287 research outputs found
The relationship between species detection probability and local extinction probability.
In community-level ecological studies, generally not all species present in sampled areas are detected. Many authors have proposed the use of
estimation methods that allow detection probabilities that are <1 and that are heterogeneous among species. These methods can also be used to
estimate community-dynamic parameters such as species local extinction probability and turnover rates (Nichols et al. Ecol Appl 8:1213â1225;
Conserv Biol 12:1390â1398). Here, we present an ad hoc approach to estimating community-level vital rates in the presence of joint
heterogeneity of detection probabilities and vital rates. The method consists of partitioning the number of species into two groups using the
detection frequencies and then estimating vital rates (e.g., local extinction probabilities) for each group. Estimators from each group are combined
in a weighted estimator of vital rates that accounts for the effect of heterogeneity. Using data from the North American Breeding Bird Survey, we
computed such estimates and tested the hypothesis that detection probabilities and local extinction probabilities were negatively related. Our
analyses support the hypothesis that species detection probability covaries negatively with local probability of extinction and turnover rates. A
simulation study was conducted to assess the performance of vital parameter estimators as well as other estimators relevant to questions about
heterogeneity, such as coefficient of variation of detection probabilities and proportion of species in each group. Both the weighted estimator
suggested in this paper and the original unweighted estimator for local extinction probability performed fairly well and provided no basis for
preferring one to the other
Calibration of cognitive tests to address the reliability paradox for decision-conflict tasks
Standard, well-established cognitive tasks that produce reliable effects in group comparisons also lead to unreliable measurement when assessing individual differences. This reliability paradox has been demonstrated in decision-conflict tasks such as the Simon, Flanker, and Stroop tasks, which measure various aspects of cognitive control. We aim to address this paradox by implementing carefully calibrated versions of the standard tests with an additional manipulation to encourage processing of conflicting information, as well as combinations of standard tasks. Over five experiments, we show that a Flanker task and a combined Simon and Stroop task with the additional manipulation produced reliable estimates of individual differences in under 100 trials per task, which improves on the reliability seen in benchmark Flanker, Simon, and Stroop data. We make these tasks freely available and discuss both theoretical and applied implications regarding how the cognitive testing of individual differences is carried out.</p
Asymmetric nuclear matter:the role of the isovector scalar channel
We try to single out some qualitative new effects of the coupling to the
-isovector-scalar meson introduced in a minimal way in a
phenomenological hadronic field theory. Results for the equation of state
() and the phase diagram of asymmetric nuclear matter () are
discussed. We stress the consistency of the -coupling introduction in a
relativistic approach. New contributions to the slope and curvature of the
symmetry energy and the neutron-proton effective mass splitting appear
particularly interesting. A more repulsive for neutron matter at high
baryon densities is expected. Effects on new critical properties of warm ,
mixing of mechanical and chemical instabilities and isospin distillation, are
also presented. The influence is mostly on the {\it isovectorlike}
collective response.
The results are largely analytical and this makes the physical meaning quite
transparent. Implications for nuclear structure properties of drip-line nuclei
and for reaction dynamics with Radioactive Beams are finally pointed out.Comment: 12 pages, 10 Postscript figure
The Plasma Environment of Comets
Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138863/1/rog199129s2976.pd
Petrophysical, Geochemical, and Hydrological Evidence for Extensive Fracture-Mediated Fluid and Heat Transport in the Alpine Fault's Hanging-Wall Damage Zone
Fault rock assemblages reflect interaction between deformation, stress, temperature, fluid, and chemical regimes on distinct spatial and temporal scales at various positions in the crust. Here we interpret measurements made in the hanging-wall of the Alpine Fault during the second stage of the Deep Fault Drilling Project (DFDP-2). We present observational evidence for extensive fracturing and high hanging-wall hydraulic conductivity (âŒ10â9 to 10â7 m/s, corresponding to permeability of âŒ10â16 to 10â14 m2) extending several hundred meters from the fault's principal slip zone. Mud losses, gas chemistry anomalies, and petrophysical data indicate that a subset of fractures intersected by the borehole are capable of transmitting fluid volumes of several cubic meters on time scales of hours. DFDP-2 observations and other data suggest that this hydrogeologically active portion of the fault zone in the hanging-wall is several kilometers wide in the uppermost crust. This finding is consistent with numerical models of earthquake rupture and off-fault damage. We conclude that the mechanically and hydrogeologically active part of the Alpine Fault is a more dynamic and extensive feature than commonly described in models based on exhumed faults. We propose that the hydrogeologically active damage zone of the Alpine Fault and other large active faults in areas of high topographic relief can be subdivided into an inner zone in which damage is controlled principally by earthquake rupture processes and an outer zone in which damage reflects coseismic shaking, strain accumulation and release on interseismic timescales, and inherited fracturing related to exhumation
Extracting dynamics from threshold-crossing interspike intervals: Possibilities and limitations
No evidence that protein truncating variants in BRIP1 are associated with breast cancer risk: implications for gene panel testing.
BACKGROUND: BRCA1 interacting protein C-terminal helicase 1 (BRIP1) is one of the Fanconi Anaemia Complementation (FANC) group family of DNA repair proteins. Biallelic mutations in BRIP1 are responsible for FANC group J, and previous studies have also suggested that rare protein truncating variants in BRIP1 are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. These studies have led to inclusion of BRIP1 on targeted sequencing panels for breast cancer risk prediction. METHODS: We evaluated a truncating variant, p.Arg798Ter (rs137852986), and 10 missense variants of BRIP1, in 48â
144 cases and 43â
607 controls of European origin, drawn from 41 studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). Additionally, we sequenced the coding regions of BRIP1 in 13â
213 cases and 5242 controls from the UK, 1313 cases and 1123 controls from three population-based studies as part of the Breast Cancer Family Registry, and 1853 familial cases and 2001 controls from Australia. RESULTS: The rare truncating allele of rs137852986 was observed in 23 cases and 18 controls in Europeans in BCAC (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.03, p=0.79). Truncating variants were found in the sequencing studies in 34 cases (0.21%) and 19 controls (0.23%) (combined OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.70, p=0.75). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that truncating variants in BRIP1, and in particular p.Arg798Ter, are not associated with a substantial increase in breast cancer risk. Such observations have important implications for the reporting of results from breast cancer screening panels.The COGS project is funded through a European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme grant
(agreement number 223175 - HEALTH-F2-2009-223175). BCAC is funded by Cancer Research UK
[C1287/A10118, C1287/A12014] and by the European CommunityÂŽs Seventh Framework Programme under
grant agreement number 223175 (grant number HEALTH-F2-2009-223175) (COGS). Funding for the iCOGS
infrastructure came from: the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement
n° 223175 (HEALTH-F2-2009-223175) (COGS), Cancer Research UK (C1287/A10118, C1287/A 10710,
C12292/A11174, C1281/A12014, C5047/A8384, C5047/A15007, C5047/A10692, C8197/A16565), the
National Institutes of Health (CA128978) and Post-Cancer GWAS initiative (1U19 CA148537, 1U19
16
CA148065 and 1U19 CA148112 - the GAME-ON initiative), the Department of Defense (W81XWH-10-1-
0341), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) for the CIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast
Cancer, Komen Foundation for the Cure, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and the Ovarian Cancer
Research Fund. This study made use of data generated by the Wellcome Trust Case Control consortium.
Funding for the project was provided by the Wellcome Trust under award 076113. The results published here
are in part based upon data generated by The Cancer Genome Atlas Project established by the National Cancer
Institute and National Human Genome Research Institute.This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from BMJ Group at http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103529
- âŠ