Difficulties in the diagnosis and treatment of malignant paraganglioma of the urinary bladder

Not required for Clinical Vignette

Pituitary stalk metastasis of a neuroendocrine tumour of unknown origin

Not required for Clinical Vignettes

Heterogeneity of the Clinical Presentation of the MEN1 LRG_509 c.781C>T (p.Leu261Phe) Variant Within a Three-Generation Family

Multiple neuroendocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare genetic disorder with an autosomal dominant inheritance, predisposing carriers to benign and malignant tumors. The phenotype of MEN1 syndrome varies between patients in terms of tumor localization, age of onset, and clinical aggressiveness, even between affected members within the same family. We describe a heterogenic phenotype of the MEN1 variant c.781C>T (LRG_509t1), which was previously reported only once in a family with isolated hyperparathyroidism. A heterozygous missense variant in exon 4 of the gene was identified in the sequence of the MEN1 gene, i.e., c.781C>T, leading to the amino acid change p.Leu261Phe in a three-generation family. In the screened family, 5/6 affected members had already developed hyperparathyroidism. In the index patient and two other family members, an aggressive course of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (insulinoma and non-functioning neuroendocrine tumors) with dissemination was diagnosed. In the index patient, late diagnosis and slow progression of the disseminated neuroendocrine tumor have been observed (24 years of follow-up). The very rare variant of MEN1, LRG_509t1 c.781C>T /p.Leu261Phe (LRG_509p1), diagnosed within a three-generation family has a heterogenic clinical presentation. Further follow-up of the family members should be carried out to confirm the spectrum and exact time of clinical presentation

Efficacy and safety of 90Y-DOTATATE therapy in neuroendocrine tumours

Wstęp: Celem pracy była ocena skuteczności oraz toksyczności celowanej terapii receptorowej (PRRT) guzów neuroendokrynnych z wykorzystaniem analogu somatostatyny Tyr3-octreotate znakowanego 90Y (90Y-DOTATATE). Materiał i metody: Do badania włączono 46 pacjentów z rozsianym lub nieoperacyjnym guzem NET. 90Y-DOTATATE podawano w 3–5 kursach w odstępach 4–9-tygodniowych. Każdorazowo wyznaczano aktywność terapeutyczną, uwzględniając taką całkowitą powierzchnię ciała, by nie przekroczyć sumarycznej wartości 7,4 GBq/m2. Przed terapią i po niej wykonano oznaczenia parametrów morfotycznych, nerkowych oraz wątrobowych, a także stężenia chromograniny A. Wyniki: Spośród 46 leczonych pacjentów jeden chory zmarł przed zakończeniem pełnego cyklu terapeutycznego, a 16 po zakończeniu terapii, w tym jeden z powodu zawału serca. W 12. miesiącu obserwacji stwierdzono 47% stabilizacji, 31% częściowych odpowiedzi oraz 9% progresji wśród 45 pacjentów, którzy ukończyli leczenie. Pięciu chorych zmarło przed 12. miesiącem obserwacji. W jednym przypadku utracono możliwość uzyskania informacji o chorym po 12 miesiącach. Okres czasu bez progresji choroby wyniósł 37,4 miesiąca. W ciągu pierwszego roku od zakończenia terapii zaobserwowano jedynie przejściowe obniżenie wartości morfotycznych krwi oraz przejściowy wzrost stężenia kreatyniny i spadek wartości przesączania kłębuszkowego (GFR). Wnioski: Celowana terapia receptorowa z użyciem 90Y-DOTATATE może być skuteczną oraz stosunkowo bezpieczną metodą leczenia prowadzącą do częściowej odpowiedzi lub stabilizacji choroby u większości pacjentów. (Endokrynol Pol 2011; 62 (5): 392–400)Background: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with the use of the high affinity somatostatin receptor subtype 2 analogue, 90Y labelled Tyr3-octreotate, (90Y-DOTATATE) in neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Material and methods: 46 patients with disseminated or non-operable NET were enrolled in this study. The 90Y-DOTATATE therapeutic activity was calculated per total body surface area up to a total of 7.4 GBq/m2 administered in three to five cycles, repeated every four to nine weeks. Before and after the therapy, blood tests for haematology, kidney and liver function, and chromogranin A were performed. Results: Out of 46 90Y-DOTATATE treated patients, one died before completing the therapy and 16 died after completing the therapy, among them one due to myocardial infarction. After 12 month follow-up, stabilisation of disease was observed in 47%, partial remission in 31%, and progression in 9% of the 45 patients who completed the therapy. Five patients died before completion of 12 months of follow-up. One of the patients died due to myocardial infarction. In one case, the information after 12 months is incomplete. The progression free survival was 37.4 months. During 12 months follow-up, transient decrease of PLT, WBC and haemoglobin values was observed. A transient increase of creatinine level (within normal ranges) and decrease of GFR values were found. Conclusions: NETs 90Y-DOTATATE therapy results in symptomatic relief and tumour mass reduction. The mild critical organ toxicity does not limit the PRRT of NETs. (Pol J Endocrinol 2011; 62 (5): 392–400

