Chimerism in Wild Adult Populations of the Broadcast Spawning Coral Acropora millepora on the Great Barrier Reef

Chimeras are organisms containing tissues or cells of two or more genetically distinct individuals, and are known to exist in at least nine phyla of protists, plants, and animals. Although widespread and common in marine invertebrates, the extent of chimerism in wild populations of reef corals is unknown.The extent of chimerism was explored within two populations of a common coral, Acropora millepora, on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia, by using up to 12 polymorphic DNA microsatellite loci. At least 2% and 5% of Magnetic Island and Pelorus Island populations of A. millepora, respectively, were found to be chimeras (3% overall), based on conservative estimates. A slightly less conservative estimate indicated that 5% of colonies in each population were chimeras. These values are likely to be vast underestimates of the true extent of chimerism, as our sampling protocol was restricted to a maximum of eight branches per colony, while most colonies consist of hundreds of branches. Genotypes within chimeric corals showed high relatedness, indicating that genetic similarity is a prerequisite for long-term acceptance of non-self genotypes within coral colonies.While some brooding corals have been shown to form genetic chimeras in their early life history stages under experimental conditions, this study provides the first genetic evidence of the occurrence of coral chimeras in the wild and of chimerism in a broadcast spawning species. We hypothesize that chimerism is more widespread in corals than previously thought, and suggest that this has important implications for their resilience, potentially enhancing their capacity to compete for space and respond to stressors such as pathogen infection

A remarkable synergistic effect at the transcriptomic level in peach fruits doubly infected by Prunus necrotic ringspot virus and Peach latent mosaic viroid

[EN] Background: Microarray profiling is a powerful technique to investigate expression changes of large amounts of genes in response to specific environmental conditions. The majority of the studies investigating gene expression changes in virus-infected plants are limited to interactions between a virus and a model host plant, which usually is Arabidopsis thaliana or Nicotiana benthamiana. In the present work, we performed microarray profiling to explore changes in the expression profile of field-grown Prunus persica (peach) originating from Chile upon single and double infection with Prunus necrotic ringspot virus (PNRSV) and Peach latent mosaic viroid (PLMVd), worldwide natural pathogens of peach trees. Results: Upon single PLMVd or PNRSV infection, the number of statistically significant gene expression changes was relatively low. By contrast, doubly-infected fruits presented a high number of differentially regulated genes. Among these, down-regulated genes were prevalent. Functional categorization of the gene expression changes upon double PLMVd and PNRSV infection revealed protein modification and degradation as the functional category with the highest percentage of repressed genes whereas induced genes encoded mainly proteins related to phosphate, C-compound and carbohydrate metabolism and also protein modification. Overrepresentation analysis upon double infection with PLMVd and PNRSV revealed specific functional categories over- and underrepresented among the repressed genes indicating active counter-defense mechanisms of the pathogens during infection. Conclusions: Our results identify a novel synergistic effect of PLMVd and PNRSV on the transcriptome of peach fruits. We demonstrate that mixed infections, which occur frequently in field conditions, result in a more complex transcriptional response than that observed in single infections. Thus, our data demonstrate for the first time that the simultaneous infection of a viroid and a plant virus synergistically affect the host transcriptome in infected peach fruits. These field studies can help to fully