les GluN2A- et GluN2B-NMDAR présentent des nano-organisations différentes dans la membrane postsynaptique, reposant vraisemblablement sur des voies de régulation et des complexes de signalisation distincts

Microscopia de alta-resolução revela diferente organização e regulação de subtipos de receptores NMDA

Tese de doutoramento em cotutela, na área de Biologia Experimental e Biomedicina, na especialidade de Neurociências e Doença, apresentada ao Instituto de Investigação Interdisciplinar da Universidade de Coimbra e à Escola Doutoral de Ciências da Vida e da Saúde da Universidade de Bordéus.NMDA-type glutamate receptors (NMDARs) are a type of ion permeable channels playing critical roles in excitatory neurotransmission in the central nervous system by mediating different forms of synaptic plasticity, a mechanism thought to be the molecular basis of neuronal development, learning and memory formation. NMDARs form tetramers in the postsynaptic membrane, most generally associating two obligatory GluN1 subunits and two modulatory GluN2 (GluN2A-D) or GluN3 (GluN3A-B) subunits. In the hippocampus, the dominant GluN2 subunits are GluN2A and GluN2B, displaying different expression patterns, with GluN2B being highly expressed in early development while GluN2A levels increase gradually during postnatal development. In the forebrain, the plastic processes mediated by NMDARs, such as the adaptation of glutamate synapses and excitatory neuronal networks, mostly rely on the relative implication of GluN2A- and GluN2B-containing NMDARs that have different signaling properties. Although the molecular regulation of synaptic NMDARs has been under intense investigation over the last decades, the exact topology of these two subtypes within the postsynaptic membrane has remained elusive. Here we used a combination of super-resolution microscopy techniques such as direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM) and stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy to characterize the surface distribution of GluN2A- or GluN2B-containing NMDARs. Both dSTORM and STED microscopy, based on different principles, enable to overcome the resolution barrier due to the diffraction limit of light. Using these techniques, we here unveil a differential nanoscale organization of native GluN2A- and GluN2B-NMDARs in rat hippocampal neurons. Both NMDAR subtypes are organized in nanoscale structures (termed nanodomains) that differ in their number, area, and shape. These observed differences are also maintained in synaptic structures. During development of hippocampal cultures, the membrane organization of both NMDAR subtypes evolves, with marked changes for the topology of GluN2A-NMDARs. Furthermore, GluN2A- and GluN2B-NMDAR nanoscale organizations are differentially affected by alterations of either interactions with PDZ scaffold proteins or CaMKII activity. The regulation of GluN2A-NMDARs mostly implicates changes in the number of receptors in fixed nanodomains, whereas the regulation of GluN2B-NMDARs mostly implicates changes in the nanodomain topography with fixed numbers of receptors. Thus, GluN2A- and GluN2B-NMDARs have distinct organizations in the postsynaptic membrane, likely implicating different regulatory pathways and signaling complexes.Os recetores do glutamato do tipo NMDA são canais iónicos que desempenham um papel de especial relevância na neurotransmissão excitatória no sistema nervoso central, e são responsáveis por mediar diferentes formas de plasticidade sináptica, o mecanismo considerado na base do desenvolvimento neuronal, aprendizagem e formação da memória. Os recetores NMDA dispõem-se em tetrâmeros na membrana pós-sináptica e são normalmente constituídos por duas subunidades obrigatórias GluN1 e duas subunidades modeladoras GluN2 (GluN2A-D) ou GluN3 (GluN3A-B). No hipocampo as duas subunidades GluN2 mais expressas são as subunidades GluN2A e GluN2B, que se caracterizam por padrões de expressão diferentes; enquanto a subunidade GluN2B é expressa cedo no desenvolvimento em níveis elevados, os níveis de expressão da subunidade GluN2A vão aumentando gradualmente durante o desenvolvimento pós-natal. Na região do prosencéfalo, os mecanismos de plasticidade mediados pelos recetores NMDA, tais como a adaptação de sinapses glutamatérgicas e das redes neuronais excitatórias, são altamente dependentes da diferente contribuição dos recetores que contêm a subunidade GluN2A (recetores GluN2A-NMDA) ou a subunidade GluN2B (recetores GluN2B-NMDA), os quais apresentam diferentes propriedades de sinalização. Embora a regulação molecular sináptica dos recetores NMDA tenha sido intensamente estudada durante as últimas décadas, a topografia exacta destes dois tipos de recetores, GluN2A-NMDA e GluN2B-NMDA, na membrana pós-sináptica continua a ser largamente desconhecida. Neste trabalho, foi utilizado