Differences in clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of sporadic and MEN-1-related insulinomas

Introduction: Although in most cases insulinomas are small, benign, sporadic tumours, they can also be associated with hereditary syndromes, most commonly multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1). Such a diagnosis significantly affects patient management. The objective was to elucidate the clinical differences between sporadic and MEN-1-linked insulinoma. Material and methods: Comparison of clinical and histopathological characteristics, types of surgery, and outcomes of patients with sporadic and MEN-1-related insulinoma diagnosed between 2015 and 2022. Results: There were 17 cases of insulinomas that underwent MEN-1 genetic testing (10 women and 7 men). In 7 cases, the mutation in the menin gene was confirmed. The median age at the time of diagnosis of sporadic insulinoma related to MEN-1 was 69 years (range 29–87) and 31.5 years (16–47), respectively. Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP) was found in 6 of 7 patients with MEN-1-related insulinoma, while in none of the patients without MEN-1 mutations. Multifocal pancreatic NETs were found in 3 patients with MEN-1 syndrome, while in all sporadic cases there was a single pancreatic tumour. Two patients with insulinoma related to MEN-1 had a positive familial history of MEN-1-related diseases, while none with sporadic form. Dissemination at diagnosis was found in 4 cases, including 3 patients with insulinoma related to MEN-1-related insulinoma. Patients with sporadic and MEN-1-related insulinoma did not differ in tumour size, Ki-67 proliferation index, and outcome. Conclusions: Of all the features evaluated, only the multifocal nature of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (PanNET) lesions and a positive family history differentiated between patients with sporadic and MEN-1-related insulinomas. An age of insulinoma diagnosis of less than 30 years may be a strong indicator of an increased risk of MEN-1 syndrome

Effect of a Perioperative, Cardiac Output-Guided Hemodynamic Therapy Algorithm on Outcomes Following Major Gastrointestinal Surgery A Randomized Clinical Trial and Systematic Review

Importance: small trials suggest that postoperative outcomes may be improved by the use of cardiac output monitoring to guide administration of intravenous fluid and inotropic drugs as part of a hemodynamic therapy algorithm.Objective: to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a perioperative, cardiac output–guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm.Design, setting, and participants: OPTIMISE was a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized, observer-blinded trial of 734 high-risk patients aged 50 years or older undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery at 17 acute care hospitals in the United Kingdom. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis were also conducted including randomized trials published from 1966 to February 2014.Interventions: patients were randomly assigned to a cardiac output–guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm for intravenous fluid and inotrope (dopexamine) infusion during and 6 hours following surgery (n=368) or to usual care (n=366).Main outcomes and measures: the primary outcome was a composite of predefined 30-day moderate or major complications and mortality. Secondary outcomes were morbidity on day 7; infection, critical care–free days, and all-cause mortality at 30 days; all-cause mortality at 180 days; and length of hospital stay.Results: baseline patient characteristics, clinical care, and volumes of intravenous fluid were similar between groups. Care was nonadherent to the allocated treatment for less than 10% of patients in each group. The primary outcome occurred in 36.6% of intervention and 43.4% of usual care participants (relative risk [RR], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.71-1.01]; absolute risk reduction, 6.8% [95% CI, ?0.3% to 13.9%]; P?=?.07). There was no significant difference between groups for any secondary outcomes. Five intervention patients (1.4%) experienced cardiovascular serious adverse events within 24 hours compared with none in the usual care group. Findings of the meta-analysis of 38 trials, including data from this study, suggest that the intervention is associated with fewer complications (intervention, 488/1548 [31.5%] vs control, 614/1476 [41.6%]; RR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.71-0.83]) and a nonsignificant reduction in hospital, 28-day, or 30-day mortality (intervention, 159/3215 deaths [4.9%] vs control, 206/3160 deaths [6.5%]; RR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.67-1.01]) and mortality at longest follow-up (intervention, 267/3215 deaths [8.3%] vs control, 327/3160 deaths [10.3%]; RR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.74-1.00]).Conclusions and relevance: in a randomized trial of high-risk patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery, use of a cardiac output–guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm compared with usual care did not reduce a composite outcome of complications and 30-day mortality. However, inclusion of these data in an updated meta-analysis indicates that the intervention was associated with a reduction in complication rate