understand plant-pathogen interactions and to develop appropriate crop protection strategies.We thank Drs M.A. Perez-Amador y J. Gadea for helping in the result analysis. This work was supported by grant BIO2011-25018 from the Spanish granting agency Direccion General de Investigacion Cientifica for the transcriptomic analyses and from the grant 2009CL0020 from the bilateral project INIA-Chile/CSIC-Spain for the phytosanitary evaluation. MC Herranz was the recipient of a contract from the Juan de la Cierva program of the Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia of Spain.Herranz Gordo, MDC.; Niehl, A.; Rosales, M.; Fiore, N.; Zamorano, A.; Granell Richart, A.; Pallás Benet, V. (2013). A remarkable synergistic effect at the transcriptomic level in peach fruits doubly infected by Prunus necrotic ringspot virus and Peach latent mosaic viroid. Virology Journal. 10:11-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-10-164S111510Pallas V, Garcia JA: How do plant viruses induce disease? Interactions and interference with host components. J Gen Virol 2011, 92: 2691-2705.Whitham SA, Yang C, Goodin MM: Global impact: elucidating plant responses to viral infection. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2006, 19: 1207-1215.Havelda Z, Varallyay E, Valoczi A, Burgyan J: Plant virus infection-induced persistent host gene downregulation in systemically infected leaves. Plant J 2008, 55: 278-288.Aranda M, Maule A: Virus-induced host gene shutoff in animals and plants. Virology 1998, 243: 261-267.Whitham SA, Quan S, Chang HS, Cooper B, Estes B, Zhu T, Wang X, Hou YM: Diverse RNA viruses elicit the expression of common sets of genes in susceptible Arabidopsis thaliana plants. Plant J 2003, 33: 271-283.Liu Y, Ren D, Pike S, Pallardy S, Gassmann W, Zhang S: Chloroplast-generated reactive oxygen species are involved in hypersensitive response-like cell death mediated by a mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Plant J 2007, 51: 941-954.Hadidi A, Barba M: Economic impact of pome and stone fruit viruses and viroids. In Virus and Virus Like Diseases of Pome and Stone Fruits. Edited by: Hadidi A, Barba M, Candresse T, Jelkmann W. St Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society; 2011:1-8.Flores R, Delgado S, Rodio ME, Ambros S, Hernandez C, Serio FD: Peach latent mosaic viroid: not so latent. Mol Plant Pathol 2006, 7: 209-221.Pallas V, Aparicio F, Herranz MC, Amari K, Sanchez-Pina MA, Myrta A, Sanchez-Navarro JA: Ilarviruses of Prunus spp.: A continued concern for fruit trees. Phytopathology 2012,102(12):1108-1120.Rowland O, Jones JD: Unraveling regulatory networks in plant defense using microarrays. Genome Biol 2001,2(1):1001.1-1001.3.Trinks D, Rajeswaran R, Shivaprasad PV, Akbergenov R, Oakeley EJ, Veluthambi K, Hohn T, Pooggin MM: Suppression of RNA silencing by a geminivirus nuclear protein, AC2, correlates with transactivation of host genes. J Virol 2005, 79: 2517-2527.Senthil G, Liu H, Puram VG, Clark A, Stromberg A, Goodin MM: Specific and common changes in Nicotiana benthamiana gene expression in response to infection by enveloped viruses. J Gen Virol 2005, 86: 2615-2625.Marathe R, Guan Z, Anandalakshmi R, Zhao H, Dinesh-Kumar SP: Study of Arabidopsis thaliana resistome in response to cucumber mosaic virus infection using whole genome microarray. Plant Mol Biol 2004, 55: 501-520.Agudelo-Romero P, Carbonell P, de la Iglesia F, Carrera J, Rodrigo G, Jaramillo A, Perez-Amador MA, Elena SF: Changes in the gene expression profile of Arabidopsis thaliana after infection with Tobacco etch virus. Virol J 2008, 5: 92.Itaya A, Matsuda Y, Gonzales RA, Nelson RS, Ding B: Potato spindle tuber viroid strains of different pathogenicity induces and suppresses expression of common and unique genes in infected tomato. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2002, 15: 990-999.Huang Z, Yeakley JM, Garcia EW, Holdridge JD, Fan JB, Whitham SA: Salicylic acid-dependent expression of host genes in compatible Arabidopsis-virus interactions. Plant Physiol 2005, 137: 1147-1159.Rizza S, Conesa A, Juarez J, Catara A, Navarro L, Duran-Vila N, Ancillo G: Microarray analysis of Etrog citron (Citrus medica L.) reveals changes in chloroplast, cell wall, peroxidase and symporter activities in response to viroid infection. Mol Plant Pathol 2012,13(8):852-864.Golem S, Culver JN: Tobacco mosaic virus induced alterations in the gene expression profile of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2003, 16: 681-688.Dardick C: Comparative expression profiling of Nicotiana benthamiana leaves systemically infected with three fruit tree viruses. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2007, 20: 1004-1017.Hull R: In Matthews’ Plant Virology. London: Edited by Academic Press; 2002.Gonzalez-Jara P, Tenllado F, Martinez-Garcia B, Atencio FA, Barajas D, Vargas M, Diaz-Ruiz J, Diaz-Ruiz JR: Host-dependent differences during synergistic infection by Potyviruses with potato virus X. Mol Plant Pathol 2004, 5: 29-35.Gonzalez-Jara P, Atencio FA, Martinez-Garcia B, Barajas D, Tenllado F, Diaz-Ruiz JR: A Single Amino Acid Mutation in the Plum pox virus Helper Component-Proteinase Gene Abolishes Both Synergistic and RNA Silencing Suppression Activities. Phytopathology 2005, 95: 894-901.Vance VB: Replication of potato virus X RNA is altered in coinfections with potato virus Y. Virology 1991, 182: 486-494.Garcia-Marcos A, Pacheco R, Martianez J, Gonzalez-Jara P, Diaz-Ruiz JR, Tenllado F: Transcriptional changes and oxidative stress associated with the synergistic interaction between Potato virus X and Potato virus Y and their relationship with symptom expression. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2009, 22: 1431-1444.Postnikova OA, Nemchinov LG: Comparative analysis of microarray data in Arabidopsis transcriptome during compatible interactions with plant viruses. Virol J 2012, 9: 101.Zanchin A, Bonghi C, Casadoro G, Ramina A, Rascio N: Cell enlargement and cell separation during peach fruit development. International Journal of Plant Science 1994, 155: 49-56.Herranz MC, Sanchez-Navarro JA, Aparicio F, Pallas V: Simultaneous detection of six stone fruit viruses by non-isotopic molecular hybridization using a unique riboprobe or ‘polyprobe’. J Virol Methods 2005, 124: 49-55.Pallas V, Mas P, Sanchez-Navarro JA: Detection of plant RNA viruses by nonisotopic dot-blot hybridization. Methods Mol Biol 1998, 81: 461-468.Lilly ST, Drummond RS, Pearson MN, MacDiarmid RM: Identification and validation of reference genes for normalization of transcripts from virus-infected Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2011, 24: 294-304.Cosgrove JD: Expansive growth of plant cell walls. Plant Physiol Biochem 2000,38(1–2):109-124.Tessitori M, Maria G, Capasso C, Catara G, Rizza S, De Luca V, Catara A, Capasso A, Carginale V: Differential display analysis of gene expression in Etrog citron leaves infected by Citrus viroid III. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007, 1769: 228-235.Rizza S, Capasso C, Catara A, Capasso A, Conte E, Catara A Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Organization of Citrus Virologists-IOCV, pp. XVII. In Transcriptional response of Troyer citrange, sour orange and alemow rootstocks to Citrus viroid IIIb (CVd-IIIb) infection. Adana, Turkey: Conference of the International Organization of Citrus Virologists; 2010:142-149. http://www.ivia.es/iocv/Owens RA, Tech KB, Shao JY, Sano T, Baker CJ: Global analysis of tomato gene expression during Potato spindle tuber viroid infection reveals a complex array of changes affecting hormone signaling. