Modelo experimental de aneurisma sacular de artéria ilíaca comum com pericárdio bovino em suínos Experimental model of saccular aneurysm of the common iliac artery with bovine pericardium in pigs

OBJETIVO: Desenvolver um novo modelo experimental de pseudoaneurisma sacular de artéria ilíaca comum com o uso de remendo de pericárdio bovino em suínos. MÉTODO: Foram utilizados dois suínos da raça Landrace, com peso de 30 kg e do sexo feminino. Os animais foram submetidos a anestesia geral e a laparotomia com acesso extraperitoneal da aorta infra-renal e artérias ilíacas. Após heparinização sistêmica e pinçamento, foram efetuadas arteriotomia longitudinal e sutura do pericárdio bovino em formato de bolsa previamente confeccionada. Os animais permaneceram confinados por 3 semanas e então foram submetidos a arteriografia para avaliação da perviedade do aneurisma e, posteriormente, sacrificados. RESULTADO: Os animais sobreviveram ao experimento e apresentaram aneurismas pérvios no momento do sacrifício. Não houve ocorrência de ruptura de aneurismas. CONCLUSÃO: O modelo proposto é viável e tem potencial para ser utilizado no estudo e desenvolvimento de novas próteses endovasculares.<br>OBJECTIVE: To develop an experimental model of saccular pseudoaneurysm of the common iliac artery with bovine pericardium in pigs. METHOD: The animals used were two 30-kg female pigs from the Landrace specimen. The animals were submitted to general anesthesia and laparotomy with extraperitoneal access to infrarenal aorta and the iliac arteries. After systemic heparin and clamping, the iliac artery was opened and the pericardium sutured to the vessel wall. All animals were confined for 3 weeks and were sacrificed after performing an arteriography to verify the patency of the aneurysm. RESULT: All animals survived the procedure and the aneurysms were patent. No rupture was detected. CONCLUSION: This is a feasible pig model of iliac artery aneurysm with potential for further studies to develop new endovascular prostheses

Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort study

Background: Clinical outcomes after major surgery are poorly described at the national level. Evidence of heterogeneity between hospitals and health-care systems suggests potential to improve care for patients but this potential remains unconfirmed. The European Surgical Outcomes Study was an international study designed to assess outcomes after non-cardiac surgery in Europe.Methods: We did this 7 day cohort study between April 4 and April 11, 2011. We collected data describing consecutive patients aged 16 years and older undergoing inpatient non-cardiac surgery in 498 hospitals across 28 European nations. Patients were followed up for a maximum of 60 days. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcome measures were duration of hospital stay and admission to critical care. We used χ² and Fisher’s exact tests to compare categorical variables and the t test or the Mann-Whitney U test to compare continuous variables. Significance was set at p&lt;0·05. We constructed multilevel logistic regression models to adjust for the differences in mortality rates between countries.Findings: We included 46 539 patients, of whom 1855 (4%) died before hospital discharge. 3599 (8%) patients were admitted to critical care after surgery with a median length of stay of 1·2 days (IQR 0·9–3·6). 1358 (73%) patients who died were not admitted to critical care at any stage after surgery. Crude mortality rates varied widely between countries (from 1·2% [95% CI 0·0–3·0] for Iceland to 21·5% [16·9–26·2] for Latvia). After adjustment for confounding variables, important differences remained between countries when compared with the UK, the country with the largest dataset (OR range from 0·44 [95% CI 0·19 1·05; p=0·06] for Finland to 6·92 [2·37–20·27; p=0·0004] for Poland).Interpretation: The mortality rate for patients undergoing inpatient non-cardiac surgery was higher than anticipated. Variations in mortality between countries suggest the need for national and international strategies to improve care for this group of patients.Funding: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, European Society of Anaesthesiology