Elective surgery cancellations due to the COVID-19 pandemic: global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted routine hospital services globally. This study estimated the total number of adult elective operations that would be cancelled worldwide during the 12 weeks of peak disruption due to COVID-19. METHODS: A global expert response study was conducted to elicit projections for the proportion of elective surgery that would be cancelled or postponed during the 12 weeks of peak disruption. A Bayesian β-regression model was used to estimate 12-week cancellation rates for 190 countries. Elective surgical case-mix data, stratified by specialty and indication (surgery for cancer versus benign disease), were determined. This case mix was applied to country-level surgical volumes. The 12-week cancellation rates were then applied to these figures to calculate the total number of cancelled operations. RESULTS: The best estimate was that 28 404 603 operations would be cancelled or postponed during the peak 12 weeks of disruption due to COVID-19 (2 367 050 operations per week). Most would be operations for benign disease (90·2 per cent, 25 638 922 of 28 404 603). The overall 12-week cancellation rate would be 72·3 per cent. Globally, 81·7 per cent of operations for benign conditions (25 638 922 of 31 378 062), 37·7 per cent of cancer operations (2 324 070 of 6 162 311) and 25·4 per cent of elective caesarean sections (441 611 of 1 735 483) would be cancelled or postponed. If countries increased their normal surgical volume by 20 per cent after the pandemic, it would take a median of 45 weeks to clear the backlog of operations resulting from COVID-19 disruption. CONCLUSION: A very large number of operations will be cancelled or postponed owing to disruption caused by COVID-19. Governments should mitigate against this major burden on patients by developing recovery plans and implementing strategies to restore surgical activity safely

Effectiveness of a national quality improvement programme to improve survival after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH): a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Emergency abdominal surgery is associated with poor patient outcomes. We studied the effectiveness of a national quality improvement (QI) programme to implement a care pathway to improve survival for these patients. METHODS: We did a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial of patients aged 40 years or older undergoing emergency open major abdominal surgery. Eligible UK National Health Service (NHS) hospitals (those that had an emergency general surgical service, a substantial volume of emergency abdominal surgery cases, and contributed data to the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit) were organised into 15 geographical clusters and commenced the QI programme in a random order, based on a computer-generated random sequence, over an 85-week period with one geographical cluster commencing the intervention every 5 weeks from the second to the 16th time period. Patients were masked to the study group, but it was not possible to mask hospital staff or investigators. The primary outcome measure was mortality within 90 days of surgery. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN80682973. FINDINGS: Treatment took place between March 3, 2014, and Oct 19, 2015. 22 754 patients were assessed for elegibility. Of 15 873 eligible patients from 93 NHS hospitals, primary outcome data were analysed for 8482 patients in the usual care group and 7374 in the QI group. Eight patients in the usual care group and nine patients in the QI group were not included in the analysis because of missing primary outcome data. The primary outcome of 90-day mortality occurred in 1210 (16%) patients in the QI group compared with 1393 (16%) patients in the usual care group (HR 1·11, 0·96-1·28). INTERPRETATION: No survival benefit was observed from this QI programme to implement a care pathway for patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Future QI programmes should ensure that teams have both the time and resources needed to improve patient care. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research Programme

Effectiveness of a national quality improvement programme to improve survival after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH): a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial

Background: Emergency abdominal surgery is associated with poor patient outcomes. We studied the effectiveness of a national quality improvement (QI) programme to implement a care pathway to improve survival for these patients. Methods: We did a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial of patients aged 40 years or older undergoing emergency open major abdominal surgery. Eligible UK National Health Service (NHS) hospitals (those that had an emergency general surgical service, a substantial volume of emergency abdominal surgery cases, and contributed data to the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit) were organised into 15 geographical clusters and commenced the QI programme in a random order, based on a computer-generated random sequence, over an 85-week period with one geographical cluster commencing the intervention every 5 weeks from the second to the 16th time period. Patients were masked to the study group, but it was not possible to mask hospital staff or investigators. The primary outcome measure was mortality within 90 days of surgery. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN80682973. Findings: Treatment took place between March 3, 2014, and Oct 19, 2015. 22 754 patients were assessed for elegibility. Of 15 873 eligible patients from 93 NHS hospitals, primary outcome data were analysed for 8482 patients in the usual care group and 7374 in the QI group. Eight patients in the usual care group and nine patients in the QI group were not included in the analysis because of missing primary outcome data. The primary outcome of 90-day mortality occurred in 1210 (16%) patients in the QI group compared with 1393 (16%) patients in the usual care group (HR 1·11, 0·96–1·28). Interpretation: No survival benefit was observed from this QI programme to implement a care pathway for patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Future QI programmes should ensure that teams have both the time and resources needed to improve patient care. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research Programme