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2012, 25: 582-598.Ogundiwin EA, Marti C, Forment J, Pons C, Granell A, Gradziel TM, Peace CP, Crisosto CH: Development of ChillPeach genomic tools and identification of cold-responsive genes in peach fruit. Plant Mol Biol 2008, 68: 379-397.Sánchez-Navarro JA FA, Rowhani A, Pallás V: Comparative analysis of ELISA, nonradioactive molecular hybridization and PCR for the detection of Prunus necrotic ringspot virus in herbaceous and prunus host. Plant Pathol 1998, 47: 780-786.Astruc N, Marcos JF, Macquaire G, Candresse T, Pallas V: Studies on the diagnosis of hop stunt viroid in fruit trees: Identification of new hosts and application of a nucleic acid extraction procedure based on non-organic solvents. Eur J Plant Pathol 1996, 102: 837-846.Myrta A, Di Terlizzi B, Pallas V, Savino V: Viruses and viroids of apricot in the Mediterranean: incidence and biodiversity. Acta Horticulturae 2006, 701: 409-417.Bouzayen M, Latché A, Nath P, Pech JC: Mechanism of fruit ripening. In Plant Developmental Biology- Biotechnological Perspectives: Volume I Edited by: Pua EC, Darvey MR. 2010, 319-339. Chapter 16Trainotti L, Bonghi C, Ziliotto F, Zanin D, Rasori A, Casadoro G, Ramina A, T P: The use of microarray mPEACH 1.0 to investigate transcriptome changes during transition from pre-climateric to climacteric phase in peach fruit. Plant Sci 2006, 170: 606-613.Lombardo VA, Osorio S, Borsani J, Lauxmann MA, Bustamante CA, Budde CO, Andreo CS, Lara MV, Fernie AR MFD: Metabolic profiling during peach fruit development and ripening reveals the metabolic networks that underpin each developmental stage. Plant Physiol 2011,157(4):1696-1710.Manganaris GA RA, Bassi D, Geuna F, Ramina A, Tonutti P, Bonghi C: Comparative transcript profiling of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) fruit development and on-tree ripening. Tree Genet Genomes 2011, 7: 609-616.Uyemoto JK, Scott SW: Important diseases of Prunus caused by viruses and other graft-transmissible pathogens in California and South Carolina. Plant Dis 1992, 76: 5-11.Li J, Yang H, Peer WA, Richter G, Blakeslee J, Bandyopadhyay A, Titapiwantakun B, Undurraga S, Khodakovskaya M, Richards EL, et al.: Arabidopsis H+-PPase AVP1 regulates auxin-mediated organ development. Science 2005, 310: 121-125.Paponov IA, Paponov M, Teale W, Menges M, Chakrabortee S, Murray JA, Palme K: Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of auxin responses in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant 2008, 1: 321-337.Padmanabhan MS, Goregaoker SP, Golem S, Shiferaw H, Culver JN: Interaction of the tobacco mosaic virus replicase protein with the Aux/IAA protein PAP1/IAA26 is associated with disease development. J Virol 2005, 79: 2549-2558.Padmanabhan MS, Shiferaw H, Culver JN: The Tobacco mosaic virus replicase protein disrupts the localization and function of interacting Aux/IAA proteins. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2006, 19: 864-873.Padmanabhan MS, Kramer SR, Wang X, Culver JN: Tobacco mosaic virus replicase-auxin/indole acetic acid protein interactions: reprogramming the auxin response pathway to enhance virus infection. J Virol 2008, 82: 2477-2485.Kuhn JM, Boisson-Dernier A, Dizon MB, Maktabi MH, Schroeder JI: The protein phosphatase AtPP2CA negatively regulates abscisic acid signal transduction in Arabidopsis, and effects of abh1 on AtPP2CA mRNA. Plant Physiol 2006, 140: 127-139.Whenham RJ, Fraser RSS, Brown LP, Payne JA: Tobacco-mosaic-virus-induced increase in abscisic-acid concentration in tobacco leaves: Intracellular location in light and dark-green areas, and relationship to symptom development. Planta 1986, 168: 592-598.Bari R, Jones JD: Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses. Plant Mol Biol 2009, 69: 473-488.Kotchoni SO, Kuhns C, Ditzer A, Kirch HH, Bartels D: Over-expression of different aldehyde dehydrogenase genes in Arabidopsis thaliana confers tolerance to abiotic stress and protects plants against lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress. Plant Cell Environ 2006, 29: 1033-1048.Mowla SB, Cuypers A, Driscoll SP, Kiddle G, Thomson J, Foyer CH, Theodoulou FL: Yeast complementation reveals a role for an Arabidopsis thaliana late embryogenesis abundant (LEA)-like protein in oxidative stress tolerance. Plant J 2006, 48: 743-756.Amari K, Diaz-Vivancos P, Pallas V, Sanchez-Pina MA, Hernandez JA: Oxidative stress induction by Prunus necrotic ringspot virus infection in apricot seeds. Physiol Plant 2007, 131: 302-310.Gilroy EM, Hein I, van der Hoorn R, Boevink PC, Venter E, McLellan H, Kaffarnik F, Hrubikova K, Shaw J, Holeva M, et al.: