3 research outputs found

    Description of Turkish paraphrase corpus structure and generation method

    No full text
    17th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, CICLing 2016 -- 3 April 2016 through 9 April 2016 -- 212219Because developing a corpus requires a long time and lots of human effort, it is desirable to make it as resourceful as possible: rich in coverage, flexible, multipurpose and expandable. Here we describe the steps we took in the development of Turkish paraphrase corpus, the factors we considered, problems we faced and how we dealt with them. Currently our corpus contains nearly 4000 sentences with the ratio of 60% paraphrase and 40% non-paraphrase sentence pairs. The sentence pairs are annotated at 5-scale: paraphrase, encapsulating, encapsulated, non-paraphrase and opposite. The corpus is formulated in a database structure integrated with Turkish dictionary. The sources we used till now are news texts from Bilcon 2005 corpus, a set of professionally translated sentence pairs from MSRP corpus, multiple Turkish translations from different languages that are involved in Tatoeba corpus and user generated paraphrases. © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018.2015/BİL/034 114E126Acknowledgement. This work is carried under the grant of TÜBİTAK – The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey to Project No: 114E126, Using Certainty Factor Approach and Creating Paraphrase Corpus for Measuring Similarity of Short Turkish Texts and Ege University Scientific Research Council Project No 2015/BİL/034, Developing a Paraphrase Corpus for Turkish Short Text Similarity Studies. -

    Neuropsychiatric involvement in juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: A multicenter study

    No full text
    Introduction: Neuropsychiatric (NP) involvement is a restricted area in juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (jSLE). Aim: To investigate the prevalence, demographic and clinical features, and outcomes of the neurological involvement in the Turkish jSLE population. Methods: This study was based upon 24 referral centers’ SLE cohorts, multicenter and multidisciplinary network in Turkey. Patient data were collected by a case report form which was standardized for NP definitions according to American Collage of Rheumatology (ACR). Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) neuropsychiatric part was used to determine NP damage. Variables were evaluated Ward's hierarchical clustering analyses, univariate, and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: A hundred forty-nine of 1107 jSLE patients had NP involvement (13.5%). The most common NPSLE findings were headache (50.3%), seizure (38.3%), and acute confusional state (33.6%). Five clusters were identified with all clinical and laboratory findings. The first two clusters involved neuropathies, demyelinating diseases, aseptic meningitis, and movement disorder. Cluster 3 involved headache, activity markers and other SLE involvements. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, cognitive dysfunction, psychiatric disorders and SLE antibodies were in the fourth, and acute confusional state was in the fifth cluster. In multivariate analysis, APA positivity; OR: 2.820, (%95CI: 1.002–7.939), P: 0,050, plasmapheresis; OR: 13.804 (%95CI: 2.785–68.432), P: 0,001, SLEDAI scores; OR: 1.115 (%95CI: (1.049–1.186), P: 0,001 were associated with increased risk for neurologic sequelae. Conclusion: We detected the prevalence of juvenile NPSLE manifestations in Turkey. We have identified five clusters that may shed light pathogenesis, treatment and prognosis of NP involvements. We also determined risk factors of neurological sequelae. Our study showed that new definitions NP involvements and sequelae for childhood period are needed
    corecore