615 research outputs found

    Would a Rose By Any Other Name - Cause Such Confusion?

    Get PDF

    The Good, the Bad and the Ugly – Four Years of Rumination (Part 1)

    Get PDF

    Importance of the code of ethics in the organization

    No full text
    Counteracting the unethical actions and influencing the behavior of the human factor towards ethical behavior must be a priority of a company’s policy. The research and recommendations in this direction outline the necessity of an Ethic code that shall comprise individual and company values, and whose harmonious interaction shall provide stability and efficiency of the management process. This code shall serve as a balancing force among the various interests and systems of values, which shall thus establish common ethical standards of behavior.ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ΄Ρ–Ρ Π°Π½Ρ‚Ρ–Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈΠΌ діям ΠΈ Π²ΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ² Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΡ— ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Ρ–Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Ρ–Π½ΠΊΡƒ людського Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρƒ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Π½Ρ– Π±ΡƒΡ‚ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Ρ–ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Ρ–Ρ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ°Π½Ρ–Ρ—. ДослідТСння Ρ‚Π° Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†Ρ–Ρ— Π² Ρ†ΡŒΠΎΠΌΡƒ напрямку Π΄ΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π½Π°ΠΌΡ–Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…Ρ–Π΄Π½Ρ–ΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π² Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΌΡƒ кодСксі, який ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π°Ρ‚ΠΈ Ρ–Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ²Ρ–Π΄ΡƒΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ– Ρ‚Π° ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½Ρ–Π·Π°Ρ†Ρ–ΠΉΠ½Ρ– цінності, Ρ– Π³Π°Ρ€ΠΌΠΎΠ½Ρ–Ρ‡Π½Ρƒ Π²Π·Π°Ρ”ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Ρ–ΡŽ, яка Π·Π°Π±Π΅Π·ΠΏΠ΅Ρ‡ΡƒΡ” ΡΡ‚Π°Π±Ρ–Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ–ΡΡ‚ΡŒ Ρ– Π΅Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ–ΡΡ‚ΡŒ процСсу управління. Π¦Π΅ΠΉ кодСкс Π±ΡƒΠ΄Π΅ виступати Π² якості Π²Ρ€Ρ–Π²Π½ΠΎΠ²Π°ΠΆΡƒΡŽΡ‡ΠΎΡ— сили ΠΌΡ–ΠΆ Ρ€Ρ–Π·Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ інтСрСсами Ρ‚Π° систСмами цінностСй, які Π²ΡΡ‚Π°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»ΡŽΡŽΡ‚ΡŒ Π·Π°Π³Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ– Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ– Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Ρ–Π½ΠΊΠΈ.ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡ‚Π²ΠΈΠ΅ нСэтичным дСйствиям ΠΈ влияниС этичСского повСдСния Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ чСловСчСского Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Π° Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½Ρ‹ Π±Ρ‹Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ. ИсслСдования ΠΈ Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Π² этом Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π½Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π² этичСском кодСксС, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ΠΉ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ΅Π½ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π² сСбя ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡƒΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ цСнности, ΠΈ Π³Π°Ρ€ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ΅ взаимодСйствиС ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅Ρ‡ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡŽΡ‰Π΅Π΅ ΡΡ‚Π°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΈ ΡΡ„Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ процСссауправлСния. Π­Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‚ кодСкс Π±ΡƒΠ΄Π΅Ρ‚ Π²Ρ‹ΡΡ‚ΡƒΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π² качСствС ΡƒΡ€Π°Π²Π½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡˆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡŽΡ‰Π΅ΠΉ силы ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ интСрСсами ΠΈ систСмами цСнностСй, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½Ρ‹, Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΎΠΌ, ΡƒΡΡ‚Π°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰ΠΈΠ΅ этичСскиС Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΡ‹ повСдСния

    Simulations of inner magnetosphere dynamics with an expanded RAM-SCB model and comparisons with Van Allen Probes observations

    Get PDF
    Abstract Simulations from our newly expanded ring current-atmosphere interactions model with self-consistent magnetic field (RAM-SCB), now valid out to 9 R E, are compared for the first time with Van Allen Probes observations. The expanded model reproduces the storm time ring current buildup due to the increased convection and inflow of plasma from the magnetotail. It matches Magnetic Electron Ion Spectrometer (MagEIS) observations of the trapped high-energy (\u3e50 keV) ion flux; however, it underestimates the low-energy (\u3c10 keV) Helium, Oxygen, Proton, and Electron (HOPE) observations. The dispersed injections of ring current ions observed with the Energetic particle, Composition, and Thermal plasma (ECT) suite at high (\u3e20 keV) energy are better reproduced using a high-resolution convection model. In agreement with Electric and Magnetic Field Instrument Suite and Integrated Science (EMFISIS) observations, RAM-SCB indicates that the large-scale magnetic field is depressed as close as ∼4.5 RE during even a moderate storm. Regions of electromagnetic ion cyclotron instability are predicted on the duskside from ∼6 to ∼9 RE, indicating that previous studies confined to geosynchronous orbit may have underestimated their scattering effect on the energetic particles. Key Points Expanded RAM-SCB model reproduces well high-energy (\u3e50 keV) MagEIS observations The magnetic field is depressed as close as ∼4.5 RE during even a moderate storm EMIC wave growth extends on duskside from ∼6 to ∼9 RE during storm main phase

