39 research outputs found
Moral judgments, gender, and antisocial preferences : an experimental study
Peer reviewedPostprin
Embedding cultural competence in faculty : a mixed-methods evaluation of an applied Indigenous proficiency workshop
One of the most pressing issues in Australian society is the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous health and life expectancies (Marmot, 2017). Australia agreed with the World Health Organisationâs 2008 Closing the Gap in a Generation report (WHO, 2008), spending approximately 5.6% of government expenditure towards ameliorating this gap (Gardiner-Garden & Simon-Davies, 2012), yet there have been only minimal positive outcomes (Alford, 2015; Gannon, 2018). In applied terms, this means Indigenous people are still dying younger (Anderson et al., 2016), scoring higher on psychological distress (Markwick, Ansari, Sullivan, & McNeil, 2015) and suffering poorer indices on all chronic diseases (e.g. Walsh & Kangaharan, 2016; Thompson, Talley, & Kong, 2017). The level of complexity involved in addressing these âwickedâ or seemingly âimpossible to solveâ health problems is made worse by the lack of any pan-national strategic planning and/or intervention evaluation (Lokuge et al., 2017), even though there has been a plethora of programs and projects designed to improve Indigenous health (see for example, AGPC, 2016). Leaders in health and educational institutions must consider why there is a lack of progress in closing the gap in Indigenous health and life expectancies. Addressing the inequities in Indigenous health requires a determinant of health approach (Mitrou et al., 2014), as 39% of the gap in health outcomes can be explained by social determinates (AIHW, 2017; Markwick, Ansari, Sullivan, Parsons, & McNeil, 2014). The social determinant considered to most reliably predict Indigenous poor health is racism (Kelaher, Ferdinand, & Paradies, 2014; Paradies, 2006; Paradies & Cunningham, 2009; Paradies et al., 2015; Paradies, Truong, & Priest, 2014)
Experimental Design
AbstractThis chapter covers various issues related to the experimental design, a statistical technique at the core of a discrete choice experiment. Specifically, it focuses on the dimensionality of a choice experiment and the statistical techniques used to allocate attribute levels to choice tasks. Among others, the pros and cons of orthogonal designs, optimal orthogonal in the differences designs as well as efficient designs are addressed. The last section shows how a simulation exercise can help to test the appropriateness of the experimental design
Developing the Questionnaire
AbstractThis chapter outlines the essential topics for developing and testing a questionnaire for a discrete choice experiment survey. It addresses issues such as the description of the environmental good, pretesting of the survey, incentive compatibility, consequentiality or mitigation of hypothetical bias. For the latter, cheap talk scripts, opt-out reminders or an oath script are discussed. Moreover, the use of instructional choice sets, the identification of protest responses and strategic bidders are considered. Finally, issues related to the payment vehicle and the cost vector design are the subject of this section
Resolving questions about bias in real and hypothetical referenda
Experimental economics, Real referenda, Hypothetical referenda, Demand revelation, Hypothetical bias, Non-market valuation, C91, Q51,
Mitigating hypothetical bias in willingness to pay studies: post-estimation uncertainty and anchoring on irrelevant information
One possible source of hypothetical bias in willingness to pay (WTP) estimates is response uncertainty, referring to subjectâs uncertainty about the value of the good under assessment. It has been argued that uncertainty can be measured using the post-valuation âcertainty questionâ that asks: âHow certain are you about your stated WTP?â and marks the degree of certainty on a quantitative or a qualitative scale. Research has shown that the self- reported certainty evaluations can help mitigate hypothetical bias and obtain increasingly accurate WTP estimates. These study reports present a simple test of reliability of post-valuation certainty assessment and then looks at the empirical evidence for clues regarding the general usefulness of certainty adjustment in mitigating hypothetical bias in WTP studies. We find that the post-estimation uncertainty scores are malleable, i.e., significantly correlated with entirely irrelevant information. We conclude that more robust evidence could justify the routine inclusion of certainty evaluation in WTP studies although in the meantime the interpretation of certainty- adjusted WTP values should be approached cautiously
A Comparison of Induced Value and Home-Grown Value Experiments to Test for Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation
Contingent valuation, Hypothetical bias, Experiments, Induced values, Home-grown values, C91, H41, Q26, Q28,
Testing the Effectiveness of Certainty Scales, Cheap Talk, and Dissonance-Minimization in Reducing Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies
Contingent valuation, Hypothetical bias, Cheap talk, Certainty scales, Dissonance,