uma combinação de duas técnicas de microspocia de alta-resolução, dSTORM (direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy) e STED (stimulated emission depletion microscopy), para caracterizar a distribuição dos recetores GluN2A-NMDA e GluN2B-NMDA à superfície da membrana pós-sináptica. As duas técnicas de microscopia, dSTORM e STED, baseiam-se em diferentes princípios físicos, mas ambas permitem ultrapassar o limite de resolução devido à difração da luz. A utilização destas técnicas permitiu definir a diferente organização à escala nanométrica dos recetores nativos GluN2A-NMDA e GluN2B-NMDA, em neurónios de hipocampo de rato. Os dois subtipos de recetores organizam-se em estruturas com o tamanho de alguns nanómetros (definidas como “nanodomínio”) mas que diferem em número, área ou forma. Estas diferenças são mantidas se avaliadas especificamente dentro das estruturas sinápticas. Durante o desenvolvimento das culturas de hipocampo, a organização membranar de ambos os subtipos de recetores NMDA vai-se modificando, particularmente a topologia dos recetores GluN2A-NMDA. A organização à escala nanométrica dos recetores GluN2A-NMDA ou GluN2B-NMDA é afetada de forma diferente pela alteração da interação dos recetores com as proteínas âncora que contêm o domínio PDZ, ou pela modificação da atividade da proteína CaMKII. A regulação dos recetores GluN2A-NMDA baseia-se sobretudo na alteração do número de recetores dentro de determinados nanodomínios, enquanto a regulação dos recetores GluN2B-NMDA se baseia principalmente nas alterações da topografia dos nanodomínios, sem alterar o número de recetores. Em conclusão, os recetores GluN2A-NMDA ou GluN2B-NMDA apresentam uma organização distinta na membrana pós-sináptica, o que sugere que poderá estar associada a diferentes vias de regulação e complexos de sinalização.Les récepteurs du glutamate de type NMDA (NMDAR) sont des canaux ioniques impliqués dans les phénomènes de plasticité de la transmission synaptique dans le système nerveux central, des mécanismes supposés être à la base du développement neuronal, de l’apprentissage et de la formation de la mémoire. Les NMDAR forment des tétramères à la membrane plasmique, constitués de deux sous-unités obligatoires GluN1 et deux sous-unités variables GluN2 (GluN2A-D) ou GluN3. Dans le prosencéphale, les récepteurs comportant les sous-unités GluN2A (GluN2A-NMDAR) et GluN2B (GluN2B-NMDAR) sont les plus abondants et présentent des profils d’expression différents au cours du développement, les GluN2B-NMDAR étant fortement exprimés aux stades précoces tandis que l’expression des GluN2A-NMDAR augmente progressivement au cours du développement postnatal. Des contributions relatives de ces deux sous-types majoritaires de NMDAR aux propriétés de signalisation distinctes dépendent directement les phénomènes de plasticité neuronale, tels que l’adaptation des synapses glutamatergiques et des circuits neuronaux excitateurs. Bien que la régulation moléculaire des NMDAR ait fait l’objet d’intenses recherches ces dernières décennies, la localisation précise de ces deux sous-types de récepteurs dans la membrane postsynaptique demeurait méconnue. Pour répondre à cette question, nous avons étudié la distribution des NMDAR à la surface de neurones d’hippocampe de rats en combinant deux techniques de microscopie de super-résolution - la microscopie de reconstruction optique stochastique directe (dSTORM) et la déplétion d’émission stimulée (STED) - permettant de dépasser la limite de résolution inhérente à la diffraction de la lumière. Ces techniques nous ont permis de mettre en évidence que les sous-types de récepteurs GluN2A- et GluN2B-NMDAR présentent une nano-organisation différente à la surface neuronale. En effet, ils sont organisés en structures nanoscopiques (nanodomaines) qui diffèrent en nombre, en surface et en morphologie, notamment au niveau des synapses. Au cours du développement, l’organisation membranaire des deux sous-types de NMDAR évolue, avec en particulier de profonds changements de distribution des GluN2A-NMDAR. De plus, cette organisation nanoscopique est impactée différemment par des modulations de l’interaction avec les protéines d’échafaudage à domaine PDZ ou de l’activité de la kinase CaMKII suivant le sous-type de NMDAR considéré. En effet, la réorganisation des GluN2A-NMDAR implique principalement des changements de nombre de récepteurs dans les nanodomaines sans modification de leur localisation, tandis que la réorganisation des GluN2B-NMDAR passe essentiellement par des modifications de localisation des nanodomaines sans changements du nombre de récepteurs qu’ils contiennent. Ainsi, les GluN2A- et GluN2B-NMDAR présentent des nano-organisations différentes dans la membrane postsynaptique, reposant vraisemblablement sur des voies de régulation et des complexes de signalisation distincts