    Application and testing of the L neural network with the self-consistent magnetic field model of RAM-SCB

    Get PDF
    Abstract We expanded our previous work on L neural networks that used empirical magnetic field models as the underlying models by applying and extending our technique to drift shells calculated from a physics-based magnetic field model. While empirical magnetic field models represent an average, statistical magnetospheric state, the RAM-SCB model, a first-principles magnetically self-consistent code, computes magnetic fields based on fundamental equations of plasma physics. Unlike the previous L neural networks that include McIlwain L and mirror point magnetic field as part of the inputs, the new L neural network only requires solar wind conditions and the Dst index, allowing for an easier preparation of input parameters. This new neural network is compared against those previously trained networks and validated by the tracing method in the International Radiation Belt Environment Modeling (IRBEM) library. The accuracy of all L neural networks with different underlying magnetic field models is evaluated by applying the electron phase space density (PSD)-matching technique derived from the Liouville\u27s theorem to the Van Allen Probes observations. Results indicate that the uncertainty in the predicted L is statistically (75%) below 0.7 with a median value mostly below 0.2 and the median absolute deviation around 0.15, regardless of the underlying magnetic field model. We found that such an uncertainty in the calculated L value can shift the peak location of electron phase space density (PSD) profile by 0.2 RE radially but with its shape nearly preserved. Key Points L* neural network based on RAM-SCB model is developed L* calculation accuracy is estimated by PSD matching using RBSP data L* uncertainty causes a radial shift in the electron phase space density profile

    Global, collisional model of high‐energy photoelectrons

    Get PDF
    Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/95539/1/grl8976.pd

    A bounce‐averaged kinetic model of the ring current ion population

    Full text link
    Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/94668/1/grl7966.pd

    Energy Content of the Stormtime Ring Current

    Get PDF
    Given the important role the ring current plays in magnetospheric energetics, it is essential to understand its strength and evolution in disturbed times. There are currently three main methods for deducing the strength of the ring current: measuring ground magnetic perturbations, measuring high-altitude magnetic perturbations, or directly measuring ring current particles. The use of ground magnetometers is the most convenient, and many use the ground magnetometer-derived Dst index as a proxy for the ring current. Recent work suggests, however, that a substantial portion of Dst may not be caused only by the ring current but also by local induction effects or other magnetospheric currents, so simply using the Dst index may yield inaccurate results. This study uses direct particle measurements to calculate the strength of the ring current and compares this to the measured Dst values. We investigate several magnetic storm intervals, using the Polar Charge and Mass Magnetospheric Ion Composition Experiment (CAMMICE) to measure ring current ions. We then use the Dessler-Parker-Sckopke relation to compare this to the measured Dst. This analysis is used both to understand the general behavior of the ring current compared to Dst as well as to compare the usefulness of the Dst proxy for different types of storms. Ring current ions are shown in this analysis to contribute, on average, half of the Dst depression, with a large variation among individual events

    Excitation of EMIC waves detected by the Van Allen Probes on 28 April 2013

    Get PDF
    Abstract We report the wave observations, associated plasma measurements, and linear theory testing of electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) wave events observed by the Van Allen Probes on 28 April 2013. The wave events are detected in their generation regions as three individual events in two consecutive orbits of Van Allen Probe-A, while the other spacecraft, B, does not detect any significant EMIC wave activity during this period. Three overlapping H+ populations are observed around the plasmapause when the waves are excited. The difference between the observational EMIC wave growth parameter (Eh) and the theoretical EMIC instability parameter (Sh) is significantly raised, on average, to 0.10 Β± 0.01, 0.15 Β± 0.02, and 0.07 Β± 0.02 during the three wave events, respectively. On Van Allen Probe-B, this difference never exceeds 0. Compared to linear theory (Eh\u3eSh), the waves are only excited for elevated thresholds
    • …
    corecore