Involvement of cathepsin B in the plant disease resistance hypersensitive response. Plant J 2007, 52: 1-13.Kruger J, Thomas CM, Golstein C, Dixon MS, Smoker M, Tang S, Mulder L, Jones JD: A tomato cysteine protease required for Cf-2-dependent disease resistance and suppression of autonecrosis. Science 2002, 296: 744-747.Bernoux M, Timmers T, Jauneau A, Briere C, De Wit PJ, Marco Y, Deslandes L: RD19, an Arabidopsis cysteine protease required for RRS1-R-mediated resistance, is relocalized to the nucleus by the Ralstonia solanacearum PopP2 effector. Plant Cell 2008, 20: 2252-2264.Shabab M, Shindo T, Gu C, Kaschani F, Pansuriya T, Chintha R, Harzen A, Colby T, Kamoun S, van der Hoorn RA: Fungal effector protein AVR2 targets diversifying defense-related cys proteases of tomato. Plant Cell 2008, 20: 1169-1183.Van Esse HP, Van’t Klooster JW, Bolton MD, Yadeta KA, Van Baarlen P, Boeren S, Vervoort J, De Wit PJ, Thomma BP: The Cladosporium fulvum virulence protein Avr2 inhibits host proteases required for basal defense. Plant Cell 2008, 20: 1948-1963.Song J, Win J, Tian M, Schornack S, Kaschani F, Ilyas M, van der Hoorn RA, Kamoun S: Apoplastic effectors secreted by two unrelated eukaryotic plant pathogens target the tomato defense protease Rcr3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106: 1654-1659.Tian M, Win J, Song J, van der Hoorn R, van der Knaap E, Kamoun S: A Phytophthora infestans cystatin-like protein targets a novel tomato papain-like apoplastic protease. Plant Physiol 2007, 143: 364-377.Rooney H, Van’t Klooster J, Van der Hoorn R, Joosten M, Jones J: Cladosporium Avr2 inhibits tomato Rcr3 protease required for Cf-2-dependent disease resistance. Science 2005, 308: 1783-1786.Auger AJ: Tomato ringspot virus associated with brownline disease on prune trees in Chile. Acta Horticulturae 1989, 235: 197-204.Herrera G: Enfermedades causadas por virus en frutales en Chile. Santiago, Chile: Instituto de Investigación Agropecuaria; 2001. Boletín INIA N°52. 65pFiore N, Abou Ghanem-Sabanadzovic N, Infante R, Myrta A, Pallás V: Detection of Peach latent mosaic viroid in stone fruits from Chile. In Option Méditerranéennes, Sér. B/n°45 –Virus ad virus-like disease of stone fruits, with particular reference to the Mediterranean region Edited by: Myrta A, Di Terlizzi B, Savino V. 2003, 143-145.Torres H, Gómez G, Pallás V, Stamo B, Shalaby A, Aouane B, Gavriel I, Kominek P, Caglayan K, Sipahioglu M, et al.: Detection by tissue printing of stone fruit viroids, from europe, the mediterranean and north and south America. Acta Horticulturae 2004, 657: 379-383.Peiró A, Pallás V, Sánchez-Navarro JA: Simultaneous detection of eight viruses and two viroids affecting stone fruit trees by using a unique polyprobe. Eur J Plant Pathol 2012,132(4):469-475.Meisel L, Fonseca B, Gonzalez S, Baeza-Yates R, Cambiazo V, Campos R, Gonzalez M, Orellana A, Retamales J, Silva H: A rapid and efficient method for purifying high quality total RNA from peaches (Prunus persica) for functional genomics analyses. Biol Res 2005, 38: 83-88.Van Gelder RN, Von Zastrow ME, Yool A, Dement WC, Barchas JD JHE: Amplified RNA synthesized from limited quantities of heterogeneous cDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990,87(5):1663-1667.Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G: Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001, 98: 5116-5121.Sanchez-Navarro JA, Canizares MC, Cano EA, Pallas V: Simultaneous detection of five carnation viruses by non-isotopic molecular hybridization. J Virol Methods 1999, 82: 167-175

T-cell and antibody responses to first BNT162b2 vaccine dose in previously infected and SARS-CoV-2-naive UK health-care workers: a multicentre prospective cohort study