Super-resolution imaging reveals differential organization and regulation of NMDA receptor subtypes

Résumé: Les récepteurs du glutamate de type NMDA (NMDAR) sont des canaux ioniques impliqués dans les phénomènes de plasticité de la transmission synaptique dans le système nerveux central, des mécanismes supposés être à la base du développement neuronal, de l’apprentissage et de la formation de la mémoire. Les NMDAR forment des tétramères à la membrane plasmique, constitués de deux sous-unités obligatoires GluN1 et deux sous-unités variables GluN2 (GluN2A-D) ou GluN3. Dans le prosencéphale, les récepteurs comportant les sous-unités GluN2A (GluN2A-NMDAR) et GluN2B (GluN2B-NMDAR) sont les plus abondants et présentent des profils d’expression différents au cours du développement, les GluN2B-NMDAR étant fortement exprimés aux stades précoces tandis que l’expression des GluN2A-NMDAR augmente progressivement au cours du développement postnatal. Des contributions relatives de ces deux sous-types majoritaires de NMDAR aux propriétés de signalisation distinctes dépendent directement les phénomènes de plasticité neuronale, tels que l’adaptation des synapses glutamatergiques et des circuits neuronaux excitateurs. Bien que la régulation moléculaire des NMDAR ait fait l’objet d’intenses recherches ces dernières décennies, la localisation précise de ces deux sous-types de récepteurs dans la membrane postsynaptique demeurait méconnue. Pour répondre à cette question, nous avons étudié la distribution des NMDAR à la surface de neurones d’hippocampe de rats en combinant deux techniques de microscopie de super-résolution - la microscopie de reconstruction optique stochastique directe (dSTORM) et la déplétion d’émission stimulée (STED) - permettant de dépasser la limite de résolution inhérente à la diffraction de la lumière. Ces techniques nous ont permis de mettre en évidence que les sous-types de récepteurs GluN2A- et GluN2B-NMDAR présentent une nano-organisation différente à la surface neuronale. En effet, ils sont organisés en structures nanoscopiques (nanodomaines) qui diffèrent en nombre, en surface et en morphologie, notamment au niveau des synapses. Au cours du développement, l’organisation membranaire des deux sous-types de NMDAR évolue, avec en particulier de profonds changements de distribution des GluN2A-NMDAR. De plus, cette organisation nanoscopique est impactée différemment par des modulations de l’interaction avec les protéines d’échafaudage à domaine PDZ ou de l’activité de la kinase CaMKII suivant le sous-type de NMDAR considéré. En effet, la réorganisation des GluN2A-NMDAR implique principalement des changements de nombre de récepteurs dans les nanodomaines sans modification de leur localisation, tandis que la réorganisation des GluN2B-NMDAR passe essentiellement par des modifications de localisation des nanodomaines sans changements du nombre de récepteurs qu’ils contiennent. Ainsi, les GluN2A- et GluN2B-NMDAR présentent des nano-organisations différentes dans la membrane postsynaptique, reposant vraisemblablement sur des voies de régulation et des complexes de signalisation distincts.NMDA-type glutamate receptors (NMDARs) are a type of ion permeable channels playing critical roles in excitatory neurotransmission in the central nervous system by mediating different forms of synaptic plasticity, a mechanism thought to be the molecular basis of neuronal development, learning and memory formation. NMDARs form tetramers in the postsynaptic membrane, most generally associating two obligatory GluN1 subunits and two modulatory GluN2 (GluN2A-D) or GluN3 (GluN3A-B) subunits. In the hippocampus, the dominant GluN2 subunits are GluN2A and GluN2B, displaying different expression patterns, with GluN2B being highly expressed in early development while GluN2A levels increase gradually during postnatal development. In the forebrain, the plastic processes mediated by NMDARs, such as the adaptation of glutamate synapses and excitatory neuronal networks, mostly rely on the relative implication of GluN2A- and GluN2B-containing NMDARs that have different signaling properties. Although the molecular regulation of synaptic NMDARs has been under intense investigation over the last decades, the exact topology of these two subtypes within the postsynaptic membrane has remained elusive. Here we used a combination of super-resolution microscopy techniques such as direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM) and stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy to characterize the surface distribution of GluN2A- or GluN2B-containing NMDARs. Both dSTORM and STED microscopy, based on different principles, enable to overcome the resolution barrier due to the diffraction limit of light. Using these techniques, we here unveil a differential nanoscale organization of native GluN2A- and GluN2B-NMDARs in rat hippocampal neurons. Both NMDAR subtypes are organized in nanoscale structures (termed nanodomains) that differ in their number, area, and shape. These observed differences are also maintained in synaptic structures. During development of hippocampal cultures, the membrane organization of both NMDAR subtypes evolves, with marked changes for the topology of GluN2A-NMDARs. Furthermore, GluN2A- and GluN2B-NMDAR nanoscale organizations are differentially affected by alterations of either interactions with PDZ scaffold proteins or CaMKII activity. The regulation of GluN2A-NMDARs mostly implicates changes in the number of receptors in fixed nanodomains, whereas the regulation of GluN2B-NMDARs mostly implicates changes in the nanodomain topography with fixed numbers of receptors. Thus, GluN2A- and GluN2B-NMDARs have distinct organizations in the postsynaptic membrane, likely implicating different regulatory pathways and signaling complexes

Aquaporin-4 Surface Trafficking Regulates Astrocytic Process Motility and Synaptic Activity in Health and Autoimmune Disease

International audienceAstrocytes constantly adapt their ramified morphology in order to support brain cell assemblies. Such plasticity is partly mediated by ion and water fluxes, which rely on the water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4). The mechanism by which this channel locally contributes to process dynamics has remained elusive. Using a combination of single-molecule and calcium imaging approaches, we here investigated in hippocampal astrocytes the dynamic distribution of the AQP4 isoforms M1 and M23. Surface AQP4-M1 formed small aggregates that contrast with the large AQP4-M23 clusters that are enriched near glutamatergic synapses. Strikingly, stabilizing surface AQP4-M23 tuned the motility of astrocyte processes and favors glutamate synapse activity. Furthermore, human autoantibodies directed against AQP4 from neuromyelitis optica (NMO) patients impaired AQP4-M23 dynamic distribution and, consequently, astrocyte process and synaptic activity. Collectively, it emerges that the membrane dynamics of AQP4 isoform regulate brain cell assemblies in health and autoimmune brain disease targeting AQP4

Differential role of the proteasome in the early and late phases of BDNF-induced facilitation of LTP