Background Previous infection with SARS-CoV-2 affects the immune response to the first dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. We aimed to compare SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell and antibody responses in health-care workers with and without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection following a single dose of the BNT162b2 (tozinameran; Pfizer–BioNTech) mRNA vaccine. Methods We sampled health-care workers enrolled in the PITCH study across four hospital sites in the UK (Oxford, Liverpool, Newcastle, and Sheffield). All health-care workers aged 18 years or older consenting to participate in this prospective cohort study were included, with no exclusion criteria applied. Blood samples were collected where possible before vaccination and 28 (±7) days following one or two doses (given 3–4 weeks apart) of the BNT162b2 vaccine. Previous infection was determined by a documented SARS-CoV-2-positive RT-PCR result or the presence of positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibodies. We measured spike-specific IgG antibodies and quantified T-cell responses by interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay in all participants where samples were available at the time of analysis, comparing SARS-CoV-2-naive individuals to those with previous infection. Findings Between Dec 9, 2020, and Feb 9, 2021, 119 SARS-CoV-2-naive and 145 previously infected health-care workers received one dose, and 25 SARS-CoV-2-naive health-care workers received two doses, of the BNT162b2 vaccine. In previously infected health-care workers, the median time from previous infection to vaccination was 268 days (IQR 232–285). At 28 days (IQR 27–33) after a single dose, the spike-specific T-cell response measured in fresh peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was higher in previously infected (n=76) than in infection-naive (n=45) health-care workers (median 284 [IQR 150–461] vs 55 [IQR 24–132] spot-forming units [SFUs] per 106 PBMCs; p<0·0001). With cryopreserved PBMCs, the T-cell response in previously infected individuals (n=52) after one vaccine dose was equivalent to that of infection-naive individuals (n=19) after receiving two vaccine doses (median 152 [IQR 119–275] vs 162 [104–258] SFUs/106 PBMCs; p=1·00). Anti-spike IgG antibody responses following a single dose in 142 previously infected health-care workers (median 270 373 [IQR 203 461–535 188] antibody units [AU] per mL) were higher than in 111 infection-naive health-care workers following one dose (35 001 [17 099–55 341] AU/mL; p<0·0001) and higher than in 25 infection-naive individuals given two doses (180 904 [108 221–242 467] AU/mL; p<0·0001). Interpretation A single dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine is likely to provide greater protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, than in SARS-CoV-2-naive individuals, including against variants of concern. Future studies should determine the additional benefit of a second dose on the magnitude and durability of immune responses in individuals vaccinated following infection, alongside evaluation of the impact of extending the interval between vaccine doses. Funding UK Department of Health and Social Care, and UK Coronavirus Immunology Consortium

Immunogenicity of standard and extended dosing intervals of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine

Extension of the interval between vaccine doses for the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was introduced in the United Kingdom to accelerate population coverage with a single dose. At this time, trial data were lacking, and we addressed this in a study of United Kingdom healthcare workers. The first vaccine dose induced protection from infection from the circulating alpha (B.1.1.7) variant over several weeks. In a substudy of 589 individuals, we show that this single dose induces severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses and a sustained B and T cell response to the spike protein. NAb levels were higher after the extended dosing interval (6–14 weeks) compared with the conventional 3- to 4-week regimen, accompanied by enrichment of CD4+ T cells expressing interleukin-2 (IL-2). Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection amplified and accelerated the response. These data on dynamic cellular and humoral responses indicate that extension of the dosing interval is an effective immunogenic protocol