Copyright © 2015 the authorsThe neurotrophin brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) mediates activity-dependent long-term changes of synaptic strength in the CNS. The effects of BDNF are partly mediated by stimulation of local translation, with consequent alterations in the synaptic proteome. The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) also plays an important role in protein homeostasis at the synapse by regulating synaptic activity. However, whether BDNF acts on the UPS to mediate the effects on long-term synaptic potentiation (LTP) has not been investigated. In the present study, we show similar and nonadditive effects of BDNF and proteasome inhibition on the early phase of synaptic potentiation (E-LTP) induced by theta-burst stimulation of rat hippocampal CA1 synapses. The effects of BDNF were blocked by the proteasome activator IU1, suggesting that the neurotrophin acts by decreasing proteasome activity. Accordingly, BDNF downregulated the proteasome activity in cultured hippocampal neurons and in hippocampal synaptoneurosomes. Furthermore, BDNF increased the activity of the deubiquitinating enzyme UchL1 in synaptoneurosomes and upregulated free ubiquitin. In contrast to the effects on posttetanic potentiation, proteasome activity was required for BDNF-mediated LTP. These results show a novel role for BDNF in UPS regulation at the synapse, which is likely to act together with the increased translation activity in the regulation of the synaptic proteome during E-LTP.This work was supported by FEDER (QREN) through Programa Mais Centro (Projects CENTRO-07-ST24-FEDER-002002, CENTRO-07-ST24-FEDER-002006, and CENTRO-07-ST24-FEDER-002008), through Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade- COMPETE and National funds via Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Projects Pest-C/SAU/LA0001/2013–2014, PTDC/SAU-NMC/120144/2010, and PTDC/SAU-NMC/0198/2012).info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Differential Nanoscale Topography and Functional Role of GluN2-NMDA Receptor Subtypes at Glutamatergic Synapses

NMDA receptors (NMDARs) play key roles in the use-dependent adaptation of glutamatergic synapses underpinning memory formation. In the forebrain, these plastic processes involve the varied contributions of GluN2A- and GluN2B-containing NMDARs that have different signaling properties. Although the molecular machinery of synaptic NMDAR trafficking has been under scrutiny, the postsynaptic spatial organization of these two receptor subtypes has remained elusive. Here, we used super-resolution imaging of NMDARs in rat hippocampal synapses to unveil the nanoscale topography of native GluN2A- and GluN2B-NMDARs. Both subtypes were found to be organized in separate nanodomains that vary over the course of development. Furthermore, GluN2A- and GluN2B-NMDAR nanoscale organizations relied on distinct regulatory mechanisms. Strikingly, the selective rearrangement of GluN2A- and GluN2B-NMDARs, with no overall change in NMDAR current amplitude, allowed bi-directional tuning of synaptic LTP. Thus, GluN2A- and GluN2B-NMDAR nanoscale organizations are differentially regulated and seem to involve distinct signaling complexes during synaptic adaptation

TNF receptor agonists induce distinct receptor clusters to mediate differential agonistic activity

Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) and natural ligands targeting costimulatory tumor necrosis factor receptors (TNFR) exhibit a wide range of agonistic activities and antitumor responses. The mechanisms underlying these differential agonistic activities remain poorly understood. Here, we employ a panel of experimental and clinically-relevant molecules targeting human CD40, 4-1BB and OX40 to examine this issue. Confocal and STORM microscopy reveal that strongly agonistic reagents induce clusters characterized by small area and high receptor density. Using antibody pairs differing only in isotype we show that hIgG2 confers significantly more receptor clustering than hIgG1 across all three receptors, explaining its greater agonistic activity, with receptor clustering shielding the receptor-agonist complex from further molecular access. Nevertheless, discrete receptor clustering patterns are observed with different hIgG2 mAb, with a unique rod-shaped assembly observed with the most agonistic mAb. These findings dispel the notion that larger receptor clusters elicit greater agonism, and instead point to receptor density and subsequent super-structure as key determinants.</p